REVIEW 1 cited by
Arrival Times Versus Detection Times
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Arrival Times Versus Detection Times
read the original abstract
How to compute the probability distribution of a detection time, i.e., of the time which a detector registers as the arrival time of a quantum particle, is a long-debated problem. In this regard, Bohmian mechanics provides in a straightforward way the distribution of the time at which the particle actually does arrive at a given surface in 3-space in the absence of detectors. However, as we discuss here, since the presence of detectors can change the evolution of the wave function and thus the particle trajectories, it cannot be taken for granted that the arrival time of the Bohmian trajectories in the absence of detectors agrees with the one in the presence of detectors, and even less with the detection time. In particular, we explain why certain distributions that Das and D\"urr [arXiv:1802.07141] presented as the distribution of the detection time in a case with spin, based on assuming that all three times mentioned coincide, is actually not what Bohmian mechanics predicts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Scattering Cross Section Formula Derived From Macroscopic Model of Detectors
The usual quantum scattering cross-section formula is derived as the actual detection distribution from imaginary-potential and repeated-measurement detector models in the far-field limit.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.