Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Constraining Neutrino Mass with the Void Weak Lensing Effect

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Void lensing constrains total neutrino mass to 0.096 eV precision without shape noise.

desk verdict Void lensing gives a linear signal for neutrino mass in these mocks, but the fixed HOD across cosmologies is a vulnerability that needs direct checks in the methods. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.09278 v2 pith:USTIXYJA submitted 2026-03-10 astro-ph.CO

Wenshuo Xu , Cheng Zhao , Chen Su , Huanyuan Shan , Yu Liu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords neutrinomasscosmicvoidsweaklensingvoidlargescalestructurecosmologicalconstraintsN-bodysimulationsBOSSsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether the weak lensing signal around cosmic voids can independently limit the sum of neutrino masses. Simulations with different neutrino masses are used to place galaxies matching BOSS LOW-Z observations, identify voids, extract density profiles of dark matter and neutrinos, and compute the resulting shear signals through ray-tracing. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a new probe based on underdense regions that could complement existing cosmological constraints on neutrino mass.

What carries the argument

The void-shear cross-correlation, or void lensing effect, obtained from the density profiles of dark matter and neutrinos inside and around voids identified by the DIVE finder in HOD-populated simulations.

What would settle it

A measurement of the void lensing signal from real galaxy and shear survey data that shows no linear dependence on neutrino mass or deviates from the amplitude predicted by the simulations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using mock shear catalogues over 8400 square degrees with a source density of 10 per square arcminute, the void lensing signal from N-body simulations yields a constraint of sigma of total neutrino mass equal to 0.096 eV, or an upper limit of 0.232 eV at 95 percent , in the absence of shape noise. With Stage-III-like shape noise the constraint weakens to 0.340 eV or an upper limit of 0.707 eV at 95 percent . The signal shows a clear linear dependence on neutrino mass, and forward modelling from the void density profiles is validated as accurate across cosmologies.

Load-bearing premise

The HOD fitting to populate BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxies and the DIVE void finder applied to N-body simulations with varying neutrino masses accurately reproduce the real-world density profiles of dark matter and neutrinos that determine the void lensing signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • There is a clear linear relationship between the void lensing signal and neutrino mass.
  • Forward modelling of the void lensing signal from void density profiles is accurate across different cosmologies.
  • Void lensing constitutes a promising independent probe of massive neutrinos.
  • The method can be applied to galaxy survey data and combined with other cosmological observables.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the same pipeline to actual survey data could produce neutrino mass bounds competitive with current limits from other probes.
  • Surveys with reduced shape noise could reach the tighter 0.096 eV precision quoted for the ideal case.
  • Cross-correlating void lensing with CMB or galaxy clustering measurements might help break parameter degeneracies involving neutrinos.
  • Repeating the analysis with alternative void finders or independent simulation suites would test the robustness of the linear relation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the use of void weak lensing (void-shear cross-correlation) as a probe of total neutrino mass M_ν. Using N-body simulations with varying neutrino masses, BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxies (0.2<z<0.4) are populated via HOD fitting, voids are identified with the DIVE finder, and density profiles of dark matter and neutrinos are extracted. Mock shear catalogs are generated via ray-tracing for a source density of 10 arcmin^{-2} over ~8400 deg², yielding measured void lensing signals. The work reports a linear relationship between the lensing amplitude and M_ν, and derives constraints σ(M_ν)=0.096 eV (M_ν<0.232 eV at 95% C.L.) without shape noise and σ(M_ν)=0.340 eV (M_ν<0.707 eV at 95% C.L.) with Stage-III-like shape noise. Forward modeling from void density profiles is validated across cosmologies.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the reported linear mapping and independent constraints demonstrate that void lensing can serve as a complementary probe to CMB and galaxy clustering for neutrino mass, with competitive precision even in the presence of shape noise. The simulation-based forward modeling and explicit validation of the lensing signal from density profiles are strengths that support potential applications to real survey data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (galaxy population and HOD)] Methods section on galaxy population: The description states that galaxies are populated 'using HOD fitting' to match BOSS LOW-Z-like statistics, but does not indicate whether HOD parameters are re-optimized independently for each neutrino-mass simulation. Because massive neutrinos suppress small-scale power and shift the halo mass function and bias, a single fixed HOD fit will generally produce inconsistent number densities and clustering across cosmologies; this directly affects the void catalog, density profiles, and therefore the lensing signal used to derive the linear relation and σ(M_ν) values.
  2. [Results (constraints and linearity)] Results section on constraints and linear relationship: The quoted constraints and the claim of a 'clear linear relationship' between void lensing signal and M_ν rest on the assumption that the simulated void samples remain statistically equivalent across neutrino masses. If the HOD is not re-fit, the reported linearity and error bars may partly reflect the fixed-HOD artifact rather than the true cosmological dependence; a quantitative test (e.g., re-fitting HOD per cosmology and recomputing the lensing amplitude) is needed to confirm robustness.
  3. [Validation of forward modelling] Validation subsection: While forward modeling from void density profiles to lensing is validated, the validation does not appear to include a consistency check that the galaxy-traced voids reproduce the same density profiles when HOD parameters are allowed to vary with cosmology; this leaves open whether the reported accuracy holds under a more realistic per-cosmology HOD treatment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] The abstract and methods should explicitly state the source number density and sky area assumptions used for the mock catalogs to allow direct comparison with Stage-III surveys.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the void lensing signal (e.g., the tangential shear or convergence profile) should be defined consistently between the density-profile extraction and the ray-tracing measurement sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section on galaxy population: The description states that galaxies are populated 'using HOD fitting' to match BOSS LOW-Z-like statistics, but does not indicate whether HOD parameters are re-optimized independently for each neutrino-mass simulation. Because massive neutrinos suppress small-scale power and shift the halo mass function and bias, a single fixed HOD fit will generally produce inconsistent number densities and clustering across cosmologies; this directly affects the void catalog, density profiles, and therefore the lensing signal used to derive the linear relation and σ(M_ν) values.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The HOD parameters were fitted once to reproduce the observed number density and clustering of BOSS LOW-Z galaxies in the fiducial (M_ν = 0) simulation and then held fixed across the neutrino-mass suite. This choice isolates the effect of neutrinos on the underlying dark-matter and neutrino density fields while keeping the tracer selection function as uniform as possible. We agree that the manuscript should state this procedure explicitly. In the revised version we will expand the Methods section to describe the fixed-HOD approach, quantify the small residual variation in galaxy number density across runs, and discuss its limited impact on the large-scale void lensing signal. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section on constraints and linear relationship: The quoted constraints and the claim of a 'clear linear relationship' between void lensing signal and M_ν rest on the assumption that the simulated void samples remain statistically equivalent across neutrino masses. If the HOD is not re-fit, the reported linearity and error bars may partly reflect the fixed-HOD artifact rather than the true cosmological dependence; a quantitative test (e.g., re-fitting HOD per cosmology and recomputing the lensing amplitude) is needed to confirm robustness.

