Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A single general TOV equation covers stellar equilibrium in a broad class of gravity theories and shows that weaker gravity softens the Buchdahl limit and allows fluid cores inside regular black holes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 18:57 UTC pith:637FUVGQ

load-bearing objection Clean general TOV under the master-equation assumptions, plus solid constant-density illustrations of Buchdahl mitigation and fluid-core solutions; the parity tension is real but already owned by the authors and does not sink the result. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.24269 v2 pith:637FUVGQ submitted 2026-03-25 gr-qc hep-th

Effective geometrostatics of spherical stars beyond general relativity

Julio Arrechea , Ra\'ul Carballo-Rubio , Matt Visser This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords stellar equilibriumTolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equationspherical symmetryZiprick-Kunstatter theoriesBuchdahl limitregular black holesgeodesic completeness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper supplies a unified toolkit for stellar structure in any theory whose spherical sector is governed by master field equations that equate an identically conserved tensor built from at most second derivatives of the metric to an identically conserved matter tensor. From those minimal assumptions the authors extract the most general Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation that still closes as a sequence of first-order ordinary differential equations. They also spell out the parity and analyticity conditions needed for geodesic completeness at the center. When the general equation is specialized to the Ziprick–Kunstatter family of deformations of general relativity, two universal features appear: the classical Buchdahl compactness bound is continuously raised as gravity is weakened, and static solutions exist that place perfect-fluid cores inside the inner horizon of a regular black hole. A sympathetic reader cares because the same geometric assumptions that control black-hole interiors now control ordinary stars, turning stellar equilibrium into a precision probe of modified gravity.

Core claim

Under the sole requirement that the spherical Einstein tensor is replaced by an identically conserved tensor of at most second order, stellar equilibrium is completely described by a single generalized TOV equation (their Eq. 26). When that equation is integrated inside the Ziprick–Kunstatter class, the Buchdahl limit is mitigated and static regular black holes with perfect-fluid cores appear as equilibrium solutions.

What carries the argument

The generalized Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation obtained by combining the master field equations with fluid conservation; it reduces hydrostatic equilibrium to a first-order ODE for pressure once the free functions α(r,χ) and β(r,χ) are specified.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that geodesic completeness at the origin forces density, pressure and the metric functions to admit even-parity analytic expansions, which in turn forces the free function β of the Ziprick–Kunstatter family to be odd inside matter.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the generalized TOV equation for a Ziprick–Kunstatter model whose β is not odd near the origin and check whether a smooth, geodesically complete constant-density star still exists; if it does, the parity requirement fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives the most general Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff (TOV) equation of stellar equilibrium compatible with master field equations that equate an identically conserved second-order tensor built from the metric to an identically conserved matter tensor (Eqs. 3–7). Under spherical symmetry and staticity the radial equations reduce to a first-order ODE for the Misner–Sharp mass (Eq. 24) and a generalized TOV for the radial pressure (Eq. 26); the D-dimensional GR limit is recovered explicitly. Conditions guaranteeing geodesic completeness at the origin are obtained from parity requirements on analytic expansions of density, pressure and metric functions (Sec. III.B). The TOV is then specialized to the Ziprick–Kunstatter (ZK) family (integrability condition ∂_χα−∂_rβ=0) and integrated for constant-density stars with an odd-parity β_odd that regularizes the interior; the resulting solutions exhibit a continuous mitigation of the Buchdahl limit and static regular black holes with perfect-fluid cores inside an inner horizon.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies a compact, theory-independent TOV that unifies stellar equilibrium across a broad class of second-order spherical modifications of GR (Lovelock, quasitopological, effective quantum-gravity corrections, etc.). The explicit recovery of the known D-dimensional GR TOV and the transparent specialization to the ZK family give a concrete computational tool. The numerical illustrations of Buchdahl mitigation and fluid-core solutions for odd-β models are reproducible and falsifiable once a specific β is chosen. The parity analysis of geodesic completeness is a useful consistency check that any reconstruction of a D-dimensional metric from lower-dimensional fields must satisfy. These are genuine contributions to the effective-geometry literature.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. III.B and IV.D–F: the parity argument that forces β to be odd inside matter (and therefore excludes the vacuum regular black holes that originally motivated the ZK family) is load-bearing for the claim of geodesic completeness. The manuscript correctly acknowledges the tension, but the reader is left without a quantitative criterion for how large a neighborhood of r=0 must be covered by matter before the incompleteness of the exterior vacuum solution becomes physically irrelevant. A short estimate (e.g., in terms of the curvature radius set by ℓ) would strengthen the physical interpretation of the fluid-core solutions.
  2. Eq. (26) and Sec. IV.G–I: all numerical integrations are performed for constant density. While this is the classic Buchdahl setting, the claim of “universal aspects associated with the weakening of the strength of gravity” would be more robust if at least one polytropic or piecewise-polytropic equation of state were shown to exhibit the same qualitative mitigation of the compactness bound. The constant-density restriction is not fatal, but it should be flagged more explicitly as a limitation of the present illustrations.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 1 caption and surrounding text: the plot of β_odd for n=1 is useful, but the vertical axis label is missing and the range of ℓ shown is not stated in the caption.
  2. Eq. (65): the family β_odd is introduced as “illustrative”; a one-sentence remark on whether other odd functions (e.g., pure power-law or exponential) produce quantitatively different Buchdahl curves would help the reader assess robustness.
  3. App. A: the junction conditions are derived for the ZK family in four dimensions; a brief statement that the same continuity of m and u' holds for the general master equations (or a pointer to the literature) would make the appendix self-contained.
  4. References: several arXiv-only citations lack journal versions that have since appeared; updating them would improve archival value.
  5. Typographical: “ther o0 divergence” (Fig. 1 caption) and occasional missing spaces around mathematical operators should be cleaned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: generalized TOV (26) is algebraically derived from the stated master equations; ZK illustrations use a free parameter ℓ with no data fitting.

