Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.01228 v1 pith:PHCRMSWL submitted 2024-09-02 hep-ph hep-exhep-th

classification hep-phhep-exhep-th
keywords alphaperturbationsymmetrytheoryactuallyambiguitybecausebecome
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neural network expansion of Euclidean path integrals and its application to interacting scalar fields

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RBF neural-network expansion of the interaction factor turns Euclidean path integrals into factorized Gaussian integrals that reproduce the 1+1 phi^4 phase transition line in seconds.

Pith tools