Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Leptogenesis can succeed in left-right symmetric models with the W_R gauge boson as light as 6 TeV, if the baryon asymmetry is produced by decays of the gauge-singlet seesaw mediators N_L and N_R.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:35 UTC pith:FXIIGK6E

load-bearing objection A real new leptogenesis mechanism with a genuine, advertised weak spot: the low-scale branch needs hard parity breaking in the lepton sector, and the paper never shows that this survives the strong-CP constraint. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19833 v2 pith:FXIIGK6E submitted 2025-12-22 hep-ph

Universal Seesaw Leptogenesis

K.S. Babu , Maximilian Berbig , Srubabati Goswami , Drona Vatsyayan This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords leptogenesisleft-right symmetric modeluniversal seesawgeneralized paritystrong CP problemright-handed neutrinodark radiationbaryon asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that leptogenesis—the generation of the observed baryon asymmetry through lepton-number-violating decays—can work in left-right symmetric models even when the right-handed gauge boson W_R is as light as the current collider limit of about 6 TeV. The authors achieve this by sourcing the asymmetry from the decays of the gauge-singlet mediators N_L and N_R that implement the Type-I seesaw for neutrino masses, rather than from the heavy neutrino embedded in the SU(2)_R doublet as in earlier work. Because a generalized parity symmetry doubles the fermion content, a single generation of these mediators suffices to supply the CP violation via tree-loop interference, provided the parity is softly broken in the mediator masses. The paper also shows how to avoid a cancellation between left- and right-chiral asymmetries for decays above the left-right breaking scale, and it predicts a sub-electronvolt right-handed neutrino whose relic abundance appears as potentially observable dark radiation.

Core claim

The central claim is that the universal seesaw framework, combined with a generalized parity that solves the strong CP problem, offers a new and viable leptogenesis channel that avoids the usual high-scale obstruction. Instead of using the ν_R inside the SU(2)_R doublet—whose gauge interactions thermalize and wash out the asymmetry unless the left-right breaking scale is very high—the model uses the gauge-singlet fermions N_L and N_R required for Type-I seesaw neutrino masses. The parity doubling of these singlets means that one generation already contains two heavy states with complex couplings, so the interference of tree and one-loop diagrams yields a nonzero CP asymmetry once the masses

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the out-of-equilibrium decay of the gauge-singlet seesaw mediators N_L and N_R into lepton doublets and Higgs doublets, with the CP asymmetry coming from interference of tree-level and one-loop vertex/self-energy diagrams; the loop functions f(r, δ) depend on the mass ratio r = M_RR^2/M_LL^2 and the heavy-Higgs phase-space factor δ = m_hR^2/M_LL^2. The generalized parity symmetry P—a discrete space-time exchange mapping each left-chiral field to its right-chiral conjugate—doubles the fermionic degrees of freedom and provides an irreducible phase φ = Arg(Y_LL Y_LR^*); when the parity is softly broken so the two singlet masses differ, the total asymmetry no longer vani

Load-bearing premise

The low-scale scenario hinges on the expectation—stated but not proven at loop level—that hard breaking of generalized parity in the neutrino Yukawa sector (ω ≠ 0) does not generate a contribution to the QCD theta angle above 10^-10, spoiling the parity solution to the strong CP problem.

