Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Fully charmed P-wave tetraquark resonant states in the quark model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts narrow, compact P-wave tetraquark resonances with masses in the 7.0–7.2 GeV window—including exotic $0^{--}$ and $1^{-+}$ states—and argues that X(6400) and X(6600) cannot be narrow tetraquarks in the quark model.

desk verdict A technically careful first full four-body P-wave calculation of fully charmed tetraquarks; the specific masses and widths depend on an unvaried regulator, but the broad predictions are worth taking seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17962 v2 pith:SEVAJVBL submitted 2024-11-27 hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th

Wei-Lin Wu , Shi-Lin Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exhep-latnucl-th PACS 12.39.Jh
keywords fullycharmedtetraquarkP-wavequarkpotentialmodelGaussianexpansionmethodcomplexscalingexoticquantumnumbersX(6400)X(6600)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that fully charmed four-quark systems ($cc\bar c\bar c$) with one unit of orbital excitation form narrow resonant states with masses in the window 7.0–7.2 GeV and widths of order 1–50 MeV, all spatially compact rather than meson molecules. Among them are states with exotic quantum numbers $J^{PC}=0^{--}$ and $1^{-+}$ that ordinary charmonium cannot have, so they are directly searchable signals for four-quark matter. The same calculation finds no narrow ($\Gamma<200$ MeV) tetraquark resonance below 7 GeV, which, combined with the earlier S-wave study, means the experimentally reported X(6400) and X(6600) cannot be reproduced as compact tetraquark poles in this quark model. The interest is twofold: the predicted states give concrete targets for future collider searches, and the predicted absence sharpens the open question of what X(6400) and X(6600) actually are.

What carries the argument

The calculation rests on four pieces. (i) A nonrelativistic quark potential Hamiltonian with one-gluon-exchange and linear confinement terms, whose singular $\delta^{(3)}(r)$ and $1/r^3$ spin-orbit/tensor pieces are regularized by Gaussian smearing, with the $1/r^3$ regulator (Eq. (4), parameter $\sigma_1$) fixed to the $\chi_{cJ}$ spectrum; the spin-orbit and tensor terms are included in the full diagonalization rather than as perturbations. (ii) The Gaussian expansion method, which expands the four-body wave function in three Jacobi-coordinate sets (two dimeson arrangements and one diquark-antidiquark arrangement) and uses infinitesimally-shifted Gaussians so that P-wave matrix elements are evaluated analytically. (iii) The complex scaling method, which rotates coordinates and momenta into the complex plane to expose resonant poles as stable eigenvalues separated from the rotated continuum. (iv) A decomposition of the complex-scaled wave function into color-singlet meson pairs, whose root-mean-square radii distinguish compact tetraquarks from meson molecules.

