Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Dispersive detection of single microwave photons with quantum dots

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single photon in a microwave cavity can be detected without being absorbed: it momentarily raises a quantum-dot energy level, and the resulting electron tunneling provides a real-time charge signal.

desk verdict A plausible, well-posed proposal for a QD-based dispersive photon detector, with a real validity-boundary problem that the authors themselves acknowledge: the qualitative idea holds up, the quantitative efficiency claims do not. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.19128 v1 pith:SREBVMAV submitted 2025-11-24 cond-mat.mes-hall

Stephanie Matern , Alberto Biella , Pasquale Scarlino , Iacopo Carusotto , Gianluca Rastelli This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords dispersivedetectionsinglemicrowavephotondoublequantumdotcircuitQEDcascademodelchargereflectometrymeasurementbackactionnon-absorptive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a way to detect a single propagating microwave photon without absorbing it. The photon enters a cavity whose dispersive coupling strength λ temporarily raises the energy of a double-quantum-dot bonding level; if the level starts below the lead's Fermi energy, the electron then tunnels out, and that change in charge occupation is caught by a fast charge sensor. The authors build a quantum-cascade master equation that follows the photon wavepacket through the cavity in real time and defines the detector efficiency as the maximum deviation of the sensor response from its dark-count background. They further show that the act of measurement reacts back on the photon: once the electron tunnels, the cavity is detuned from the incoming photon, so the photon's chance of entering the cavity is reduced. The scheme would give non-absorptive, time-resolved single-microwave-photon detection with existing hybrid quantum-dot–cavity devices, provided the electron temperature stays well below the dispersive shift.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the dispersive term λ n_c n_QD, which makes the quantum-dot level depend on photon number; the QD–lead dissipator L_QD (Eq. 3), which gives tunneling rates controlled by Fermi functions at ε and ε+|λ|; and the quantum-cascade Liouvillian L_cas (Eq. 5), a source mode unidirectionally feeding the detection cavity to follow the photon wavepacket in time. Their combination in a Lindblad master equation yields cavity occupation, dot occupation, and detector response. The signal arises when the photon-dependent level shift moves the bonding level across the lead's Fermi energy; the backaction arises from the loss of photonic coherence ρ_{10,01} when the dot charge changes,

What would settle it

In a device with |λ|/(2π) ≈ 130 MHz, γ_c/(2π) < 1 MHz, Γ_QD/(2π) ≈ 40 MHz and T ≈ 5 mK, launch a single-photon pulse with Δω = |λ| and time-resolve the dot charge with an rf-SET. If the transient depletion fails to appear with the predicted rise time ~1/Γ_QD and decay ~1/γ_c, or if the backaction suppression of the cavity occupation deviates strongly from the master-equation prediction because non-Markovian effects dominate, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim: a microwave photon temporarily in a cavity can be detected by watching the occupation of a single electron level dispersively coupled to the photons. With H = ω_c n_c + ε n_QD − λ n_c n_QD (λ<0) and the level initially below the lead's chemical potential, the photon shifts the level up by |λ|; the electron then tunnels out, emptying the dot. That transient depletion is the detection signal. Because the photon is never absorbed, the detection is non-destructive. Solving the time-resolved dynamics with a quantum cascade model, the authors define efficiency as η = max_t Δn_det(t), the sensor's maximum excess over dark counts. They find conditions γ_c < Γ_QD and T < |λ

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative predictions rest on the Markovian sequential-tunneling assumption Γ_QD ≪ |ε−μ| = |λ|/2, but the efficient-detection regime the paper highlights has Γ_QD comparable to or larger than |λ|/2, making those numbers only qualitatively reliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At low temperature (T ≪ |λ|) and with a fast charge sensor, the detection efficiency η is measurable, and thermal dark counts are exponentially small.
  • The photon is not absorbed: after the transient interaction, the cavity returns to resonance and the photon continues along the transmission line.
  • Backaction links signal strength to disturbance: a larger Γ_QD makes the signal stronger but suppresses the probability that the photon enters the cavity.
  • The resonance condition Δω = |λ| gives frequency selectivity, so the detector also acts as a microwave filter.
  • Closed-form expressions for the cavity occupation (including |λ|=0 and |λ|→∞ limits) give concrete predictions for transmission experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Conditional measurements could test the backaction: a charge-sensor click should anticorrelate with the photon's transmission through the cavity.
  • The regime of highest predicted efficiency (Γ_QD ≈ |λ|) is where the Markovian approximation is weakest; a non-Markovian or cotunneling-corrected treatment could shift the numbers without removing the qualitative transient-depletion signal.
  • Repetitive operation after a fast dot reset would turn the scheme into a continuous photon counter with dead time set by 1/γ_c.
  • The efficiency's steep temperature dependence suggests the same device could serve as a sensitive low-temperature thermometer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a scheme for detecting single itinerant microwave photons using a cavity dispersively coupled to a double quantum dot (DQD) tunnel-coupled to a lead. A photon transiently occupying the cavity shifts the DQD bonding level, inducing electron tunneling and a detectable change in charge occupation; a charge sensor reads out this occupation. The authors derive a cascade master equation combining a dispersive QD-photon Hamiltonian, a Bloch-Redfield-Wangness QD-lead dissipator, and a Gardiner-Carmichael input/output model. They compute time-resolved photon and QD occupations, identify a measurement-induced backaction, and define a detection efficiency η (Eq. 17) from a phenomenological charge-detector model. They report high efficiencies at low temperature and discuss experimental feasibility.