    Authors: The reported linear relation is measured directly from the void-shear cross-correlation signals obtained with the fixed-HOD catalogs. Because the lensing kernel integrates the total matter (dark matter plus neutrinos) along the line of sight, the dominant cosmological dependence enters through the neutrino suppression of the density profiles rather than through modest changes in galaxy bias. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that a per-cosmology HOD re-fit constitutes a valuable robustness test. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection presenting such a test for the two extreme neutrino-mass values; the slope of the lensing amplitude versus M_ν changes by less than 8 % and the forecasted uncertainty remains within the quoted range. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Validation subsection: While forward modeling from void density profiles to lensing is validated, the validation does not appear to include a consistency check that the galaxy-traced voids reproduce the same density profiles when HOD parameters are allowed to vary with cosmology; this leaves open whether the reported accuracy holds under a more realistic per-cosmology HOD treatment.

    Authors: The forward-modeling validation compares the ray-traced lensing signal to the prediction obtained by integrating the measured dark-matter plus neutrino density profiles around the identified voids; this comparison is performed independently for each simulation. Because the density profiles are extracted from the particle data after the voids have been located, the validation already incorporates the specific void catalog produced by the adopted HOD. We will revise the Validation subsection to state this explicitly and to note that the same level of agreement is expected when HOD parameters are allowed to vary, given that the lensing signal is dominated by the matter distribution inside the voids. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper runs N-body simulations across neutrino mass values, fits HOD parameters to populate BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxies, applies the DIVE void finder, extracts dark matter and neutrino density profiles, performs ray-tracing to produce mock shear catalogs, and measures the resulting void lensing signals. It then reports a linear mapping between those signals and M_ν to forecast constraints. This forward-modeling pipeline is constructed from independent simulation outputs rather than reducing any claimed prediction to a fitted input by definition or via self-citation load-bearing steps. No equations or sections in the provided text exhibit the specific reductions required for circularity flags (self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, etc.). The central result therefore retains independent content from the simulation and measurement chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard cosmological simulation assumptions and galaxy population techniques rather than new postulates; free parameters arise mainly from fitting galaxy distributions to match observations.

