REVIEW 1 cited by
A measurement of the Hubble constant from angular diameter distances to two gravitational lenses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A measurement of the Hubble constant from angular diameter distances to two gravitational lenses
read the original abstract
The local expansion rate of the Universe is parametrized by the Hubble constant, $H_0$, the ratio between recession velocity and distance. Different techniques lead to inconsistent estimates of $H_0$. Observations of Type Ia supernovae (SNe) can be used to measure $H_0$, but this requires an external calibrator to convert relative distances to absolute ones. We use the angular diameter distance to strong gravitational lenses as a suitable calibrator, which is only weakly sensitive to cosmological assumptions. We determine the angular diameter distances to two gravitational lenses, $810^{+160}_{-130}$ and $1230^{+180}_{-150}$~Mpc, at redshifts of $z=0.295$ and $0.6304$. Using these absolute distances to calibrate 740 previously-measured relative distances to SNe, we measure the Hubble constant to be $H_0=82.4^{+8.4}_{-8.3} ~{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dissipative Unimodular Gravity: Linking Energy Diffusion to Bulk Viscosity as an Alternative to $\Lambda$CDM under DESI DR2 Data
A viscous version of unimodular gravity fits late-time cosmological data as well as ΛCDM, but the fitted viscosity is consistent with zero and the claimed energy nonconservation is not statistically significant.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.