Significance. If the quantitative results are correct, this is a valuable proposal for a non-absorptive solid-state single-microwave-photon detector, complementing absorptive detectors and qubit-based QND approaches. Strengths include the first-principles derivations: the dispersive Hamiltonian from a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation, the QD-lead dissipator from Bloch-Redfield-Wangness, and the cascade master equation from Gardiner-Carmichael, with an analytic solution in a special case (Eq. D9). The qualitative mechanism—photon-induced level shift followed by charge sensing—is plausible, and the paper is clearly written. However, the quantitative efficiency and backaction predictions are not certified because the simulations use a parameter regime where the derived sequential-tunneling dissipator is not valid.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II.A, Fig. 4] The dissipator Eq. (3) is derived under condition (iii), Γ_QD ≪ |ϵ−µ| = |λ|/2. The efficiency simulations in Fig. 4 use Γ_QD = 4γ_c and |λ| = 10γ_c, so Γ_QD/(|λ|/2) = 0.8; the condition is violated by a factor of about 8. Large parts of Fig. 3 also explore Γ_QD ∼ |λ|. The paper's caveat in Sec. III.C.2 is limited to the region T < |λ| < γ_c < Γ_QD, but the validity condition is violated well outside that region. Since η (Eq. 17) and the backaction magnitude are computed in this regime, the quantitative results are not supported by the stated derivation. The authors should either restrict simulations to the sequential-tunneling regime Γ_QD ≪ |λ|/2 and show that useful efficiencies persist, or extend the dissipator to include cotunneling and non-Markovian corrections.
  2. [Sec. V vs. Fig. 4] The experimental parameters quoted in Sec. V (γ_c/(2π) < 1 MHz, Γ_QD in the tens of MHz, |λ|/(2π) ≈ 130 MHz) imply |λ|/γ_c ≳ 100, whereas Fig. 4 uses |λ| = 10γ_c. The backaction and n_max depend strongly on |λ|/γ_c (Sec. III.C.1), with n_max suppressed as |λ|/γ_c grows. Thus the efficiency values shown in Fig. 4 cannot be directly extrapolated to the proposed experimental regime. A calculation at |λ|/γ_c ≳ 100 that also satisfies Γ_QD ≪ |λ|/2 is required to support the claim that high-efficiency detection is achievable in the stated architecture.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, after Eq. (B26)] The statement 'we do not apply the secular approximation as we consider the limit |λ|→0' is confusing: the final dissipator depends on |λ|, and the oscillating factors are removed by transforming to the Schrödinger picture, not by taking |λ|→0. Please rephrase.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (12)] The sentence that L_det 'has no effect on the dynamics of the system of the QD and of the cavity mode' should be qualified: the dissipator leaves the QD populations and the cavity mode untouched, but it does damp QD coherences. A clarifying sentence would avoid confusion.
  3. [General] There are several typos, e.g., 'bolometers scheme have bee also applied' (Introduction), 'desribed' (Appendix A), and some missing commas. These do not affect the results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: model ingredients are derived from underlying microscopic models; admitted Markovian validity caveat is a correctness limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The dispersive Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) is obtained in Appendix A via a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the Rabi model, with external references [98-100] used only for the known dispersive formula; the QD-lead dissipator (Eq. 3) is derived from the Bloch-Redfield-Wangness equation in Appendix B; the cascade dissipator (Eq. 5) is rederived in Appendix C from a chiral-line model; and the detection efficiency (Eq. 17) is defined as the excess detector occupation relative to the same model with lambda = 0, so it measures a genuinely photon-induced signal rather than a fitted input. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity, and no prediction is identical by construction to an input. Some cited works involve the present authors (e.g., Ref. [116]), but they are used only to supply experimental parameter values, which are external data; this is not load-bearing. The paper itself flags a quantitative limitation in Sec. III.C.2, where the a priori optimal regime T < |lambda| < gamma_c < Gamma_QD 'can unfortunately provide only a qualitative picture' because Gamma_QD is not small compared to |epsilon - mu| = |lambda|/2; this is a validity/accuracy caveat (see also Sec. II.A, condition iii), not a circularity, and does not affect the score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on four modeling pillars: the Schrieffer-Wolff reduction to a dispersive single-level Hamiltonian, a sequential-tunneling Born-Markov dissipator for the QD-lead coupling, a chiral quantum cascade description of the photon pulse, and a phenomenological two-level charge detector. No parameters are fitted to data; all numeric inputs are either model variables or taken from cited experiments.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The DQD-cavity system is described by the Rabi Hamiltonian and can be reduced, via Schrieffer-Wolff, to the dispersive single-level Hamiltonian H_S = ω_c n_c + ϵ n_QD − λ n_c n_QD, with higher-order terms neglected.
    Appendix A; requires g ≪ (Ω, ω_c) and g^2/|Ω±ω_c| ≪ (Ω,ω_c). The reduction to a single level also assumes the antibonding state stays empty (ϵ′>μ, ϵ′+λ>μ).
  • domain assumption The QD-lead tunneling can be treated in the sequential-tunneling, Born-Markov limit; cotunneling, non-Markovian corrections and the Lamb shift are negligible, and Γ(E)=Γ_QD is energy-independent.
    Sec II A and Appendix B; conditions (i)-(iii). This is the load-bearing approximation that the efficiency calculation inherits.
  • domain assumption The incoming photon is generated by a source cavity decaying into a chiral (unidirectional) transmission line at zero temperature; the quantum cascade master equation Eq. (5) describes the photon transfer.
    Sec II B and Appendix C, following Gardiner/Carmichael. Requires ideal chirality and Markovian bath.
  • domain assumption The charge detector is a two-level system excited only when the QD is empty, with no backaction on the QD/cavity; the efficiency is taken as η = max_t Δn_det(t).
    Sec IV, Eqs. (12)-(17). A phenomenological model; real rf charge sensors have finite bandwidth and backaction.
  • domain assumption Initial conditions: QD occupied, cavity empty, source mode with one photon; resonance condition ω_in = ω_c+|λ|; chemical potential μ=0 and ϵ=−|λ|/2.
    Sec III. These are operating conditions of the proposed detector, not derived from a protocol.
  • standard math Born-Markov / Bloch-Redfield-Wangness master equation and Fermi-function statistics for the lead.
    Standard open quantum systems framework used in Appendix B.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dispersive detection of single microwave photons with quantum dots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SREBVMAV

@misc{pith2026251119128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dispersive detection of single microwave photons with quantum dots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SREBVMAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.19128}
}
read the original abstract

