Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Searching for cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with third-generation detectors in the presence of an astrophysical foreground

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.16116 v1 pith:7LM5PGFC submitted 2020-06-29 gr-qc

Searching for cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with third-generation detectors in the presence of an astrophysical foreground

classification gr-qc
keywords foregroundastrophysicalcgwbcosmologicalgravitational-wavethird-generationanalysisbackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The stochastic cosmological gravitational-wave background (CGWB) provides a direct window to study early universe phenomena and fundamental physics. With the proposed third-generation ground-based gravitational wave detectors, Einstein Telescope (ET) and Cosmic Explorer (CE), we might be able to detect evidence of a CGWB. However, to dig out these prime signals would be a difficult quest as the dominance of the astrophysical foreground from compact-binary coalescence (CBC) will mask this CGWB. In this paper, we study a subtraction-noise projection method, making it possible to reduce the residuals left after subtraction of the astrophysical foreground of CBCs, greatly improving our chances to detect a cosmological background. We carried out our analysis based on simulations of ET and CE and using posterior sampling for the parameter estimation of binary black-hole mergers. We demonstrate the sensitivity improvement of stochastic gravitational-wave searches and conclude that the ultimate sensitivity of these searches will not be limited by residuals left when subtracting the estimated BBH foreground, but by the fraction of the astrophysical foreground that cannot be detected even with third-generation instruments, or possibly by other signals not included in our analysis. We also resolve previous misconceptions of residual noise in the context of Gaussian parameter estimation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can machine learning improve the detectability and disentanglement of the gravitational-wave background?

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    On 108 days of simulated O4a-like LIGO noise, a deep-learning autoencoder plus MCMC pipeline detects a CBC background at Ωα≈4.5e-9 and separates a flat cosmological component at Ω0≈9e-10, outperforming the standard py...