Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal and topological phases from the ferrovalley states of the sliding bilayer altermagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-18 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin-dependent interlayer hopping in ferrovalley states of sliding bilayer altermagnets produces intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals.

desk verdict Sliding bilayer altermagnets like V2OSSe can produce an intrinsic AFM half-metal through spin-dependent interlayer hopping in the ferrovalley state, though the DFT robustness needs checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.20687 v2 submitted 2025-09-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Shihao Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismferrovalleystatesantiferromagnetichalf-metalslidingbilayertopologicalphasesinterlayerhoppingV2OSSespintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper investigates sliding bilayer altermagnets formed from monolayers with small bandgaps. It finds that sliding engineering induces ferrovalley states where spin-dependent interlayer hopping creates a direct gap in one valley for one spin channel and band inversion in the other valley for the opposite spin. This configuration results in an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The approach also leads to topological phases including Chern insulators and gapless surface states that switch with sliding direction. Such systems could provide a platform for antiferromagnetic spintronics without net magnetization.

What carries the argument

Spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state of the sliding bilayer altermagnet

What would settle it

If measurements or calculations on the V2OSSe sliding bilayer show no band inversion in either valley or metallic states in both spin channels, the intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the V2OSSe system, first-principles calculations indicate that the spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state ensures a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the other valley (opposite spin channel), which is manifested as an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian confirm the universal spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Further calculations imply the existence of Chern insulator and gapless surface states in the sliding altermagnet bilayer.

Load-bearing premise

The density functional theory calculations with standard approximations accurately capture the interlayer hopping and resulting band inversion without errors that close the gaps or remove the half-metallic property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adjusting the sliding direction can achieve the transition between different half-metals with conducting electrons of different spins.
  • Gapless surface states of opposite spins switch with the change in sliding direction.
  • The sliding altermagnet bilayer can host Chern insulator states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism relies on the small bandgap of the altermagnet monolayer, suggesting it applies to other similar systems.
  • These half-metals could be useful for spin-polarized transport without external magnetic fields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that sliding bilayer altermagnets constructed from monolayers with small bandgaps host intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals and topological phases via ferrovalley states. Interlayer hopping reduces bandgaps while sliding engineering induces ferrovalley behavior. For the V2OSSe example, first-principles calculations show that spin-dependent interlayer hopping produces a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the opposite valley (other spin channel), yielding an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. An effective Hamiltonian confirms the universal character of the spin-dependent hopping. Additional results indicate Chern insulator phases, gapless surface states, and the ability to switch between half-metals of opposite spin polarization by changing the sliding direction.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, the work identifies a new intrinsic route to antiferromagnetic half-metals and switchable topological features in altermagnetic bilayers without external fields or doping. This combination of altermagnetism, ferrovalley physics, and sliding engineering could be relevant for spintronics. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian provide generality beyond the specific V2OSSe example, which is a strength of the computational discovery approach.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallicity in V2OSSe (abstract and results on first-principles calculations) rests on the predicted direct gap in one valley and band inversion in the other arising from spin-dependent interlayer hopping. The manuscript provides no convergence tests for k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or sensitivity to the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction. Because interlayer hopping amplitudes in van der Waals magnets are known to vary by tens of meV under standard approximations, these omissions leave the quantitative gap sizes and the half-metallic window vulnerable to methodological artifacts.
  2. In the section presenting the effective Hamiltonian and microscopic model, a direct quantitative comparison between the model-derived gaps and the DFT band structures (including the magnitude of the inverted gap) is not shown. Without this, it is difficult to assess how faithfully the model captures the first-principles results that underpin the half-metal claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is information-dense; splitting the description of the V2OSSe results into separate sentences would improve readability.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the functional, vdW correction, and k-mesh used for each band-structure plot to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment of our work and for the constructive major comments. We have carefully addressed each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional methodological details and comparisons. These changes will strengthen the presentation of our first-principles results and the effective model without altering the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallicity in V2OSSe (abstract and results on first-principles calculations) rests on the predicted direct gap in one valley and band inversion in the other arising from spin-dependent interlayer hopping. The manuscript provides no convergence tests for k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or sensitivity to the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction. Because interlayer hopping amplitudes in van der Waals magnets are known to vary by tens of meV under standard approximations, these omissions leave the quantitative gap sizes and the half-metallic window vulnerable to methodological artifacts.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The original manuscript indeed omitted explicit convergence tests and sensitivity analyses. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (or Supplementary Note) presenting systematic checks: k-point meshes from 9×9×1 to 24×24×1, plane-wave cutoffs from 450 eV to 700 eV, exchange-correlation functionals (PBE, PBEsol, and HSE06 where computationally feasible), and van der Waals corrections (DFT-D3, optB88-vdW, rVV10). While quantitative gap values shift by up to ~25 meV across these settings, the qualitative features—spin-selective gap opening in one valley and band inversion in the opposite valley—remain intact, preserving the antiferromagnetic half-metallic character. We will explicitly state the range of variation and its effect on the half-metallic window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the section presenting the effective Hamiltonian and microscopic model, a direct quantitative comparison between the model-derived gaps and the DFT band structures (including the magnitude of the inverted gap) is not shown. Without this, it is difficult to assess how faithfully the model captures the first-principles results that underpin the half-metal claim.

