Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

Measurement of angular and momentum distributions of charged particles within and around jets in Pb+Pb and $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Central lead-lead collisions enhance soft charged-particle yields with angular distance from the jet axis up to r=0.6, while hard fragments concentrate in the jet core relative to proton-proton collisions.

desk verdict A careful, incremental but genuinely new measurement of jet fragmentation angular profiles; the UE subtraction is the main issue but not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05264 v2 pith:2EG3RD2Q submitted 2019-08-14 nucl-ex hep-ex

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exhep-ex
keywords jetquenchingquark-gluonplasmafragmentationangulardistributionPb+Pbcollisionsunderlyingeventsubtractionchargedparticleyields5.02TeV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper measures how the charged particles inside and around jets are arranged in angle and momentum in lead-lead (Pb+Pb) collisions, and compares that arrangement with proton-proton (pp) collisions at the same 5.02 TeV nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy. The central result is a split by particle momentum: particles below 4 GeV are increasingly more abundant in Pb+Pb than in pp as one moves outward from the jet axis, up to a maximum at angular distance r=0.6, whereas particles above 4 GeV are more concentrated in the jet core (r<0.05) and suppressed at larger angles. The modification grows with collision centrality and is weak in peripheral collisions. A sympathetic reader would care because the angular pattern of soft particles around quenched jets is a direct probe of how the quark-gluon plasma responds to a jet passing through it, discriminating between energy loss by medium-induced radiation and hydrodynamic wake effects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the per-jet yield density $D(p_T,r)=(1/N_{\rm jet})(1/(2\pi r\,dr))\,dn_{\rm ch}/dp_T$, the number of charged particles at transverse momentum $p_T$ and angular distance $r$ from the jet axis, normalized per jet and per annulus area, and its Pb+Pb-to-pp ratio $R_D(p_T,r)$. The measurement uses anti-$k_t$ jets (a sequential clustering algorithm that produces cone-like jets) with radius parameter $R=0.4$, matched charged tracks with $p_T$ from 1 to 63 GeV, and extends to $r=0.8$. What carries the argument is the ratio to pp collisions together with a careful subtraction of the underlying event: in Pb+Pb the soft background, fake tracks, and secondaries are estimated from maps built from Monte-Carlo-overlay events and cross-checked with an alternative cone method, and the remaining detector effects are unfolded in two dimensions using Bayesian response matrices.

