REVIEW 1 cited by
Reconstructing simulated CMB polarization power spectra with the Analytical Blind Separation method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reconstructing simulated CMB polarization power spectra with the Analytical Blind Separation method
read the original abstract
Multi-frequency observations are needed to separate the CMB from foregrounds and accurately extract cosmological information from the data. The Analytical Blind Separation (ABS) method is dedicated to extracting the CMB power spectrum from multi-frequency observations in the presence of contamination from astrophysical foreground emission and instrumental noise. In this study, we apply the ABS method to simulated sky maps as could be observed with a future space-borne survey, in order to test the method's capability for determining the CMB polarization $E$- and $B$-mode power spectra. We present the ABS method performance on simulations for both a full-sky analysis and for an analysis concentrating on sky regions less impacted by Galactic foreground emission. We discuss the origin and minimization of biases in the estimated CMB polarization angular power spectra. We find that the ABS method performs quite well for the analysis of full-sky observations at intermediate and small angular scales, in spite of strong foreground contamination. On the largest scales, extra work is still required to reduce biases of various origins and the impact of confusion between CMB $E$ and $B$ polarization for partial-sky analyses.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fast End-to-End Framework for Cosmological Parameter Inference from CMB Data Using Machine Learning
An ABS+neural-network pipeline recovers τ and r from simulated CMB maps for LiteBIRD/PICO with reported 1-σ errors of 0.0030–0.0035 (τ) and 0.0014–0.0056 (r), using held-out cosmologies sampled inside the training range.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.