Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Causality makes the global baryonic vortex a real excitation in rotating nuclear matter.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:04 UTC pith:WGBJT5I4

load-bearing objection Genuinely new global baryonic vortex idea, but the quantitative competition is undercut by setting A_z=0 when the charged-pion phase sources it; the qualitative scenario survives, the numbers do not. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.29325 v3 pith:WGBJT5I4 submitted 2026-03-31 hep-ph nucl-th

Baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter

Kazuya Mameda , Muneto Nitta , Zebin Qiu This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords baryonic vortexglobal vortexlocal vortexchiral perturbation theoryWess-Zumino-Witten termrotating nuclear mattertopological solitoncausality bound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that rotating nuclear matter can host a global baryonic vortex — a tube of neutral-pion winding with zero gauge field — because the causality bound on the system size cuts off the logarithmic divergence that normally discards such vortices. The vortex carries baryon number through the third homotopy group π3(S3), and the Wess-Zumino-Witten term couples it to the baryon chemical potential, lowering its energy. Numerical minimization of the string tension shows that the global vortex is energetically favored over the standard local (gauged) vortex when the system radius is smaller than about 12.7 fm, independent of chemical potential across a wide range. For larger systems, the local vortex dominates. This identifies a previously overlooked topological state that should be present in rotating quark-gluon plasma and neutron star cores.

Core claim

The central claim is that a global baryonic vortex — with neutral-pion condensate winding in the azimuthal direction and charged pions winding along the rotation axis, carrying baryon number via π3(S3) — becomes a viable excitation in a rotating finite-size system. The causality constraint R ≤ Ω⁻¹ regularizes the vortex's logarithmic energy divergence, which is why such vortices are usually absent in infinite systems. Solving the leading-order chiral Lagrangian with the WZW term, the authors compute the string tension for both local and global vortices and find a transition at a critical radius Rc ≈ 6/fπ ≈ 12.7 fm: below this radius the global vortex has lower string tension, above it the lo

What carries the argument

The SU(2) chiral Lagrangian in a rotating frame (metric gμν with the causality bound R ≤ Ω⁻¹), coupled to dynamical electromagnetism and the Wess-Zumino-Witten term. Two ansatzes are compared: the local vortex (γ=ϕ, charged-pion phase winding, gauge field Aφ=1 at the boundary) and the global vortex (β=ϕ, neutral-pion winding, Aφ=0). Baryon number arises from the π3(S3) topology via longitudinal winding of the complementary pion component; the string tension T is minimized over the longitudinal period d. For the global vortex, Aφ=0 is derived by positivity, leaving a single equation for α(ρ), with the finite radius R supplying the infrared cutoff.

Load-bearing premise

The ansatz sets the longitudinal gauge-field component A_z to zero even though the global vortex's charged-pion phase winds along z, so the Maxwell equation for A_z is never solved; if A_z is nonzero, the vortex energy and profile change.