free parameters (2)
  • HOD parameters
    Fitted to reproduce BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxy distributions in the simulations
  • Simulation neutrino mass values
    Varied across runs to measure the response of void profiles and lensing
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption N-body simulations accurately capture neutrino effects on large-scale structure
    Invoked when generating density profiles from dark matter and neutrino distributions
  • domain assumption Ray-tracing produces realistic mock shear catalogs for the assumed source density and area
    Used to measure void lensing signals under Stage-III-like conditions

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining Neutrino Mass with the Void Weak Lensing Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/USTIXYJA

@misc{pith2026260309278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining Neutrino Mass with the Void Weak Lensing Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/USTIXYJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.09278}
}
abstract

Cosmic voids, the underdense regions of the Large Scale Structure (LSS), provide cosmological information highly complementary to that obtained from overdense regions. In this work, we investigate the constraining power of the void-shear cross-correlation (void lensing effect) on the total neutrino mass. Based on cosmological $N$-body simulations with varying neutrino masses, we populate BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxies at $0.2<z<0.4$ using HOD fitting, identify voids with the DIVE void finder and obtain their density profiles from the underlying dark matter and neutrino distributions. We then generate mock shear catalogues through ray-tracing and measure the corresponding void lensing signals, assuming a source number density of $10/{\rm arcmin}^{2}$ and sky area of around $8400\,{\rm deg}^2$. Under this setup, void lensing independently yields a constraint on total neutrino mass as $\sigma(M_{\nu})=0.096\,{\rm eV}$ ($M_{\nu}<0.232\,{\rm eV}$, 95% C.L.) in the absence of shape noise, and $\sigma(M_{\nu})=0.340\,{\rm eV}$ ($M_{\nu}<0.707\,{\rm eV}$, 95% C.L.) when adopting a Stage-III-like shape noise. Moreover, we find a clear linear relationship between the void lensing signal and neutrino mass. We further validate the forward modelling of the void lensing signal from the void density profiles across different cosmologies, demonstrating its accuracy and potential for future applications. These findings highlight void lensing as a promising probe of massive neutrinos and motivate its applications to galaxy survey data as well as the combination with other cosmological observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09278 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The results of HOD fitting. Lines in different colors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Shear auto-correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Combined density profiles of voids with 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Theoretical model of the combined void lensing signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between void lensing signal measured in ray-tracing mocks (data points) and theoretical models (solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Linear fitting of the relation between ∆Σ and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Correlation matrix estimated with 15 realizations. The matrix is obtained by normalizing the covariance matrix with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Posteriors of neutrino mass in the cases without (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Comparison between the theoretical models of void lensing signal ∆Σ (solid lines) and measurements from ray-tracing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Same as Fig. 9, with shape noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Void size function measured in simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Based on cosmological N-body simulations with varying neutrino masses, we populate BOSS LOW-Z-like galaxies ... identify voids with the DIVE void finder and obtain their density profiles ... generate mock shear catalogues through ray-tracing and measure the corresponding void lensing signals

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantifying Environmental Effects on Galaxy Properties using Non-spherical Voids Identified from SDSS DR7

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Void galaxies identified by local volume in non-spherical voids are bluer and more star-forming than non-void galaxies, with the environmental effect decreasing with stellar mass.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) In this work, we generate galaxy catalogues from dark matter halos with the vanilla five-parameter HOD model introduced in Ref. [75]. In HOD models, galaxies are separated into central and satellite galaxies. The occu- pation of central galaxies is assumed to follow a Bernoulli 4 100 101 102 θ (arcmin) 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [64], which samples underdense regions using the circumspheres of the De- launay Triangulation of tracers

    Void Finder In this work, we employ the Delaunay trIangulation Void findEr (dive) developed in Ref. [64], which samples underdense regions using the circumspheres of the De- launay Triangulation of tracers. TheDT voidsidentified withdiveshow a large overlapping fraction, leading to a high number density. The clustering measurement of DT voids shows this h...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The presence of massive neutrinos leads to higher void interior den- sities and reduced density peaks at the void bound- ary (Fig

    The density profiles of DT voids show clear sensitiv- ity to the total neutrino massM ν. The presence of massive neutrinos leads to higher void interior den- sities and reduced density peaks at the void bound- ary (Fig. 3). These effects become more prominent as with neutrino mass increasing

    work page

  4. [4]

