Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Credit card fraud detection using machine learning: A survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.06479 v1 pith:UNV4GYTS submitted 2020-10-13 cs.LG

Credit card fraud detection using machine learning: A survey

classification cs.LG
keywords cardcreditdetectionfraudmethodstransactionsdatasetdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Credit card fraud has emerged as major problem in the electronic payment sector. In this survey, we study data-driven credit card fraud detection particularities and several machine learning methods to address each of its intricate challenges with the goal to identify fraudulent transactions that have been issued illegitimately on behalf of the rightful card owner. In particular, we first characterize a typical credit card detection task: the dataset and its attributes, the metric choice along with some methods to handle such unbalanced datasets. These questions are the entry point of every credit card fraud detection problem. Then we focus on dataset shift (sometimes called concept drift), which refers to the fact that the underlying distribution generating the dataset evolves over times: For example, card holders may change their buying habits over seasons and fraudsters may adapt their strategies. This phenomenon may hinder the usage of machine learning methods for real world datasets such as credit card transactions datasets. Afterwards we highlights different approaches used in order to capture the sequential properties of credit card transactions. These approaches range from feature engineering techniques (transactions aggregations for example) to proper sequence modeling methods such as recurrent neural networks (LSTM) or graphical models (hidden markov models).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SAGE: An LLM-driven Self Reflective Agentic Framework for Fraud Detection

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SAGE is the first end-to-end LLM-driven multi-agent fraud detection system using a Data Diagnostic Tree and MDP optimization, achieving 40.86% average F1 gain and winning 96% of comparisons across five datasets and fi...