Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

In anisotropic fluids, modes that collide at k=0 keep colliding along a whole surface in complex wavevector space, and microcausality sets a directional upper bound on the radius of convergence of the hydrodynamic expansion.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 13:14 UTC pith:SVGY2LK2

load-bearing objection A genuinely new result on anisotropic hydrodynamic convergence — the continuum-of-collisions picture and the theta-dependent causality bounds are real, and the paper deserves a serious referee even though the holographic section is numerically demonstrated rather than proven. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.24819 v2 pith:SVGY2LK2 submitted 2025-12-31 hep-th nucl-th

Causality constraints and anisotropic states

classification hep-th nucl-th PACS 47.75.+f
keywords anisotropic hydrodynamicsdispersion relationsradius of convergencemicrocausalityseveral complex variablesmagnetohydrodynamicsholographic plasmaquasinormal modes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that anisotropy changes the analytic structure of hydrodynamic dispersion relations: once the wavevector is complexified in more than one component, a branch point at the origin cannot stay an isolated collision point, and modes collide along a continuous surface for every nonzero |k|. Whether this continuum of collisions limits the derivative expansion is decided by whether the critical surface intersects the expansion surface on which the small-|k| series proceeds. The paper exhibits all three outcomes — no intersection, intersection that leaves convergence intact, and intersection that drives the radius of convergence to zero in a direction — and confirms the continuum of collisions in the sound channel of a boosted holographic plasma. It then derives, from the covariant stability condition Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|, an infinite set of angle-dependent bounds capping the radius of convergence from above in terms of transport coefficients, and vice versa. A reader should care because the radius of convergence delimits where hydrodynamics is predictive, and isotropy was previously assumed to define it.

Core claim

For dispersion relations with a branch point at the origin — sound modes, Alfvén waves, second sound — the singularity at k=0 must, by Hartogs' extension theorem, open into a non-compact critical surface through the origin. Hence at any |k| ≠ 0 a complex direction exists in which hydrodynamic modes collide, a continuum the paper verifies in the boosted AdS5 black-brane sound channel. The |k|-expansion survives only when that critical surface avoids the expansion surface; in first-order magnetohydrodynamics they intersect, and the radius of convergence vanishes as k becomes perpendicular to the magnetic field. Imposing microcausality, Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|, yields bounds like |c_n(θ)| ≤ [2(n²−1)−(

What carries the argument

The argument runs on three pieces: Hartogs' extension theorem from several complex variables, which forbids compact singularity sets in Cⁿ (n>1) and forces the origin branch point to grow into a critical surface; the covariant stability/microcausality inequality Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|, the only input from physics; and the Hopf-coordinate parametrization of the complexified wavevector, k_z = r cos θ e^{iξ}, k_x = r sin θ e^{iξ}, which splits the critical surfaces from the expansion surfaces (ξ_z = ξ_x = ξ) and makes the angle θ carry the anisotropy. Fourier analysis over the phases ξ_z, ξ_x converts the inequality into term-by-term bounds on the series coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

All the causality bounds rest on the imported premise that microcausality is exactly the condition Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|; if that inequality is not the correct test for anisotropic states, every upper bound on transport coefficients and radii of convergence in Section 4 loses its support.

