Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Equation of State of Dark Matter after Planck Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1310.1532 v3 pith:BO2ZTCDA submitted 2013-10-06 astro-ph.CO

Equation of State of Dark Matter after Planck Data

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lambdamattercosmicdarkequationstateavailablecurrently
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we loosen the zero equation of state of dark matter to a constant $w_{dm}$. By using the currently available cosmic observations which include the type-Ia supernovae, the baryon acoustic oscillation, the WiggleZ measurements of matter power spectrum and the cosmic microwave background radiation from the firs release of {\it Planck} dat through the Markov chain Monte Carlo method, we found the equation of state of dark matter in $3\sigma$ regions: $w_{dm}=0.000707_{-0.000747-0.00149-0.00196}^{+0.000746+0.00146+0.00193}$. The difference of the minimum $\chi^2$ between the $\Lambda$CDM and $\Lambda$wDM models is $\Delta\chi^2_{min}=0.446$ for one extra model parameter $w_{dm}$. Although the currently available cosmic observations favor the $\Lambda$wDM mildly, no significant deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model is found in $1\sigma$ regions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Modeling dark matter halos with self-interacting fermions: A polytropic approach

    hep-ph 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0

    A single ~40 eV self-interacting fermion is claimed to fit rotation curves of many galaxies with one adjustable density per galaxy, but fit quality and reported parameter ranges are inconsistent.