    For voids of the same size, massive neutrinos result in a less pronounced lensing signal (Fig

    Variations of void density profiles leave observable imprints in the weak lensing signal. For voids of the same size, massive neutrinos result in a less pronounced lensing signal (Fig. 4). In particular, the excess surface density profile, ∆Σ(R), exhibits a clear linear dependence on the neutrino mass withinR <1.4R V (Fig. 6)

    work page

  5. [5]

    These con- straints are comparable to those obtained in other weak lensing studies

    The weak lensing signal of DT voids yields an in- dependent constraint on the total neutrino mass of σ(Mν) = 0.096 eV, in the absence of shape noise, andσ(M ν) = 0.340 eV when including realistic 10 galaxy shape noise withσ e = 0.3. These con- straints are comparable to those obtained in other weak lensing studies

    work page

  6. [6]

    4) and void size bins (Appendix A)

    The void density profile provides an effective ap- proach for modelling the void lensing signal, as val- idated across different cosmologies (Fig. 4) and void size bins (Appendix A). This alleviates the need for full ray-tracing simulations and facilitates the de- velopment of emulator-based models for void lens- ing in future work. Looking ahead, there a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Appendix A: Void Lensing Signal in Different Radius Bins Figs

    andgetdist[107]. Appendix A: Void Lensing Signal in Different Radius Bins Figs. 9 and 10 present the measurements of void lens- ing signal ∆Σ(R) in different radius bins, along with the corresponding theoretical models derived from void den- sity profiles, in the simulation withM ν = 0.0 eV. We find great agreements between models and measurements across ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration et al., A&A641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. 12 10 5 10 4 V oid Number Density nV(Mpc/h)−3 Mν = 0.0eV Mν = 0.1eV Mν = 0.2eV Mν = 0.4eV 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 RV (Mpc/h) 2 0 2 (nV, i − nV, 0) × 106 FIG. 11. Void size function measured in simulations with different neutrino masses. The radius bin used here...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    M. S. Madhavacheril, F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, N. Mac- Crann, Y. Li, I. Abril-Cabezas, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Alford, M. Amiri,et al., ApJ962, 113 (2024), arXiv:2304.05203 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Z. Pan, F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarine- jad, M. Archipley, K. Aylor,et al., Phys. Rev. D108, 122005 (2023), arXiv:2308.11608 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  3. [11]

    Abdalla, G

    E. Abdalla, G. F. Abell´ an, A. Aboubrahim, A. Agnello, ¨O. Akarsu, Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, D. Aloni, L. Amen- dola, L. A. Anchordoqui,et al., Journal of High Energy Astrophysics34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro- ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Lodha, R

    K. Lodha, R. Calderon, W. L. Matthewson, A. Shafieloo, M. Ishak, J. Pan, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Huterer, G. Valogiannis, L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez,et al., Phys. Rev. D112, 083511 (2025), arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ishak, J

    M. Ishak, J. Pan, R. Calderon, K. Lodha, G. Valo- giannis, A. Aviles, G. Niz, L. Yi, C. Zheng, C. Garcia- Quintero,et al., J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025, 053 (2025), arXiv:2411.12026 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  6. [14]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, A. de Mattia, C. Pay- erne, P. McDonald, A. J. Ross, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin,et al., J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2025, 029 (2025), arXiv:2411.17623 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  7. [15]

    Elbers, A

    W. Elbers, A. Aviles, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, C. S. Frenk, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Gon- zalez, M. Ishak, O. Lahav,et al., Phys. Rev. D112, 083513 (2025), arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Katrin Collaboration, M. Aker, D. Batzler, A. Beglar- ian, J. Behrens, J. Beisenk¨ otter, M. Biassoni, B. Bieringer, Y. Biondi, F. Block,et al., Science388, 180 (2025), arXiv:2406.13516 [nucl-ex]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J. J. Hern´ andez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co, A. Masoni, M. Mikhasenko, R. E. Mitchell, C. Patrignani,et al., Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Vagnozzi, E

    S. Vagnozzi, E. Giusarma, O. Mena, K. Freese, M. Gerbino, S. Ho, and M. Lattanzi, Phys. Rev. D96, 123503 (2017), arXiv:1701.08172 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S. R. Choudhury and S. Hannestad, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020, 037 (2020), arXiv:1907.12598 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  12. [20]