full rationale

The paper's central result is the generalized TOV equation (26), obtained by rearranging the master field equations (21)–(22) together with fluid conservation (23) under the sole assumptions that the Einstein tensor is replaced by an identically conserved second-order tensor built from the metric and that the matter tensor is likewise conserved. This derivation is self-contained and transparent; it does not redefine its inputs as outputs, fit parameters to target compactness, or import a uniqueness theorem that forces the stellar results. The master equations themselves are taken from the authors' prior framework [30], a normal foundational citation that supplies the starting point rather than a load-bearing circular step for the TOV or the subsequent solutions. Specialization to the Ziprick–Kunstatter family (integrability condition ∂_χα=∂_rβ=0, potential of the form (42)) is an explicit choice of a subset of the allowed theories; the illustrative odd-parity β_odd (65) is constructed by hand to satisfy the geodesic-completeness parity conditions derived in Sec. III.B, and the length scale ℓ remains a free theory parameter. Numerical integration of the resulting first-order ODE for constant-density stars simply exhibits the consequences of that choice (lower central pressure, continuous mitigation of the Buchdahl limit, static fluid cores inside an inner horizon). The parity requirements that exclude the vacuum regular black holes originally motivating the ZK family are openly acknowledged (Secs. III.B, IV.D–F) and do not force the stellar conclusions by construction. No claimed prediction reduces to a fitted input, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its inputs once the master equations are granted; the single self-citation is not load-bearing for the stellar-equilibrium claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the master-field framework of Ref. [30], spherical symmetry, second-order equations of motion, and the integrability condition that defines the ZK family. The only free parameters introduced for the concrete solutions are the length scale ell and the integer n that control the short-distance behavior of beta_odd; both are theory parameters, not fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • ell
    Length scale that deforms beta away from its GR value; controls the strength of the short-distance modification and the location of the inner horizon. Chosen by hand for numerical illustrations (e.g., ell = 1/5, 1).
  • n = 1
    Integer power that sets the strength of the divergence of beta_odd at the origin; n = 1 is used for all explicit integrations.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Spherically symmetric spacetimes obey master field equations equating an identically conserved tensor built from at most second derivatives of the metric to an identically conserved matter tensor.
    Stated in the abstract and Sec. II; taken from the authors' prior work [30] and used as the starting point for the entire derivation.
  • domain assumption Physical observables (density, pressure) and metric functions admit analytic Taylor expansions about the origin, forcing even parity for scalars and dimension-dependent parity for the Misner-Sharp mass.
    Sec. III.B; used to constrain the allowed parity of alpha and beta and thereby to select the odd-parity beta_odd family.
  • ad hoc to paper The integrability condition partial_chi alpha - partial_r beta = 0 holds, so that a potential Omega exists and the theory belongs to the Ziprick-Kunstatter family.
    Imposed in Sec. IV.B to obtain a tractable subset of the master equations; not required by the general TOV derivation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 27574 in / 2588 out tokens · 28511 ms · 2026-07-13T18:57:02.764771+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We provide a set of general tools to study the problem of stellar equilibrium in any gravitational theory in which spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfy master field equations taking the form of an equality between an identically conserved tensor, with derivatives of up to second order in the metric, and an identically conserved matter tensor. We derive the most general expression for the Tolman--Oppenheimer--Volkoff equation of stellar equilibrium that is compatible with these minimal requirements. A general discussion of the conditions that guarantee geodesic completeness at the center of symmetry is also presented. The equations of stellar equilibrium are integrated in a subset of the space of allowed deformations of general relativity proposed by Ziprick and Kunstatter, allowing us to illustrate universal aspects associated with the weakening of the strength of gravity, such as the mitigation of the Buchdahl limit obtained in general relativity or the existence of static solutions describing regular black holes with perfect fluid cores.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Charging up regular black holes