What would settle it

Search the complexified wavevector space of the boosted AdS5 sound channel at a fixed small |k| ≠ 0 for the predicted sound-mode collision: the paper reports collisions for |q_x| = 0.1 at several phases, so a high-precision scan that finds any magnitude |k| with no complex direction in which the two sound modes collide would refute the continuum claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In any anisotropic state whose modes collide at k=0, hydrodynamic modes collide infinitely often at complex wavevector for every |k| ≠ 0; the paper confirms this in the strongly coupled holographic plasma, so it is not a first-order-truncation artifact.
  • The derivative expansion keeps converging only when the critical surface misses the expansion surface; in first-order MHD the two intersect, and the radius of convergence R(θ) → 0 as the wavevector becomes perpendicular to the magnetic field, explaining the known non-commutativity of the small-|k| and θ→π/2 limits.
  • Microcausality alone yields an infinite, angle-dependent set of upper bounds on R(θ) from each transport coefficient, and matching upper bounds on the coefficients given R(θ); the strongest constraints come from the highest-order coefficients in the worked example.
  • For sound-type modes the bounds imply |v(θ)| ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ Γ(θ) ≤ (16/3π) R(θ)^{-1}, direction by direction.
  • The anisotropic bounds reduce to the known isotropic causality bounds in the appropriate limits, so the isotropic results are recovered as a special case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the expansion surface itself becomes a choice in anisotropic systems — different parametrizations of the small-|k| limit give different convergence radii (even zero versus finite) — so the derivative expansion is not fully defined until the expansion surface is specified.
  • Editorial extension: the same machinery applies to relativistic superfluids, whose second-sound mode has a branch point at the origin; the paper suggests a possible critical-surface/expansion-surface intersection there, which would make the expansion fail in specific directions — a testable prediction for holographic superfluids.
  • Editorial extension: the infinite set of causality bounds could be combined into an angle-dependent bootstrap that constrains the allowed space of transport data without solving the microscopic theory, an anisotropic version of the known isotropic constraints.
  • Editorial flag: the bounds stand or fall with the covariant stability condition Im ω ≤ |Im k|, which the paper adopts from earlier work rather than proves; and the dimension count in the holographic section (two equations in three unknowns define a one-dimensional continuum) is supported numerically but lacks a transversality proof.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies dispersion relations ω=ω(k) of relativistic hydrodynamic modes in anisotropic equilibrium states, complexifying all spatial components of the wavevector k. The two central claims are: (i) for dispersion relations with a branch point at the origin (e.g., sound-like modes), the set of collision points between hydrodynamic modes in C^2 is a non-compact critical surface through the origin, giving a continuum of collisions at any fixed |k|; this is illustrated with first-order uncharged hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics, and demonstrated numerically for the boosted sound channel of a holographic N=4 SYM plasma. (ii) Using the covariant stability/microcausality condition Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|, the paper derives upper bounds on anisotropic transport coefficients in terms of the θ-dependent radius of convergence R(θ), and reciprocal upper bounds on R(θ) in terms of transport coefficients, for both holomorphic-at-origin and branch-point-at-origin dispersion relations.