    Authors: We agree that a side-by-side quantitative comparison would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new panel (or Supplementary Figure) that directly overlays or tabulates the valley gaps and band dispersions obtained from the effective Hamiltonian against the corresponding DFT results for V2OSSe. The comparison will report the numerical values of the direct gap and the inverted gap, together with the fitted model parameters. Any residual discrepancies will be discussed in the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results from ab initio DFT and derived model are independent of target property

full rationale

The paper's central claim for intrinsic AFM half-metallicity in sliding V2OSSe bilayers arises from first-principles calculations showing spin-dependent interlayer hopping that produces a direct gap in one valley/spin channel and band inversion in the other. This is not obtained by fitting any parameter to the half-metallic outcome itself, nor by defining the result in terms of itself. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian are constructed after the DFT observations to illustrate universality, but the primary evidence remains the numerical band-structure results under standard approximations. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear in the derivation chain. The work is a standard computational materials discovery and remains self-contained against external DFT benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT assumptions plus the specific choice of V2OSSe as representative; no new particles or forces are postulated, and the effective Hamiltonian is derived from the computed bands rather than fitted to the half-metallic outcome.

free parameters (1)
  • sliding vector
    The relative lateral shift between layers is chosen to induce the ferrovalley state; its precise value is material-specific and not derived from first principles.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Kohn-Sham DFT with chosen exchange-correlation functional accurately describes interlayer hopping and band inversion in these van der Waals bilayers.
    Invoked implicitly when reporting first-principles results for V2OSSe.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal and topological phases from the ferrovalley states of the sliding bilayer altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2509.20687

@misc{pith2026250920687,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal and topological phases from the ferrovalley states of the sliding bilayer altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2509.20687}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.20687}
}
abstract

Altermagnetism is characterized by non-relativistic spin splitting and zero total magnetic moments. In this work, intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallic and topological phases were discovered within the ferrovalley states of sliding bilayer altermagnets. We construct the bilayer system by utilizing altermagnet monolayers with a small bandgap. The inter-layer hopping phenomenon leads to a reduction in bandgaps, and sliding engineering induces ferrovalley states. Taking the V$_2$OSSe system for example, first-principles calculations indicate that the spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state ensures a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the other valley (opposite spin channel), which is manifested as an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian employed in this research confirm the universal spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Further calculations imply the existence of Chern insulator and gapless surface states in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Adjusting the sliding direction can achieve the transition between different half-metals with conducting electrons of different spins, accompanied by the switching of gapless surface states of opposite spins. This research lays a foundation for the potential applications of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals and topological phases in spintronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.20687 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The first-principles energy bands of (a) AA-stacking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Four possible phases (a-d) in the ferrovalley states in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) The energy bands with SOC effect in the x-sliding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Third-order optical response in d-wave altermagnets: Analytical and numerical results from microscopic model

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Third-order photoconductivities in d-wave altermagnets are determined solely by quantum metric and connection, with closed-form solutions when delta-bond hopping vanishes and perturbative solutions otherwise, verified...

  2. Quantum-metric-driven light-induced ferrovalley state in d-wave altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Predicted light-induced ferrovalley state in d-wave altermagnets whose orbital-selective gap reduction is proportional to the quantum metric, with no Berry-curvature contribution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics (2012)

    X. Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Van Leuken and R

    H. Van Leuken and R. De Groot, Physical review letters 74, 1171 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Nie and X

    Y.-m. Nie and X. Hu, Physical review letters100, 117203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Hu and X

    S.-J. Hu and X. Hu, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C114, 11614 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Akai and M

