Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Color-allowed Bottom Baryon to Charmed Baryon non-leptonic Decays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.09265 v3 pith:I6WLQL3Y submitted 2018-11-22 hep-ph hep-ex

Color-allowed Bottom Baryon to Charmed Baryon non-leptonic Decays

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords lambdatransitiontypebaryoncharmeddecaysomegathose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study color allowed $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda^{(*,**)}_c M^-$, $\Xi_b\to\Xi_c^{(**)} M^-$ and $\Omega_b\to\Omega^{(*)}_c M^-$ decays with $M=\pi, K,\rho, K^*, D, D_s, D^*, D^*_s, a_1$, $\Lambda^{(*,**)}_c=\Lambda_c$, $\Lambda_c(2595)$, $\Lambda_c(2765)$, $\Lambda_c(2940)$, $\Xi_c^{(**)}=\Xi_c, \Xi_c(2790)$ and $\Omega^{(*)}_c=\Omega_c, \Omega_c(3090)$, in this work. There are three types of transitions, namely ${\cal B}_b({\bf \bar 3_f},1/2^+)$ to ${\cal B}_c({\bf \bar 3_f},1/2^+)$, ${\cal B}_b({\bf 6_f},1/2^+)$ to ${\cal B}_c({\bf 6_f},1/2^+)$ and ${\cal B}_b({\bf \bar 3_f},1/2^+)$ to ${\cal B}_c({\bf \bar 3_f},1/2^-)$ transitions. The bottom baryon to charmed baryon form factors are calculated using the light-front quark model. Decay rates and up-down asymmetries are predicted using na\"{i}ve factorization and can be checked experimentally. We find that in ${\cal B}_b\to {\cal B}_cP$ decays, rates in type~(ii) transition are smaller than those in type (i) transition, but similar to those in type (iii) transition, while in ${\cal B}_b\to{\cal B}_c V, {\cal B}_c A$ decays, rates in type~(ii) transition are much smaller than those in type (i) transition and are also smaller than those in type (iii) transition. For the up-down asymmetries, the signs are mostly negative, except for those in the type (ii) transition. All of these asymmetries are large in sizes. The study on these decay modes may shed light on the quantum numbers of some of the charmed baryons as the decays depend on the bottom baryon to charmed baryon form factors, which are sensitive to the configurations of the final state charmed baryons.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Two-body charmed anti-charmed baryonic $B$ decays

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Topological decomposition of amplitudes for B to charmed baryon anti-baryon decays yields predictions for several channels after fitting 35% SU(3) breaking effects to existing data, with large cancellations noted in s...

  2. Two-body charmed anti-charmed baryonic $B$ decays

    hep-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Topological amplitude decomposition of two-body B→B_c B̄_c decays with modeled SU(3) breaking fits 9 measured branching ratios and predicts rates for unmeasured modes, finding 35% SU(3) breaking and sizable W-exchange...

  3. Semileptonic and nonleptonic weak decays of bottom baryons $\Omega^{(*)}_{b}$

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    QCD sum-rule calculation predicts Ω_b^*→Ω_c and Ω_b→Ω_c^* semileptonic and nonleptonic decay widths, e.g. Γ(Ω_b^*→Ω_c eν)=(1.54+0.29−0.27)×10^-14 GeV.