Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Consistent $N_{\rm eff}$ fitting in big bang nucleosynthesis analysis

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BBN constraints on negative N_eff deviate when entropy injection is modeled after neutrino decoupling.

desk verdict The paper flags a genuine modeling inconsistency for negative Delta N_eff in BBN but shows the size of the effect only for one illustrative entropy-injection case. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23354 v2 submitted 2025-07-31 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Sougata Ganguly , Tae Hyun Jung , Seokhoon Yun This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords bigbangnucleosynthesisN_effentropyinjectionneutrinodecouplingdarkradiationneutron-protonconversionprimordialabundances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper identifies an inconsistency in how negative values of Delta N_eff are handled in big bang nucleosynthesis analyses. When negative Delta N_eff comes from entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector after neutrino decoupling, the neutrino temperature is diluted and the rates for neutrino-driven neutron to proton conversions are suppressed. Consequently, the bounds placed on N_eff from primordial element abundances differ substantially from those obtained by simply extending dark radiation models to negative deviations. Readers should care because N_eff is widely used to probe new physics in cosmology, and incorrect assumptions here can distort conclusions about the early universe.

What carries the argument

Entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector after neutrino decoupling, which dilutes the neutrino temperature relative to photons and suppresses neutrino-induced n-p conversion rates.

What would settle it

Precise measurements of primordial helium-4 and deuterium abundances that distinguish between the adjusted neutrino rates and the conventional negative Delta N_eff extrapolation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the assumption that negative Delta N_eff arises from entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector after neutrino decoupling, the resulting BBN constraints on N_eff deviate significantly from those obtained by the conventional extrapolation of dark radiation scenarios into the Delta N_eff < 0 regime. This process dilutes the neutrino density and suppresses the rate of neutrino-driven neutron-proton conversion.

Load-bearing premise

The entropy injection is assumed to occur after neutrino decoupling, affecting only the electromagnetic sector and thereby diluting neutrinos relative to photons while suppressing their interaction rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The allowed range of N_eff must be restricted or neutrino reaction rates adjusted according to the physical scenario for consistent BBN analysis.
  • BBN constraints become scenario-dependent rather than universally applicable for negative Delta N_eff.
  • This affects the interpretation of cosmological observations in the presence of new physics that injects entropy post-decoupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future studies of decaying particles should use this adjusted approach to derive more accurate BBN limits.
  • The method could be extended to other post-decoupling processes affecting neutrino-photon temperature ratios.
  • It connects to the broader problem of consistently parametrizing deviations in effective degrees of freedom across different epochs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that conventional N_eff fitting in BBN is inconsistent for negative Delta N_eff because it simply reduces total radiation density without accounting for changes to neutrino temperature or weak rates. Using the concrete example of entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector from long-lived particle decays after neutrino decoupling, the authors argue that this physically motivated scenario dilutes the neutrino-to-photon temperature ratio and suppresses neutrino-induced n-p conversion rates, leading to BBN constraints on N_eff that deviate significantly from those obtained by extrapolating dark-radiation models into the Delta N_eff < 0 regime.

Significance. If the quantitative demonstration is robust, the result would be significant for BBN analyses of new-physics scenarios that produce negative Delta N_eff, as it shows that unphysical extrapolations can bias constraints on primordial abundances and thereby affect interpretations of cosmological data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that constraints 'deviate significantly' rests on the post-decoupling entropy-injection scenario, yet the manuscript presents this only as an illustrative example without deriving the required rescaling of the weak rates from the Boltzmann equations or from an explicit particle Lagrangian (see abstract and the discussion of the concrete scenario).
  2. To establish that the modified Hubble rate and adjusted weak rates produce quantitatively different abundance predictions, the paper must show the effect on the n-p conversion rates and the resulting shifts in Y_p or D/H; without these explicit calculations or comparison plots, the size of the reported deviation cannot be verified as robust against changes in decay lifetime, branching ratio, or injection epoch.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify in the introduction whether the standard N_eff = 3.046 value is held fixed or allowed to vary when comparing the two fitting procedures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify the scope of our illustrative example and to strengthen the quantitative presentation of the results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that constraints 'deviate significantly' rests on the post-decoupling entropy-injection scenario, yet the manuscript presents this only as an illustrative example without deriving the required rescaling of the weak rates from the Boltzmann equations or from an explicit particle Lagrangian (see abstract and the discussion of the concrete scenario).