    H. Akai and M. Ogura, Physical review letters97, 026401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    H. Luo, L. Ma, Z. Zhu, G. Wu, H. Liu, J. Qu, and Y. Li, Physica B: Condensed Matter403, 1797 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02123 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Fang, L. Chen, and Q. Si, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02295 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10364 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10371 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12366 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    J. Ren, X. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, J. Li, C. Li, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10369 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04418 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Qu, Z.-F

    S. Qu, Z.-F. Gao, H. Sun, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11065 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16603 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    S.-D. Guo, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13950 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Physical Review Letters130, 046401 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Okugawa, K

    T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 075502 (2018)

    2018

  12. [21]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Phys. Rev. B 101, 220403 (2020)

    2020

  13. [22]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020)

    2020

  14. [23]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    2007

  15. [24]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Nature Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  16. [25]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  17. [26]

    D.-F. Shao, J. Ding, G. Gurung, S.-H. Zhang, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Physical Review Applied15, 024057 (2021)

    2021

  18. [27]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12115 (2024)

    2024

  19. [28]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Science advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  20. [29]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Leˇ zai´ c, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Journal of applied physics127 (2020)

    2020

  21. [30]

    R. G. Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn´ ık, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth,et al., Physical Re- view Letters130, 036702 (2023)

    2023

  22. [31]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Leˇ zai´ c, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Journal of Applied Physics127 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Physical Review B108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  24. [33]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, journal of the physical society of japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  25. [34]

    H. Bai, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, P. Chen, C. Wan, L. Han, W. Zhu, S. Liang, Y. Su, X. Han,et al., Physical review letters130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, L. Han, C. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. H. Back, F. Pan, Y. Wang, and C. Song, Advanced Functional Materials , 2313332 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y.-y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, B. He,et al., Advanced Science , 2400967 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin,et al., Nature Electronics5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  29. [38]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Physical Review B 103, 125114 (2021)

    2021

  30. [39]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Physical review letters129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  31. [40]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan,et al., Physical Review Letters128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  32. [41]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind,et al., Science Advances10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  33. [42]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Physical Review B99, 184432 (2019)

    2019

  34. [43]

    Z. Lin, D. Chen, W. Lu, X. Liang, S. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Osiecki, M. Leandersson, B. Thiagarajan, J. Liu,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04995 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, Y. Wang, M. R. Koehler,et al., Physical review letters118, 077201 (2017)

    2017

  36. [45]

    Tschirner, P

    T. Tschirner, P. Keßler, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, T. Kotte, D. Kriegner, B. B¨ uchner, J. Dufouleur, M. Kamp, V. Jovic, L. Smejkal,et al., APL Materials 11(2023)

    2023

  37. [46]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova,et al., Physical Review Let- ters131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Physical Review B102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Physical Review X14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  40. [49]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14645 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- 6 Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  42. [52]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  43. [53]

    Urata, W

    T. Urata, W. Hattori, and H. Ikuta, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19233 (2024)

    2024

  44. [54]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  45. [55]

    S. Liao, X. Li, X. Chen, Z. Yu, J. Yao, R. Xu, J. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Wang,et al., Chinese Physics Letters 42, 067503 (2025)

    2025

  46. [56]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Nature communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  47. [57]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Physical Review B102, 075112 (2020)

    2020

  48. [58]

    Guo, X.-S

    S.-D. Guo, X.-S. Guo, K. Cheng, K. Wang, and Y. S. Ang, Applied Physics Letters123(2023)

    2023

  49. [59]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05992 (2024)

    2024

  50. [60]

    Milivojevi´ c, M

    M. Milivojevi´ c, M. Orozovi´ c, S. Picozzi, M. Gmitra, and S. Stavri´ c, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15424 (2024)

    2024

  51. [61]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Nature communications12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  52. [62]

    Guo, Y.-L

    S.-D. Guo, Y.-L. Tao, G. Wang, and Y. S. Ang, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2024)

    2024

  53. [63]

    He and S

    X. He and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B112, 075138 (2025)

    2025

  54. [64]

    Zhang and S

    X. Zhang and S. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.00430 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  56. [66]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical re- view letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  57. [67]

    R. Xu, Y. Gao, and J. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15484 (2025)

    2025

  58. [68]

    Li, Y.-K

    Y.-Q. Li, Y.-K. Zhang, X.-L. Lu, Y.-P. Shao, Z.-Q. Bao, J.-D. Zheng, W.-Y. Tong, and C.-G. Duan, Nano Letters 25, 6032 (2025)

    2025

  59. [69]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  60. [70]

    Z. Fu, M. Hu, A. Li, H. Duan, J. Liu, and F. Ouyang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22474 (2025)

    2025

  61. [71]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed May 18, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.