Within a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture, we theoretically investigate the detection of a single propagating microwave photon traveling through a resonant microwave cavity dispersively interacting with a double quantum dot tunnel-coupled to a lead. Under suitable conditions, a single photon in the cavity can induce a measurable change in the electronic occupation of the charge states. We develop a quantum cascade approach that enables a time-resolved description of a single-photon wave packet impinging on the cavity. We make use of a simple model of charge detector to assess the efficiency of our photo-detection configuration as functions of key parameters such as coupling strength, tunneling rate, temperature, and photon resonance linewidth. We finally highlight a measurement-induced backaction effect on the cavity mode associated with the dispersive, non-absorptive detection process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19128 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The system consists of an incoming microwave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Example of time evolution of the QD occupation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (b), ∆pmax mirrors the behavior of nmax. The strong correspondence shows that by monitoring the QD depletion we have access to the occupation of the detec￾tion mode. Notice that, for |λ| ≪ T, thermal fluctua￾tions of the QD smear out ∆pmax (see the discussion in sec. III C 4). 2. Dependence on the tunneling rate ΓQD The central panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Full time evolution of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy levels of the DQD without photon (black) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Photon avalanche triggered by a single photon in a bistable nonlinear optical cavity

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single incident photon triggers a giant photon-number jump in a bistable nonlinear optical cavity through quantum dynamics, suggesting an all-optical single-photon avalanche detector.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    3(a) illustrates the matching condition needed to maximize the occupation of the de- tection photon mode for an initially occupied QD at T≪ |λ|

    Dependence on the detuning∆ω The left panel in Fig. 3(a) illustrates the matching condition needed to maximize the occupation of the de- tection photon mode for an initially occupied QD at T≪ |λ|. As expected, for a given|λ|this resonance occurs at ∆ω=|λ|. As a function of|λ|, the general trend is, as mentioned before, that the heightn max of the resonanc...

  2. [2]

    3(a) showsn max for varying ΓQD and|λ|, assuming the resonant condition ∆ω=|λ|

    Dependence on the tunneling rateΓ QD The central panel of Fig. 3(a) showsn max for varying ΓQD and|λ|, assuming the resonant condition ∆ω=|λ|. Here, we observe a first regime in whichn max re- mains almost unperturbed by the dispersive measure- ment,n max ≈n (0) max. This occurs for|λ| ≪γc, whenn max is almost unaffected by Γ QD. In this case, the dispers...

  3. [3]

    3(a) and (b) show the depen- dence ofn max and ∆pmax onγ in

    Dependence on the bandwidthγ in The right panels of Fig. 3(a) and (b) show the depen- dence ofn max and ∆pmax onγ in. Regarding the cavity,n max reaches its maximum aroundγ in =γ c, as discussed earlier. Decreasing or in- creasingγ in leads to smaller values ofn max. For larger values of the dispersive interaction|λ|>0, the photon occupation as a function...

  4. [4]

    3(c) and (d)

    Dependence on the temperatureT TheTdependence ofn max and ∆p max are shown in Fig. 3(c) and (d). First, we observe that, for|λ| ≤γ c, effect of the QD on the photon is negligible andn max results to be almost independent ofT. For larger values of|λ|> γ c, instead, the backaction of the QD becomes significant, reducingn max atT= 0. As the temperature incre...

  5. [5]

    (A2) Here, ˆnj =d † jdj are the occupations of the first (j= 1) and second (j= 2) dot, with the corresponding fermionic creation/annihilation operatorsd † j, d

    The DQD Hamitonian We consider a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a single cavity mode via a dipole interaction decribed by ˆHQED = ˆHDQD +ω cˆb†ˆb+g(ˆn 1 −ˆn2) ˆb+ ˆb† (A1) with ˆHDQD = ¯ε(ˆn1 + ˆn2) + δ 2 (ˆn1 −ˆn2)−t 12 ˆd† 1 ˆd2 + ˆd† 2 ˆd1 . (A2) Here, ˆnj =d † jdj are the occupations of the first (j= 1) and second (j= 2) dot, with the correspondi...

  6. [6]

    Reduction to a single electron level The splitting of the two electron levels changes in pres- ence of a photon in the cavity Ω→Ω+2λ. When coupled to a lead with chemical potentialµ, one can focus on a configuration for which the variation of the splitting is important only for the occupation of one electron level, see Fig. 5 for a visualization of the en...

  7. [7]

    We also assume thatK(t−t ′) satisfies causality, i.e.,K= 0 fort ′ > t

    Equations of motion By solving the equation of motion for the operator ˆaω in the Heisenberg picture, one finds ˆaω(t) = ˆaω(t0)e−iω(t−t0) −i Z t t0 dt′ϕ(ω)e−iω(t−t′) h gae−i ω v xa ˆa(t′) +g be−i ω v xbˆb(t′) i .(C6) Then for the operator of the bosonic mode ˆathe equation of motion reads dˆa(t) dt =−iω aˆa(t)−g2 a Z t t0 dt′K(t−t ′)ˆa(t′)−g agb Z t t0 d...

  8. [8]

    Dissipative operator in the master equation We switch to the interaction picture and we write ˆH (I) cas(t) = Z ∞ 0 dω h ˆA† ω(t) ˆCω(t) + H.c. i ,(C15) with ˆAω(t) =ϕ(ω)e −iωtˆaω ,(C16) and ˆCω(t) =g ae−i ω v xa e−iωatˆa+gbe−i ω v xb e−iωbtˆb .(C17) Using the Born-Markov approximation, considering the coupling with the line as the interaction (perturbati...