What would settle it

A high-statistics scan of the di-$J/\psi$ invariant mass spectrum from 6.2 to 7.4 GeV, with angular analyses to assign quantum numbers of any peaks, would settle the claim: narrow peaks at the Table III masses with the predicted $J^{PC}$ would confirm; their absence—or a demonstration that X(6400)/X(6600) are narrow tetraquark-like states with matching quantum numbers—would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Performing, for the first time, a full four-body dynamical calculation of P-wave fully charmed tetraquark systems with the Gaussian expansion method and complex scaling, the authors find several resonant states in the mass region (7.0, 7.2) GeV with compact tetraquark configurations. These include $T_{4c,0^{--}}(7080)$, $T_{4c,1^{-+}}(7065)$, $T_{4c,2^{-+}}(7064)$, $T_{4c,2^{--}}(7025)$, $T_{4c,3^{-+}}(7187)$, and three $3^{--}$ states at 7040, 7059, and 7154 MeV, with widths ranging from 0.6 to 46 MeV. All lie close to di-charmonia thresholds involving a 1S and a 2P meson, and all show strong mixing between the $\bar 3_c \otimes 3_c$ and $6_c \otimes \bar 6_c$ color configurations. No bound or resonant P-wave tetraquark state is found below 7 GeV with width under 200 MeV, and the paper concludes that X(6400) and X(6600) find no candidate in this quark model.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the Gaussian regularization of the singular $1/r^3$ spin-orbit and tensor potentials, with the single parameter $\sigma_1$ fixed by the charmonium spectrum, is a faithful representation of these forces for four-quark P-wave states, so the quoted masses and widths carry no estimate of the uncertainty from this choice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The exotic states $J^{PC}=0^{--}$ and $1^{-+}$ around 7.1 GeV provide concrete, experimentally testable signatures for fully charmed four-quark matter with quantum numbers no $c\bar c$ meson can possess.
  • Any narrow structure below 7 GeV in the di-$J/\psi$ spectrum is not a compact tetraquark resonance in this model; X(6400) and X(6600) therefore require a different explanation, such as broad states, kinematic effects, or modified confinement.
  • P-wave compact tetraquarks, if produced, should appear as narrow peaks near the $\psi(2S)J/\psi$ and related thresholds, potentially hidden inside the broad structures already reported.
  • The predicted resonances are mostly mixtures of color configurations, not single diquark-antidiquark states, so searches should not rely on diquark-dominated decay patterns.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted narrow states exist, they would make the fully charmed sector the first place where all-heavy exotic-quantum-number hadrons are seen, and would test whether the quark model's regularization of spin-orbit and tensor forces survives the four-body setting.
  • The same computational scheme, with the same $1/r^3$ regulator, could be applied to fully bottom $bb\bar b\bar b$ P-wave systems; the analogous prediction would give an independent check of the regularization's validity.
  • A high-statistics angular analysis of the di-$J/\psi$ spectrum above 7 GeV that isolates $J^{PC}=1^{-+}$ or $0^{--}$ contributions could confirm or exclude the two exotic states even if the total lineshape is dominated by broad structures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a four-body dynamical calculation of P-wave fully charmed tetraquark (cc\bar c\bar c) systems in a nonrelativistic quark potential model. The authors use the Gaussian expansion method with both dimeson and diquark-antidiquark Jacobi configurations, compute P-wave matrix elements analytically with infinitesimally-shifted Gaussian basis functions, and apply the complex scaling method to distinguish resonances from continuum. They report several compact tetraquark resonant states with masses in the (7.0, 7.2) GeV window, including states with exotic quantum numbers J^{PC}=0^{--} and 1^{-+}, and they find no resonant states below 7 GeV with width less than 200 MeV. Combining these results with their earlier S-wave study, they conclude that the experimental X(6400) and X(6600) states are not reproduced as compact tetraquark states in this model.

