Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Nuclear effects in electron- and neutrino-nucleus scattering within a relativistic quantum mechanical framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.10696 v2 pith:BISX6KHA submitted 2019-04-24 nucl-th

Nuclear effects in electron- and neutrino-nucleus scattering within a relativistic quantum mechanical framework

classification nucl-th
keywords crosseffectsmechanicalquantumrelativisticelectron-frameworknuclear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the impact of the description of the knockout nucleon wave function on electron- and neutrino-induced quasielastic and single-pion production cross sections. We work in a fully relativistic and quantum mechanical framework, where the relativistic mean-field model is used to describe the target nucleus. The focus is on Pauli blocking and the distortion of the final nucleon, these two nuclear effects are separated and analyzed in detail. We find that a proper quantum mechanical treatment of these effects is crucial to provide the correct magnitude and shape of the inclusive cross section. Also, this seems to be key to predict the right ratio of muon- to electron-neutrino cross sections at very forward scattering angles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Cosine Similarity of Label Representations Can and Cannot Tell us

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    For softmax classifiers, cosine similarity of unembeddings is uninformative about model probabilities because it can be reset to ±1 while leaving all probabilities unchanged.