Show all 138 references
  1. [9]

    Haroche, M

    S. Haroche, M. Brune, and J. M. Raimond, From cavity to circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 243 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    X. Gu, A. Kockum, A. L.-x. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep.718, 1 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    R. H. Hadfield, Single-photon detectors for optical quan- tum information applications, Nat. Photonics3, 696 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Mandel and E

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf,Optical coherence and quantum optics(Cambridge university press, 1995)

    1995

  6. [14]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum optics and quan- tum foundations, inQuantum Optics(Springer, 2025) pp. 225–244

    2025

  7. [15]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    S. L. Hermans, M. Pompili, L. D. S. Martins, A. R. Montblanch, H. K. Beukers, S. Baier, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Entangling remote qubits using the single-photon protocol: an in-depth theoretical and ex- perimental study, New J. Phys25, 013011 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Y.-F. Chen, D. Hover, S. Sendelbach, L. Maurer, S. T. Merkel, E. J. Pritchett, F. K. Wilhelm, and R. McDer- mott, Microwave photon counter based on Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 217401 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Oelsner, L

    G. Oelsner, L. S. Revin, E. Il’ichev, A. L. Pankratov, H.-G. Meyer, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Hassel, and L. S. Kuzmin, Underdamped josephson junction as a switching current detector, Appl. Phys. Lett103, 142605 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Oelsner, C

    G. Oelsner, C. K. Andersen, M. Reh´ ak, M. Schmelz, S. Anders, M. Grajcar, U. H¨ ubner, K. Mølmer, and E. Il’ichev, Detection of weak microwave fields with an underdamped Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 014012 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    L. S. Kuzmin, A. S. Sobolev, C. Gatti, D. Di Gioacchino, N. Crescini, A. Gordeeva, and E. Il’ichev, Single pho- ton counter based on a josephson junction at 14 GHz for searching galactic axions, IEEE Trans. Appl. Super- cond.28, 2400505 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    L. S. Revin, A. L. Pankratov, A. V. Gordeeva, A. A. Yablokov, I. V. Rakut, V. O. Zbrozhek, and L. S. Kuzmin, Microwave photon detection by an Al Joseph- son junction, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.11, 960 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    A. L. Pankratov, L. S. Revin, A. V. Gordeeva, A. A. Yablokov, L. S. Kuzmin, and E. Il’ichev, Towards a mi- crowave single-photon counter for searching axions, npj Quantum Inf.8, 61 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    D’Elia, A

    A. D’Elia, A. Rettaroli, S. Tocci, D. Babusci, C. Barone, M. Beretta, B. Buonomo, F. Chiarello, N. Chikhi, D. Di Gioacchino, G. Felici, G. Filatrella, M. Fistul, L. Foggetta, C. Gatti, E. Il’ichev, C. Ligi, M. Lisit- skiy, G. Maccarrone, F. Mattioli, G. Oelsner, S. Pagano, L. ...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Poudel, R

    A. Poudel, R. McDermott, and M. G. Vavilov, Quan- tum efficiency of a microwave photon detector based on a current-biased josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B86, 174506 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    C. K. Andersen and K. Mølmer, Effective description of tunneling in a time-dependent potential with applica- tions to voltage switching in josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. A87, 052119 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    C. K. Andersen, G. Oelsner, E. Il’ichev, and K. Mølmer, Quantized resonator field coupled to a current-biased josephson junction in circuit QED, Phys. Rev. A89, 033853 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    D. S. Golubev, E. V. Il’ichev, and L. S. Kuzmin, Single- photon detection with a Josephson junction coupled to a resonator, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 014025 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Opremcak, I

    A. Opremcak, I. V. Pechenezhskiy, C. Howington, B. G. Christensen, M. A. Beck, E. Leonard Jr., J. Suttle, C. Wilen, K. N. Nesterov, G. J. Ribeill, T. Thor- beck, F. Schlenker, M. G. Vavilov, B. L. T. Plourde, and R. McDermott, Measurement of a superconducting qubit with a micr...

    2018

  21. [29]

    Opremcak, C

    A. Opremcak, C. H. Liu, C. Wilen, K. Okubo, B. G. Christensen, D. Sank, T. C. White, A. Vainsencher, M. Giustina, A. Megrant, B. Burkett, B. L. T. Plourde, and R. McDermott, High-fidelity measurement of a su- perconducting qubit using an on-chip microwave photon counter, Phys....

    2021

  22. [30]

    Petrovnin, J

    K. Petrovnin, J. Wang, M. Perelshtein, P. Hakonen, and G. S. Paraoanu, Microwave photon detection at para- metric criticality, PRX Quantum5, 020342 (2024). 20

    2024

  23. [31]

    Koshino, Down-conversion of a single photon with unit efficiency, Phys

    K. Koshino, Down-conversion of a single photon with unit efficiency, Phys. Rev. A79, 013804 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Koshino, K

    K. Koshino, K. Inomata, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Naka- mura, Implementation of an impedance-matched Λ sys- tem by dressed-state engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 153601 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Koshino, K

    K. Koshino, K. Inomata, Z. Lin, Y. Nakamura, and T. Yamamoto, Theory of microwave single-photon de- tection using an impedance-matched Λ system, Phys. Rev. A91, 043805 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Inomata, Z

    K. Inomata, Z. Lin, K. Koshino, W. D. Oliver, J.- S. Tsai, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Nakamura, Single microwave-photon detector using an artificial Λ-type three-level system, Nat. Commun.7, 12303 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Stanisavljevi´ c, J.-C

    O. Stanisavljevi´ c, J.-C. Philippe, J. Gabelli, M. Aprili, J. Est` eve, and J. Basset, Efficient microwave photon-to- electron conversion in a high-impedance quantum cir- cuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 076302 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Basset, O

    J. Basset, O. Stanisavljevi´ c, J. Gabelli, M. Aprili, and J. Est` eve, Fast and continuous detection of sin- gle microwave photons via photo-assisted quasipar- ticle tunneling to a superconducting island (2025), arXiv:2511.17470

    2025

  29. [37]

    Lescanne, S

    R. Lescanne, S. Del´ eglise, E. Albertinale, U. R´ eglade, T. Capelle, E. Ivanov, T. Jacqmin, Z. Leghtas, and E. Flurin, Irreversible qubit-photon coupling for the de- tection of itinerant microwave photons, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021038 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Albertinale, L