What would settle it

Solve the full Maxwell equations for A_z on the global vortex ansatz and recompute the string-tension crossover radius; if the crossing moves outside the window R≈(5.97–6.17) fπ⁻¹ or disappears, the quantitative claim fails. Alternatively, a lattice simulation of rotating SU(2) chiral matter with dynamical photons could check whether a global vortex with A_z=0 is a true local minimum.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Global baryonic vortices should be considered alongside local vortices in phenomenological models of fast-rotating quark-gluon plasma and neutron star interiors.
  • The transition radius of roughly 12.7 fm is robust across a wide range of baryon chemical potential, suggesting a universal geometric scale for the competition.
  • Critical angular velocities around 10–100 MeV overlap with rotational scales in heavy-ion collisions, making the vortex state potentially observable through its baryon-number and magnetic-field signatures.
  • For small rotating systems (radius ≲ 12.7 fm), the global vortex is energetically preferred, meaning the previously overlooked configuration could dominate the topological response of compact rotating hadronic matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the z-component of the gauge field is nonzero for the global vortex, the energy and baryon profile will shift; the present truncation likely preserves the qualitative competition but may move the exact crossover radius.
  • The same causality-limited finite-size regularization should apply to global vortices in other models (e.g., Abelian-Higgs), so this mechanism is generic beyond chiral perturbation theory.
  • The large longitudinal periods (tens to hundreds of fm) at leading order suggest that higher-order Skyrme terms will compress the soliton and change quantitative densities, though the qualitative global-vs-local ordering may endure.
  • The near independence of the transition radius from μ hints that the competition is controlled by geometry (R and Ω) rather than by how strongly the vortex couples to baryon number.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter using chiral perturbation theory at leading order, including the Wess-Zumino-Witten term and a dynamical U(1) gauge field. It constructs two types of vortex-Skyrmion configurations that carry baryon number via π_3(S^3): a local vortex, in which charged pions wind around the azimuth and the neutral pion winds along the longitudinal direction, and a global vortex, in which the neutral pion winds around the azimuth and charged pions wind along z. The central claim is that the causality bound R ≤ Ω^{-1} regularizes the logarithmic divergence of the global vortex, making it a viable excitation, and that the two vortex types compete energetically, with the global vortex favored for small system size. The numerical analysis compares the string tensions T_L and T_G and locates a transition region around R ≈ 6 f_π^{-1}.

