Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Quantification of 2D vs 3D BAO tension using SNIa as a redshift interpolator and test of the Etherington relation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12142 v3 pith:UY2776CQ submitted 2024-05-20 astro-ph.CO

Quantification of 2D vs 3D BAO tension using SNIa as a redshift interpolator and test of the Etherington relation

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords datadistancerelationwhenangulardualitymeasurementssigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Several studies in the literature have found a disagreement between data on Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) derived using two distinct methodologies: the two-dimensional (2D or angular) BAO, which extracts the BAO signal from the angular two-point correlation function; and the three-dimensional (3D) BAO, which also exploits the radial signal imprinted on the large-scale structure of the universe. This discrepancy is worrisome, since many of the points contained in these data sets are obtained from the same catalogs of tracers, so we would expect them to be consistent. Since BAO measurements play a pivotal role in the building of the inverse distance ladder, this mismatch impacts the discourse on the Hubble tension and the theoretical solutions to the latter. So far, the discrepancy between 2D and 3D BAO has been only pointed out in the context of fitting analyses of cosmological models or parametrizations that involve a concrete calibration of the comoving sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch. In this Letter, we avoid the use of any calibration and cosmological model, assuming that the Etherington (a.k.a distance duality) relation holds. We use state-of-the-art measurements in our analysis, and study how the results change when the angular components of the 3D BAO data from BOSS/eBOSS are substituted by the recent data from DESI Y1. We find the tension to exist at the level of $\sim 2\sigma$ and $\sim 2.5\sigma$, respectively, when the SNIa of Pantheon+ are used, and at $\sim 4.6\sigma$ when they are replaced with those of DES Y5. We then apply a calibrator-independent method to investigate the robustness of the distance duality relation when analyzed not only with 3D BAO measurements, but also with 2D BAO. We do not find any hint for a violation of the cosmic distance duality relation in any of the considered data sets. [abridged]

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

  3. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5

    Under standard recombination, phantom-crossing dynamical dark energy is preferred at ~97–98.5% probability; early-time fixes to the Hubble tension erase that preference while creating severe ω_m tension with CMB.

  4. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...

  5. High-redshift transverse BAO measurements with the SDSS quasar catalog

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0

    A transverse-BAO angular diameter distance at z≈1.725 is claimed from SDSS DR16 quasars, but the abstract (two shells: θ_BAO=1.911°±0.062° and 1.727°±0.081°, 3.4σ/3.0σ) contradicts the body (one shell: θ_BAO=1.928°±0....

  6. Crosschecking Cosmic Distances from DESI BAO and DES SNe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    For DESI DR2 BAO versus DES SNe, the comoving-distance ratio is flat but the inverse-Hubble-distance ratio falls with redshift at 2.3–2.5σ, which the authors attribute to systematics.

  7. Crosschecking Cosmic Distances from DESI BAO and DES SNe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    Cross-check finds good agreement between DESI BAO and DES SNe distances in transverse measures but a mild, method-dependent decreasing trend in radial distances.

  8. Revisiting $\Lambda$CDM extensions in light of re-analyzed CMB data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Re-analysis with PR4 Planck likelihoods reduces lensing anomaly significance and curvature preference in Lambda CDM extensions while indicating a preference for evolving dark energy consistent with DESI.

  9. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 3.0

    Pure early or late fixes to the Hubble tension are tightly constrained; remaining options are combined early-late interacting dark energy or new physics at the local-to-homogeneous transition.

  10. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing the Hubble tension as a persistent crisis and discussing resolutions via interacting dark energy models that combine early-time and late-time modifications.