Significance. The paper is a technically substantial extension of quark-model benchmark calculations to P-wave fully charmed tetraquarks. Its strengths are the use of standard, documented methods (Gaussian expansion, complex scaling, analytic matrix elements in Appendix A) and a charmonium spectrum that agrees with experiment within tens of MeV. If the resonance inventory is robust, the predictions of narrow exotic states (0^{--}, 1^{-+}) and the exclusion of X(6400)/X(6600) as compact tetraquark poles are concrete, falsifiable statements that can guide experimental searches. The main weakness is the lack of uncertainty quantification for the regulator-dependent spin-orbit and tensor potentials, which directly affects the quoted masses, widths, and the claimed null result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.A, Eq. (4), Tables I-II] The regulator (1 - e^{-\sigma_1^2 r^2})^2/r^3 for the 1/r^3 spin-orbit and tensor terms is an ad hoc choice, and \sigma_1 is fixed by fitting the \chi_{cJ} multiplet. That fit validates the central and spin-dependent potentials for quark-antiquark P-wave states, but the tetraquark Hamiltonian contains different color factors (\lambda_i \cdot \lambda_j) and orbital operator combinations, and the four-quark P-wave wave functions sample short distances where the regulator matters most. The paper reports no variation of \sigma_1, no tests of an alternative regulator, and no error estimates for the masses and widths in Table III. Because several states (e.g., 2^{--} at 7025 MeV and 3^{--} at 7040 MeV) sit within roughly 30 MeV of the 7 GeV boundary used in the null claim, a 50-100 MeV shift could change the resonance inventory and weaken the conclusion that no states below 7 GeV exist. A sensitivity study of \sigma_1 and propagation of the resulting uncertainty into the quoted masses, widths, and null result is needed.
  2. [Sec. III, Table III and Figs. 2-3] The text notes that resonance identification in the 1^{--} system is difficult because the dimeson thresholds are nearly degenerate, and it reports that the rms radii of T_{4c,2^{--}}(7025) change drastically with the complex scaling angle so that its configuration cannot be determined. Despite these caveats, Table III lists these states as resonances without stating the quantitative criterion used to identify them as poles (e.g., stability of the complex eigenvalue over a range of \theta and basis sizes). The authors should specify how each pole was identified, indicate which entries are numerically stable, and mark tentative states separately from definite predictions.
  3. [Sec. III, Table IV and discussion] The widths are quoted without uncertainties, and the paper acknowledges that they are underestimated because the finite widths of charmonia are not included and quark-antiquark annihilation channels are omitted. This matters for the comparison with X(6400) and X(6600), which have experimental widths around 100 MeV and are excluded only modulo the numerical limitation that states with \Gamma > 200 MeV cannot be studied with the current complex scaling setup. The conclusion that X(6400) and X(6600) are not candidates should therefore be phrased with this caveat made explicit in the abstract and summary, not only in the discussion at the end of Sec. III.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table IV] In the header, 'T4c.0\,^{-+}' should read 'T_{4c,0^{-+}}'; the period appears to be a typo for a comma.
  2. [Introduction] The sentence 'The P-wave fully charmed tetraquark system was studied in the the QCD sum rule' contains a duplicated 'the'.
  3. [Sec. III, first paragraph] The phrase 'all possible quantum numbers' is not self-evident for a four-identical-quark system with P-wave orbital excitation; a short enumeration of how the J^{PC} list is derived from the color-spin and orbital couplings would aid the reader.
  4. [Fig. 4] The label 'ATLASCMS' appears concatenated; the experiment names should be separated for clarity.
  5. [Sec. II.A and Eq. (5)] The symbol \chi is used both for the spatial-spin wave function in Eq. (5) and for the color wave function in Eq. (12); this notation should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tetraquark resonance predictions are independent outputs of a model fitted to charmonium data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: fix the potential parameters (alpha_s, b, m_c, sigma) from the charmonium fit of Ref. [71]; fix the new regulator parameter sigma_1 by fitting the chi_cJ spectrum; then solve the four-body Schrodinger equation for P-wave cccbar-cbar states with the Gaussian expansion method and complex scaling. The target quantities of the paper, namely the tetraquark resonance masses, widths, and exotic J^PC states, never enter any parameter fit, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional reduction. Equation (4) is a stated regularization choice, not an output of the fit, and although sigma_1 is calibrated on P-wave charmonium, the tetraquark matrix elements are a genuinely different four-body problem; the fit to chi_cJ is not a renamed prediction of Table III. The null claim for X(6400) and X(6600) is explicitly conditional on the numerical limitation that only states with width Gamma < 200 MeV are identified: the paper states 'we only focus on states with widths Gamma < 200 MeV' and 'if X(6400) and X(6600) are states with widths larger than 200 MeV, as suggested by the experimental results, they cannot be obtained numerically in the current calculations.' This is a transparent scope limitation rather than a circular reduction. The only self-citation is the previous S-wave study [1], used to combine spectra; it is not used to justify the P-wave Hamiltonian, the basis, the regularization, or the resonance identification, and the P-wave calculation is self-contained. No equation in the paper reduces to its inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The quoted results are therefore genuine model predictions, with robustness caveats that belong to a correctness assessment rather than a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictions rest on a nonrelativistic quark potential model with five parameters fitted to charmonium data, plus a regularization scheme for singular potentials. The tetraquark results are not used in any fit, but the model assumptions and the regularization sensitivity are not fully quantified.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha_s = 0.5461
    Strong coupling constant in the potential, fitted to charmonium spectrum in Ref. [71].
  • b = 0.1425 GeV^2
    String tension of the linear confinement, fitted to charmonium spectrum in Ref. [71].
  • m_c = 1.4794 GeV
    Charm quark mass, fitted to charmonium spectrum in Ref. [71].
  • sigma = 1.0946 GeV
    Gaussian smearing width for the delta-function spin-spin term, taken from Ref. [71].
  • sigma_1 = 1.3133 GeV
    Regularization scale for the 1/r^3 spin-orbit and tensor terms, fit to the chi_cJ spectrum in this work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Nonrelativistic quark potential model with one-gluon-exchange and linear confinement potentials (Eq. 2) describes four-quark systems.
    Used throughout Sec. II. No derivation from QCD; parameters calibrated on charmonium.
  • ad hoc to paper The singular delta^3(r) and 1/r^3 terms in the potential can be regularized by Gaussian smearing and the regularized form (Eqs. 3, 4) preserves the physics.
    The regularization function for 1/r^3 is chosen here; sigma_1 fitted to chi_cJ states. The paper states the parameters are 'comparable to mc' and therefore reasonable, but this is a modeling assumption.
  • standard math The fully charmed tetraquark wave function can be expanded in a finite Gaussian basis (nmax = 10-12) with convergence.
    Gaussian expansion method [63] is a standard variational technique; convergence is assumed but not demonstrated with a systematic extrapolation.
  • standard math Complex scaling method identifies resonances as stable eigenvalues under theta variation.
    CSM is a standard method for resonances [64-66]; the paper cites its use in previous tetraquark studies.
  • domain assumption The rms radius defined via the non-antisymmetric wave function (Eq. 13) distinguishes meson molecules from compact tetraquarks.
    This definition is used for classification; the paper notes it is consistent with the standard definition for compact states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fully charmed P-wave tetraquark resonant states in the quark model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SEVAJVBL