    Authors: The entropy-injection scenario serves as a concrete illustrative example to demonstrate the physical inconsistency of extrapolating conventional N_eff fits into the negative Delta N_eff regime. The rescaling of the weak rates follows from the standard entropy dilution that reduces the neutrino-to-photon temperature ratio after decoupling, which directly suppresses the phase-space density entering the n-p conversion rates. This is a general consequence of post-decoupling EM entropy production and does not depend on a specific particle Lagrangian. To address the concern, we will add a concise derivation of the temperature ratio and the resulting Boltzmann-equation adjustment to the weak rates in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [—] To establish that the modified Hubble rate and adjusted weak rates produce quantitatively different abundance predictions, the paper must show the effect on the n-p conversion rates and the resulting shifts in Y_p or D/H; without these explicit calculations or comparison plots, the size of the reported deviation cannot be verified as robust against changes in decay lifetime, branching ratio, or injection epoch.

    Authors: The BBN abundance calculations in the manuscript already incorporate both the modified Hubble rate and the adjusted weak rates for the entropy-injection example, yielding the reported deviation from conventional fits. To make the quantitative impact explicit and allow verification of robustness, we will include new figures in the revised version showing the n-p conversion rates as a function of temperature for the standard and modified cases, together with the resulting shifts in Y_p and D/H for representative values of decay lifetime, branching ratio, and injection epoch. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the N_eff BBN consistency analysis

full rationale

The paper contrasts the conventional extrapolation of N_eff into the negative Delta N_eff regime (which simply reduces total radiation density) against an explicit illustrative scenario of post-neutrino-decoupling entropy injection into the EM sector from long-lived particle decay. This scenario is used to adjust both the Hubble expansion rate and the neutrino-induced n-p conversion rates, with the resulting abundance predictions computed numerically and shown to differ. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the modeling choice is stated as a concrete example rather than derived as a uniqueness theorem, and the central claim remains an independent numerical comparison against standard BBN codes. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard BBN reaction network assumptions and the timing of neutrino decoupling; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Neutrino decoupling occurs before the entropy injection from long-lived particle decay
    This timing is required for the dilution to affect only the relative neutrino temperature and suppress neutrino-driven rates; invoked in the concrete example scenario.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Consistent $N_{\rm eff}$ fitting in big bang nucleosynthesis analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2507.23354

@misc{pith2026250723354,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Consistent $N_\rm eff$ fitting in big bang nucleosynthesis analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2507.23354}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23354}
}
abstract

The effective number of neutrino species, $N_{\rm eff}$, serves as a key fitting parameter extensively employed in cosmological studies. In this work, we point out a fundamental inconsistency in the conventional treatment of $N_{\rm eff}$ in big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), particularly regarding its applicability to new physics scenarios where $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$, the deviation of $N_{\rm eff}$ from the standard BBN prediction, is negative. To ensure consistent interpretation, it is imperative to either restrict the allowed range of $N_{\rm eff}$ or systematically adjust neutrino-induced reaction rates based on physically motivated assumptions. As a concrete example, we consider a simple scenario in which a negative $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ arises from entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector due to the decay of long-lived particles after neutrino decoupling. This process dilutes the neutrino density and suppresses the rate of neutrino-driven neutron-proton conversion. Under this assumption, we demonstrate that the resulting BBN constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ deviate significantly from those obtained by the conventional, but unphysical, extrapolation of dark radiation scenarios into the $\Delta N_{\rm eff} < 0$ regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23354 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows our fitting result in the Ωbh 2 – Neff plane obtained with the simplest assumption on neutrino tem￾perature for the ∆Neff < 0 region; we assume that the negative ∆Neff solely comes from the change in Tν/Tγ (the details of the assumptions are given in the next sec￾tion, and the result shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Primordial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Light nuclei under magnetic field and the lithium problem

    nucl-th 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Magnetic fields linearly change the exponential decay rate of light-nucleus wave functions, which the authors argue could enhance low-energy fusion reactions and, at implausibly high field strengths, affect the Big Ba...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We recommend not to use Neff in BBN analysis

    Neff is not a good fitting parameter in the BBN analysis. We recommend not to use Neff in BBN analysis

    work page

  2. [2]

    One may simply include minimal cor- rections in the neutrino-induced n ↔ p conversion rates for ∆ Neff < 0, but it does not give a mean- ingful result in the end, as shown in Fig

    If it is insisted to use Neff, some model dependence is inevitable. One may simply include minimal cor- rections in the neutrino-induced n ↔ p conversion rates for ∆ Neff < 0, but it does not give a mean- ingful result in the end, as shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 shows our fitting result in the Ω bh2 – Neff plane obtained with the simplest assumption on neutrin...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ∆Neff < 0 For negative ∆Neff, the deviation is realized via a re- duction in the neutrino temperature, as described by Eq. (6). To linear order, this gives δTν T (0) ν ≃ 1 12∆Neff . (18) This in turn modifies the Hubble rate as H ≃ H(0) 1 + 42 43 δTν T (0) ν . (19) Since the neutron-proton conversion rates are sensitive to the electron-neutrino temperatur...