What would settle it

Compute the two-loop contribution of the hard parity-breaking neutrino Yukawa couplings (ω) to the QCD theta angle; if it exceeds 10^-10, the parity-based strong CP solution fails and the low-scale leptogenesis scenario cannot stand.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Gauge-mediated washout—the usual obstacle that forces left-right breaking scales above ~10^9 GeV in conventional left-right leptogenesis—does not apply here, because the decaying N_L,R are singlets and the light right-handed neutrino is sub-eV; the allowed scale drops to v_R > 18 TeV.
  • In the high-scale regime (M_N < v_R), successful leptogenesis requires M_N > O(10^10 GeV), which may conflict with the quality of the parity solution to the strong CP problem unless higher-dimensional operators are suppressed.
  • In the low-scale regime (M_N > v_R), avoiding the left/right cancellation requires explicit parity breaking in the neutrino Yukawas (ω ≠ 0) and raises the required mediator mass to M_N > O(10^12 GeV); this region is compatible with the strong CP quality bound and with v_R at the collider limit.
  • The predicted sub-eV right-handed neutrino ν_R contributes ΔN_eff ≈ 0.05 to dark radiation; future CMB experiments sensitive to ΔN_eff < 0.06 would push v_R above ~400 TeV, a testable consequence.
  • Because the model requires v_R > 18 TeV from colliders, the heavier right-handed neutrinos' contribution to the dark matter relic density is at most 0.17% of the observed abundance, keeping them cosmologically safe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A multi-generation implementation could modify the allowed parameter space: flavor-dependent CP asymmetries and washouts might relax the M_N > 10^12 GeV bound or introduce additional constraints, which the single-generation approximation does not capture.
  • If the hard parity breaking ω originates from the VEV of the parity-odd singlet S, the same operator could feed into the quark sector via GUT unification; computing its two-loop effect on the strong CP phase would provide a decisive cross-check of the scenario's consistency.
  • The dark-radiation component from ν_R offers a clean experimental avenue: a detection of ΔN_eff near 0.05 combined with a W_R discovery near 6-7 TeV would simultaneously confirm the model's low-scale breaking and the sub-eV ν_R prediction.
  • The model's thermal history (TRH > M_N > v_R with global parity) implies the parity-odd singlet, if present, must be biased to avoid domain walls; a study of the phase transition could yield gravitational-wave signatures correlated with the leptogenesis scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops leptogenesis in a left-right symmetric Universal Seesaw model with generalized parity. Instead of using the decays of the right-handed doublet lepton, the baryon asymmetry is sourced by decays of the gauge-singlet mediators N_L,R. With a single generation, CP violation arises from tree-loop interference because parity doubling provides two non-degenerate mass eigenstates. The authors derive CP asymmetries, set up Boltzmann equations, and consider both decays after (M_N<v_R) and before (M_N>v_R) left-right symmetry breaking. They identify a cancellation between left- and right-chiral lepton asymmetries when both SU(2)_L and SU(2)_R sphalerons are active, and propose to evade it by soft mass splitting (r≠1) plus hard parity breaking in the neutrino Yukawa couplings (ω≠0). The central result is that M_N>v_R leptogenesis is compatible with v_R>18 TeV, the current collider bound. The paper also studies the cosmology of the lightest right-handed neutrino, finding a sub-eV mass and a potentially observable dark radiation contribution. Appendices contain decay widths, branching ratios, and chemical-potential calculations.