What would settle it

Recompute $R_D(p_T,r)$ for 0-10% central Pb+Pb using a background template built entirely from data, for example by rotating or scaling peripheral Pb+Pb events to the central multiplicity instead of using the Monte-Carlo-overlay maps; if the $p_T<4$ GeV enhancement no longer rises to a maximum near $r=0.6$, the claimed peak is an artifact of the underlying-event subtraction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for jets with transverse momentum 126-316 GeV in central 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions, the ratio RD(pT,r) = D(pT,r)_PbPb/D(pT,r)_pp rises above unity for 1-4 GeV charged particles and grows with r to about 0.3, stays roughly flat to 0.6, and then decreases slightly toward 0.8, while for pT>4 GeV the ratio is above unity only in the innermost r<0.05 and below unity beyond. It further finds RD(pT,r)>=1 for all pT at r<0.05, a statistically significant increase of the low-pT excess with jet pT for 0.1<r<0.25, and no significant jet-pT dependence for high-pT particles. These results are presented after detector corrections using an event-by-event underlying-event subtraction and two-dimensional Bayesian unfolding; the same observables integrated over 1-4 GeV keep RP(r)>1 over the whole measured range.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that the underlying-event background subtracted in Pb+Pb is accurately known; at the largest angles for 1 GeV tracks this background is about 100 times the measured signal, so a small relative error in the background would directly create or erase the claimed enhancement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the $p_T<4$ GeV enhancement is real, jet energy lost to the medium is being redistributed as soft particles at angles well outside the reconstructed $R=0.4$ jet, up to $r\approx0.6$.
  • The $p_T>4$ GeV core enhancement plus outer suppression implies that, at fixed jet $p_T$, the surviving hard fragments are more collimated in Pb+Pb than in pp, consistent with a relative enrichment of quark-initiated jets.
  • The centrality dependence, stronger in 0-10% than 30-40% and near unity in 60-80%, ties the effect to the density of the quark-gluon plasma produced in the collision.
  • The flattening or slight decrease of the soft enhancement beyond $r\approx0.6$ indicates that the medium response to the jet is bounded in angle; this can be used to normalize hydrodynamic wake models.
  • The integrated ratio $R_P(r)$ remaining above unity across all measured $r$ implies that within a radius of 0.8 the number of sub-4 GeV particles per jet is not depleted in Pb+Pb relative to pp, only rearranged in angle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the soft excess peaks near $r\approx0.6$ rather than at the jet edge, comparing jets of radius $R=0.2$ and $R=0.4$ in the same data could test whether the excess tracks the jet boundary or a fixed angular scale of medium-induced emission.
  • Editorial inference: if the effect is a medium wake, the excess should be larger when the jet travels in the reaction plane (longer in-medium path) than perpendicular to it; a measurement of $R_D(p_T,r)$ versus the jet angle to the event plane would test this.
  • Editorial inference: the same $r$-resolved technique applied to photon+jet events, where the photon tags the initial parton energy, would separate the energy lost to soft particles from the modified jet fragmentation and could directly measure the angular distribution of the lost energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents a measurement of the angular and transverse-momentum distributions of charged particles around reconstructed anti-k_t R=0.4 jets in Pb+Pb and pp collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. The yields D(pT,r) are measured out to r=0.8 for jet pT between 126 and 316 GeV, and the Pb+Pb-to-pp ratio RD(pT,r) and difference DeltaD(pT,r) are reported as functions of centrality, pT, and r. The central observations are that charged particles with pT below 4 GeV are increasingly enhanced with growing r, peaking near r=0.6 in central collisions, while particles above 4 GeV are enhanced in the jet core (r<0.05) and suppressed at larger r. The analysis uses a two-dimensional Bayesian unfolding, MC-overlay-based underlying-event subtraction with an alternative cone-method cross-check, and detailed systematic studies including JES, JER, tracking, unfolding, and non-closure uncertainties.

Significance. If the result holds, it provides a new differential constraint on jet energy loss and medium response in the quark-gluon plasma, extending previous fragmentation-function measurements to angular distances outside the jet cone. The paper is methodologically strong: it performs MC closure tests, validates the two-dimensional unfolding, evaluates a broad set of systematic uncertainties, and presents the results as both ratios and absolute differences to pp. The pp reference measurement itself is a useful precision result. The main physics claims are falsifiable and directly comparable to theory calculations of jet wake and medium response, which makes this a valuable contribution to the heavy-ion jet-quenching program.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sections 5 and 6, Figs. 1 and 3] The central observation that RD(pT,r) for pT < 4 GeV rises with r and reaches a maximum near r=0.6 is governed by the Pb+Pb underlying-event (UE) subtraction at large r, where the background-to-signal ratio is approximately 100 for 1 GeV tracks near r=0.8 (Section 5, Fig. 1). The two UE estimators (MC-overlay maps and the cone method) are combined into a single systematic uncertainty, and the paper does not display the RD(r) shape obtained with the cone method alone, nor the r-dependence of the difference between the two UE-subtracted distributions. Because the enhancement at r~0.6 is a factor of about two and the quoted UE systematic there is 20-30%, a common r-dependent bias in the two estimators could materially alter the claimed rise and the location of the maximum. I request that the authors show the cone-method-only result for RD(pT,r), or at least the r-dependence of the difference between the two UE-subtracted D(pT,r) distributions, for the 0-10% centrality bin, to demonstrate that the observed r-dependence is not an artifact of the UE model choice.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 7.2] The abstract states the low-pT enhancement 'reaches a maximum at r=0.6', while Section 7.2 describes RD as 'approximately constant for r in the interval 0.3-0.6 and decreases for r>0.6'; these statements should be harmonized to avoid overinterpreting the position of the maximum.
  2. [Section 5] The text 'the error introduced by this assumption is less than 1%, and is further corrected for by the Bayesian unfolding' would be more precise as 'accounted for by the Bayesian unfolding', since unfolding does not correct the efficiency assumption in the strict sense.
  3. [Figure 5] In the arXiv version the Figure 5 block appears to be repeated with garbled captions; the published version should ensure a single clean figure with the full caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper reports a direct measurement with an external pp baseline and MC-based corrections validated by closure.