    work page

  4. [4]

    ∆Neff > 0 In the case of positive ∆ Neff, corresponding to ad- ditional dark radiation degree, the neutron-proton con- version rates are unchanged from the SBBN case (i.e., Tν = T (0) ν ). The change in H then leads to a shift in the freeze-out temperature as δTnp T (0) np ≃ 3 × 10−2∆Neff (29) This results in a modified freeze-out abundance δXn,fo X(0) n,...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions

    C. Pitrou, A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, Preci- sion big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions, Phys. Rept. 754, 1 (2018), arXiv:1801.08023 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh, and C. Young, Big- Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck, JCAP 03, 010, [Er- ratum: JCAP 11, E02 (2020)], arXiv:1912.01132 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Mangano, G

    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and M. Peloso, A Pre- cision calculation of the effective number of cosmologi- cal neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 534, 8 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0111408

    work page arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Relic neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations

    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling includ- ing flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 729, 221 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506164

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    P. F. de Salas and S. Pastor, Relic neutrino decou- pling with flavour oscillations revisited, JCAP 07, 051, arXiv:1606.06986 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Escudero Abenza, Precision early universe thermo- dynamics made simple: Neff and neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond, JCAP 05, 048, arXiv:2001.04466 [hep-ph]

    M. Escudero Abenza, Precision early universe thermo- dynamics made simple: Neff and neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond, JCAP 05, 048, arXiv:2001.04466 [hep-ph]

    2001

  3. [11]

    Akita and M

    K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calcula- tion of relic neutrino decoupling, JCAP 08, 012, arXiv:2005.07047 [hep-ph]

    2005

  4. [12]

    Cielo, M

    M. Cielo, M. Escudero, G. Mangano, and O. Pisanti, Neff in the Standard Model at NLO is 3.043, Phys. Rev. D 108, L121301 (2023), arXiv:2306.05460 [hep-ph]

    2023

  5. [13]

    Boehm, M

    C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, A Lower Bound on the Mass of Cold Thermal Dark Matter from Planck, JCAP 08, 041, arXiv:1303.6270 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Vogel and J

    H. Vogel and J. Redondo, Dark Radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon, JCAP 02, 029, arXiv:1311.2600 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. A. Buen-Abad, G. Marques-Tavares, and M. Schmaltz, Non-Abelian dark matter and dark radia- tion, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023531 (2015), arXiv:1505.03542 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chacko, Y

    Z. Chacko, Y. Cui, S. Hong, and T. Okui, Hidden dark matter sector, dark radiation, and the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 92, 055033 (2015), arXiv:1505.04192 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, and Y. Zhang, Intimate Relationship between Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter and ∆Neff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 041101 (2021), arXiv:2011.02487 [hep- ph]

    2021

  10. [18]

    Giovanetti, M

    C. Giovanetti, M. Lisanti, H. Liu, and J. T. Ruderman, Joint Cosmic Microwave Background and Big Bang Nu- cleosynthesis Constraints on Light Dark Sectors with Dark Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021302 (2022), arXiv:2109.03246 [hep-ph]

    2022

  11. [19]

    Adshead, P

    P. Adshead, P. Ralegankar, and J. Shelton, Dark radia- tion constraints on portal interactions with hidden sec- tors, JCAP 09, 056, arXiv:2206.13530 [hep-ph]

  12. [20]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Calabrese et al

    E. Calabrese et al. (ACT), The Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Mod- els, (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama, and S. Shirai, Cos- mological constraint on dark photon from N ef f, JHEP 04, 009, arXiv:1912.12152 [hep-ph]

    1912

  16. [24]

    J.-T. Li, G. M. Fuller, and E. Grohs, Probing dark pho- tons in the early universe with big bang nucleosynthesis, JCAP 12, 049, arXiv:2009.14325 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009

  17. [25]

    T.-H. Yeh, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, Limits on non-relativistic matter during Big-bang nucleosynthesis, JCAP 07, 016, arXiv:2401.08795 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [26]

    M. H. Reno and D. Seckel, Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Effects of Injecting Hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3441 (1988)

    1988

  19. [27]

    Kohri and J

    K. Kohri and J. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes and primordial nucleosynthesis. 1. Effects of hadron injection from low mass holes, Phys. Rev. D 61, 023501 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908160