Significance. If correct, the paper makes a useful conceptual contribution to the hydrodynamic convergence program: it shows that anisotropy changes the singularity structure qualitatively, with branch points at the origin belonging to non-compact critical surfaces, and it provides a criterion (intersection of the critical surface with the expansion surface) for when those singularities affect the small-|k| expansion. The causality bounds are derived explicitly, with no fitted parameters, and generalize the isotropic results of [29] to anisotropic states; they also yield new θ-dependent upper bounds on the radius of convergence. The holographic demonstration extends the known 'complex life of hydrodynamic modes' to boosted black branes. The main limitations are the lack of a rigorous proof of the dimension count in the holographic critical-set analysis and the absence of released numerics, which temper the strength of the holographic claim but do not affect the causality bounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.8)] The claim that the boosted holographic sound channel exhibits a continuum of collisions for any fixed |q| rests on the assertion that the two complex equations F=0 and ∂_w F=0 define a one-dimensional complex curve in (w,q_z,q_x). This is a generic dimension count (two equations in three complex variables), but for the non-polynomial spectral curve of the boosted black brane no transversality, Jacobian-rank, or Weierstrass-preparation argument is provided; the numerical evidence in Figures 7 and 8 supports the claim but does not prove that the critical set has exactly complex dimension one and is connected through the origin. Since the abstract states 'we show ... there exists a continuum' for the holographic plasma, this is a load-bearing gap. Please either supply a rigorous local argument or weaken the abstract/conclusion to 'numerical evidence' for the holographic case.
  2. [Sections 3.2–3.3, Frobenius method] The numerical determination of quasinormal-mode collisions uses Frobenius series truncated at N=25 (sound) and N=35 (shear), but the paper reports no convergence checks or error estimates for the collision locations. The continuum-of-collisions claim, central to the first part of the paper, rests on these numerics; please provide (i) a convergence test in N for the collision values, (ii) an estimate of the numerical uncertainty in the curves in Figures 7–8, and (iii) ideally a release of the code/data for reproducibility.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, after Eq. (4.37)] The sentence 'For n=1, the bound (4.37) gives a weaker condition ...' is confusing because the formula (4.37) is singular (0/0) for n=1. Please state explicitly that the n=1 case is obtained directly from Im(c_1 e^{iξ}) ≤ |sin ξ|, yielding |v(θ)| ≤ 1, and that (4.37) applies for n≥2.
  2. [Eq. (2.19a)] The expression '2√2 ± √3/5 q_z' appears to be missing parentheses or a factor; please clarify whether the term is linear in q_z and how the ± sign groups.
  3. [Figure 6] The 'slight kink at the right edge' is attributed to a numerical artifact; please mark this region explicitly in the figure or adjust the plot range so the artifact is not confused with a physical feature.
  4. [General] The term 'critical surface' is used throughout but never formally defined for non-polynomial spectral curves. A short definition (the zero set of the discriminant in the projected k-space, or the set where F=0 and ∂F/∂ω=0) would improve precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the bounds and continuum-of-collisions claim follow from cited external causality conditions and explicit Fourier/discriminant arguments; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The continuum-of-collisions claim follows from the discriminant conditions F=0, ∂_w F=0 in several complex variables combined with Hartogs' extension theorem (Appendix A), and it is explicitly checked in the first-order examples (Section 2) and numerically in the holographic sound channel (Section 3.3); this does not presuppose the conclusion. The causality bounds in Section 4 use the covariant stability/microcausality condition Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k|, cited to [28,29] rather than to the author's own work, and the Fourier-extraction argument (Eqs. (4.4)–(4.6), (4.16)–(4.18), (4.35)) is a direct derivation with no fitted parameters. Eq. (4.37) is explicitly the isotropic inequality with θ-dependent coefficients, which is a generalization rather than a repackaging of the input. Self-citations [36], [46], and [64] are used for background material (classical dispersion relations, the dMHD formulation, and previously noted non-commutativity) and are not load-bearing for the main claims. The notable gaps are numerical/reproducibility in nature: the holographic demonstration in Section 3.3 relies on a dimension count rather than a transversality proof, and no code or data are released; similarly, the maximum of F_{n,m} at φ = −π/2 is checked only for the lowest 119 terms. These are rigor and reproducibility limitations, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard mathematical theorems, the prior causality condition, and modeling choices about expansion surfaces. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are postulated. The only new objects, Σ_0 and Σ_r, are mathematical surfaces, not physical entities.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Covariant stability/microcausality condition: Im ω(k) ≤ |Im k| for complexified k.
    Adopted from [28,29] in Section 4.1; underlies all Section 4 bounds. It is cited, not re-derived.
  • standard math Hartogs' extension theorem in C^n, n>1, implying singular sets cannot be compact.
    Invoked in Section 2.1.2 and Appendix A to conclude a branch point at the origin extends to a critical surface reaching infinity. The theorem is standard, but its applicability to non-polynomial holographic spectral curves is assumed.
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic derivative expansion proceeds on expansion surfaces Σ_r with real θ and common complex phase.
    Defined in Section 2.1.2 (Eq. 2.23) and used to decide whether critical surfaces obstruct convergence. Physically motivated but not derived from microscopic theory.
  • domain assumption For the holographic spectral curve, the vanishing set of (F, ∂_w F) in C^3 is a one-complex-dimensional continuum.
    Dimension counting near Eq. (3.8) assumes generic rank; numerical evidence is shown but no transversality proof is given.
  • domain assumption The boosted black-brane quasinormal spectrum is obtained by boosting the isotropic spectral relation.
    Standard AdS/CFT frame transformation used in Section 3.1; relies on the Lorentz invariance of the dual plasma background.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30772 in / 18312 out tokens · 196054 ms · 2026-08-03T13:14:01.120451+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the effects of anisotropy on dispersion relations and convergence in relativistic hydrodynamics. In particular, we show that for dispersion relations with a branch point at the origin (such as sound modes), there exists a continuum of collisions between hydrodynamic modes at complex wavevector. These collisions are then explicitly demonstrated to be present in a holographic plasma. We lay out a criterion for when the continuum of collisions affects the convergence of the hydrodynamic derivative expansion. Finally, the radius of convergence of hydrodynamic dispersion relations in anisotropic systems is bounded from above on the basis of compatibility with microscopic causality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Lorentzian geometry of relaxation

    nucl-th 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Causality forces purely relaxational dispersion relations to follow spacelike trajectories on the Lorentzian {iω,ik} plane, producing universal bounds on diffusivity, viscosity, time-dilation deviations, and hydrodyna...