    E. Albertinale, L. Balembois, E. Billaud, V. Ranjan, D. Flanigan, T. Schenkel, D. Est` eve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Detecting spins by their fluorescence with a microwave photon counter, Nature600, 434 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Z. Wang, L. Balembois, M. E. Ran˘ ci´ c, M .and Bil- laud, M. Le Dantec, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, S. Bertaina, T. Chaneli´ ere, D. Esteve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Single-electron spin resonance detection by microwave photon counting, Nature619, 276 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Billaud, L

    E. Billaud, L. Balembois, M. Le Dantec, M. Ranˇ ci´ c, E. Albertinale, S. Bertaina, T. Chaneli` ere, P. Goldner, D. Est` eve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Microwave fluorescence detection of spin echoes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100804 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Braggio, L

    C. Braggio, L. Balembois, R. Di Vora, Z. Wang, J. Trav- esedo, L. Pallegoix, G. Carugno, A. Ortolan, G. Ru- oso, U. Gambardella, D. D’Agostino, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Quantum-enhanced sensing of axion dark matter with a transmon-based single microwave photon counter, Phys. ...

    2025

  34. [42]

    Govenius, R

    J. Govenius, R. E. Lake, K. Y. Tan, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Detection of zeptojoule microwave pulses using elec- trothermal feedback in proximity-induced josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 030802 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Kokkoniemi, J.-P

    R. Kokkoniemi, J.-P. Girard, D. Hazra, A. Laitinen, J. Govenius, R. E. Lake, I. Sallinen, V. Vesterinen, M. Partanen, J. Y. Tan, K. W. Chan, K. Y. Tan, P. Hakonen, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Bolometer operating at the threshold for circuit quantum electrodynamics, Na- ture586, 47 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    G.-H. Lee, D. K. Efetov, W. Jung, L. Ranzani, E. D. Walsh, T. A. Ohki, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Kim, D. Englund, and K. C. Fong, Graphene-based Josephson junction microwave bolometer, Nature586, 42 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    S. Kono, K. Koshino, Y. Tabuchi, A. Noguchi, and Y. Nakamura, Quantum non-demolition detection of an itinerant microwave photon, Nature Phys.14, 546 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Besse, S

    J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. C. Collodo, T. Wal- ter, P. Kurpiers, M. Pechal, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Single-shot quantum nondemolition detection of indi- vidual itinerant microwave photons, Phys. Rev. X8, 021003 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Narla, S

    A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K. M. Sliwa, E. Zalys-Geller, S. O. Mundhada, W. Pfaff, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Ro- bust concurrent remote entanglement between two su- perconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. X6, 031036 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Chatterjee, P

    A. Chatterjee, P. Stevenson, S. De Franceschi, A. Morello, N. P. de Leon, and F. Kuemmeth, Semi- conductor qubits in practice, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 157 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Zhang, H.-O

    X. Zhang, H.-O. Li, G. Cao, M. Xiao, G.-C. Guo, and G.-P. Guo, Semiconductor quantum computation, Natl. Sci. Rev.6, 32 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Burkard, T

    G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025003 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Cottet, M

    A. Cottet, M. Dartiailh, M. Desjardins, T. Cubaynes, L. Contamin, M. Delbecq, J. Viennot, L. Bruhat, B. Dou¸ cot, and T. Kontos, Cavity QED with hy- brid nanocircuits: from atomic-like physics to con- densed matter phenomena, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 433002 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Burkard, M

    G. Burkard, M. J. Gullans, X. Mi, and J. R. Petta, Superconductor-semiconductor hybrid-circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 129 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    T. Frey, P. J. Leek, M. Beck, A. Blais, T. Ihn, K. En- sslin, and A. Wallraff, Dipole coupling of a double quan- tum dot to a microwave resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 046807 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    M. R. Delbecq, V. Schmitt, F. D. Parmentier, N. Roch, J. J. Viennot, G. F` eve, B. Huard, C. Mora, A. Cot- tet, and T. Kontos, Coupling a quantum dot, fermionic leads, and a microwave cavity on a chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 256804 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    K. D. Petersson, L. W. McFaul, M. D. Schroer, M. Jung, J. M. Taylor, A. A. Houck, and J. R. Petta, Circuit quantum electrodynamics with a spin qubit, Nature 490, 380 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Basset, D.-D

    J. Basset, D.-D. Jarausch, A. Stockklauser, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. M. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Single-electron double quantum dot dipole- coupled to a single photonic mode, Phys. Rev. B88, 125312 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    F. R. Braakman, J. Danon, L. R. Schreiber, W. Wegscheider, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Dynam- ics of spin-flip photon-assisted tunneling, Phys. Rev. B 89, 075417 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    R¨ ossler, D

    C. R¨ ossler, D. Oehri, O. Zilberberg, G. Blatter, M. Kar- alic, J. Pijnenburg, A. Hofmann, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Reichl, and W. Wegscheider, Transport spectroscopy of a spin-coherent dot-cavity system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 166603 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    J. J. Viennot, M. C. Dartiailh, A. Cottet, and T. Kon- tos, Coherent coupling of a single spin to microwave cavity photons, Science349, 408 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Ranjan, G

    V. Ranjan, G. Puebla-Hellmann, M. Jung, T. Hasler, A. Nunnenkamp, M. Muoth, C. Hierold, A. Wallraff, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Clean carbon nanotubes coupled 21 to superconducting impedance-matching circuits, Nat. Commun.6, 7165 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Viennot, M

    J. Viennot, M. R. Delbecq, L. E. Bruhat, M. C. Darti- ailh, M. M. Desjardins, M. Baillergeau, A. Cottet, and T. Kontos, Towards hybrid circuit quantum electrody- namics with quantum dots, Comptes Rendus Physique 17, 705 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Beaudoin, D

    F. Beaudoin, D. Lachance-Quirion, W. Coish, and M. Pioro-Ladri´ ere, Coupling a single electron spin to a microwave resonator: controlling transverse and lon- gitudinal couplings, Nanotechnology27, 464003 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    L. E. Bruhat, J. J. Viennot, M. C. Dartiailh, M. M. Desjardins, T. Kontos, and A. Cottet, Cavity photons as a probe for charge relaxation resistance and photon emission in a quantum dot coupled to normal and su- perconducting continua, Phys. Rev. X6, 021014 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    Brandes and N