    2000 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kohri, Primordial nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of a massive particle with a relatively short lifetime, Phys

    K. Kohri, Primordial nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of a massive particle with a relatively short lifetime, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043515 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0103411

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Pospelov and J

    M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Metastable GeV-scale par- ticles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem, Phys. Rev. D 82, 103514 (2010), arXiv:1006.4172 [hep- ph]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Escudero, D

    M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and M. Pierre, Cos- mology with A Very Light Lµ − Lτ Gauge Boson, JHEP 03, 071, arXiv:1901.02010 [hep-ph]

    1901 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Sabti, J

    N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, Refined Bounds on MeV-scale Thermal Dark Sectors from BBN and the CMB, JCAP 01, 004, arXiv:1910.01649 [hep-ph]

    1910

  24. [32]

    Esseili and G

    H. Esseili and G. D. Kribs, Cosmological implications of gauged U(1)B−L on ∆N ef f in the CMB and BBN, JCAP 05, 110, arXiv:2308.07955 [hep-ph]

  25. [33]

    Chang, S

    S. Chang, S. Ganguly, T. H. Jung, T.-S. Park, and C. S. Shin, Constraining MeV to 10 GeV Majorons by big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015019 (2024), arXiv:2401.00687 [hep-ph]

    2024

  26. [34]

    F. F. Deppisch, T. E. Gonzalo, C. Majumdar, and Z. Zhang, Relaxing limits from Big Bang Nucleosynthe- sis on Heavy Neutral Leptons with axion-like particles, JCAP 02, 054, arXiv:2410.06970 [hep-ph]

  27. [35]

    Kanzaki, M

    T. Kanzaki, M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, Cos- mological Constraints on Neutrino Injection, Phys. Rev. D 76, 105017 (2007), arXiv:0705.1200 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    H. Hong, U. Min, M. Son, and T. You, A cosmic window on the dark axion portal, JHEP 03, 155, arXiv:2310.19544 [hep-ph]

  29. [37]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe , Vol. 69 (1990)

    1990

  30. [38]

    Weinberg, Cosmology (2008)

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    V. F. Mukhanov, Nucleosynthesis without a com- puter, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 43, 669 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0303073

    2004

  32. [40]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Pisanti, A

    O. Pisanti, A. Cirillo, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and P. D. Serpico, PArthENoPE: Public Al- gorithm Evaluating the Nucleosynthesis of Primordial Elements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 956 (2008), 8 arXiv:0705.0290 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Consiglio, P

    R. Consiglio, P. F. de Salas, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, PArthENoPE reloaded, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 233, 237 (2018), arXiv:1712.04378 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Gariazzo, P

    S. Gariazzo, P. F. de Salas, O. Pisanti, and R. Consiglio, PArthENoPE revolutions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108205 (2022), arXiv:2103.05027 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022

  36. [44]

    P. D. Serpico, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and O. Pisanti, Nuclear reaction network for primordial nucleosynthesis: A Detailed analysis of rates, uncertainties and light nuclei yields, JCAP 12, 010, arXiv:astro-ph/0408076

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Matsumoto et al

    A. Matsumoto et al. , EMPRESS. VIII. A New Deter- mination of Primordial He Abundance with Extremely Metal-poor Galaxies: A Suggestion of the Lepton Asym- metry and Implications for the Hubble Tension, As- trophys. J. 941, 167 (2022), arXiv:2203.09617 [astro- ph.CO]

    2022

  38. [46]

    Burns, T

    A.-K. Burns, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Valli, Indications for a Nonzero Lepton Asymmetry from Extremely Metal- Poor Galaxies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 131001 (2023), arXiv:2206.00693 [hep-ph]

    2023

  39. [47]

    Escudero, A

    M. Escudero, A. Ibarra, and V. Maura, Primordial lep- ton asymmetries in the precision cosmology era: Current status and future sensitivities from BBN and the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035024 (2023), arXiv:2208.03201 [hep- ph]

    2023

  40. [48]

    Kawasaki and K

    M. Kawasaki and K. Murai, Lepton asymmetric universe, JCAP 08 (08), 041, arXiv:2203.09713 [hep-ph]

  41. [49]

    Borah and A

    D. Borah and A. Dasgupta, Large neutrino asymmetry from TeV scale leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035015 (2023), arXiv:2206.14722 [hep-ph]

    2023

  42. [50]

    ChoeJo, K

    Y. ChoeJo, K. Enomoto, Y. Kim, and H.-S. Lee, Second leptogenesis: Unraveling the baryon-lepton asymmetry discrepancy, JHEP 03, 003, arXiv:2311.16672 [hep-ph]

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.