Significance. If the construction holds, this is a novel and useful result: the usual gauge-mediated washout obstruction to low-scale leptogenesis in left-right models is avoided, and parity doubling replaces the need for multiple mediator generations. The formal machinery is mostly standard, the Boltzmann/chemical-potential framework is set out in detail, and the appendices are a valuable reference. The paper is also commendably explicit about its assumptions and limitations. The main significance hinges on whether an ultraviolet completion can realize parity breaking in the lepton sector without spoiling the parity solution to the strong CP problem; this is not demonstrated in the present manuscript, and a quantitative statement in the cosmology section appears internally inconsistent.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, §6.2, §8] The low-scale branch M_N>v_R rests on hard P breaking in the neutrino Yukawa sector. The particular origin proposed in Eq. (6.19) with a parity-odd singlet S requires Λ_UV>v_S≥M_RR>M_N>v_R and, with Eq. (6.29), v_S>O(10^12) GeV. The same S VEV generates the strong-CP-violating operators of Eq. (3.11), and Eq. (3.12) requires v_S<10^7/|γ| GeV for θ̄<10^-10. The required suppression |γ_q|<10^-5 for quark couplings is not reconciled with the S-lepton couplings needed to obtain ω=O(0.1)-size effects; the authors acknowledge this difficulty in Sec. 8. If the hard breaking is instead imposed by hand as in Eq. (6.16), P is not an exact symmetry and the automatic parity protection of θ̄ is lost; no loop-level argument is supplied. This issue is load-bearing for the headline v_R>18 TeV claim.
  2. [§7, Eqs. (7.5) and (7.20)] The statement that the stable heavier ν_R states 'can at most account for 0.17% of the observed relic abundance' is inconsistent with the authors' own Eq. (7.5). Using v_R=18 TeV and Σ m_νi<0.12 eV, Eq. (7.20) gives Σ m_νR2,3≈857 eV. Inserting this into Eq. (7.5) with g_S=106.75 gives ρ/s≈3.4 eV, about 8 times the dark-matter value 0.44 eV; with a more realistic g_S≈60 at the relevant freeze-out temperature the ratio is even larger. Thus stable heavier ν_R would overclose, not contribute 0.17%. The later comment about decays/dilution may be the intended resolution, but the stated estimate must be corrected.
  3. [§5.2.2, Figs. 2–3] The central quantitative claims (e.g., M_N>O(10^12) GeV for the low-scale scenario and the contours in Fig. 3) come from a numerical solution of Eq. (5.17), but the numerical setup is not specified: no integration range in z, no treatment of the off-shell '2↔2 washout/transfer' terms beyond a schematic mention, and no method or tolerances. As written, the scans cannot be independently reproduced. Please provide the numerical details or a publicly available code.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5.5)] The variable x in f^{(1)}(r,δ)=√r(1−δ)/(1−x) is undefined; the denominator should presumably be 1−r or 1−δ. Please clarify.
  2. [§7 and §8] The allowed active-sterile mixing angle is written as O(10^-5)>θ_LR>O(10^-2); the ordering is reversed. It should read O(10^-2)>θ_LR>O(10^-5).
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] The captions should state all fixed parameter values used in each panel (e.g., δ, v_R, and the values of ω and φ), since several parameters are varied separately and the text refers to fixed values without listing them.
  4. [§5.1] The statement that soft breaking of the N_L,R mass spectrum 'is not expected to affect' the strong CP solution is plausible but the reasoning is only heuristic. Given that Ref. [13] finds two-loop effects from soft P breaking in the vector-like fermion sector, a brief quantitative argument or reference would strengthen the presentation here.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the leptogenesis CP-asymmetry calculation and the m_νR/dark-radiation check are derived from the model, not fitted-by-construction; the flagged strong-CP gaps are correctness risks, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The baryon asymmetry is computed from explicit one-loop CP asymmetries (Eqs. 5.7-5.8, 6.10, 6.25), and the vanishings in the parity-symmetric limit (Eq. 5.9) and at T>v_R (εeff ∝ δ_L, Eq. 6.13) are derived, not assumed. The low-scale branch is an existence proof: Y, M_N, r, φ, ω are scanned to reproduce the observed ΔB (Fig. 3), while v_R is an external input bounded by collider limits, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction of the same observable. The m_νR and dark-radiation results (Sec. 7, Eqs. 4.11, 7.5, 7.14) are a consistency check: m_νR is fixed by the seesaw relation and could have been excluded by CMB/BBN bounds, so it is not statistically forced by construction. Self-citations (notably Ref. [9], co-authored by one of the present authors) supply the parity-based strong-CP solution, but they are independent published calculations, not an imported uniqueness theorem invoked to forbid alternatives. The limitations flagged in the manuscript are physical-consistency risks rather than circular steps: Sec. 5.1 asserts without a loop-level proof that hard lepton-sector P-breaking 'does not directly upset' the strong-CP solution; Sec. 8 admits the difficulty of generating different P-breaking for quarks and leptons in a common SO(10)_L×SO(10)_R multiplet; and the S-based completion (Eq. 6.22, with M_N > O(10^12) GeV from Eq. 6.29) requires v_S > 10^12 GeV, while Eq. (3.12) allows v_S < 10^7 GeV/|γ| unless |γ| < 10^-5 with no mechanism shown. These are open questions about UV consistency, not reductions of the leptogenesis derivation to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The model's predictions rest on a large set of scanned parameters (Y, M_N, r, φ, δ, ω, v_R) and on several model-construction assumptions, most importantly that generalized parity can be broken in the neutrino sector without reviving the strong-CP problem. The heavy-generation decoupling and sphaleron-equilibrium assumptions are also load-bearing.

