REVIEW 3 cited by
A Primer on Security of Quantum Computing Hardware
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Quantum computing is an emerging computing paradigm that can potentially transform several application areas by solving some of the intractable problems from classical domain. Similar to classical computing systems, quantum computing stack including software and hardware rely extensively on third parties many of them could be untrusted or less-trusted or unreliable. Quantum computing stack may contain sensitive Intellectual Properties (IP) that requires protection. From hardware perspective, quantum computers suffer from crosstalk that couples two programs in a multi-tenant setting to facilitate traditionally known fault injection attacks. Furthermore, third party calibration services can report incorrect error rates of qubits or mis-calibrate the qubits to degrade the computation performance for denial-of-service attacks. Quantum computers are expensive and access queue is typically long for trusted providers. Therefore, users may be enticed to explore untrusted but cheaper and readily available quantum hardware which can enable stealth of IP and tampering of quantum programs and/or computation outcomes. Recent studies have indicated the evolution of efficient but untrusted compilation services which presents risks to the IPs present in the quantum circuits. The untrusted compiler can also inject Trojans and perform tampering. Although quantum computing can involve sensitive IP and private information and can solve problems with strategic impact, its security and privacy has received inadequate attention. This paper provides comprehensive overview of the basics of quantum computing, key vulnerabilities embedded in the quantum systems and the recent attack vectors and corresponding defenses. Future research directions are also provided to build a stronger community of quantum security investigators.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fault Attacks on ML-based Quantum Control and Error Correction
Voltage glitching of an MCU running the HERQULES ML readout corrector causes mispredictions, with early layers showing far more faults than later ones.
-
Quantum Trojan Insertion: Controlled Activation for Covert Circuit Manipulation
A proposed controllable quantum Trojan is not actually controllable: the X-gate switch runs on every execution and no input-conditioned dormancy is demonstrated.
-
Quantum Quandaries: Unraveling Encoding Vulnerabilities in Quantum Neural Networks
A white-box adversary can classify quantum ML encoding schemes from transpiled circuit features with about 95% accuracy, but the proposed random-gate obfuscation only drops accuracy to 42%, far above the 20% random baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.