REVIEW 2 cited by
Stability via resampling: statistical problems beyond the real line
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Stability via resampling: statistical problems beyond the real line
read the original abstract
Model averaging techniques based on resampling methods (such as bootstrapping or subsampling) have been utilized across many areas of statistics, often with the explicit goal of promoting stability in the resulting output. We provide a general, finite-sample theoretical result guaranteeing the stability of bagging when applied to algorithms that return outputs in a general space, so that the output is not necessarily a real-valued -- for example, an algorithm that estimates a vector of weights or a density function. We empirically assess the stability of bagging on synthetic and real-world data for a range of problem settings, including causal inference, nonparametric regression, and Bayesian model selection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Feature Bagging Provides Stability
Feature bagging provably reduces feature instability relative to non-bagged learners, with larger gains under aggressive feature subsampling and modest ensemble size.
-
Stabilizing black-box algorithms through task-oriented randomization
Introduces task-oriented randomization for black-box stability with theoretical guarantees, stability-exploration trade-off analysis, and extension to top-k ranking motivated by LLMs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.