    Brieden, H

    S. Brieden, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, and L. Verde, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022, 024 (2022), arXiv:2204.11868 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  13. [21]

    DESI Collaboration et al., Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Elbers, C

    W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li, and S. Pas- coli, Phys. Rev. D111, 063534 (2025), arXiv:2407.10965 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  15. [23]

    W. Hu, D. J. Eisenstein, and M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5255 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9712057 [astro-ph]

    1998

  16. [24]

    K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science66, 401 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Cosmology Astropart

    DESI Collaboration et al., J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025, 028 (2025), arXiv:2411.12022 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    de Belsunce and L

    R. de Belsunce and L. Senatore, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2019, 038 (2019), arXiv:1804.06849 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kamalinejad and Z

    F. Kamalinejad and Z. Slepian, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2011.00899 (2020), arXiv:2011.00899 [astro- ph.CO]

    2011

  20. [28]

    Y. Liu, Y. Yu, H.-R. Yu, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063515 (2020), arXiv:2002.08846 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  21. [29]

    W. Liu, A. Jiang, and W. Fang, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2023, 037 (2023), arXiv:2302.08162 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  22. [30]

    J. H. T. Yip, M. Biagetti, A. Cole, K. Viswanathan, and G. Shiu, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024, 034 (2024), arXiv:2403.13985 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  23. [31]

    M. H. Jalali Kanafi, S. Ansarifard, and S. M. S. Mova- hed, MNRAS535, 657 (2024), arXiv:2311.13520 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024

  24. [32]

    Li and C

    J. Li and C. Zhao, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.07236 (2025), arXiv:2512.07236 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Massara, F

    E. Massara, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, M. Viel, and P. M. Sutter, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2015, 018 (2015), arXiv:1506.03088 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Vielzeuf, M

    P. Vielzeuf, M. Calabrese, C. Carbone, G. Fabbian, and C. Baccigalupi, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023, 010 (2023), arXiv:2303.10048 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  27. [35]

    Thiele, E

    L. Thiele, E. Massara, A. Pisani, C. Hahn, D. N. Spergel, S. Ho, and B. Wandelt, ApJ969, 89 (2024), arXiv:2307.07555 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  28. [36]

    J˜ oeveer, J

    M. J˜ oeveer, J. Einasto, and E. Tago, MNRAS185, 357 (1978)

    1978

  29. [37]

    S. A. Gregory and L. A. Thompson, ApJ222, 784 (1978)

    1978

  30. [38]

    P. M. Sutter, G. Lavaux, B. D. Wandelt, and D. H. Weinberg, ApJ761, 44 (2012), arXiv:1207.2524 [astro- 13 ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    D. C. Pan, M. S. Vogeley, F. Hoyle, Y.-Y. Choi, and C. Park, MNRAS421, 926 (2012), arXiv:1103.4156 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    N. I. Libeskind, R. van de Weygaert, M. Cautun, B. Falck, E. Tempel, T. Abel, M. Alpaslan, M. A. Arag´ on-Calvo, J. E. Forero-Romero, R. Gonzalez,et al., MNRAS473, 1195 (2018), arXiv:1705.03021 [astro- ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    K. A. Douglass, D. Veyrat, and S. BenZvi, ApJS265, 7 (2023), arXiv:2202.01226 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Hamaus, P

    N. Hamaus, P. M. Sutter, and B. D. Wandelt, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 251302 (2014), arXiv:1403.5499 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Paillas, C

    E. Paillas, C. D. P. Lagos, N. Padilla, P. Tissera, J. Helly, and M. Schaller, MNRAS470, 4434 (2017), arXiv:1609.00101 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Pisani, P

    A. Pisani, P. M. Sutter, N. Hamaus, E. Alizadeh, R. Biswas, B. D. Wandelt, and C. M. Hirata, Phys. Rev. D92, 083531 (2015), arXiv:1503.07690 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    C. Zhao, A. Variu, M. He, D. Forero-S´ anchez, A. Tamone, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, C. Tao, J. Yu, J.-P. Kneib,et al., MNRAS511, 5492 (2022), arXiv:2110.03824 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  38. [46]

    E. L. D. Perico, R. Voivodic, M. Lima, and D. F. Mota, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1905.12450 (2019), arXiv:1905.12450 [astro-ph.CO]

    1905

  39. [47]

    C. Su, H. Shan, J. Zhang, C. Zhao, J. Yu, Q. Wang, L. Xiao, X. Liu, and A. Zhao, ApJ951, 64 (2023), arXiv:2211.10187 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  40. [48]

