REVIEW 1 cited by
Coherent-Nuclear Pion Photoproduction and Neutron Radii
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Coherent-Nuclear Pion Photoproduction and Neutron Radii
read the original abstract
{ {\bf Background:} Knowing the difference between the neutron and proton densities of nuclei is a significant topic because of its importance for understanding neutron star structures and cooling mechanisms. The coherent-nuclear photoproduction of pions, $({\g,\pi^0})$, combined with elastic electron scattering, has been suggested to be a very accurate probe of density differences. {\bf Purpose:} Study the ${(\g,\pi^0})$ reaction mechanism so as to better access the uncertainties involved in extracting the neutron density. {\bf Methods:} Include the effects of final-state pion-nucleus charge-exchange reactions on the cross section and study the influence of the non-zero spatial extent of the proton. {\bf Results:} The effects of final-state charge-exchange increase the cross section between 6\% and 5\%, generally decreasing as the momentum transfer increases. This leads to an increase of the extracted neutron skin distance by about 50\%. The validity of the previous treatments of the proton size is confirmed. {\bf Conclusion:} The model dependence of the theoretically computed cross section increases the total systematic uncertainty (experiment plus theory) in extracting the neutron skin from the ${(\g,\pi^0})$ cross section by at least a factor of three. }
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Explicitly on-shell currents in relativistic mean field models
The 'off-shell ambiguity' in relativistic mean-field one-body currents is spurious when currents are defined via free-nucleon operators; the correct mapping (Eq. 26) is parametrization-independent and requires time-li...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.