@misc{pith2026241117962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fully charmed P-wave tetraquark resonant states in the quark model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SEVAJVBL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17962}
}
abstract

We conduct the first comprehensive P-wave four-body dynamical calculations of the fully charmed tetraquark systems within the quark potential model. We apply the Gaussian expansion method to solve the four-body Schr\"odinger equation, incorporating both dimeson and diquark-antidiquark spatial configurations. The matrix elements of P-wave states are calculated analytically using the infinitesimally-shifted Gaussian basis functions. With the complex scaling method, we obtain several fully charmed P-wave resonant states with compact tetraquark configuration in the mass region of $(7.0,7.2)$ GeV, including states with exotic quantum numbers $J^{PC}=0^{--},1^{-+}$. However, we find no resonant states with the mass $M<7$ GeV and width $\Gamma<200$ MeV. Combining the present investigation with our previous results on S-wave fully charmed tetraquark systems, we find no candidates for the experimental states $X(6400)$ and $X(6600)$ in the quark model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The Jacobian coordinates for two types of spatial configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The complex energy eigenvalues of C-parity positive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The complex energy eigenvalues of C-parity negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The experimental and theoretical mass spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Heavy flavored hydrogen molecule systems

    physics.atom-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors use Gaussian expansion and complex scaling to predict bound and quasi-bound energies of muonic and tauonic hydrogen-molecule analogues, reporting first values for ppμμ and ppττ.

  2. Symmetry Analysis of Compact Tetraquark States and Implications for the Fully Charmed Candidates $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$, and $X(7100)$

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Symmetry analysis of compact tetraquarks shows low-energy states favor J^P=2+ and places X(6600), X(6900), X(7100) among the lower levels of the fully charmed spectrum.

