Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Supersolid Phases in Ultracold Gases of Microwave Shielded Polar Molecules

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding ellipticity to a microwave dressing field makes trapped polar molecules form a supersolid at densities an order of magnitude lower than atomic dipolar supersolids, in a parameter window current experiments can reach.

desk verdict A credible new molecular-supersolid mechanism via elliptical microwave polarization; the phase diagram holds up, but the 'accessible to current experiments' claim needs a loss-rate estimate. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23820 v1 pith:N55PVGRD submitted 2025-06-30 cond-mat.quant-gas

Wei Zhang , Hongye Liu , Fulin Deng , Kun Chen , Su Yi , Tao Shi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords supersolidpolarmoleculesmicrowaveshieldingdipolarinteractionpath-integralMonteCarloNaCsquantumphasesellipticallypolarized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that dressing a gas of microwave-shielded polar molecules with an elliptically polarized microwave breaks the cylindrical symmetry of the inter-molecular dipolar interaction, turning it repulsive along one in-plane axis and attractive along the other. Using unbiased path-integral Monte Carlo simulations of trapped NaCs molecules, it maps a finite-temperature phase diagram in the ellipticity–trap-frequency plane and finds a supersolid phase with density modulation along the weak trap axis and measurable inter-droplet coherence. The supersolid appears near an ellipticity of about 4 degrees and for y-direction trap frequencies between about 60 and 120 Hz, parameters within reach of present experiments. If correct, this gives a molecular platform for studying supersolidity at peak densities near 1.5×$10^{12}$ $cm^{-3}$, much lower than atomic dipolar supersolids, which the authors argue should extend the lifetime of the molecular gas.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective two-body potential Veff(r) derived to second order in the microwave coupling, Eq. (1), which contains a 1/$r^{3}$ dipolar term with an isotropic C3,0 part and an in-plane anisotropic C3,2 part, plus a 1/$r^{6}$ shielding potential parametrized by six independent C6 coefficients. The ellipticity ξ controls C3,2, which is proportional to sin 2ξ and makes the interaction repulsive along the x axis and attractive along the y axis. The load-bearing numerical machinery is path-integral Monte Carlo with the worm algorithm, which provides an unbiased finite-temperature treatment of the trapped gas without mean-field approximations; the phases are identified through column densities, the structure factor S(kx,0,0) for crystalline order, and the reduced peak-to-peak correlation g_pp for coherence.

What would settle it

In a trapped NaCs gas with dual microwave shielding, tune the ellipticity to about 4 degrees and set the y-trap frequency to about 100 Hz at roughly 4 nK, then measure the in-plane structure factor and the peak-to-peak correlation function: if no density-modulation side peaks appear in S(kx,0,0) or if the inter-peak coherence g_pp remains below 1 percent, the predicted supersolid window is not realized.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that replacing the σ-polarized microwave with an elliptically polarized one introduces an additional anisotropic term, C3,2 $sin^{2}$θ cos2φ, in the effective dipolar interaction of microwave-shielded polar molecules, and that the interplay of this interaction anisotropy with the trapping anisotropy produces a supersolid phase. In the ellipticity–trap-frequency plane, the authors identify three phases—expanding gas, supersolid, and self-bound droplet—and show by path-integral Monte Carlo that the supersolid has multiple density peaks along the x direction while retaining significant peak-to-peak coherence. They further show that the supersolid phase sits in a parameter window accessible to current NaCs experiments and that it develops at substantially lower density than previously considered molecular or atomic supersolid schemes.