free parameters (9)
  • MLL = M_N = scanned; > O(10^10) GeV (high-scale) or > O(10^12) GeV (low-scale)
    Mass of the left gauge-singlet mediator; sets the scale of leptogenesis and neutrino masses.
  • r = M_RR^2/M_LL^2 = 1.1-25 in numerical analysis
    Parity-breaking mass ratio; CP violation vanishes at r=1.
  • Y (Yukawa magnitude) = ~10^-3 to ~10^-1 depending on M_N
    Overall coupling of N_L,R to leptons/Higgs; controls neutrino masses and CP asymmetries.
  • φ = π/4, π/3, π/16 in plots
    Irreducible CP phase; required for leptogenesis.
  • δ_L = m_hR^2/M_LL^2 = fixed 10^-4
    Phase-space suppression/parity-breaking in Higgs sector; needed to avoid cancellation in high-scale scenario.
  • ω = ≤0.1
    Size of hard parity-breaking in neutrino Yukawas; needed for M_N > v_R scenario.
  • χ = 0
    Additional phase of hard parity breaking; set to zero.
  • v_R = 18 TeV - 10^7 GeV
    Left-right breaking scale; scanned subject to collider and strong-CP constraints.
  • α = π/4
    Ratio of Y_LL to Y_LR; fixed by hand to reduce free parameters.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Mass hierarchy M_LL,RR >> v_R >> v_L with perturbative Yukawas; v_R/M ≳ O(1%)
    Used to integrate out N_L,R and derive seesaw masses; from Ref. [12].
  • ad hoc to paper Generalized parity P solves the strong CP problem and can be broken in the neutrino/vector-like mass sector without reintroducing θ̄ at the level needed
    Central to the mechanism; no explicit derivation of the safety of hard lepton-sector breaking.
  • ad hoc to paper Two heavier generations of N_L,R are heavy enough not to be produced: M^(2,3) > T_RH > M^1
    Required for single-generation treatment; Eq. (5.12).
  • domain assumption Both SU(2)_L and SU(2)_R sphalerons are in equilibrium above ~10^11 GeV, and all relevant Yukawa interactions are equilibrated
    Needed for cancellation and c_sph=28/79; Appendix B.2.
  • domain assumption Vanishing initial abundances of N_L,R and lepton asymmetries
    Standard thermal leptogenesis assumption; Sec. 5.2.1.
  • domain assumption 2↔2 scatterings involving N_L,N_R are negligible due to fourth-power Yukawa suppression and Boltzmann suppression
    Justifies simplified Boltzmann equations; Sec. 5.2.2.
invented entities (3)
  • Sub-eV lightest right-handed neutrino ν_R independent evidence
    purpose: Acts as dark radiation; mass derived via seesaw from N_L,R
    Predicts ΔNeff > 0 and free-streaming relic; testable by CMB-S4/PICO and structure formation, but the mass depends on fitted parameters.
  • Gauge-singlet mediator N_L (and parity partner N_R) no independent evidence
    purpose: Source of leptogenesis and Type-I seesaw masses
    Not new to this paper but no direct independent evidence; their decays are the mechanism.
  • Gauge singlet ψ in Appendix C no independent evidence
    purpose: Alternative selective washout of the right-chiral lepton asymmetry
    Ad hoc optional field; not part of main scenario.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32219 in / 19457 out tokens · 188801 ms · 2026-08-03T14:35:21.831050+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the implications for leptogenesis in a class of left-right symmetric model, where all fermion masses are induced through the Universal Seesaw mechanism. Unlike conventional analyses, we do not use the decays of the neutrino embedded in the right-chiral lepton doublet, but rather those of the gauge-singlet mediators required for neutrino mass generation in the canonical Type-I seesaw. This model features a generalized parity symmetry, which is motivated by the solution to the strong $CP$ problem. Since this discrete symmetry doubles the fermionic degrees of freedom in this model, we can generate the required $CP$ violation in the heavy fermion decays with only a single generation of mediators. One of the distinct features of our scenario is that the bounds from thermalization or washout via gauge interactions typically encountered in the canonical left-right symmetric models do not apply here. Moreover, the heavy mediators can decay to both the left and the right-chiral neutrinos, leading to a cancellation in the resulting baryon asymmetry for decays above the left-right symmetry breaking scale. We discuss ways to avoid this cancellation and show that low scale left-right symmetry breaking above the current collider limits $v_R > 18$ TeV is viable. The right chiral neutrinos also obtain their masses from the seesaw mechanism, and the lightest one turns out to have a sub-eV scale mass. We find that its abundance is consistent with standard cosmology, and it acts as potentially observable dark radiation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accidentally Stable Dark Matter in a Parity Solution to the Strong CP Problem

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SU(2)_L×SU(2)_R bi-triplet fermions are accidentally stable dark matter in a parity solution to strong CP, with relic abundance forcing v_R ≲ 150 TeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 94 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Pati and A