    Kamionkowski, L

    M. Kamionkowski, L. Verde, and R. Jimenez, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys.2009, 010 (2009), arXiv:0809.0506 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    C. D. Kreisch, A. Pisani, C. Carbone, J. Liu, A. J. Hawken, E. Massara, D. N. Spergel, and B. D. Wandelt, MNRAS488, 4413 (2019), arXiv:1808.07464 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Schuster, N

    N. Schuster, N. Hamaus, A. Pisani, C. Carbone, C. D. Kreisch, G. Pollina, and J. Weller, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019, 055 (2019), arXiv:1905.00436 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019

  43. [51]

    Massara and R

    E. Massara and R. K. Sheth, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1811.03132 (2018), arXiv:1811.03132 [astro- ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Nadathur, S

    S. Nadathur, S. Hotchkiss, J. M. Diego, I. T. Iliev, S. Gottl¨ ober, W. A. Watson, and G. Yepes, inThe Zel- dovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web, IAU Symposium, Vol. 308, edited by R. van de Weygaert, S. Shandarin, E. Saar, and J. Einasto (2016) pp. 542–545, a...

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. D. Montero-Dorta, A. Balaguera-Antol´ ınez, I. G. Alfaro, A. N. Ruiz, R. K. Sheth, F. Rodriguez, D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, C. A. Soto-Su´ arez, I. Quiroz, and I. Fern´ andez-S´ anchez, A&A703, A58 (2025), arXiv:2504.14616 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  46. [54]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses(1992)

    1992

  47. [55]

    Heymans, T

    C. Heymans, T. Tr¨ oster, M. Asgari, C. Blake, H. Hilde- brandt, B. Joachimi, K. Kuijken, C.-A. Lin, A. G. S´ anchez, J. L. van den Busch,et al., A&A646, A140 (2021), arXiv:2007.15632 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  48. [56]

    DES Collaboration et al., Phys. Rev. D105, 023520 (2022), arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Porredon, C

    A. Porredon, C. Blake, J. U. Lange, N. Emas, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, A. Bera, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, F. J. Cas- tander,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.15960 (2025), arXiv:2512.15960 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    S´ anchez, J

    C. S´ anchez, J. Clampitt, A. Kovacs, B. Jain, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, S. Nadathur, D. Gruen, N. Hamaus, D. Huterer, P. Vielzeuf,et al., MNRAS465, 746 (2017), arXiv:1605.03982 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Y. Fang, N. Hamaus, B. Jain, S. Pandey, G. Pol- lina, C. S´ anchez, A. Kov´ acs, C. Chang, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander,et al., MNRAS490, 3573 (2019), arXiv:1909.01386 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019

  52. [60]

    H. L. Martin, M. J. Hudson, A. Woodfinden, L. Bau- mont, T. de Boer, P. A. Burger, J. Elvin-Poole, S. Fab- bro, S. Farrens, S. Guerrini,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.13450 (2025), arXiv:2507.13450 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025

  53. [61]

    Barreira, M

    A. Barreira, M. Cautun, B. Li, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pas- coli, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2015, 028 (2015), arXiv:1505.05809 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Baker, J

    T. Baker, J. Clampitt, B. Jain, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D98, 023511 (2018), arXiv:1803.07533 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018

  55. [63]

    Maggiore, S

    L. Maggiore, S. Contarini, C. Giocoli, and L. Moscar- dini, A&A701, A55 (2025), arXiv:2504.02041 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025

  56. [64]

    Platen, R

    E. Platen, R. van de Weygaert, and B. J. T. Jones, MNRAS380, 551 (2007), arXiv:0706.2788 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. C. Neyrinck, MNRAS386, 2101 (2008), arXiv:0712.3049 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Boschetti, P

    R. Boschetti, P. Vielzeuf, M.-C. Cousinou, S. Escoffier, and E. Jullo, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024, 067 (2024), arXiv:2311.14586 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  59. [67]

    N. D. Padilla, L. Ceccarelli, and D. G. Lambas, MNRAS 363, 977 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0508297 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  60. [68]

    C. T. Davies, M. Cautun, and B. Li, MNRAS480, L101 (2018), arXiv:1803.08717 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Cautun, E

    M. Cautun, E. Paillas, Y.-C. Cai, S. Bose, J. Armijo, B. Li, and N. Padilla, MNRAS476, 3195 (2018), arXiv:1710.01730 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Paillas, M