Load-bearing premise

The many-body simulations use an effective two-body potential derived to second order in the microwave coupling and assume that three-body recombination and the finite lifetime of the dressed molecular state are negligible at the densities reached in the supersolid window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A supersolid of polar molecules should appear at peak densities around 1.5×10^12 cm^-3, about two orders of magnitude lower than dysprosium droplet supersolids, which the authors argue alleviates the three-body-loss problem.
  • The phase diagram on the ellipticity–trap-frequency plane predicts tunable transitions: increasing ellipticity at fixed trap drives the gas from an expanding gas through the supersolid to a self-bound droplet, while increasing the y-trap frequency at fixed ellipticity drives it from droplet to supersolid to expanding gas.
  • The inter-droplet coherence, measured by g_pp, decreases monotonically with ellipticity and increases with trap frequency, giving clear experimental signatures of where the supersolid phase melts.
  • The superfluid fraction is anisotropic, with the x-component dominant, and the finite y- and z-components signal phase coherence between separate density peaks, a hallmark of supersolidity.
  • The scheme relies only on the permanent dipole moment and microwave shielding, so it should extend to other bialkali polar molecules beyond NaCs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-body effective potential is accurate but three-body recombination is not fully quenched at the predicted densities, the experimental lifetimes may be shorter than the density argument suggests; a direct loss-rate measurement at the supersolid parameters would settle this.
  • A sharper test of supersolidity than g_pp>1% would be a time-of-flight interference measurement of the entire droplet array, which would reveal long-range phase coherence directly.
  • The same anisotropy mechanism might stabilize other modulated phases in two-dimensional traps, such as stripe or checkerboard supersolids, where the sign of C3,2 can be flipped by changing the sign of the ellipticity.
  • The predicted phase boundaries could be mapped experimentally by quenching ellipticity from zero to about 4 degrees and monitoring the growth of side peaks in the structure factor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a scheme for realizing a supersolid phase in a trapped gas of microwave-shielded NaCs polar molecules using a combination of a π-polarized and an elliptically polarized microwave. The authors derive an analytic effective two-body potential (Eq. (1)) whose in-plane anisotropy is controlled by the ellipticity ξ, and validate it against adiabatic and multichannel scattering calculations (SM2, SM3). The many-body Hamiltonian (Eq. (2)) is then studied by path-integral Monte Carlo with the worm algorithm at T = 4 nK for a harmonic trap with ωx/2π = 20 Hz and ωz/2π = 80 Hz, mapping the (ξ, ωy) plane into expanding gas (EG), supersolid (SS), and self-bound droplet (SBD) phases. The central finding is a supersolid phase with density modulation along the x axis and finite peak-to-peak coherence g_pp for ξ around 4° and ωy/2π between about 60 and 120 Hz, at peak densities of order 1.5×10^12 cm^-3. The authors argue that this density is substantially lower than in atomic dipolar supersolids, which they claim leads to a significantly extended molecular gas lifetime.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides an important new platform for supersolidity: a molecular system with a tunable, fully characterized anisotropic interaction and a numerically exact many-body treatment. The strengths are the careful analytic derivation of Veff and its cross-validation against adiabatic and multi-channel scattering results, the use of unbiased PIMC for the stated Hamiltonian, and the explicit finite-temperature phase diagram with a concrete experimental parameter set. The main weakness is that the promise of 'accessibility to current experiments' relies on unquantified inelastic loss rates and on simulation parameters (notably N) that are not stated. Provided these points are addressed, the paper would be a significant contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (2), SM3] The abstract and conclusion assert that the supersolid phase is 'in the parameter regime accessible to current experiments' and that the low density 'leads to a significantly extended lifetime of molecular gases.' These claims are not supported by the calculation as presented. The many-body Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) contains only the kinetic, trap, and pairwise Veff terms; no inelastic two-body or three-body loss terms are included, and SM3 defines the inelastic rate β_inel but reports no value for the dual-microwave parameters used here (Ωσ/2π = 7.9 MHz, δσ/2π = −8 MHz, Ωπ/2π = 6.5 MHz, δπ/2π = −10 MHz, ξ ≈ 4°). Because this C3,0 ≈ 0 configuration is not the single-microwave NaCs setup demonstrated in Ref. [5], the assumption that losses are negligible at the peak density ≈1.5×10^12 cm^-3 and T = 4 nK is unverified. I request a quantitative estimate of β_inel (and, where possible, the three-body loss rate K3) for the proposed parameters, or a careful justification based on the existing shielding literature. If such an estimate is not possible, the 'accessible' and 'extended lifetime' claims should be tempered accordingly.
  2. [Many-body quantum phases] The main text repeatedly refers to 'a trapped gas of N NaCs molecules' but never states the value of N used in the PIMC simulations, nor does it give the PIMC discretization parameters (e.g., imaginary-time step, interaction cutoff, number of beads). The quoted peak density and the phase boundaries in Fig. 2 depend on N; without this information the results are not reproducible and the 'low-density' claim cannot be verified. Please state N explicitly and provide a brief finite-size analysis (e.g., results for two or three N values) to show that the phase regions do not shift qualitatively with N.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Effective inter-molecular interaction] The sentence preceding Eq. (1) states that the effective potential takes this form 'for ∣ξ∣ > 15○'. This conflicts with the rest of the paper, where all results are for ξ between 0° and about 5°, and with the SM validations for ξ = 0°, 3°, 6°. Please correct the domain of validity (likely 'ξ > 0' or 'small ξ').
  2. [Many-body quantum phases] The phase boundaries are defined by the cutoffs S(ksub,0,0) > 1% and g_pp ≤ 1%. Since the system is finite and trapped, these are crossover criteria rather than phase transitions; a brief discussion of how the SS region shifts when these thresholds are varied (e.g., 0.5% or 2%) would place the phase diagram on firmer footing.
  3. [Many-body quantum phases] The definition of ksub as 'the momentum at the sub-dominated peak along the x-direction' could be made more precise: it would be useful to state explicitly that ksub is the largest nonzero peak of S(kx,0,0) for kx ≠ 0.
  4. [General] There are several typographical errors, including 'anistropy' in the Fig. 4 caption and 'ebahnced' in SM3; a careful proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the effective potential is derived and independently cross-validated, and the PIMC phase diagram is an unbiased output for that Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The effective potential Veff(r) of Eq. (1) is obtained from Floquet perturbation theory in the Supplemental Material: the first-order coefficients C3,0 and C3,2 are given explicitly in Eqs. (SM14)-(SM15), and the second-order C6 terms are collected from Eq. (SM16). No many-body phase information is used as input. The potential is then checked against two independent two-body calculations: the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer potential (SM2, Figs. SM2b-c) and full multichannel scattering in Floquet space (SM3). The comparison includes the s-wave scattering length versus ellipticity, with the shape-resonance position agreeing within about 0.4 degrees (Fig. SM2d). This is a cross-validation, not a fit to the target phase diagram. The many-body Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) uses this fixed pairwise potential, and the PIMC worm-algorithm simulation is unbiased for that Hamiltonian; the phase boundaries and coherence diagnostics (S(k)>1% and g_pp<=1%) are criteria applied to computed observables, not fitted parameters. The self-citations, including refs. [8], [21], [32], and [35], refer to the same group's earlier formalism, but the present manuscript actually supplies the derivation instead of merely invoking an unverified prior result. The claim that the parameters are 'accessible to current experiments' and the inferred lifetime extension are not quantitatively supported by inelastic-loss or three-body-loss rate calculations for the proposed parameters, but that is an external-validity and correctness gap, not a circularity of the derivation. No step was found in which a prediction reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the effective potential parameters computed from the microwave setup, not on fitting to the target phase diagram. The main free choices are the assumed pi-field strength and the ad hoc phase-boundary thresholds. The calculations rest on standard Born-Oppenheimer, Floquet, and pairwise-additivity assumptions. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the elliptically polarized microwave is a control parameter, not an entity.