  2. How Lorentz boosts reshape relaxation spectra

    gr-qc 2026-01 accept novelty 8.0

    Under an Onsager-type symmetry, boosted k=0 non-hydrodynamic relaxation rates of a relativistic fluid are bounded by a(1-v)/γ ≤ iω' ≤ b/[γ(1-v)] in terms of rest-frame bounds a,b and boost speed v.

  3. Near-Light-Cone Nonhydrodynamic Structure from Boosted Hydrodynamics

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Large boosts select near-light-cone nonhydrodynamic singularities that set the hydrodynamic radius of convergence, with RTA giving a finite offset and holography a vanishing one after Lorentz rescaling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 65 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon (1987)

  2. [2]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti,Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Oxford (2013)

  3. [3]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press (2019), 10.1017/9781108651998, [1712.05815]

  4. [4]

    Faber and F.A

    J.A. Faber and F.A. Rasio,Binary Neutron Star Mergers,Living Rev. Rel.15(2012) 8 [1204.3858]

  5. [5]

    Abramowicz and P.C

    M.A. Abramowicz and P.C. Fragile,Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory,Living Rev. Rel.16(2013) 1 [1104.5499]

  6. [6]

    Heinz and B

    U. Heinz and B. Schenke,Hydrodynamic Description of the Quark-Gluon Plasma, 12, 2024 [2412.19393]

  7. [7]

    Bernhard,Bayesian parameter estimation for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ph.D

    J.E. Bernhard,Bayesian parameter estimation for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ph.D. thesis, Duke U., 4, 2018.1804.06469

  8. [8]

    Bjorken,Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys

    J.D. Bjorken,Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 140

  9. [9]

    Heller, R.A

    M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk,Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion in Gauge Theory Plasmas,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 211602 [1302.0697]. – 35 –

  10. [10]

    Denicol and J

    G.S. Denicol and J. Noronha,Divergence of the Chapman-Enskog expansion in relativistic kinetic theory,1608.07869

  11. [11]

    Florkowski, M.P

    W. Florkowski, M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski,New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 046001 [1707.02282]

  12. [12]

    Heller and M

    M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski,Hydrodynamics beyond the gradient expansion: Resurgence and resummation,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 072501 [1503.07514]

  13. [13]

    Basar and G.V

    G. Basar and G.V. Dunne,Hydrodynamics, resurgence, and transasymptotics,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 125011 [1509.05046]

  14. [14]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Kurkela, M. Spali´ nski and V. Svensson,Hydrodynamization in kinetic theory: Transient modes and the gradient expansion,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 091503 [1609.04803]

  15. [15]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson and B. Withers,Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion Diverges beyond Bjorken Flow,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 122302 [2110.07621]

  16. [16]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson and B. Withers,Relativistic Hydrodynamics: A Singulant Perspective,Phys. Rev. X12(2022) 041010 [2112.12794]

  17. [17]

    Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06(2018) 059 [1803.08058]

    B. Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06(2018) 059 [1803.08058]

  18. [18]

    Grozdanov, P.K

    S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadi´ c,Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 251601 [1904.01018]

  19. [19]

    Grozdanov, P.K

    S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadi´ c,The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,JHEP11(2019) 097 [1904.12862]

  20. [20]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson and B. Withers,Hydrodynamic gradient expansion in linear response theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 066002 [2007.05524]

  21. [21]

    Gavassino,Infinite Order Hydrodynamics: An Analytical Example,Phys

    L. Gavassino,Infinite Order Hydrodynamics: An Analytical Example,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 032302 [2402.19343]

  22. [22]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson and B. Withers,Convergence of hydrodynamic modes: insights from kinetic theory and holography,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 123 [2012.15393]

  23. [23]

    Romatschke,Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions,Eur

    P. Romatschke,Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 352 [1512.02641]

  24. [24]

    Kurkela and U.A

    A. Kurkela and U.A. Wiedemann,Analytic structure of nonhydrodynamic modes in kinetic theory,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 776 [1712.04376]

  25. [25]

    Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

    P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys.A45(2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

  26. [26]

    Krall and A.W

    N.A. Krall and A.W. Trivelpiece,Principles of plasma physics(1973)

  27. [27]

