Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Euclid preparation. XXIV. Calibration of the halo mass function in Λ(ν)CDM cosmologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.02174 v2 pith:TATMJGCV submitted 2022-08-03 astro-ph.CO

Euclid preparation. XXIV. Calibration of the halo mass function in Λ(ν)CDM cosmologies

Euclid Collaboration: T. Castro , A. Fumagalli , R. E. Angulo , S. Bocquet , S. Borgani , C. Carbone , J. Dakin , K. Dolag
show 173 more authors
C. Giocoli P. Monaco A. Ragagnin A. Saro E. Sefusatti M. Costanzi A. M. C. Le Brun P.-S. Corasaniti A. Amara L. Amendola M. Baldi R. Bender C. Bodendorf E. Branchini M. Brescia S. Camera V. Capobianco J. Carretero M. Castellano S. Cavuoti A. Cimatti R. Cledassou G. Congedo L. Conversi Y. Copin L. Corcione F. Courbin A. Da Silva H. Degaudenzi M. Douspis F. Dubath C.A.J. Duncan X. Dupac S. Farrens S. Ferriol P. Fosalba M. Frailis E. Franceschi S. Galeotta B. Garilli B. Gillis A. Grazian F. Grupp S.V.H. Haugan F. Hormuth A. Hornstrup P. Hudelot K. Jahnke S. Kermiche T. Kitching M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio P.B. Lilje I. Lloro O. Mansutti O. Marggraf F. Marulli M. Meneghetti E. Merlin G. Meylan M. Moresco L. Moscardini E. Munari S.M. Niemi C. Padilla S. Paltani F. Pasian K. Pedersen V. Pettorino S. Pires G. Polenta M. Poncet L. Popa L. Pozzetti F. Raison R. Rebolo A. Renzi J. Rhodes G. Riccio E. Romelli R. Saglia D. Sapone B. Sartoris P. Schneider G. Seidel G. Sirri L. Stanco P. Tallada Cresp\'i A.N. Taylor R. Toledo-Moreo F. Torradeflot I. Tutusaus E.A. Valentijn L. Valenziano T. Vassallo Y. Wang J. Weller A. Zacchei G. Zamorani S. Andreon S. Bardelli E. Bozzo C. Colodro-Conde D. Di Ferdinando M. Farina J. Graci\'a-Carpio V. Lindholm C. Neissner V. Scottez M. Tenti E. Zucca C. Baccigalupi A. Balaguera-Antol\'inez M. Ballardini F. Bernardeau A. Biviano A. Blanchard A. S. Borlaff C. Burigana R. Cabanac A. Cappi C.S. Carvalho S. Casas G. Castignani A. Cooray J. Coupon H.M. Courtois S. Davini G. De Lucia G. Desprez H. Dole J.A. Escartin S. Escoffier F. Finelli K. Ganga J. Garcia-Bellido K. George G. Gozaliasl H. Hildebrandt I. Hook S. Ili\'c V. Kansal E. Keihanen C.C. Kirkpatrick A. Loureiro J. Macias-Perez M. Magliocchetti R. Maoli S. Marcin M. Martinelli N. Martinet S. Matthew M. Maturi R.B. Metcalf G. Morgante S. Nadathur A.A. Nucita L. Patrizii A. Peel V. Popa C. Porciani D. Potter A. Pourtsidou M. P\"ontinen A.G. S\'anchez Z. Sakr M. Schirmer M. Sereno A. Spurio Mancini R. Teyssier J. Valiviita A. Veropalumbo M. Viel
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords differentcosmologicalcalibrationeuclidfunctionhalolambdamass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Euclid's photometric galaxy cluster survey has the potential to be a very competitive cosmological probe. The main cosmological probe with observations of clusters is their number count, within which the halo mass function (HMF) is a key theoretical quantity. We present a new calibration of the analytic HMF, at the level of accuracy and precision required for the uncertainty in this quantity to be subdominant with respect to other sources of uncertainty in recovering cosmological parameters from Euclid cluster counts. Our model is calibrated against a suite of N-body simulations using a Bayesian approach taking into account systematic errors arising from numerical effects in the simulation. First, we test the convergence of HMF predictions from different N-body codes, by using initial conditions generated with different orders of Lagrangian Perturbation theory, and adopting different simulation box sizes and mass resolution. Then, we quantify the effect of using different halo-finder algorithms, and how the resulting differences propagate to the cosmological constraints. In order to trace the violation of universality in the HMF, we also analyse simulations based on initial conditions characterised by scale-free power spectra with different spectral indexes, assuming both Einstein--de Sitter and standard $\Lambda$CDM expansion histories. Based on these results, we construct a fitting function for the HMF that we demonstrate to be sub-percent accurate in reproducing results from 9 different variants of the $\Lambda$CDM model including massive neutrinos cosmologies. The calibration systematic uncertainty is largely sub-dominant with respect to the expected precision of future mass-observation relations; with the only notable exception of the effect due to the halo finder, that could lead to biased cosmological inference.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A pilot sample of Planck-selected strongly lensed sub-mm galaxies: NOEMA observations and physical characterisation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Four Planck-selected dusty star-forming galaxies are confirmed as strongly lensed at z≈2.3–3.3 via NOEMA CO line detections; a lens model for one source yields µ≈11.

  2. Accelerating cosmological simulations on GPUs: a portable approach using OpenMP

    astro-ph.IM 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    An OpenMP-based GPU port of PINOCCHIO's collapse-time kernel reaches 4x (NVIDIA) to 8x (AMD) speedups and matches CPU interpolation results to ~0.003%.