  3. Propagation and Dynamics of Oscillating Tetraquark Systems

    hep-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper derives a harmonic-oscillator propagator and time-dependent Gaussian wave function for a four-quark tetraquark model, showing oscillating and decaying probability densities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Wu, Y .-K

    W.-L. Wu, Y .-K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Benchmark calculations of fully heavy compact and molecular tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054034 (2024), arXiv:2401.14899 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Reso- nances, Phys. Rept. 668, 1 (2017), arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y . Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y , Z, and related states, PTEP 2016, 062C01 (2016), arXiv:1603.09229 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy- Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017), arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pen- taquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017), arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y .-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019), arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral pertur- bation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field the- ory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019, 1 (2023), arXiv:2204.08716 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Towards a the- ory of hadron resonances, Phys. Rept. 1001, 1 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y .-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation of structure in theJ/ψ -pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020), arXiv:2006.16957 [hep-ex]

    2020

  6. [14]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS), New Structures in the J/ ψJ/ψ Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024), arXiv:2306.07164 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Observation of an Excess of Dicharmo- nium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the ATLAS De- tector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023), arXiv:2304.08962 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    C. Deng, H. Chen, and J. Ping, Towards the understanding of fully-heavy tetraquark states from various models, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014001 (2021), arXiv:2003.05154 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    liu, F.-X

    M.-S. liu, F.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evidences in LHC observations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024), arXiv:2006.11952 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    X. Jin, Y . Xue, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Full-heavy tetraquarks in constituent quark models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1083 (2020), arXiv:2006.13745 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    L ¨u, D.-Y

    Q.-F. L ¨u, D.-Y . Chen, and Y .-B. Dong, Masses of fully heavy tetraquarks QQ ¯Q ¯Q in an extended relativized quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 871 (2020), arXiv:2006.14445 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Strong decays of fully-charm tetraquarks into di-charmonia, Sci. Bull. 65, 1994 (2020), arXiv:2006.16027 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, D. Ra- betiarivony, and G. Randriamanatrika, Doubly-hidden scalar heavy molecules and tetraquarks states from QCD at NLO, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094001 (2020), arXiv:2008.01569 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Simple spectrum of c¯cc¯c states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074003 9 (2020), arXiv:2008.01631 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Wang, D.-Y

    J.-Z. Wang, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Producing fully charm structures in theJ/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 103, 071503 (2021), arXiv:2008.07430 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    X.-K. Dong, V . Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and A. Nefediev, Coupled-Channel Interpretation of the LHCb Double- J/ψ Spectrum and Hints of a New State Near the J/ψJ/ψ Threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132001 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 119901 (2021)], arXiv:2009.07795...

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zhang and Y .-Q

    H.-F. Zhang and Y .-Q. Ma, Exploring the di- J/ψ reso- nances based on \itab initio perturbative QCD, (2020), arXiv:2009.08376 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. Zhao, S. Shi, and P. Zhuang, Fully-heavy tetraquarks in a strongly interacting medium, Phys. Rev. D102, 114001 (2020), arXiv:2009.10319 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. C. Gordillo, F. De Soto, and J. Segovia, Diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of fully-heavy multiquark bound states, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114007 (2020), arXiv:2009.11889 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zhang, 0+ fully-charmed tetraquark states, Phys

    J.-R. Zhang, 0+ fully-charmed tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014018 (2021), arXiv:2010.07719 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Guo and J

    Z.-H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Insights into the inner structures of the fully charmed tetraquark state X(6900), Phys. Rev. D 103, 034024 (2021), arXiv:2011.00978 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gong, M.-C

    C. Gong, M.-C. Du, Q. Zhao, X.-H. Zhong, and B. Zhou, Na- ture of X(6900) and its production mechanism at LHCb, Phys. Lett. B 824, 136794 (2022), arXiv:2011.11374 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Wan and C.-F

    B.-D. Wan and C.-F. Qiao, Gluonic tetracharm configuration of X(6900), Phys. Lett. B 817, 136339 (2021), arXiv:2012.00454 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    H. G. Dosch, S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de T´eramond, M. Nielsen, and L. Zou, Exotic states in a holographic theory, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 312-317, 135 (2021), arXiv:2012.02496 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    B.-C. Yang, L. Tang, and C.-F. Qiao, Scalar fully-heavy tetraquark states QQ′ ¯Q ¯Q′ in QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 324 (2021), arXiv:2012.04463 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Z. Zhao, K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, X. Liu, A. Limphi- rat, and Y . Yan, Study of charmoniumlike and fully-charm tetraquark spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116027 (2021), arXiv:2012.15554 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. N. Faustov, V . O. Galkin, and E. M. Savchenko, Heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Universe 7, 94 (2021), arXiv:2103.01763 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    H.-W. Ke, X. Han, X.-H. Liu, and Y .-L. Shi, Tetraquark state X(6900) and the interaction between diquark and antidiquark, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 427 (2021), arXiv:2103.13140 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Liang, X.-Y

