REVIEW 1 cited by
The Empirical Content of Bayesianism
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Empirical Content of Bayesianism
read the original abstract
This paper characterizes the conditions under which the observed beliefs of a group of agents are consistent with Bayesian updating. Beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if they arise from the application of Bayes' rule given some subjective distribution for the state and the signals agents observe between periods. The paper's main finding is that beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if and only if the mean of the distribution of posteriors is uniformly absolutely continuous with respect to the prior. Furthermore, the paper shows that the existing results on the empirical content of Bayesianism rely on additional restrictions on permissible subjective distributions, such as the requirement that agents have correct beliefs about the distribution of signals.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning from an Unknown DGP: Experimental Evidence on Belief Updating with AI Recommendations
With qualitative AI advice and an unknown DGP, belief updates show confirmation inertia at extremes, large reaction to contradiction, and weaker intermediate moves, better fit by CR/wIU than quasi-Bayes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.