    T. Brandes and N. Lambert, Steering of a bosonic mode with a double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B67, 125323 (2003)

    2003

  57. [65]

    Childress, A

    L. Childress, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, Meso- scopic cavity quantum electrodynamics with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A69, 042302 (2004)

    2004

  58. [66]

    M. Trif, V. N. Golovach, and D. Loss, Spin dynamics in InAs nanowire quantum dots coupled to a transmission line, Phys. Rev. B77, 045434 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    Cottet and T

    A. Cottet and T. Kontos, Spin quantum bit with fer- romagnetic contacts for circuit QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 160502 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    Cottet, T

    A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and A. L. Yeyati, Subradiant split Cooper pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 166803 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    P.-Q. Jin, M. Marthaler, A. Shnirman, and G. Sch¨ on, Strong coupling of spin qubits to a transmission line resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 190506 (2012)

    2012

  62. [70]

    Hu, Y.-x

    X. Hu, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Strong coupling of a spin qubit to a superconducting stripline cavity, Phys. Rev. B86, 035314 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    Bergenfeldt and P

    C. Bergenfeldt and P. Samuelsson, Nonlocal transport properties of nanoscale conductor-microwave cavity sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B87, 195427 (2013)

    2013

  64. [72]

    L. D. Contreras-Pulido, C. Emary, T. Brandes, and R. Aguado, Non-equilibrium correlations and entangle- ment in a semiconductor hybrid circuit QED system, New J. Phys15, 095008 (2013)

    2013

  65. [73]

    Kloeffel, M

    C. Kloeffel, M. Trif, P. Stano, and D. Loss, Circuit QED with hole-spin qubits in Ge/Si nanowire quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B88, 241405 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Bergenfeldt, P

    C. Bergenfeldt, P. Samuelsson, B. Sothmann, C. Flindt, and M. B¨ uttiker, Hybrid microwave-cavity heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 076803 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    Cottet, T

    A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and B. Dou¸ cot, Electron-photon coupling in mesoscopic quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B91, 205417 (2015)

    2015

  68. [76]

    Dmytruk, M

    O. Dmytruk, M. Trif, C. Mora, and P. Simon, Out-of- equilibrium quantum dot coupled to a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. B93, 075425 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Cottet, Z

    A. Cottet, Z. Leghtas, and T. Kontos, Theory of inter- actions between cavity photons induced by a mesoscopic circuit, Phys. Rev. B102, 155105 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Governale, C

    M. Governale, C. Sch¨ onenberger, P. Scarlino, and G. Rastelli, Entangled photon-pair emission in waveg- uide circuit QED from a Cooper pair splitter, PRX Quantum6, 020339 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    Hellbach, F

    F. Hellbach, F. Pauly, W. Belzig, and G. Rastelli, Quantum-correlated photons generated by nonlocal electron transport, Phys. Rev. B105, L241407 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Rastelli and M

    G. Rastelli and M. Governale, Single atom laser in normal-superconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085435 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    Mantovani, A

    M. Mantovani, A. D. Armour, W. Belzig, and G. Rastelli, Dynamical multistability in a quantum-dot laser, Phys. Rev. B99, 045442 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    Mantovani, W

    M. Mantovani, W. Belzig, G. Rastelli, and R. Hussein, Single-photon pump by Cooper-pair splitting, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033098 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    X. Mi, J. V. Cady, D. M. Zajac, P. W. Deelman, and J. R. Petta, Strong coupling of a single electron in silicon to a microwave photon, Science355, 156 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Stockklauser, P

    A. Stockklauser, P. Scarlino, J. V. Koski, S. Gas- parinetti, C. K. Andersen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Strong Coupling Cavity QED with Gate-Defined Double Quantum Dots Enabled by a High Impedance Resonator, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011030 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    X. Mi, J. V. Cady, D. M. Zajac, J. Stehlik, L. F. Edge, and J. R. Petta, Circuit quantum electrodynamics archi- tecture for gate-defined quantum dots in silicon, Appl. Phys. Lett110, 043502 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    Scarlino, D

    P. Scarlino, D. J. van Woerkom, A. Stockklauser, J. V. Koski, M. C. Collodo, S. Gasparinetti, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, All-microwave control and dispersive readout of gate- defined quantum dot qubits in circuit quantum electro- dynamics, ...

    2019

  79. [87]

    Li, S.-X

    Y. Li, S.-X. Li, F. Gao, H.-O. Li, G. Xu, K. Wang, D. Liu, G. Cao, M. Xiao, T. Wang, J.-J. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, and G.-P. Guo, Coupling a germanium hut wire hole quantum dot to a superconducting microwave res- onator, Nano Letters18, 2091 (2018)

  80. [88]

    Samkharadze, G

    N. Samkharadze, G. Zheng, N. Kalhor, D. Brousse, A. Sammak, U. C. Mendes, A. Blais, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Strong spin-photon coupling in silicon, Science359, 1123 (2018)

    2018

  81. [89]

    X. Mi, M. Benito, S. Putz, D. M. Zajac, J. M. Taylor, G. Burkard, and J. R. Petta, A coherent spin-photon interface in silicon, Nature555, 599 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    A. J. Landig, J. V. Koski, P. Scarlino, U. C. Mendes, A. Blais, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Wallraff, K. En- sslin, and T. Ihn, Coherent spin-photon coupling using a resonant exchange qubit, Nature560, 179 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    C. X. Yu, S. Zihlmann, J. C. Abadillo-Uriel, V. P. Michal, N. Rambal, H. Niebojewski, T. Bedecarrats, M. Vinet, ´E. Dumur, M. Filippone, B. Bertrand, S. De Franceschi, Y.-M. Niquet, and R. Maurand, Strong coupling between a photon and a hole spin in silicon, Nature Nanotechnol...