full rationale

The paper's central result is a corrected, data-derived observable: D(pT,r) = (1/Njet)(1/2πr dr)(dnch/dpT), with RD(pT,r) defined as the ratio of the Pb+Pb to pp versions of this measured yield density. No step in the derivation defines the claimed enhancement in terms of a fitted parameter or in terms of the result itself. The detector corrections (tracking efficiency, two-dimensional Bayesian unfolding, and bin-by-bin angular correction factors) are obtained from Monte Carlo samples and are explicitly tested for closure, with the paper reporting that 'Good recovery of the generator-level distributions (closure) is observed, with a variation of less than 4%'. These MC-based corrections do not impose the final Pb+Pb-to-pp ratio; the pp data provide an independent baseline that is not constructed from the Pb+Pb measurement. The largest systematic concern is the Pb+Pb underlying-event subtraction, whose uncertainty reaches about 40% at large r for low-pT particles, but this is a quantified systematic uncertainty rather than a circular reduction: the two UE estimators (MC-overlay maps and the cone method) are alternative background estimates, and no equation in the paper defines the reported enhancement as the difference between those estimators. Citations to previous ATLAS analyses, such as Ref. [20] for the analysis procedure, are methodological and are not used to define the physics result. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-called-prediction step, self-citation load-bearing step, or author-imported uniqueness argument was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an experimental measurement with no fitted physical parameters. The analysis relies on standard detector-response corrections from Monte Carlo simulation, an assumed form of the underlying-event background, the convergence of the unfolding procedure, and the pp baseline. These are all stated assumptions, and the paper evaluates the associated systematic uncertainties.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Monte Carlo simulation (Powheg+Pythia8 A14, NNPDF23LO, overlaid on MB Pb+Pb events, and Geant4 detector simulation) accurately models the detector response and signal distributions for both pp and Pb+Pb, including tracking efficiency, fake rates, and response matrices.
    Used throughout Sections 4 and 5 for efficiency corrections, unfolding response matrices, and closure tests. A biased MC model would directly bias the unfolded yields.
  • domain assumption The Pb+Pb underlying event is azimuthally modulated only by the second-, third-, and fourth-order flow harmonics; higher harmonics are negligible for this measurement.
    Section 4 states that the UE subtraction includes contributions from second-, third-, and fourth-order azimuthal anisotropy harmonics [49]; neglected higher harmonics could contribute to the background estimate.
  • domain assumption Bayesian unfolding with four iterations is unbiased and stable for the measured distributions.
    Section 5 states that after four iterations the charged-particle distributions are stable within 2-4%; the choice of iteration count and prior is a procedural assumption.
  • domain assumption Proton-proton collisions provide an unmodified baseline: no quark-gluon plasma is produced, so the ratio to pp isolates medium effects.
    This is the standard baseline assumption in heavy-ion jet measurements and is stated in the introduction; it is not derived within the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measurement of angular and momentum distributions of charged particles within and around jets in Pb+Pb and $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2EG3RD2Q

@misc{pith2026190805264,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measurement of angular and momentum distributions of charged particles within and around jets in Pb+Pb and $pp$ collisions at $\sqrts_\mathrmNN = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2EG3RD2Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05264}
}
abstract