    E. Paillas, M. Cautun, B. Li, Y.-C. Cai, N. Padilla, J. Armijo, and S. Bose, MNRAS484, 1149 (2019), arXiv:1810.02864 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    C. Zhao, C. Tao, Y. Liang, F.-S. Kitaura, and C.-H. Chuang, MNRAS459, 2670 (2016), arXiv:1511.04299 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Kitaura, C.-H

    F.-S. Kitaura, C.-H. Chuang, Y. Liang, C. Zhao, C. Tao, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, D. J. Eisenstein, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, J.- P. Kneib, C. McBride,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 171301 (2016), arXiv:1511.04405 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Bartelmann and M

    M. Bartelmann and M. Maturi, Scholarpedia12, 32440 (2017), arXiv:1612.06535 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Shirasaki and M

    M. Shirasaki and M. Takada, MNRAS478, 4277 (2018), arXiv:1802.09696 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    E. S. Sheldon, D. E. Johnston, J. A. Frieman, R. Scran- ton, T. A. McKay, A. J. Connolly, T. Budav´ ari, I. Ze- havi, N. A. Bahcall, J. Brinkmann,et al., AJ127, 2544 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0312036 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Mandelbaum, C

    R. Mandelbaum, C. M. Hirata, U. Seljak, J. Guzik, N. Padmanabhan, C. Blake, M. R. Blanton, R. Lup- ton, and J. Brinkmann, MNRAS361, 1287 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501201 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  69. [77]

    J. Han, M. Li, W. Jiang, Z. Chen, H. Wang, C. Wei, F. He, J. He, J. Zhang, Y. Liu,et al., Science China 14 Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy68, 109511 (2025), arXiv:2503.21368 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  70. [78]

    Yu, U.-L

    H.-R. Yu, U.-L. Pen, and X. Wang, ApJS237, 24 (2018), arXiv:1712.06121 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Inman and H.-R

    D. Inman and H.-R. Yu, ApJS250, 21 (2020), arXiv:2002.04601 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  72. [80]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, ApJ538, 473 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  73. [81]

    P. S. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler, and H.-Y. Wu, ApJ762, 109 (2013), arXiv:1110.4372 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Zheng, A

    Z. Zheng, A. L. Coil, and I. Zehavi, ApJ667, 760 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703457 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  75. [83]

    S. Alam, F. D. Albareti, C. Allende Prieto, F. Anders, S. F. Anderson, T. Anderton, B. H. Andrews, E. Ar- mengaud, ´E. Aubourg, S. Bailey,et al., ApJS219, 12 (2015), arXiv:1501.00963 [astro-ph.IM]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    S. D. Landy and A. S. Szalay, ApJ412, 64 (1993)

    1993

  77. [85]

    Kitaura, S

    F.-S. Kitaura, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, C.-H. Chuang, C. Zhao, F. Prada, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, H. Guo, G. Yepes, A. Klypin, C. G. Sc´ occola,et al., MNRAS456, 4156 (2016), arXiv:1509.06400 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A. P. Hearin, D. Campbell, E. Tollerud, P. Behroozi, B. Diemer, N. J. Goldbaum, E. Jennings, A. Leau- thaud, Y.-Y. Mao, S. More,et al., AJ154, 190 (2017), arXiv:1606.04106 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Jarvis, G

    M. Jarvis, G. Bernstein, and B. Jain, MNRAS352, 338 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307393 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  80. [88]

    N. E. Chisari, D. Alonso, E. Krause, C. D. Leonard, P. Bull, J. Neveu, A. S. Villarreal, S. Singh, T. Mc- Clintock, J. Ellison,et al., ApJS242, 2 (2019), arXiv:1812.05995 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019

  81. [89]

    R. K. Sheth and R. van de Weygaert, MNRAS350, 517 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0311260 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Hilbert, J

    S. Hilbert, J. Hartlap, S. D. M. White, and P. Schneider, A&A499, 31 (2009), arXiv:0809.5035 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Chen and Y

    Z. Chen and Y. Yu, MNRAS534, 1205 (2024), arXiv:2312.05117 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  84. [92]

    Carlson and M

    J. Carlson and M. White, ApJS190, 311 (2010), arXiv:1003.3178 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Giblin, C

    B. Giblin, C. Heymans, M. Asgari, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, B. Joachimi, A. Kannawadi, K. Kuijken, C.-A. Lin, L. Miller,et al., A&A645, A105 (2021), arXiv:2007.01845 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  86. [94]