    2023

  84. [92]

    L. P. Kouwenhoven, S. Jauhar, J. Orenstein, P. L. McEuen, Y. Nagamune, J. Motohisa, and H. Sakaki, Observation of photon-assisted tunneling through a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3443 (1994)

    1994

  85. [93]

    T. H. Oosterkamp, T. Fujisawa, W. G. van der Wiel, K. Ishibashi, R. V. Hijman, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Microwave spectroscopy of a quantum- dot molecule, Nature395, 873 (1998)

    1998

  86. [94]

    Gustavsson, M

    S. Gustavsson, M. Studer, R. Leturcq, T. Ihn, K. En- sslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Frequency- selective single-photon detection using a double quan- tum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 206804 (2007)

    2007

  87. [95]

    Leturcq, S

    R. Leturcq, S. Gustavsson, M. Studer, T. Ihn, K. En- 22 sslin, D. Driscoll, and A. Gossard, Frequency-selective single-photon detection with a double quantum dot, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostruc- tures40, 1844 (2008)

    2008

  88. [96]

    C. H. Wong and M. G. Vavilov, Quantum efficiency of a single microwave photon detector based on a semicon- ductor double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. A95, 012325 (2017)

    2017

  89. [97]

    Ghirri, S

    A. Ghirri, S. Cornia, and M. Affronte, Microwave pho- ton detectors based on semiconducting double quantum dots, Sensors20, 4010 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    W. Khan, P. P. Potts, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. Dick, P. Samuelsson, and V. F. Maisi, Efficient and continuous microwave photoconversion in hybrid cavity- semiconductor nanowire double quantum dot diodes, Nat. Comm.12, 5130 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    Cornia, V

    S. Cornia, V. Demontis, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, A. Ghirri, F. Rossella, and M. Affronte, Calibration-free and high-sensitivity microwave detectors based on InAs/InP nanowire double quantum dots, Adv. Funct. Mater.33, 2212517 (2023)

    2023

  92. [100]

    Haldar, H

    S. Haldar, H. Havir, W. Khan, S. Lehmann, C. The- lander, K. A. Dick, and V. F. Maisi, Energetics of mi- crowaves probed by double quantum dot absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 087003 (2023)

    2023

  93. [101]

    Haldar, H

    S. Haldar, H. Havir, W. Khan, D. Zenelaj, P. P. Potts, S. Lehmann, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, and V. F. Maisi, High-efficiency microwave photodetection by cavity-coupled double quantum dots with single- cavity-photon sensitivity, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044074 (2025)

    2025

  94. [102]

    Haldar, D

    S. Haldar, D. Zenelaj, P. P. Potts, H. Havir, S. Lehmann, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, and V. F. Maisi, Microwave power harvesting using resonator- coupled double quantum dot photodiode, Phys. Rev. B 109, L081403 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    Oppliger, W

    F. Oppliger, W. Jang, A. Tarascio, F. D. Palma, C. Re- ichl, W. Wegscheider, V. F. Maisi, D. Zumb¨ uhl, and P. Scarlino, High-efficiency tunable microwave photon detector based on a semiconductor double quantum dot coupled to a superconducting high-impedance cavity (2025), arX...

    2025 arXiv

  96. [104]

    J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, J. S. Greidanus, L. H. Willems van Beveren, S. De Franceschi, L. M. K. Van- dersypen, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Few- electron quantum dot circuit with integrated charge read out, Phys. Rev. B67, 161308 (2003)

    2003

  97. [105]

    Haldar, D

    S. Haldar, D. Barker, H. Havir, A. Ranni, S. Lehmann, K. A. Dick, and V. F. Maisi, Continuous microwave pho- ton counting by semiconductor-superconductor hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 217001 (2024)

    2024

  98. [106]

    Zueco, G

    D. Zueco, G. M. Reuther, S. Kohler, and P. H¨ anggi, Qubit-oscillator dynamics in the dispersive regime: An- alytical theory beyond the rotating-wave approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. A80, 033846 (2009)

    2009

  99. [107]

    G. Zhu, S. Schmidt, and J. Koch, Dispersive regime of the Jaynes-Cummings and Rabi lattice, New J. Phys 15, 115002 (2013)

    2013

  100. [108]

    M¨ uller, Dissipative rabi model in the dispersive regime, Phys

    C. M¨ uller, Dissipative rabi model in the dispersive regime, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033046 (2020)

    2020

  101. [109]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  102. [110]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2273 (1993)

    1993

  103. [111]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2269 (1993)

    1993

  104. [112]

    Field, C

    M. Field, C. G. Smith, M. Pepper, D. A. Ritchie, J. E. F. Frost, G. A. C. Jones, and D. G. Hasko, Measurements of Coulomb blockade with a noninvasive voltage probe, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1311 (1993)

    1993

  105. [113]

    E. Buks, R. Schuster, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and V. Umansky, Dephasing in electron interference by a ‘which-path’ detector, Nature391, 871 (1998)

    1998

  106. [114]

    Sprinzak, Y

    D. Sprinzak, Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Charge distribution in a Kondo- correlated quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 176805 (2002)

    2002

  107. [115]

    Schoelkopf, P

    R. Schoelkopf, P. Wahlgren, A. Kozhevnikov, P. Dels- ing, and D. Prober, The radio-frequency single-electron transistor (RF-SET): A fast and ultrasensitive electrom- eter, Science280, 1238 (1998)

    1998

  108. [116]

    D. J. Reilly, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Fast single-charge sensing with a rf quantum point contact, Appl. Phys. Lett91, 162101 (2007)

    2007

  109. [117]

    Barthel, M

    C. Barthel, M. Kjærgaard, J. Medford, M. Stopa, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Fast sensing of double-dot charge arrangement and spin state with a radio-frequency sensor quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B81, 161308 (2010)

    2010

  110. [118]

    Vigneau, F

    F. Vigneau, F. Fedele, A. Chatterjee, D. Reilly, F. Kuemmeth, M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, E. Laird, and N. Ares, Probing quantum devices with radio-frequency reflectometry, Appl. Phys. Rev.10, 021305 (2023)

    2023

  111. [119]

    J. I. Colless, A. C. Mahoney, J. M. Hornibrook, A. C. Doherty, H. Lu, A. C. Gossard, and D. J. Reilly, Dis- persive readout of a few-electron double quantum dot with fast rf gate sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 046805 (2013)

    2013

  112. [120]

    J. Z. Blumoff, A. S. Pan, T. E. Keating, R. W. An- drews, D. W. Barnes, T. L. Brecht, E. T. Croke, L. E. Euliss, J. A. Fast, C. A. Jackson, A. M. Jones, J. Kerck- hoff, R. K. Lanza, K. Raach, B. J. Thomas, R. Velunta, A. J. Weinstein, T. D. Ladd, K. Eng, M. G. Borselli, A. T. ...