Studies of the fragmentation of jets into charged particles in heavy-ion collisions can provide information about the mechanism of jet-quenching by the hot and dense QCD matter created in such collisions, the quark-gluon plasma. This paper presents a measurement of the angular distribution of charged particles around the jet axis in $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=$ 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb and $pp$ collisions, using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The Pb+Pb and $pp$ data sets have integrated luminosities of 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ and 25 pb$^{-1}$, respectively. The measurement is performed for jets reconstructed with the anti-$k_{t}$ algorithm with radius parameter $R = 0.4$ and is extended to an angular distance of $r= 0.8$ from the jet axis. Results are presented as a function of Pb+Pb collision centrality and distance from the jet axis for charged particles with transverse momenta in the 1$-$63 GeV range, matched to jets with transverse momenta in the 126$-$316 GeV range and an absolute value of jet rapidity of less than 1.7. Modifications to the measured distributions are quantified by taking a ratio to the measurements in $pp$ collisions. Yields of charged particles with transverse momenta below 4 GeV are observed to be increasingly enhanced as a function of angular distance from the jet axis, reaching a maximum at $r=0.6$. Charged particles with transverse momenta above 4 GeV have an enhanced yield in Pb+Pb collisions in the jet core for angular distances up to $r = 0.05$ from the jet axis, with a suppression at larger distances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Visualizing How the Structure of Large-Radius Jets Shapes Their Wakes

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hybrid Model simulations show ATLAS large-radius jet data rule out fully coherent jet energy loss, and low-pT jet-shape observables can visualize merging subjet wakes.

  2. Expected Tracking Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

    hep-ex 2024-12 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Expected ITk tracking efficiency stays close to Run 3 levels at pile-up 200, with fake rates around 3e-4 and improved impact parameter resolution.

  3. Model-Agnostic Tagging of Quenched Jets in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    hep-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A TabNet-style sequential attention model tags quenched jets with AUC 0.95 on heavy-ion simulations that include thermal background, pileup, and detector effects.

  4. Probing medium response via strangeness enhancement around quenched jets

    nucl-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In the AMPT model, jet-induced medium excitation enhances the strange-to-non-strange hadron ratio around quenched jets in Pb+Pb collisions, increasing with centrality and radial distance.

  5. Jet Modification and Medium Response -- Theory Overview

    hep-ph 2025-04 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    A theory overview concludes that medium response, evidenced by a depletion on the Z side of Z-hadron events, may now be experimentally visible in heavy-ion collisions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Roland, K

    G. Roland, K. ’afařík, and P. Steinberg,Heavy-ion collisions at the LHC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.77 (2014) 70

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee,Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68(2018) 339, arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    ALICE Collaboration,Measurement of charged jet suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, JHEP03(2014) 013, arXiv:1311.0633 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of the Nuclear Modification Factor for Jets inPb+Pb Collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 072302, arXiv: 1411.2357 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    ALICE Collaboration,Measurement of jet suppression in central Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B746 (2015) 1, arXiv:1502.01689 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of inclusive jet cross sections inpp and PbPb collisions at√sN N = 2.76TeV, Phys. Rev. C96(2017) 015202, arXiv:1609.05383 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the nuclear modification factor for inclusive jets inPb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B790 (2019) 108, arXiv: 1805.05635 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 252303, arXiv:1011.6182 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    CMS Collaboration,Observation and studies of jet quenching in PbPb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C84 (2011) 024906, arXiv:1102.1957 [nucl-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of jetpT correlations inPb+Pb and pp collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 379, arXiv:1706.09363 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    CMS Collaboration,Studies of jet quenching using isolated-photon+jet correlations in PbPb and pp collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B718 (2013) 773, arXiv:1205.0206 [nucl-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [13]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the jet fragmentation function and transverse profile in proton-protoncollisionsatacenter-of-massenergyof7TeVwiththeATLASdetector ,Eur.Phys.J.C 71(2011) 1795, arXiv:1109.5816 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [14]