Significance. If established, the existence of a viable global baryonic vortex would add a previously overlooked topological excitation to the dense hadronic phase of rotating QCD matter, with potential consequences for heavy-ion collisions and neutron-star interiors. The paper provides a concrete framework, explicit energy functionals, and numerical results, and it correctly emphasizes the physical role of the finite-size causality constraint. The local-vortex part appears internally consistent, and the paper is transparent about the factorization ansatz being a simplified configuration. However, the global-vortex analysis is incomplete: the omission of the A_z Maxwell sector means that the quoted T_G values are not obtained from a stationary configuration. Since the central claim of a viable and energetically competitive global vortex rests on this comparison, the significance is at present conditional.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.5)–(4.10) and Sec. 5.3] The global-vortex ansatz takes A = A_φ(ρ) dφ and sets A_z = 0, but the charged-pion phase γ(z) = −2π z/d produces a longitudinal charged-pion current. In the covariant derivative D_z π_+, the phase appears as (∂_z γ − A_z), so the energy density (4.6) should contain sin² α (∂_z γ − A_z)² rather than sin² α (∂_z γ)². Varying the action with respect to A_z at A_z = 0 gives a source proportional to sin² α ∂_z γ, which is nonzero wherever sin α ≠ 0. Thus A_z = 0 is not a stationary point of the action. The numerical T_G used in Sec. 5 and the claimed competition (5.3)–(5.4) are therefore not computed from a physical extremum. Including A_z(ρ) (at least) would allow partial screening of the phase gradient at the cost of F_{ρz} energy, which can lower T_G and shift the transition. This is a load-bearing issue for the central claim.
  2. [Sec. 4 and Sec. 2, Eq. (2.10)] The initial ansatz A = A_φ(ρ) dφ is introduced in Sec. 2 with the rationale of producing a uniform B along z. The global vortex, however, generates a longitudinal current and hence needs an azimuthal magnetic field B_φ from F_{ρz}; the ansatz is therefore not justified for the global case. The paper’s disclaimer about the factorized ansatz in Sec. 3 ("can not guarantee a minimum energy") is not carried over to the global vortex, where an additional dynamical field is omitted. The conclusion that the global vortex is favored for R < R_1 is premature until the A_z sector is included and the coupled equations are solved.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.1] The discussion of Ω → 0 as a "benchmark" is slightly confusing because the numerical results in Fig. 1 use finite R as a regulator. This is acceptable, but the text could state more explicitly that the zero-rotation curves represent a finite-volume regularization rather than the strict Ω = 0 limit.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.10)] The two branches of Ξ are not symmetric in notation: the first contains σ² + π_3² and π_1² + π_2² A_φ², while the second contains only π_1² + π_2² (1−A_φ)². This is correct but could benefit from a short explanatory sentence for readers unfamiliar with the parametrization.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.1)] The derivation of the baryon number N for the global vortex would be clearer if the boundary term at ρ = R were exhibited explicitly, as was done for the local vortex in Eq. (3.2). The current expression is correct, but the winding at ρ = R is carried by γ(z) while α(R) = 0; showing this step would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: vortex energies are minimized from derived EOMs; the causality bound is an explicit input boundary condition, not a hidden fit or renamed prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The global-vortex string tension is obtained by solving the EOMs (4.8)-(4.9) derived from the explicit energy functional E_G in Eq. (4.6), subject to the boundary conditions (4.3)-(4.4). No parameter is fitted to a target T_G or R_c; the local/global competition follows from separately minimized T_L and T_G. The causality bound R <= Omega^{-1} in Eq. (2.2) is an input boundary condition, not an output dressed as a prediction; using it to cut off the logarithmic divergence is a physical regularization, not a hidden re-insertion of the claimed result. The paper does cite its own earlier work [18] for the factorized ansatz alpha=alpha(rho), beta=beta(z) in Eq. (3.10), but it explicitly states: 'We shall disclaim that such a simplified configuration can not guarantee a minimum energy.' Thus the ansatz is an admitted model assumption rather than an imported uniqueness theorem or a self-citation used to forbid alternatives. The caveats in Secs. 5.1 and 6 (no O(p^4)/Skyrme term, restricted mu range, longitudinal-scale collapse) are stated limitations, not circular steps. The skeptic's concern about A_z=0 in the global vortex with gamma=gamma(z) is a genuine internal-consistency/correctness issue: the longitudinal phase winding sources A_z through the Maxwell equation, so A_z=0 is not a stationary point of the action. But this is a solution-validity flaw, not an equivalence-by-construction of the output to the input. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim uses standard ChPT/WZW ingredients and no fitted constants; the main nonstandard input is the restricted field ansatz — both the missing A_z mode and the factorized profile — which is the largest burden the reader is asked to carry.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Leading-order ChPT with the WZW term and a dynamical U(1) gauge field describes rotating nuclear matter in the chiral limit.
    The entire calculation (Sec. 2) assumes this effective theory is the correct low-energy framework; no independent evidence beyond standard ChPT is given.
  • domain assumption The chiral limit (m_π=0) is a valid simplification.
    Stated in Sec. 1: "We focus on the massless limit to elucidate the topological and finite-size effects"; a nonzero pion mass would change vortex profiles and energetics.
  • domain assumption The causality bound R≤Ω^{-1} in the rotating frame is the physical IR regulator.
    Eq. (2.2) uses the co-moving metric and the requirement that the boundary velocity stay below light speed; this is standard for rotating frames but is external input.
  • ad hoc to paper The gauge-field ansatz is truncated to A=A_φ(ρ)dφ; A_z=0 is assumed without solving its Maxwell equation.
    Sec. 2 introduces A=A_φ dφ. In Sec. 4 the global vortex has charged-pion phase γ(z), which sources a longitudinal current; no equation for A_z is written or solved, so the configuration may not be stationary in the full theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Factorization ansatz α=α(ρ), β=β(z) (local) and α=α(ρ), γ=γ(z) (global) captures the minimizing profiles.
    Eqs. (3.10) and (4.5). The authors state it "can not guarantee a minimum energy" (Sec. 3), yet all numerical results use it.
  • standard math The Goldstone-Wilczek current (Eq. 2.15) and π_3(S^3)≅Z counting as baryon number are taken from the literature.
    Cited to Refs. [52,53]; the paper uses this to convert vortex winding into baryon number N.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13476 in / 25724 out tokens · 258203 ms · 2026-08-02T17:04:54.620244+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate baryonic vortices as topological excitations in rotating nuclear matter within the framework of chiral perturbation theory. We identify two distinct configurations: local and global vortices, both carrying the baryon number as the topological charge associated with the third homotopy group $\pi_3(S^3)$. For the local vortex, similar to the vortex Skyrmion in a finite isospin chemical potential, charged pions form the condensate on the boundary and have a phase winding, while the neutral pion varies along the rotation axis inside the vortex core. On the other hand, a global vortex is formed by the condensate and phase winding of the neutral pion, while the charged pions vary on the inside along the rotation axis. Crucially, although global vortices are usually discarded in infinite systems due to logarithmic divergence in energy, we demonstrate that the finite-size constraint dictated by causality in a rotating frame regularizes the divergence physically, rendering the global vortex a viable excitation. We reveal an energetic competition between global and local vortex states, under the tunable parameters of rotation, system size, and baryon chemical potential. Our results suggest that the previously overlooked global vortex can play a significant role in the topological structure of rotating dense QCD matter.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term in Nuclear and Quark Matter under Magnetic Fields and Rotation