    Z.-R. Liang, X.-Y . Wu, and D.-L. Yao, Hunting for states in the recent LHCb di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D104, 034034 (2021), arXiv:2104.08589 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Exotic resonances of fully- heavy tetraquarks in a lattice-QCD insipired quark model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014006 (2021), arXiv:2104.08814 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 367 (2021), arXiv:2104.11823 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Li, C.-H

    Q. Li, C.-H. Chang, G.-L. Wang, and T. Wang, Mass spectra and wave functions of TQQQ ¯Q¯ tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014018 (2021), arXiv:2104.12372 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Higher fully charmed tetraquarks: Radial excitations and P-wave states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036016 (2021), arXiv:2105.13109 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    X.-K. Dong, V . Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, and B.-S. Zou, Is the existence of a J/ ψJ/ψ bound state plausible?, Sci. Bull. 66, 2462 (2021), arXiv:2107.03946 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Q.-N. Wang, Z.-Y . Yang, and W. Chen, Exotic fully-heavy Q ¯QQ ¯Q tetraquark states in 8[Q ¯Q] ⊗ 8[Q ¯Q] color configuration, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114037 (2021), arXiv:2109.08091 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Liu, M.-S

    F.-X. Liu, M.-S. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Higher mass spectra of the fully-charmed and fully-bottom tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116029 (2021), arXiv:2110.09052 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Zhuang, Y

    Z. Zhuang, Y . Zhang, Y . Ma, and Q. Wang, Lineshape of the compact fully heavy tetraquark, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054026 (2022), arXiv:2111.14028 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Asadi and G

    Z. Asadi and G. R. Boroun, Masses of fully heavy tetraquark states from a four-quark static potential model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014006 (2022), arXiv:2112.11028 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Gong, M.-C

    C. Gong, M.-C. Du, and Q. Zhao, Pseudoscalar charmonium pair interactions via the Pomeron exchange mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054011 (2022), arXiv:2206.13867 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Wang and X

    J.-Z. Wang and X. Liu, Improved understanding of the peaking phenomenon existing in the new di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum from the CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D106, 054015 (2022), arXiv:2207.04893 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Q. Zhou, D. Guo, S.-Q. Kuang, Q.-H. Yang, and L.-Y . Dai, Nature of the X(6900) in partial wave decomposition of J/ ψJ/ψ scattering, Phys. Rev. D 106, L111502 (2022), arXiv:2207.07537 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    G.-J. Wang, Q. Meng, and M. Oka, S-wave fully charmed tetraquark resonant states, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096005 (2022), arXiv:2208.07292 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    P.-Y . Niu, E. Wang, Q. Wang, and S. Yang, Determine the quan- tum numbers of X(6900) from photon-photon fusion in ultra- peripheral heavy ion collisions, (2022), arXiv:2209.01924 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Dong and Z.-G

    W.-C. Dong and Z.-G. Wang, Going in quest of potential tetraquark interpretations for the newly observed T ψψ states in light of the diquark-antidiquark scenarios, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074010 (2023), arXiv:2211.11989 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Yu, Z.-Y

    G.-L. Yu, Z.-Y . Li, Z.-G. Wang, J. Lu, and M. Yan, The S- and P-wave fully charmed tetraquark states and their radial excita- tions, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 416 (2023), arXiv:2212.14339 [hep- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fern ´andez, Exploring T ψψ tetraquark candidates in a coupled-channels formalism, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094023 (2023), arXiv:2307.00532 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    G.-J. Wang, M. Oka, and D. Jido, Quark confinement for multi- quark systems: Application to fully charmed tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 108, L071501 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    W.-L. Sang, T. Wang, Y .-D. Zhang, and F. Feng, Electromag- netic and hadronic decay of fully heavy tetraquark, (2023), arXiv:2307.16150 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. N. Anwar and T. J. Burns, Structure of cc¯c¯c tetraquarks and interpretation of LHC states, (2023), arXiv:2311.15853 [hep- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Y . Wu, X. Liu, Y . Tan, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Further study of c¯cc¯c system within a chiral quark model, (2024), arXiv:2403.10375 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Chen, H.-X