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Charged Bardeen and Hayward metrics become singular under deformed Einstein–Maxwell equations; more stringent regularity conditions are derived and improved regular charged metrics are constructed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,

    C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,” Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 4,��������������� �������

    2014

  2. [2]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,

    E. Berti et al., “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,” Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 243001,���������������� �������

    2015

  3. [3]

    Underdetermination in classic and modern tests of general relativity,

    W. J. Wolf, M. Sanchioni, and J. Read, “Underdetermination in classic and modern tests of general relativity,” Eur. J. Phil. Sci.14no. 4, (2024) 57,���������������� �����������������

    2024

  4. [4]

    Fundamental physics opportunities with the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope,

    D. Ayzenberg et al., “Fundamental physics opportunities with the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope,” Living Rev. Rel.28no. 1, (2025) 4,���������������� �������������. [Erratum: Living Rev.Rel. 28, 7 (2025)]

    2025

  5. [5]

    Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, “Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,” Living Reviews in Relativity28no. 1, (Mar., 2025) 3,���������������� �������. 32

    2025

  6. [6]

    Ten years of extreme gravity tests of general theory of relativity with gravitational-wave observations,

    A. Gupta, “Ten years of extreme gravity tests of general theory of relativity with gravitational-wave observations,”���������������� �������

  7. [7]

    Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity,” in 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9), pp. 742–768. 6, 2000.�������������������

    2000

  8. [8]

    Quantum gravity: A Progress report,

    S. Carlip, “Quantum gravity: A Progress report,” Rept. Prog. Phys.64(2001) 885, �������������������

    2001

  9. [9]

    Rovelli, Quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004

    2004

  10. [10]

    Structure, individuality and quantum gravity,

    J. Stachel, “Structure, individuality and quantum gravity,”�������������������

  11. [11]

    Quantum Gravity in 30 Questions,

    R. Loll, G. Fabiano, D. Frattulillo, and F. Wagner, “Quantum Gravity in 30 Questions,” PoSCORFU2021(2022) 316,���������������� ��������

    2022

  12. [12]

    Frontiers of Quantum Gravity: shared challenges, converging directions,

    J. de Boer et al., “Frontiers of Quantum Gravity: shared challenges, converging directions,” ���������������� ��������

  13. [13]

