REVIEW 1 cited by
Manipulation of Belief Aggregation Rules
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Manipulation of Belief Aggregation Rules
read the original abstract
This paper studies manipulation of belief aggregation rules in the setting where the society first collects individual's probabilistic opinions and then solves a public portfolio choice problem with common utility based on the aggregate belief. First, we show that belief reporting in Nash equilibrium under the linear opinion pool and log utility is identified as the profile of state-contingent wealth shares in parimutuel equilibrium with risk-neutral preference. Then we characterize belief aggregation rules which are Nash-implementable. We provide a necessary and essentially sufficient condition for implementability, which is independent of the common risk attitude.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fairness and Strategy-Proofness in Automated Market Makers
For weighted-product AMMs with n≥3 assets, no aggregation rule satisfies both Arrovian fairness and strategy-proofness except single-provider dictators; the obstruction vanishes at n=2 and transfers to logarithmic opi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.