free parameters (3)
  • Omega_pi (pi-polarized microwave Rabi frequency) = 2π × 6.5 MHz
    Chosen by hand so that C3,0 ≈ 0, making the leading dipolar interaction purely anisotropic. This is an assumed experimental parameter not yet demonstrated in NaCs microwave-shielding experiments.
  • S(k_sub) phase-boundary threshold = 1%
    Ad hoc threshold on the subdominant structure factor peak used to define the EG-to-SS transition; the phase diagram extent depends on this choice.
  • g_pp phase-boundary threshold = 1%
    Ad hoc threshold on the peak-to-peak coherence used to define the SS-to-SBD transition; the phase diagram extent depends on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation: the internal molecular state adjusts instantly to the inter-molecular distance, so the interaction can be described by an adiabatic effective potential.
    Used in SM2 to derive Veff by diagonalizing the potential matrix at fixed r; standard in ultracold molecule physics but an approximation.
  • domain assumption Pairwise additivity: the many-body Hamiltonian contains only two-body interactions; three-body forces and losses are neglected.
    Eq. (2); the phase diagram is computed for a Hamiltonian with only Veff, even though three-body recombination is the main loss in experiments.
  • domain assumption The gas is prepared in the highest dressed state |+> with a lifetime long enough that the equilibrium phase is relevant.
    The paper assumes molecules remain in |+>; no decay or heating channels are included in the PIMC.
  • standard math Floquet theory and second-order perturbation theory provide a converged description of the two-body interaction for the ellipticities used (|ξ| > 15 degrees, and ξ around 4 degrees in the many-body simulations).
    SM1-SM2; the Floquet truncation ncut=5 is stated to be converged for scattering, but the many-body potential uses the second-order form.
  • domain assumption The universal van der Waals interaction CvdW/r^6 is negligible compared to the microwave shielding C6/r^6 in the many-body regime.
    SM3 states CvdW is much smaller than C6, so the many-body potential omits it.
  • domain assumption The trap is perfectly harmonic with the stated frequencies; no anharmonicities or optical lattice effects are present.
    Eq. (2) uses U(r) = M(ω_x^2 x^2 + ...)/2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supersolid Phases in Ultracold Gases of Microwave Shielded Polar Molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N55PVGRD