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Anomalous WZW terms for Nf=2,3 dense QCD yield B·∇ϕ and Ω·∇ϕ couplings of π0, η, η' that stabilize chiral soliton lattices under magnetic fields and rotation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 43 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    H.-L. Chen, K. Fukushima, X.-G. Huang and K. Mameda,Analogy between rotation and density for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 104052 [1512.08974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [3]

    Jiang and J

    Y. Jiang and J. Liao,Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(2016) 192302 [1606.03808]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [4]

    Chernodub and S

    M.N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo,Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, moment of inertia and thermodynamics,JHEP01(2017) 136 [1611.02598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [5]

    Y. Chen, D. Li and M. Huang,Inhomogeneous chiral condensation under rotation in the holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 106002 [2208.05668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [6]

    Chen, Z.-B

    H.-L. Chen, Z.-B. Zhu and X.-G. Huang,Quark-meson model under rotation: A functional renormalization group study,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 054006 [2306.08362]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [7]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima and Y. Hidaka,Deconfining Phase Boundary of Rapidly Rotating Hot and Dense Matter and Analysis of Moment of Inertia,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136184 [2101.09173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [8]

    Chernodub,Inhomogeneous confining-deconfining phases in rotating plasmas,Phys

    M.N. Chernodub,Inhomogeneous confining-deconfining phases in rotating plasmas,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 054027 [2012.04924]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [9]

    Braga, L.F

    N.R.F. Braga, L.F. Faulhaber and O.C. Junqueira,Confinement-deconfinement temperature for a rotating quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 106003 [2201.05581]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [10]

    X. Chen, L. Zhang, D. Li, D. Hou and M. Huang,Gluodynamics and deconfinement phase transition under rotation from holography,JHEP07(2021) 132 [2010.14478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [11]

    Huang, K

    X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation,JHEP02(2018) 069 [1711.02190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [12]

    Nishimura and N

    K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Topological term, QCD anomaly, and theη ′ chiral soliton lattice in rotating baryonic matter,JHEP07(2020) 196 [2003.13945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [13]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phases of rotating baryonic matter: non-Abelian chiral soliton lattices, antiferro-isospin chains, and ferri/ferromagnetic magnetization,JHEP08 (2022) 305 [2112.01381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [14]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase in a rapidly rotating QCD matter,JHEP03(2024) 019 [2310.17511]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [15]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian chiral soliton lattice in rotating QCD matter: Nambu-Goldstone and excited modes,JHEP03(2024) 035 [2312.10927]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [16]

    Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl

    E. Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 422

    1983

  16. [17]

    Evans, N

    G.W. Evans, N. Yamamoto and D.-L. Yang,Vorticity-induced effects from Wess-Zumino-Witten terms,2510.25459

    arXiv

  17. [18]