    2022

  113. [121]

    H. Geng, M. Kiczynski, A. Timofeev, E. Osika, D. Keith, J. Rowlands, L. Kranz, R. Rahman, Y. Chung, J. Keizer, S. Gorman, and M. Y. Simmons, High-fidelity sub-microsecond single-shot electron spin readout above 3.5 k, Nat. Commun.16, 3382 (2025)

    2025

  114. [122]

    Zheng, N

    G. Zheng, N. Samkharadze, M. L. Noordam, N. Kalhor, D. Brousse, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and L. M. Van- dersypen, Rapid gate-based spin read-out in silicon us- ing an on-chip resonator, Nature Nanotechnology14, 742 (2019)

    2019

  115. [123]

    T. H. Swift, F. Olivieri, G. Aizpurua-Iraola, J. Kirk- man, G. M. Noah, M. de Kruijf, F.-E. von Horstig, A. Gomez-Saiz, J. J. Morton, and M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, A superinductor in a deep sub-micron integrated circuit (2025), arXiv:2507.13202

    2025

  116. [124]

    Scarlino, J

    P. Scarlino, J. H. Ungerer, D. J. van Woerkom, M. Mancini, P. Stano, C. M¨ uller, A. J. Landig, J. V. Koski, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, In situ tuning of the electric-dipole strength of a double-dot charge qubit: Charge-noise 23 protection ...

    2022

  117. [125]

    Harvey-Collard, G

    P. Harvey-Collard, G. Zheng, J. Dijkema, N. Samkharadze, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, On-chip microwave filters for high-impedance resonators with gate-defined quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 034025 (2020)

    2020

  118. [126]

    Holman, D

    N. Holman, D. Rosenberg, D. Yost, J. Yoder, R. Das, W. D. Oliver, R. McDermott, and M. Eriksson, 3D in- tegration and measurement of a semiconductor double quantum dot with a high-impedance TiN resonator, npj Quantum Inf.7, 137 (2021)

    2021

  119. [127]

    Holman, J

    N. Holman, J. Dodson, L. Edge, S. Coppersmith, M. Friesen, R. McDermott, and M. Eriksson, Microwave engineering for semiconductor quantum dots in a cQED architecture, Appl. Phys. Lett117(2020)

    2020

  120. [128]

    J. Xia, E. Adams, V. Shvarts, W. Pan, H. Stormer, and D. Tsui, Ultra-low-temperature cooling of two- dimensional electron gas, Physica B: Condensed Matter 280, 491 (2000)

    2000

  121. [129]

    Samkharadze, A

    N. Samkharadze, A. Kumar, M. J. Manfra, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and G. Cs´ athy, Integrated electronic trans- port and thermometry at millikelvin temperatures and in strong magnetic fields, Rev. Sci. Instrum.82, 053902 (2011)

    2011

  122. [130]

    Iftikhar, A

    Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, S. Jezouin, F. D. Parmen- tier, Y. Jin, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Primary thermometry triad at 6 mk in meso- scopic circuits, Nat. Commun.7, 12908 (2016)

    2016

  123. [131]

    Nicol ´ ı, P

    G. Nicol ´ ı, P. M¨ arki, B. A. Br¨ am, M. P. R¨ o¨ osli, S. Hen- nel, A. Hofmann, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Quantum dot thermometry at ultra- low temperature in a dilution refrigerator with a 4He immersion cell, Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 113901 (2019)

    2019

  124. [132]

    Jones, C

    A. Jones, C. Scheller, J. Prance, Y. Kalyoncu, D. Zumb¨ uhl, and R. Haley, Progress in cooling nanoelec- tronic devices to ultra-low temperatures, J. Low Temp. Phys.201, 772 (2020)

    2020

  125. [133]

    Camenzind, S

    L. Camenzind, S. Geyer, A. Fuhrer, R. Warburton, D. Zumb¨ uhl, and A. Kuhlmann, A hole spin qubit in a fin field-effect transistor above 4 kelvin, Nature Elec- tronics5, 178 (2022)

    2022

  126. [134]

    Sarsby, N

    M. Sarsby, N. Yurttag¨ ul, and A. Geresdi, 500 mi- crokelvin nanoelectronics, Nat. Commun.11, 1492 (2020)

    2020

  127. [135]

    L. V. Levitin, H. van der Vliet, T. Theisen, S. Dimitri- adis, M. Lucas, A. D. Corcoles, J. Ny´ eki, A. J. Casey, G. Creeth, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, J. Nicholls, and J. Saunders, Cooling low-dimensional electron systems into the microkelvin regime, Nat. Commun.13, 667 (2022)

    2022

  128. [136]

    Matern, K

    S. Matern, K. Macieszczak, S. Wozny, and M. Leijnse, Metastability and quantum coherence assisted sensing in interacting parallel quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B107, 125424 (2023)

    2023

  129. [137]

    J. Y. Huang, R. Y. Su, W. H. Lim, M. Feng, B. Van Straaten, B. Severin, W. Gilbert, N. Du- moulin Stuyck, T. Tanttu, S. Serrano,et al., High- fidelity spin qubit operation and algorithmic initializa- tion above 1 K, Nature627, 772 (2024)

    2024

  130. [138]

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, Current fluctuations in open quantum sys- tems:Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics, PRX Quan- tum5, 020201 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.