@misc{pith2026250623820,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supersolid Phases in Ultracold Gases of Microwave Shielded Polar Molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N55PVGRD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23820}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel scheme to realize the supersolid phase in ultracold gases of microwave-shielded polar molecules by engineering an additional anisotropy in inter-molecular dipolar interaction via an elliptically polarized microwave. It is shown through quantum Monte-Carlo calculations that the interplay of the anisotropies between the interaction and trapping potential gives rise to rich quantum phases. Particularly, it is found that the supersolid phase emerges in the parameter regime accessible to current experiments. Our study paves the way for exploring the properties of supersolid phases in ultracold gases of polar molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23820 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Column densities (first row) and structure factors (second row) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Column densities (first row) and structure factors (second row) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Molecules in (v,j)=(0,1) and (1,0) feel a strong ro-vibrational van der Waals repulsion, C6=d_e^4/(9α_e), that can cut collisional loss by orders of magnitude.

  2. Effective potentials for polar molecules under non-orthogonal dual microwave fields

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Floquet theory yields an analytic effective potential for polar molecules in non-orthogonal dual microwave fields, showing moderate shielding reduction yet strongly suppressed inelastic losses and extra interaction tu...

  3. Self-Bound Droplets of Ultracold Dipolar Molecules under Tunable Double Microwave Shielding

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ground-state path integral Monte Carlo simulations of NaCs polar molecules with double microwave shielding show self-bound droplets forming above an ellipticity threshold of ~3 degrees, with an estimated superfluid fr...

  4. Symmetry and Self-Bound Droplets in Dipolar Molecular Gases

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A D3 symmetry tiles the two-parameter interaction plane of microwave-dressed molecules, and this classification yields the phase diagram and scaling laws for self-bound molecular droplets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [5]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Kar- man, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of bose- einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature 631, 289 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  3. [2]

    X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Field-linked resonances of polar molecules, Nature 614, 59 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    X.-Y. Chen, S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, A. Schindewolf, F. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules, Nature 626, 283 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang, Microwave shielding of bosonic narb molecules, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031032 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    W.-J. Jin, F. Deng, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Bose-einstein con- densates of microwave-shielded polar molecules (2024), arXiv:2406.06412 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb ´ ın, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 053001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Quantum Phases for Finite-Temperature Gases of Bosonic Polar Molecules Shielded by Dual Microwaves

    W. Zhang, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Quantum phases for finite-temperature gases of bosonic polar molecules shielded by dual microwaves (2025), arXiv:2503.02644 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    E. P. Gross, Unified theory of interacting bosons, Phys. Rev. 106, 161 (1957)