    ALICE Collaboration,Medium modification of the shape of small-radius jets in central Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV, JHEP10 (2018) 139, arXiv:1807.06854 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [15]

    CMS Collaboration,Shape, transverse size, and charged-hadron multiplicity of jets in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV, JHEP06(2012) 160, arXiv:1204.3170 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [16]

    CMSCollaboration, ModificationofjetshapesinPbPbcollisionsat √sNN = 2.76TeV,Phys.Lett.B 730 (2014) 243, arXiv:1310.0878 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of inclusive jet charged-particle fragmentation functions in Pb+Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B739 (2014) 320, arXiv: 1406.2979 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [18]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of jet fragmentation in PbPb andpp collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 024908, arXiv:1406.0932 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [19]

    ATLASCollaboration, Measurementofjetfragmentationin Pb+Pband ppcollisionsat√sNN = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 379, arXiv:1702.00674 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of jet fragmentation inPb+Pband pp collisions at√sN N = 5.02TeVwiththeATLASdetector ,Phys.Rev.C 98(2018)024908,arXiv: 1805.05424 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [21]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of transverse momentum relative to dijet systems in PbPb and pp collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV, JHEP01 (2016) 006, arXiv:1509.09029 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [22]

    CMS Collaboration,Decomposing transverse momentum balance contributions for quenched jets in PbPb collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV, JHEP11 (2016) 055, arXiv:1609.02466 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [23]

    CMS Collaboration,Jet properties in PbPb and pp collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 05 (2018) 006, arXiv:1803.00042 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Lett.B796 (2019) 204, arXiv:1904.13118 [nucl-ex]

    ALICE Collaboration,Measurement of jet radial profiles in Pb−Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76TeV, Phys. Lett.B796 (2019) 204, arXiv:1904.13118 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Vitev, S

    I. Vitev, S. Wicks, and B.-W. Zhang,A theory of jet shapes and cross sections: from hadrons to nuclei, JHEP11 (2008) 093, arXiv:0810.2807 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [26]

    G.OvanesyanandI.Vitev, AneffectivetheoryforjetpropagationindenseQCDmatter:jetbroadening and medium-induced bremsstrahlung, JHEP06(2011) 080, arXiv:1103.1074 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Blaizot, Y

    J.-P. Blaizot, Y. Mehtar-Tani, and M. A. C. Torres,Angular Structure of the In-Medium QCD Cascade, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 222002, arXiv:1407.0326 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Qin and X.-N

    G.-Y. Qin and X.-N. Wang,Jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24(2015) 1530014, arXiv:1511.00790 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [29]

    M. A. Escobedo and E. Iancu,Event-by-event fluctuations in the medium-induced jet evolution, JHEP 05(2016) 008, arXiv:1601.03629 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Casalderrey-Solana, D

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Gulhan, G. Milhano, D. Pablos, and K. Rajagopal,Angular structure of jet quenching within a hybrid strong/weak coupling model, JHEP03(2017) 135, arXiv:1609.05842 [hep-ph]. 24

    2017 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Tachibana, N.-B

    Y. Tachibana, N.-B. Chang, and G.-Y. Qin,Full jet in quark-gluon plasma with hydrodynamic medium response, Phys. Rev. C95(2017) 044909, arXiv:1701.07951 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [32]

    ATLASCollaboration, TheATLASExperimentattheCERNLargeHadronCollider ,JINST 3(2008) S08003

    2008

  24. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19, 2010, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633 , Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1, 2012, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    2010

  25. [34]

    Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13 (2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13 (2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of longitudinal flow decorrelations inPb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 142, arXiv: 1709.02301 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11 (2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11 (2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Frixione, P

    S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari,Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Alioli, K

