REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum Measurements of Time: A reply to criticisms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantum Measurements of Time: A reply to criticisms
read the original abstract
In [arXiv:2409.00161v1 (2024)] Cavendish et al. raise three criticisms against our time of arrival proposal [L. Maccone and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110402 (2020)]. Here we show that all three criticisms are without merit. One of them is founded on a logical mistake.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Proposal of quantum arrival-time measurement with a Bose-Einstein condensate
Proposal for a BEC-based experiment measuring position-dependent arrival flux to distinguish quantum arrival-time models.
-
Arrival times of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate
Analyzes how interactions modify arrival time distributions for a Bose-Einstein condensate in the close-to-trap detection regime via analytical and numerical solutions of the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.