REVIEW 1 cited by
Corrections to the Smoothness and On-Shell Approximations in Femtoscopy and Coalescence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Corrections to the Smoothness and On-Shell Approximations in Femtoscopy and Coalescence
read the original abstract
Relativistic heavy-ion collisions produce femtometer-scale sources whose space-time structure can be constrained using two-particle femtoscopic correlations. Standard implementations rely on the smoothness and on-shell approximations, which effectively remove the relative momentum dependence of the particle emission function. We explore the validity of these approximations by deriving model-independent expansions that quantify the leading corrections for femtoscopy and coalescence with arbitrary sources and final-state interactions. The resulting first- and second-order correction terms can be evaluated with essentially the same numerical complexity as the usual Koonin-Pratt expressions; for angle-averaged correlations the first-order contributions vanish by symmetry. We illustrate the framework with explicit calculations in a blast-wave source model; for blast-wave parameter sets representative of pp and PbPb fits at LHC energies, the corrections are at or below the percent level for pp correlations and deuteron coalescence. These corrections are potentially subdominant compared to other effects, for example, corrections to the equal time approximation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Light Antinuclei Coalescence: Femtoscopic Constraints via Neural-Flow Surrogates
A neural-flow emulator of the CECA femtoscopic source, fit to 49 ALICE pp correlation functions, reduces claimed uncertainties on antinuclei coalescence parameters B2 and B3 to a few percent and ~10% respectively.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.