REVIEW 1 cited by
Can all cosmological observations be accurately interpreted with a unique geometry?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can all cosmological observations be accurately interpreted with a unique geometry?
read the original abstract
The recent analysis of the Planck results reveals a tension between the best fits for ({\Omega}m0, H0) derived from the cosmic microwave background or baryonic acoustic oscillations on the one hand, and the Hubble diagram on the other hand. These observations probe the universe on very different scales since they involve light beams of very different angular sizes; hence the tension between them may indicate that they should not be interpreted the same way. More precisely, this Letter questions the accuracy of using only the (perturbed) Friedmann-Lema\^itre geometry to interpret all the cosmological observations, regardless of their angular or spatial resolution. We show that using an inhomogeneous "Swiss-cheese" model to interpret the Hubble diagram allows to reconcile it with the Planck results. Such an approach does not require us to invoke new physics nor to violate the Copernican principle.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gravitational Lensing in a Kasner Background: Distinguishing Wormholes and Black Holes
In a Kasner (anisotropic) universe, wormhole and black-hole lenses produce different directional splits of the Einstein-like scale, while the full critical curves remain nearly circular.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.