    Anile,Relativistic fluids and magneto-fluids, Cambridge University Press (1989)

    A.M. Anile,Relativistic fluids and magneto-fluids, Cambridge University Press (1989)

  28. [28]

    Gavassino,Bounds on transport from hydrodynamic stability,Phys

    L. Gavassino,Bounds on transport from hydrodynamic stability,Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137854 [2301.06651]

  29. [29]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski and B. Withers,Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 261601 [2212.07434]

  30. [30]

    Grozdanov, K

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm and V. Scopelliti,Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 231601 [1710.00921]. – 36 –

  31. [31]

    Blake, H

    M. Blake, H. Lee and H. Liu,A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos,JHEP10(2018) 127 [1801.00010]

  32. [32]

    Blake, R.A

    M. Blake, R.A. Davison, S. Grozdanov and H. Liu,Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography,JHEP10(2018) 035 [1809.01169]

  33. [33]

    Grozdanov,On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections,JHEP01(2019) 048 [1811.09641]

    S. Grozdanov,On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections,JHEP01(2019) 048 [1811.09641]

  34. [34]

    Blake, R.A

    M. Blake, R.A. Davison and D. Vegh,Horizon constraints on holographic Green’s functions, JHEP01(2020) 077 [1904.12883]

  35. [35]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski and B. Withers,The Hydrohedron: Bootstrapping Relativistic Hydrodynamics,2305.07703

  36. [36]

    Hoult and P

    R.E. Hoult and P. Kovtun,Causality and classical dispersion relations,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 046018 [2309.11703]

  37. [37]

    Wang and S

    D.-L. Wang and S. Pu,Stability and causality criteria in linear mode analysis: Stability means causality,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L031504 [2309.11708]

  38. [38]

    Abbasi and S

    N. Abbasi and S. Tahery,Complexified quasinormal modes and the pole-skipping in a holographic system at finite chemical potential,JHEP10(2020) 076 [2007.10024]

  39. [39]

    Jansen and C

    A. Jansen and C. Pantelidou,Quasinormal modes in charged fluids at complex momentum, JHEP10(2020) 121 [2007.14418]

  40. [40]

    Grozdanov, A.O

    S. Grozdanov, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadi´ c,Hydrodynamic dispersion relations at finite coupling,JHEP06(2021) 180 [2104.11035]

  41. [41]

    ALFV ´EN,Existence of electromagnetic-hydrodynamic waves,Nature150(1942) 405–406

    H. ALFV ´EN,Existence of electromagnetic-hydrodynamic waves,Nature150(1942) 405–406

  42. [42]

    Schubring,Dissipative String Fluids,Phys

    D. Schubring,Dissipative String Fluids,Phys. Rev.D91(2015) 043518 [1412.3135]

  43. [43]

    Grozdanov, D.M

    S. Grozdanov, D.M. Hofman and N. Iqbal,Generalized global symmetries and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 096003 [1610.07392]

  44. [44]

    Hernandez and P

    J. Hernandez and P. Kovtun,Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,JHEP05(2017) 001 [1703.08757]

  45. [45]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain,Magnetohydrodynamics as superfluidity,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 141603 [1808.01939]

  46. [46]

    Hoult and P

    R.E. Hoult and P. Kovtun,Causality in dissipative relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(2025) [2411.04966]

  47. [47]

    R. Lier, A. Jain, J. Armas and O. Porth,Resistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics without Amperes Law,2501.04638

  48. [48]

    Jeon,Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,Phys

    S. Jeon,Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 3591 [hep-ph/9409250]

  49. [49]

    Jeon and L.G

    S. Jeon and L.G. Yaffe,From quantum field theory to hydrodynamics: Transport coefficients and effective kinetic theory,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 5799 [hep-ph/9512263]

  50. [50]

    Krantz and H

    S.G. Krantz and H. Parks,The implicit function theorem, Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Springer, New York, NY, 2013 ed. (Nov., 2012)

  51. [51]

    Wall,Singular Points of Plane Curves, Cambridge University Press (2004), 10.1017/CBO9780511617560

    C.T.C. Wall,Singular Points of Plane Curves, Cambridge University Press (2004), 10.1017/CBO9780511617560

  52. [52]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom,Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic fluids,Annals Phys.151(1983) 466. – 37 –

  53. [53]

    H¨ ormander,An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, North-Holland (1973)

