Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LHC analysis-specific datasets with Generative Adversarial Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.05282 v1 pith:NL4RTAMB submitted 2019-01-16 hep-ex cs.LGhep-ph

LHC analysis-specific datasets with Generative Adversarial Networks

classification hep-ex cs.LGhep-ph
keywords eventsfeaturesgenerativespecificadversarialanalysisanalysis-specificlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using generative adversarial networks (GANs), we investigate the possibility of creating large amounts of analysis-specific simulated LHC events at limited computing cost. This kind of generative model is analysis specific in the sense that it directly generates the high-level features used in the last stage of a given physics analyses, learning the N-dimensional distribution of relevant features in the context of a specific analysis selection. We apply this idea to the generation of muon four-momenta in $Z \to \mu\mu$ events at the LHC. We highlight how use-case specific issues emerge when the distributions of the considered quantities exhibit particular features. We show how substantial performance improvements and convergence speed-up can be obtained by including regression terms in the loss function of the generator. We develop an objective criterion to assess the geenrator performance in a quantitative way. With further development, a generalization of this approach could substantially reduce the needed amount of centrally produced fully simulated events in large particle physics experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.