    1957

  2. [10]

    A. F. Andreev and I. M. Lifshitz, Quantum theory of defects in crystals, Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 1107 (1969)

    1969

  3. [11]

    A. J. Leggett, Can a solid be ”superfluid”?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1543 (1970)

    1970

  4. [12]

    G. V. Chester, Speculations on bose-einstein condensa- tion and quantum crystals, Phys. Rev. A 2, 256 (1970)

    1970

  5. [13]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 759 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    D. Y. Kim and M. H. W. Chan, Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous vycor glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 155301 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    J.-R. Li, J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchesky, B. Shteynas, F. C. Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spin–orbit-coupled bose–einstein condensates, Nature 543, 91 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    L´ eonard, A

    J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Don- ner, and T. Esslinger, Monitoring and manip- ulating higgs and goldstone modes in a super- solid quantum gas, Science 358, 1415 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aan2608

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    M. Guo, F. Boettcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, 6 M. Wenzel, H. P. Buechler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature 574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    B¨ ottcher, J.-N

    F. B¨ ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011051 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields (2025), arXiv:2501.05210 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Karman, N

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, and S. Will, Double microwave shielding (2025), arXiv:2501.08095 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025

  15. [23]

    Ciardi, K

    M. Ciardi, K. R. Pedersen, T. Langen, and T. Pohl, Self- bound monolayer crystals of ultracold polar molecules (2025), arXiv:2504.02682 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Prokof’Ev, B

    N. Prokof’Ev, B. Svistunov, and I. Tupitsyn, Exact, complete, and universal continuous-time worldline monte carlo approach to the statistics of discrete quantum sys- tems, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 87, 310 (1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    Boninsegni, N

    M. Boninsegni, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Worm algorithm for continuous-space path integral monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 070601 (2006)

    2006

  18. [26]

    Boninsegni, N

    M. Boninsegni, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Worm algorithm and diagrammatic monte carlo: A new approach to continuous-space path integral monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036701 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    K. Chen, L. Liu, Y. Deng, L. Pollet, and N. Prokof’ev, Universal conductivity in a two-dimensional superfluid- to-insulator quantum critical system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030402 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    K. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Deng, A. B. Kuklov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Deconfined criticality flow in the heisenberg model with ring-exchange interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 185701 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Boninsegni, N

    M. Boninsegni, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Super- glass phase of 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 105301 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Kuklov, L

    A. Kuklov, L. Pollet, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Transverse quantum superfluids, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-042924-103908 (2024)

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Zhang, B

    C. Zhang, B. Capogrosso-Sansone, M. Boninsegni, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Superconducting tran- sition temperature of the bose one-component plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 236001 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    See Supplemental Material for the time-dependent Hamiltonian for two molecules subjected to both an ellip- tically polarized and a linearly polarized microwave field, the effective interaction potential between two molecules in the highest dressed state, the justification of t...

  25. [33]

    Stevenson, S

    I. Stevenson, S. Singh, A. Elkamshishy, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. H. Greene, and S. Will, Three- body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded po- lar molecules (2024), arXiv:2407.04901 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

    2024

  26. [34]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Deng, X.-Y

    F. Deng, X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 183001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    F. Deng, X. Chen, X. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Formation and dissociation of field-linked tetramers (2024), arXiv:2405.13645 [Quantum Physics]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Idziaszek and P

    Z. Idziaszek and P. S. Julienne, Universal rate constants for reactive collisions of ultracold molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 113202 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Lepers, R

    M. Lepers, R. Vexiau, M. Aymar, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, and O. Dulieu, Long-range interactions between polar alkali-metal diatoms in external electric fields, Phys. Rev. A 88, 032709 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped bose-einstein condensates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Floquet-Fourier

    D. M. Ceperley, Path integrals in the theory of condensed helium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995). 1 Supplemental Materials This Supplemental Material is structured as follows. In Section SM 1, we present a model for polar molecules subjected to both an elliptically polarized a...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.