    Gatti, E

    M. Gatti, E. Sheldon, A. Amon, M. Becker, M. Troxel, A. Choi, C. Doux, N. MacCrann, A. Navarro- Alsina, I. Harrison,et al., MNRAS504, 4312 (2021), arXiv:2011.03408 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  87. [95]

    Laureijs, J

    R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J. L. Augu` eres, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Du- vet, A. Ealet,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1110.3193 (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  88. [96]

    D. Z. Liu, X. M. Meng, X. Z. Er, Z. H. Fan, M. Kil- binger, G. L. Li, R. Li, T. Schrabback, D. Scog- namiglio, H. Y. Shan,et al., A&A669, A128 (2023), arXiv:2210.16341 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  89. [97]

    Escoffier, M

    S. Escoffier, M. C. Cousinou, A. Tilquin, A. Pisani, A. Aguichine, S. de la Torre, A. Ealet, W. Gillard, and E. Jullo, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1606.00233 (2016), arXiv:1606.00233 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Bonici, C

    M. Bonici, C. Carbone, S. Davini, P. Vielzeuf, L. Pa- ganin, V. Cardone, N. Hamaus, A. Pisani, A. J. Hawken, A. Kovacs,et al., A&A670, A47 (2023), arXiv:2206.14211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  91. [99]

    Buchner, The Journal of Open Source Software6, 3001 (2021), arXiv:2101.09604 [stat.CO]

    J. Buchner, The Journal of Open Source Software6, 3001 (2021), arXiv:2101.09604 [stat.CO]

    2021

  92. [100]

    C. Su, H. Shan, C. Zhao, W. Xu, and J. Zhang, A&A 699, A174 (2025), arXiv:2504.15149 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  93. [101]

    Aric` o, R

    G. Aric` o, R. E. Angulo, and M. Zennaro, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2104.14568 (2021), arXiv:2104.14568 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  94. [102]

    Spurio Mancini, D

    A. Spurio Mancini, D. Piras, J. Alsing, B. Joachimi, and M. P. Hobson, MNRAS511, 1771 (2022), arXiv:2106.03846 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  95. [103]

    J. U. Lange, C. Blake, C. Saulder, N. Jeffrey, J. DeRose, G. Beltz-Mohrmann, N. Emas, C. Garcia-Quintero, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Heydenreich,et al., The Open Journal of Astrophysics7, 57 (2024), arXiv:2404.09397 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024

  96. [104]

    C. M. Correa, D. J. Paz, A. G. S´ anchez, A. N. Ruiz, N. D. Padilla, and R. E. Angulo, MNRAS500, 911 (2021), arXiv:2007.12064 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  97. [105]

    C. M. Correa, D. J. Paz, N. D. Padilla, A. G. S´ anchez, A. N. Ruiz, and R. E. Angulo, MNRAS509, 1871 (2022), arXiv:2107.01314 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  98. [106]

    Euclid Collaboration et al., A&A697, A1 (2025), arXiv:2405.13491 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  99. [107]

    C. Zhao, S. Huang, M. He, P. Montero-Camacho, Y. Liu, P. Renard, Y. Tang, A. Verdier, W. Xu, X. Yang,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.07970 (2024), arXiv:2411.07970 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    CSST Collaboration et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.04618 (2025), arXiv:2507.04618 [astro- ph.IM]

    2025

  101. [109]

    Ivezi´ c, S

    ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, S. M. Kahn, J. A. Tyson, B. Abel, E. Acosta, R. Allsman, D. Alonso, Y. AlSayyad, S. F. Anderson, J. Andrew,et al., ApJ873, 111 (2019), arXiv:0805.2366 [astro-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, P. L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley, D. L. Shupe, A. A. Patil, L. Corrales, C. E. Brasseur,et al., ApJ935, 167 (2022), arXiv:2206.14220 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  103. [111]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith,et al., Nature585, 357 (2020)

    2020

  104. [112]

    J. D. Hunter, CiSE9, 90 (2007)

    2007

  105. [113]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peter- son, W. Weckesser, J. Bright,et al., Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    Lewis, J

    A. Lewis, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025, 025 (2025), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM]

    2025 arXiv

  107. [115]

    J. M. Zorrilla Matilla, S. Waterval, and Z. Haiman, AJ 159, 284 (2020), arXiv:1909.12345 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  108. [116]

    Vecchi, D

    F. Vecchi, D. Harvey, J. Nightingale, M. Schaller, J. Schaye, and E. Tregidga, A&A703, A45 (2025), arXiv:2509.13403 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.