    S. Alioli, K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re,Jet pair production in POWHEG, JHEP04 (2011) 081, arXiv:1012.3380 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [42]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to 7 TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

    2014

  34. [43]

    R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867 (2013) 244, arXiv: 1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Wang and M

    X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy,HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production inpp, pA, and AAcollisions, Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 3501

    1991

  36. [45]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    2003

  37. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70 (2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The Anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [48]

    M.Cacciari,G.P.Salam,andG.Soyez, FastJetUserManual ,Eur.Phys.J.C 72(2012)1896,arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy for charged particle production in√sN N = 2.76 TeV lead-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C86 (2012) 014907, arXiv: 1203.3087 [hep-ex]. 25

    2012 arXiv

  41. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton- proton collisions at√s = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 072002, arXiv: 1703.09665 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of photon-jet transverse momentum correlations in 5.02 TeVPb+Pb and pp collisions with ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 167, arXiv:1809.07280 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [52]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [53]

    ch/record/1281344

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of primary vertex reconstruction in proton–proton collisions at√s = 7 TeVin the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2010-069, 2010,url: https://cds.cern. ch/record/1281344

    2010

  45. [54]

    ATLASCollaboration, Measurementofjetfragmentationin5.02TeVproton-leadandproton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, Nucl. Phys. A978 (2018) 65, arXiv:1706.02859 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [55]

    G.D’Agostini,AmultidimensionalunfoldingmethodbasedonBayes’theorem ,Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A 362 (1995) 487

    1995

  47. [56]

    T.Adye,UnfoldingalgorithmsandtestsusingRooUnfold ,2011,arXiv: 1105.1160 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  48. [57]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy measurement with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2304, arXiv:1112.6426 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  49. [58]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy scale and its uncertainty for jets reconstructed using the ATLAS heavy ion jet algorithm, ATLAS-CONF-2015-016, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/ 2008677

    2015

  50. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy resolution in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 TeV recorded in 2010 with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2306, arXiv:1210.6210 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [60]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Data-driven determination of the energy scale and resolution of jets reconstructed in the ATLAS calorimeters using dijet and multijet events at√s = 8 TeV, ATLAS- CONF-2015-017, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2008678

    2015

  52. [61]

    ATLASCollaboration, EarlyInnerDetectorTrackingPerformanceinthe2015Dataat √s = 13TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-051, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2110140

    2015

  53. [62]

    ATLASCollaboration, Measurementoftrackreconstructioninefficienciesinthecoreofjetsviapixel dE/dxwiththeATLASexperimentusing √s = 13TeV pp collisiondata,ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-007, 2016, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2140460

    2016

  54. [63]

    Chien, A

    Y.-T. Chien, A. Emerman, Z.-B. Kang, G. Ovanesyan, and I. Vitev,Jet quenching from QCD evolution, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 074030, arXiv:1509.02936 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Z.-B. Kang, F. Ringer, and I. Vitev,Inclusive production of small radius jets in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B769 (2017) 242, arXiv:1701.05839 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Spousta and B

    M. Spousta and B. Cole,Interpreting single jet measurements inPb+Pb collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 50, arXiv:1504.05169 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [66]

    OPAL Collaboration,A model independent measurement of quark and gluon jet properties and differences, Z. Phys. C68 (1995) 179

    1995

  58. [67]

    P.M.CheslerandK.Rajagopal, Ontheevolutionofjetenergyandopeningangleinstronglycoupled plasma, JHEP05(2016) 098, arXiv:1511.07567 [hep-th]. 26

    2016 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Demokritos

    Z. Hulcher, D. Pablos, and K. Rajagopal,Resolution effects in the hybrid strong/weak coupling model, JHEP03 (2018) 010, arXiv:1707.05245 [hep-ph]. 27 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad102, B. Abbott129, D.C. Abbott103, A. Abed Abud71a,71b, K. Abeling53, D.K. Abhayasinghe94, S.H. Ab...

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.