Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Masses of tetraquarks with open charm and bottom

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1011.2677 v1 pith:Y33H5JVS submitted 2010-11-11 hep-ph hep-ex

Masses of tetraquarks with open charm and bottom

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords tetraquarksbottommassescharmcharmeddiquark-antidiquarkmesonsopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The masses of the heavy tetraquarks with open charm and bottom are calculated within the diquark-antidiquark picture in the framework of the relativistic quark model. The dynamics of the light quarks and diquarks is treated completely relativistically. The diquark structure is taken into account by calculating the diquark-gluon form factor. New experimental data on charmed and charmed-strange mesons are discussed. Our results indicate that the anomalous scalar D_{s0}^*(2317) and axial vector D_{s1}(2460) mesons could not be considered as diquark-antidiquark bound states. On the other hand, D_s(2632) and D_{sJ}^*(2860) could be interpreted as scalar and tensor tetraquarks, respectively. The predictions for masses of the corresponding bottom counterparts of the charmed tetraquarks are given.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Singly heavy tetraquarks

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hybrid quark model with gluon and meson exchange predicts that LHCb's T-c̄s̄0(2870) and T-cs̄0(2900) are compact tetraquarks, and that Ds0(2317), Ds1(2460), Tbs(5568), and Tcs(2327) are not.