    W. Chen, H.-X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Hunt- ing for exotic doubly hidden-charm/bottom tetraquark states, Phys. Lett. B 773, 247 (2017), arXiv:1605.01647 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Chen, X.-L

    Z.-Z. Chen, X.-L. Chen, P.-F. Yang, and W. Chen, P-wave fully charm and fully bottom tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094011 (2024), arXiv:2402.03117 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    V . R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, A non-relativistic model for the [cc][¯c¯c] tetraquark, Chin. Phys. C 43, 013105 (2019), arXiv:1706.07553 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. San- topinto, Spectrum of fully-heavy tetraquarks from a di- 10 quark+antidiquark perspective, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1004 (2020), arXiv:1911.00960 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Hiyama, Y

    E. Hiyama, Y . Kino, and M. Kamimura, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 51, 223 (2003)

    2003

  56. [64]

    Aguilar and J

    J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, A class of analytic perturbations for one-body schroedinger hamiltonians, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269 (1971)

    1971

  57. [65]

    Balslev and J

    E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, Spectral properties of many- body schroedinger operators with dilatation-analytic interac- tions, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 280 (1971)

    1971

  58. [66]

    Aoyama, T

    S. Aoyama, T. Myo, K. Kat ¯o, and K. Ikeda, The complex scal- ing method for many-body resonances and its applications to three-body resonances, Progress of theoretical physics 116, 1 (2006)

    2006

  59. [67]

    Meng, Y .-K

    L. Meng, Y .-K. Chen, Y . Ma, and S.-L. Zhu, Tetraquark bound states in constituent quark models: Benchmark test calcula- tions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114016 (2023), arXiv:2310.13354 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Chen, W.-L

    Y .-K. Chen, W.-L. Wu, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Unified de- scription of the Qsq ¯q¯ molecular bound states, molecular resonances, and compact tetraquark states in the quark poten- tial model, Phys. Rev. D109, 014010 (2024), arXiv:2310.14597 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    W.-L. Wu, Y . Ma, Y .-K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Fully heavy tetraquark resonant states with different flavors, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034030 (2024), arXiv:2406.17824 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    W.-L. Wu, Y . Ma, Y .-K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Doubly heavy tetraquark bound and resonant states, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094041 (2024), arXiv:2409.03373 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Barnes, S

    T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0505002

    2005 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, The hid- den charm pentaquark states and Σc ¯D(∗) interaction in chi- ral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014031 (2019), arXiv:1905.04113 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Lin, J.-Z

    Z.-Y . Lin, J.-Z. Wang, J.-B. Cheng, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Identification of the G(3900) as the P-wave D ¯D∗/ ¯DD∗ reso- nance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 241903 (2024), arXiv:2403.01727 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    R. L. Jaffe, Exotica, Phys. Rept. 409, 1 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0409065

    2005

  68. [76]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V . Riquer, Diquark- antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0412098

    2005

  69. [77]

    Ma, W.-L

    Y . Ma, W.-L. Wu, L. Meng, Y .-K. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Fully strange tetraquark resonant states as the cousins of X(6900), Phys. Rev. D 110, 074026 (2024), arXiv:2408.00503 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    W. J. Romo, Inner product for resonant states and shell-model applications, Nuclear Physics A 116, 617 (1968)

    1968

  71. [79]

    Moiseyev, Quantum theory of resonances: calculating ener- gies, widths and cross-sections by complex scaling, Phys

    N. Moiseyev, Quantum theory of resonances: calculating ener- gies, widths and cross-sections by complex scaling, Phys. Rept. 302, 212 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.