REVIEW 1 cited by
The Tameness of Quantum Field Theory, Part II -- Structures and CFTs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Tameness of Quantum Field Theory, Part II -- Structures and CFTs
read the original abstract
Tame geometry originated in mathematical logic and implements strong finiteness properties by defining the notion of tame sets and functions. In part I we argued that observables in a wide class of quantum field theories are tame functions and that the tameness of a theory relies on its UV definition. The aims of this work are (1) to formalize the connection between quantum field theories and logical structures, and (2) to investigate the tameness of conformal field theories. To address the first aim, we start from a set of quantum field theories and explain how they define a logical structure that is subsequently extended to a second structure by adding physical observables. Tameness, or o-minimality, of the two structures is then a well-defined property, and sharp statements can be made by identifying these with known examples in mathematics. For the second aim we quantify our expectations on the tameness of the set of conformal field theories and effective theories that can be coupled to quantum gravity. We formulate tameness conjectures about conformal field theory observables and propose universal constraints that render spaces of conformal field theories to be tame sets. We test these conjectures in several examples and highlight first implications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Tame Complexity of Effective Field Theories in the Quantum Gravity Landscape
Effective field theories consistent with quantum gravity are conjectured to have uniformly bounded 'tame complexity', a quantitative measure of the information needed to specify them.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.