    J.C. Pati and A. Salam,Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 275

    1974

  2. [2]

    Mohapatra and J.C

    R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati,Left-Right Gauge Symmetry and an Isoconjugate Model of CP Violation,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 566

    1975

  3. [3]

    Mohapatra and J.C

    R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati,A Natural Left-Right Symmetry,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 2558

    1975

  4. [4]

    Senjanovic and R.N

    G. Senjanovic and R.N. Mohapatra,Exact Left-Right Symmetry and Spontaneous Violation of Parity,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 1502

    1975

  5. [5]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 165

    1981

  6. [6]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski,Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,Annals Phys. 93(1975) 193

    1975

  7. [7]

    Georgi,The State of the Art—Gauge Theories,AIP Conf

    H. Georgi,The State of the Art—Gauge Theories,AIP Conf. Proc.23(1975) 575

    1975

  8. [8]

    Bolton, F.F

    P.D. Bolton, F.F. Deppisch, C. Hati, S. Patra and U. Sarkar,Alternative formulation of left-right symmetry withB−Lconservation and purely Dirac neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 035013 [1902.05802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Babu and R.N

    K.S. Babu and R.N. Mohapatra,A Solution to the Strong CP Problem Without an Axion, Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1286

    1990

  10. [10]

    Hall and K

    L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Implications of Higgs Discovery for the Strong CP Problem and Unification,JHEP10(2018) 130 [1803.08119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Hall and K

    L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Higgs Parity Grand Unification,JHEP11(2019) 033 [1905.12722]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Craig, I

    N. Craig, I. Garcia Garcia, G. Koszegi and A. McCune,P not PQ,JHEP09(2021) 130 [2012.13416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    de Vries, P

    J. de Vries, P. Draper and H.H. Patel,Do Minimal Parity Solutions to the StrongCP Problem Work?,2109.01630

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Benabou, A

    J.N. Benabou, A. Hook, C.A. Manzari, H. Murayama and B.R. Safdi,Clearing up the StrongCPproblem,2510.18951

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Berezhiani,The Weak Mixing Angles in Gauge Models with Horizontal Symmetry: A New Approach to Quark and Lepton Masses,Phys

    Z.G. Berezhiani,The Weak Mixing Angles in Gauge Models with Horizontal Symmetry: A New Approach to Quark and Lepton Masses,Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 99

    1983

  16. [16]

    Chang and R.N

    D. Chang and R.N. Mohapatra,Small and Calculable Dirac Neutrino Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1600

    1987

  17. [17]

    Davidson and K.C

    A. Davidson and K.C. Wali,Universal Seesaw Mechanism?,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 393

    1987

  18. [18]

    Rajpoot,Seesaw Masses for Quarks and Leptons in an Ambidextrous Electroweak Interaction Model,Phys

    S. Rajpoot,Seesaw Masses for Quarks and Leptons in an Ambidextrous Electroweak Interaction Model,Phys. Lett. B191(1987) 122

    1987

  19. [19]

    Babu and R.N

    K.S. Babu and R.N. Mohapatra,CP Violation in Seesaw Models of Quark Masses,Phys. Rev. Lett.62(1989) 1079

    1989

  20. [20]

    K.S. Babu, B. Dutta and R.N. Mohapatra,A theory of R(D ∗, D) anomaly with right-handed currents,JHEP01(2019) 168 [1811.04496]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Dcruz and K.S

    R. Dcruz and K.S. Babu,Resolving W boson mass shift and CKM unitarity violation in left-right symmetric models with a universal seesaw mechanism,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 095011 [2212.09697]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Dcruz,Flavor Physics Constraints on Left-Right Symmetric Models with Universal Seesaw,2301.10786

    R. Dcruz,Flavor Physics Constraints on Left-Right Symmetric Models with Universal Seesaw,2301.10786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    S. Jana, S. Klett and M. Lindner,Flavor seesaw mechanism,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 115015 [2112.09155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    S. Jana, S. Klett, M. Lindner and R.N. Mohapatra,Radiative origin of fermion mass hierarchy in left-right symmetric theory,JHEP01(2025) 082 [2409.04246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Mohapatra,Left-right Symmetry and Finite One Loop Dirac Neutrino Mass,Phys

    R.N. Mohapatra,Left-right Symmetry and Finite One Loop Dirac Neutrino Mass,Phys. Lett. B201(1988) 517