    L. H¨ ormander,An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, North-Holland (1973)

  54. [54]

    Shabat,Introduction to Complex Variables, Part II, Functions of Several Variables, American Mathematical Society (1992)

    B.V. Shabat,Introduction to Complex Variables, Part II, Functions of Several Variables, American Mathematical Society (1992)

  55. [55]

    Lebl,Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Independently published (2025)

    J. Lebl,Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Independently published (2025)

  56. [56]

    Dzhunushaliev and V

    V. Dzhunushaliev and V. Folomeev,Dirac/Rarita–Schwinger plus Maxwell theories inR×S 3 spacetime in the Hopf coordinates,Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.17(2020) 2050197 [2008.01076]

  57. [57]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz and A. Yarom,Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 101601 [1203.3556]

  58. [58]

    Kovtun,Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter,JHEP07(2016) 028 [1606.01226]

    P. Kovtun,Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter,JHEP07(2016) 028 [1606.01226]

  59. [59]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP02 (2015) 172 [1412.5148]

  60. [60]

    Grozdanov and N

    S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul,Generalised global symmetries in holography: magnetohydrodynamic waves in a strongly interacting plasma,JHEP04(2019) 141 [1707.04182]

  61. [61]

    Hofman and N

    D.M. Hofman and N. Iqbal,Generalized global symmetries and holography,SciPost Phys.4 (2018) 005 [1707.08577]

  62. [62]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain,One-form superfluids & magnetohydrodynamics,JHEP01(2020) 041 [1811.04913]

  63. [63]

    Armas and F

    J. Armas and F. Camilloni,A stable and causal model of magnetohydrodynamics,JCAP10 (2022) 039 [2201.06847]

  64. [64]

    Hoult,Causal Theories of Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Ph.D

    R.E. Hoult,Causal Theories of Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Ph.D. thesis, U. Victoria (main), 2025.2509.22862

  65. [65]

    Z. Fang, K. Hattori and J. Hu,Analytic solutions for the linearized first-order magnetohydrodynamics and implications for causality and stability,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 056049 [2402.18601]

  66. [66]

    Z. Fang, K. Hattori and J. Hu,First-order spin magnetohydrodynamics,J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.1-2(2024) 100003 [2410.00721]

  67. [67]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  68. [68]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

  69. [69]

    Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, Springer Japan (2015), 10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7

    M. Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, Springer Japan (2015), 10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7

  70. [70]

    Bhattacharyya, V.E

    S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,JHEP02(2008) 045 [0712.2456]

  71. [71]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,JHEP01(2011) 094 [0809.2596]

  72. [72]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski and A. Yarom,Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes, JHEP01(2009) 055 [0809.2488]

  73. [73]

    Kovtun and A.O

    P.K. Kovtun and A.O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes and holography,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 086009 [hep-th/0506184]. – 38 –

  74. [74]

    D’Hoker and P

    E. D’Hoker and P. Kraus,Charged Magnetic Brane Solutions in AdS (5) and the fate of the third law of thermodynamics,JHEP03(2010) 095 [0911.4518]

  75. [75]

    D’Hoker and P

    E. D’Hoker and P. Kraus,Magnetic Brane Solutions in AdS,JHEP10(2009) 088 [0908.3875]

  76. [76]

    Janiszewski and M

    S. Janiszewski and M. Kaminski,Quasinormal modes of magnetic and electric black branes versus far from equilibrium anisotropic fluids,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 025006 [1508.06993]

  77. [77]

    Ammon, M

    M. Ammon, M. Kaminski, R. Koirala, J. Leiber and J. Wu,Quasinormal modes of charged magnetic black branes & chiral magnetic transport,JHEP04(2017) 067 [1701.05565]

  78. [78]

    Cartwright,Example of the convergence of hydrodynamics in strong external fields,Phys

    C. Cartwright,Example of the convergence of hydrodynamics in strong external fields,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 026021 [2403.12638]

  79. [79]

    Carter and I.M

    B. Carter and I.M. Khalatnikov,Equivalence of convective and potential variational derivations of covariant superfluid dynamics,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4536

  80. [80]

    Bhattacharya, S

    J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya and S. Minwalla,Dissipative Superfluid dynamics from gravity,JHEP04(2011) 125 [1101.3332]

Showing first 80 references.