    Visions in quantum gravity,

    L. Buoninfante et al., “Visions in quantum gravity,”���������������� ��������

  14. [14]

    Why Do We Want a Theory of Quantum Gravity?,

    K. Crowther, “Why Do We Want a Theory of Quantum Gravity?,”���������������� �������

  15. [15]

    Sgr A* and General Relativity,

    T. Johannsen, “Sgr A* and General Relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.33no. 11, (2016) 113001,���������������� �������������

    2016

  16. [16]

    Black Hole Based Tests of General Relativity,

    K. Yagi and L. C. Stein, “Black Hole Based Tests of General Relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.33no. 5, (2016) 054001,���������������� �������

    2016

  17. [17]

    The Milky Way’s Supermassive Black Hole: How Good a Case Is It?,

    A. Eckart, A. H¨ uttemann, C. Kiefer, S. Britzen, M. Zajaˇ cek, C. L¨ ammerzahl, M. St¨ ockler, M. Valencia-S, V. Karas, and M. Garc´ ıa-Mar´ ın, “The Milky Way’s Supermassive Black Hole: How Good a Case Is It?,” Found. Phys.47no. 5, (2017) 553–624,���������������� �������������

    2017

  18. [18]

    Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 12, (2018) 124009, ���������������� �������

    2018

  19. [19]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22no. 1, (2019) 4,���������������� �������

    2019

  20. [20]

    Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole 33 physics,

    N. Afshordi et al., “Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole 33 physics,” 10, 2024.���������������� �������

    2024

  21. [21]

    Small, dark, and heavy: But is it a black hole?,

    M. Visser, C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and S. Sonego, “Small, dark, and heavy: But is it a black hole?,” PoSBHGRS(2008) 010,��������������� �������

    2008

  22. [22]

    Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity,

    A. Perez, “Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity,” Rept. Prog. Phys.80no. 12, (2017) 126901,���������������� �������

    2017

  23. [23]

    Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, “Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,” ���������������� �������.�������������������������������������������

  24. [24]

    Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,

    R. Carballo-Rubio et al., “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP 05(2025) 003,���������������� �������

    2025

  25. [25]

    Quantum Corrected Spherical Collapse: A Phenomenological Framework,

    J. Ziprick and G. Kunstatter, “Quantum Corrected Spherical Collapse: A Phenomenological Framework,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 044031,��������������� �������

    2010

  26. [26]

    Modelling the evaporation of nonsingular black holes,

    T. Taves and G. Kunstatter, “Modelling the evaporation of nonsingular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D90no. 12, (2014) 124062,��������������� �������

    2014

  27. [27]

    New 2D dilaton gravity for nonsingular black holes,

    G. Kunstatter, H. Maeda, and T. Taves, “New 2D dilaton gravity for nonsingular black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.33no. 10, (2016) 105005,���������������� �������

    2016

  28. [28]

    No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,

    J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov, and G. Kunstatter, “No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Res.6no. 3, (2024) L032055,���������������� �������

    2024

  29. [29]

    Evaporation of regular black holes in 2D dilaton gravity,

    J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov, and G. Kunstatter, “Evaporation of regular black holes in 2D dilaton gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 104068,���������������� �������

    2025

  30. [30]

    Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, “Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,” Nature Commun.17(2026) 1399,���������������� �������

    2026

  31. [31]

    Regular Vaidya solutions of effective gravitational theories,

    V. Boyanov and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Regular Vaidya solutions of effective gravitational theories,”���������������� �������

  32. [32]

    O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity

    B. O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity. Academic Press, 1983

    1983

  33. [33]

    Hydrostatic equilibrium of a perfect fluid sphere with exterior higher dimensional Schwarzschild space-time,

    J. Ponce de Leon and N. Cruz, “Hydrostatic equilibrium of a perfect fluid sphere with exterior higher dimensional Schwarzschild space-time,” Gen. Rel. Grav.32(2000) 1207–1216,�������������������

    2000

  34. [34]

    A study of neutron stars in�≥4 dimensions,

    M. Bagchi, “A study of neutron stars in�≥4 dimensions,”���������������� �������

  35. [35]

    D-dimensional self-gravitating lattice gas in general relativity,

    B. Bakhti, “D-dimensional self-gravitating lattice gas in general relativity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36no. 29, (2021) 2150217,���������������� �������

    2021

  36. [36]

    Buchdahl limits in theories 34 with regular black holes,

    P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, ´A. J. Murcia, and A. Vicente-Cano, “Buchdahl limits in theories 34 with regular black holes,”���������������� �������

  37. [37]

    On massive neutron cores,

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On massive neutron cores,” Phys. Rev.55(1939) 374–381

    1939

  38. [38]

    Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,” Universe6no. 1, (2019) 8,���������������� �������

    2019

  39. [39]

    The eye of the storm: a regular Kerr black hole,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “The eye of the storm: a regular Kerr black hole,” JCAP03 no. 03, (2022) 011,���������������� �������

    2022

  40. [40]

    Astrophysically viable Kerr-like spacetime,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Astrophysically viable Kerr-like spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D105 no. 6, (2022) 064065,���������������� �������

    2022

  41. [41]

    Rinne, Axisymmetric numerical relativity

    O. Rinne, Axisymmetric numerical relativity. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2005. �������������������

    2005

  42. [42]

    Singularity and differentiability at the origin of static and spherically symmetric black holes,

    T. Antonelli and M. Sebastianutti, “Singularity and differentiability at the origin of static and spherically symmetric black holes,” Phys. Rev. D113no. 6, (2026) 064007, ���������������� �������

    2026

  43. [43]

    Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes,

    T. Zhou and L. Modesto, “Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 4, (2023) 044016,���������������� �������

    2023

  44. [44]

    A Vaidya-type radiating solution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its application to braneworld,

    T. Kobayashi, “A Vaidya-type radiating solution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its application to braneworld,” Gen. Rel. Grav.37(2005) 1869–1876,�������������������

    2005

  45. [45]

    Effects of Gauss-Bonnet terms on final fate of gravitational collapse,

    H. Maeda, “Effects of Gauss-Bonnet terms on final fate of gravitational collapse,” Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2155,�������������������

    2006

  46. [46]

    Radiating black hole solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    A. E. Dominguez and E. Gallo, “Radiating black hole solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064018,�������������������

    2006

  47. [47]

    Horizons of radiating black holes in Einstein gauss-bonnet gravity,

    S. G. Ghosh and D. W. Deshkar, “Horizons of radiating black holes in Einstein gauss-bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 047504,��������������� �������

    2008

  48. [48]

    Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Lovelock Gravity and Thermodynamics on Apparent Horizon,

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, Y.-P. Hu, and S. P. Kim, “Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Lovelock Gravity and Thermodynamics on Apparent Horizon,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 124012, ��������������� ��������

    2008

  49. [49]

    Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity,

    R. C. Myers and B. Robinson, “Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity,” JHEP08(2010) 067,��������������� �������

    2010

  50. [50]

    A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C-function,

    J. Oliva and S. Ray, “A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C-function,” Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 225002, 35 ��������������� �������

    2010

  51. [51]

    Einsteinian cubic gravity,

    P. Bueno and P. A. Cano, “Einsteinian cubic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 10, (2016) 104005,���������������� ��������

    2016

  52. [52]

    Generalized quasitopological gravity,

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, and R. B. Mann, “Generalized quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D95no. 10, (2017) 104042,���������������� ��������

    2017

  53. [53]

    Quintessential Quartic Quasi-topological Quartet,

    J. Ahmed, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, and M. Mir, “Quintessential Quartic Quasi-topological Quartet,” JHEP05(2017) 134,���������������� ��������

    2017

  54. [54]

    Regular black holes from pure gravity,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139260,���������������� �������

    2025

  55. [55]

    Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 18, (2025) 181401,���������������� �������

    2025

  56. [56]

    Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 104009,���������������� �������

    2025

  57. [57]

    Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional nonpolynomial gravities,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and ´A. J. Murcia, “Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional nonpolynomial gravities,” Phys. Rev. D113no. 2, (2026) 024019, ���������������� �������

    2026

  58. [58]

    Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,

    J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,”���������������� �������

  59. [59]

    All 2�generalised dilaton theories from�≥4 gravities,

    J. Borissova, “All 2�generalised dilaton theories from�≥4 gravities,”���������������� ��������

  60. [60]

    Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry,

    J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry,”���������������� �������

  61. [61]

    Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse,

    J. Bardeen, “Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse,” in Abstracts of GR5 — the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity, V. Fock et al., eds., pp. 174–175. Tbilisi University Press, Tbilisi, Georgia, former USSR, Sept., 1968

    1968

  62. [62]

    Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,

    Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang, “Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 12, (2016) 124027,���������������� �������

    2016

  63. [63]

    Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 031103,�������������������

    2006

  64. [64]

    Generalized 2D dilaton gravity and kinetic gravity braiding,

    K. Takahashi and T. Kobayashi, “Generalized 2D dilaton gravity and kinetic gravity braiding,” Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 9, (2019) 095003,���������������� �������. 36

    2019

  65. [65]

    When is g(tt) g(rr) = -1?,

    T. Jacobson, “When is g(tt) g(rr) = -1?,” Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 5717–5719, ��������������� �������

    2007

  66. [66]

    �-dimensional Bardeen-AdS black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory,

    A. Kumar, D. Veer Singh, and S. G. Ghosh, “�-dimensional Bardeen-AdS black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C79no. 3, (2019) 275,���������������� �������

    2019

  67. [67]

    Generalized Misner-Sharp quasi-local mass in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    H. Maeda and M. Nozawa, “Generalized Misner-Sharp quasi-local mass in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 064031,��������������� ��������

    2008

  68. [68]

    Quantum rotating black holes,

    R. Casadio, A. Giusti, and J. Ovalle, “Quantum rotating black holes,” JHEP05(2023) 118, ���������������� �������

    2023

  69. [69]

    Physical and theoretical challenges to integrable singularities,

    J. Arrechea, S. Liberati, H. Neshat, and V. Vellucci, “Physical and theoretical challenges to integrable singularities,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 044024,���������������� �������

    2025

  70. [70]

    On the equilibrium of massive spheres,

    G. M. Volkoff, “On the equilibrium of massive spheres,” Phys. Rev.55(Feb, 1939) 413–413. �����������������������������������������������

    1939

  71. [71]

    Static solutions of einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,

    R. C. Tolman, “Static solutions of einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,” Phys. Rev. 55(Feb, 1939) 364–373.�����������������������������������������������

    1939

  72. [72]

    Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 084071, ���������������� �������

    2021

  73. [73]

    Regular Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole solutions from linear electrodynamics,

    J. Ponce de Leon, “Regular Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole solutions from linear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D95no. 12, (2017) 124015,���������������� �������

    2017

  74. [74]

    Structure of space-time,

    R. Penrose, “Structure of space-time,” in Battelle Rencontres, pp. 121–235. 1968

    1968

  75. [75]

    Instability of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes,

    R. A. Matzner, N. Zamorano, and V. D. Sandberg, “Instability of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes,” Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 2821–2826

    1979

  76. [76]

    Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989) 1663–1666

    1989

  77. [77]

    Internal structure of black holes,

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Internal structure of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1796–1809

    1990

  78. [78]

    Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution,

    A. Ori, “Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 789–792. 37

    1991

  79. [79]

    On the viability of regular black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio, and M. Visser, “On the viability of regular black holes,” JHEP07(2018) 023,���������������� �������

    2018

  80. [80]

    Opening the Pandora’s box at the core of black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Opening the Pandora’s box at the core of black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 14, (2020) 14,���������������� �������

    2020

Showing first 80 references.