    1988

  26. [26]

    Babu and X.G

    K.S. Babu and X.G. He,DIRAC NEUTRINO MASSES AS TWO LOOP RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 61

    1989

  27. [27]

    Balakrishna and R.N

    B.S. Balakrishna and R.N. Mohapatra,Radiative Fermion Masses From New Physics at Tev Scale,Phys. Lett. B216(1989) 349

    1989

  28. [28]

    Borah and A

    D. Borah and A. Dasgupta,Naturally Light Dirac Neutrino in Left-Right Symmetric Model, JCAP06(2017) 003 [1702.02877]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Babu, X.-G

    K.S. Babu, X.-G. He, M. Su and A. Thapa,Naturally light Dirac and pseudo-Dirac neutrinos from left-right symmetry,JHEP08(2022) 140 [2205.09127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Babu, R.N

    K.S. Babu, R.N. Mohapatra and A. Thapa,Predictive Dirac neutrino spectrum with strong CP solution in SU(5) L ×SU(5) R unification,JHEP04(2024) 049 [2312.14096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Dunsky, L.J

    D. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Higgs Parity, Strong CP, and Dark Matter,JHEP 07(2019) 016 [1902.07726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Dunsky, L.J

    D. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Dark Matter, Dark Radiation and Gravitational Waves from Mirror Higgs Parity,JHEP02(2020) 078 [1908.02756]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    J.A. Dror, D. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Left-Right Theories,JHEP07(2020) 168 [2004.09511]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Dunsky, L.J

    D. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter and Leptogenesis in Left-Right Higgs Parity,JHEP01(2021) 125 [2007.12711]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Baldwin, K

    M.J. Baldwin, K. Harigaya and I.R. Wang,Upper Bound on Parity Breaking Scale for Doublet WIMP Dark Matter,2507.22113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Gu,A Left-Right Symmetric Model for Neutrino Masses, Baryon Asymmetry and Dark Matter,Phys

    P.-H. Gu,A Left-Right Symmetric Model for Neutrino Masses, Baryon Asymmetry and Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 095002 [1001.1341]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Babu and A

    K.S. Babu and A. Kaladharan,Dirac Leptogenesis in Left-Right Symmetric Models, 2410.24125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Carrasco-Martinez, D.I

    J. Carrasco-Martinez, D.I. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Leptogenesis in parity solutions to the strong CP problem and Standard Model parameters,JHEP06(2024) 048 [2307.15731]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Borboruah, L

    Z.A. Borboruah, L. Malhotra, U. Patel, S. Patra and S.U. Sankar,Left-Right Symmetric Neutrino Mass Model without Scalar Bi-doublet,2504.08267. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Gr´ af, S

    L. Gr´ af, S. Jana, A. Kaladharan and S. Saad,Gravitational wave imprints of left-right symmetric model with minimal Higgs sector,JCAP05(2022) 003 [2112.12041]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Dasgupta, M

    A. Dasgupta, M. Knauss and M. Sher,Gravitational Wave Production and Baryogenesis in a Simple Left-Right model,2505.04751

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,Barygenesis without grand unification,Physics Letters B 174(1986) 45

    1986

  43. [43]

    Joshipura, E.A

    A.S. Joshipura, E.A. Paschos and W. Rodejohann,Leptogenesis in left-right symmetric theories,Nucl. Phys. B611(2001) 227 [hep-ph/0104228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  44. [44]

    Rodejohann and K.R.S

    W. Rodejohann and K.R.S. Balaji,Leptogenesis and low-energy observables in left-right symmetric models,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 093009 [hep-ph/0201052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model,Nucl. Phys. B181(1981) 287

    1981

  46. [46]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,Phys. Rev. D 22(1980) 2227

    1980

  47. [47]

    Cheng and L.-F

    T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li,Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2860

    1980

  48. [48]

    Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation,Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation,Nucl. Phys. B187(1981) 343

    1981

  49. [49]

    Gunion, J

    J.F. Gunion, J. Grifols, A. Mendez, B. Kayser and F.I. Olness,Higgs Bosons in Left-Right Symmetric Models,Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 1546

    1989

  50. [50]

    Deshpande, J.F

    N.G. Deshpande, J.F. Gunion, B. Kayser and F.I. Olness,Left-Right Symmetric Electroweak Models with Triplet Higgs,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 837

    1991

  51. [51]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji and R.N. Mohapatra,Right-handed quark mixings in minimal left-right symmetric model with general CP violation,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 091301 [0704.1662]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji and R.N. Mohapatra,General CP Violation in Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model and Constraints on the Right-Handed Scale,Nucl. Phys. B802(2008) 247 [0712.4218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421

    1977

  54. [54]

    Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,Conf

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979) 95

    1979

  55. [55]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,Conf. Proc. C790927(1979) 315 [1306.4669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  56. [56]

    Glashow,The Future of Elementary Particle Physics,NATO Sci

    S.L. Glashow,The Future of Elementary Particle Physics,NATO Sci. Ser. B61(1980) 687

    1980

  57. [57]

    Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,Prog

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,Prog. Theor. Phys.64(1980) 1103

    1980

  58. [58]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c,Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation,Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 912

    1980

  59. [59]

    E. Ma, S. Sarkar and U. Sarkar,Scale of SU(2)(R) symmetry breaking and leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B458(1999) 73 [hep-ph/9812276]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [60]

    Frere, T

    J.-M. Frere, T. Hambye and G. Vertongen,Is leptogenesis falsifiable at LHC?,JHEP01 (2009) 051 [0806.0841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Bhupal Dev, C.-H

    P.S. Bhupal Dev, C.-H. Lee and R.N. Mohapatra,Leptogenesis Constraints on the Mass of Right-handed Gauge Bosons,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 095012 [1408.2820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Gu and R.N

    P.-H. Gu and R.N. Mohapatra,Leptogenesis with TeV ScaleW R,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075014 [1712.00420]. [63]ATLAScollaboration,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 ofpp collision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B796(2019) 68 [1903.06248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [64]

    Dreiner, H.E

    H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin,Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry,Phys. Rept.494(2010) 1 [0812.1594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [65]

    Cheng and L.-F

    T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li,Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in su(2) x u(1) models of electroweak interactions,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2860

    1980

  65. [66]

    Chacko, H.-S

    Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik,The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 231802 [hep-ph/0506256]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [67]

    Jung,Spontaneous Twin Symmetry Breaking,Phys

    T.H. Jung,Spontaneous Twin Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 115012 [1902.10978]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [68]

    Carrasco-Martinez, L.J

    J. Carrasco-Martinez, L.J. Hall, K. Harigaya and K. Langhoff,A Flavor of SO(10) Unification with a Spinor Higgs,2506.20708

    arXiv

  68. [69]

    Chang, R.N

    D. Chang, R.N. Mohapatra and M.K. Parida,Decoupling Parity and SU(2)-R Breaking Scales: A New Approach to Left-Right Symmetric Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 1072

    1984

  69. [70]

    Chang, R.N

    D. Chang, R.N. Mohapatra and M.K. Parida,A New Approach to Left-Right Symmetry Breaking in Unified Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 1052. [71]ATLAScollaboration,Search for a heavy charged boson in events with a charged lepton and missing transverse momentum fromppcollisions at √s= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 052013 [1906.05609]....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1984

  70. [75]

    Berezhiani, R.N

    Z.G. Berezhiani, R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Planck scale physics and solutions to the strong CP problem without axion,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 5565 [hep-ph/9212318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  71. [76]

    Georgi, L.J

    H.M. Georgi, L.J. Hall and M.B. Wise,Grand Unified Models With an Automatic Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 409

    1981

  72. [77]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg,String Theory and the Strong CP Problem,Nucl. Phys. B273 (1986) 109

    1986

  73. [78]

    Coleman and K.-M

    S.R. Coleman and K.-M. Lee,WORMHOLES MADE WITHOUT MASSLESS MATTER FIELDS,Nucl. Phys. B329(1990) 387. – 38 –

    1990

  74. [79]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise,Wormholes and Global Symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B325(1989) 687

    1989

  75. [80]

    Holman, S.D.H

    R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu, T.W. Kephart, E.W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow, Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  76. [81]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137 [hep-th/9202003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  77. [82]

    Barr and D

    S.M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539

    1992

  78. [83]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli and M. Roncadelli,Instability of the invisible axion,Phys. Lett. B 283(1992) 278

    1992

  79. [84]

    Kallosh, A.D

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  80. [85]

    Alonso and A

    R. Alonso and A. Urbano,Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons,JHEP02(2019) 136 [1706.07415]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.