    Qiu and M

    Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Baryonic vortex phase and magnetic field generation in QCD with isospin and baryon chemical potentials,JHEP06(2024) 139 [2403.07433]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [19]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryons as linked vortices in QCD matter with isospin asymmetry,JHEP02(2026) 200 [2509.20844]

    arXiv 2026

  19. [20]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,QCD phase diagram in a magnetic field with baryon and isospin chemical potentials,2602.11762

    arXiv

  20. [21]

    Fukushima, K

    K. Fukushima, K. Hattori and K. Mameda,Preponderant Orbital Polarization in Relativistic Magnetovortical Matter, 9, 2024

    2024

  21. [22]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima and K. Mameda,Boundary effects and gapped dispersion in rotating fermionic matter,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 94 [1608.00336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [23]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Huang and R.H. Brandenberger,Pion and eta strings,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 027702 [hep-ph/9711452]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [24]

    Berera, R

    A. Berera, R. Brandenberger, J. Mabillard and R.O. Ramos,Stability of the pion string in a thermal and dense medium,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 065043 [1606.04113]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [25]

    Abrikosov,On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group,Sov

    A.A. Abrikosov,On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group,Sov. Phys. JETP5(1957) 1174

    1957

  25. [26]

    Nielsen and P

    H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen,Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,Nucl. Phys. B61(1973) 45

    1973

  26. [27]

    Adhikari, T.D

    P. Adhikari, T.D. Cohen and J. Sakowitz,Finite Isospin Chiral Perturbation Theory in a Magnetic Field,Phys. Rev. C91(2015) 045202 [1501.02737]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [28]

    Adhikari,Magnetic Vortex Lattices in Finite Isospin Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys

    P. Adhikari,Magnetic Vortex Lattices in Finite Isospin Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Lett. B790(2019) 211 [1810.03663]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [29]

    Adhikari, E

    P. Adhikari, E. Leeser and J. Markowski,Phonon modes of magnetic vortex lattices in finite isospin chiral perturbation theory,Mod. Phys. Lett. A38(2023) 2350078 [2205.13369]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [30]

    Grønli and T

    M.S. Grønli and T. Brauner,Competition of chiral soliton lattice and Abrikosov vortex lattice in QCD with isospin chemical potential,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 354 [2201.07065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [31]

    Canfora, S

    F. Canfora, S. Carignano, M. Lagos, M. Mannarelli and A. Vera,Pion crystals hosting topologically stable baryons,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076003 [2012.05921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  31. [32]

    Canfora, M

    F. Canfora, M. Lagos and A. Vera,Superconducting multi-vortices and a novel BPS bound in chiral perturbation theory,JHEP10(2024) 224 [2405.08082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [33]

    Evans and A

    G.W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral anomaly induces superconducting baryon crystal,JHEP 09(2022) 192 [2206.01227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [34]

    Evans and A

    G.W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral Soliton Lattice turns into 3D crystal,JHEP2024(2024) 041 [2311.03880]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    Skyrme,A Nonlinear field theory,Proc

    T.H.R. Skyrme,A Nonlinear field theory,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A260(1961) 127

    1961

  35. [36]

    Skyrme,A Unified Field Theory of Mesons and Baryons,Nucl

    T.H.R. Skyrme,A Unified Field Theory of Mesons and Baryons,Nucl. Phys.31(1962) 556

    1962

  36. [37]

    Nitta,Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions,Phys

    M. Nitta,Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 025013 [1210.2233]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [38]

    Nitta,Matryoshka Skyrmions,Nucl

    M. Nitta,Matryoshka Skyrmions,Nucl. Phys. B872(2013) 62 [1211.4916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [39]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Incarnations of Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085007 [1407.7210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [40]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Domain wall Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085022 [1403.1245]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [41]

    Eto and M

    M. Eto and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons: Correspondence betweenSU(N) Skyrmions andCP N−1 Lumps,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 085044 [1501.07038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [42]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-Wall Skyrmion Phase in Dense QCD at Strong Magnetic Fields Using Leading-Order Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 181902 [2304.02940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phase diagram of QCD matter with magnetic field: domain-wall Skyrmion chain in chiral soliton lattice,JHEP12(2023) 032 [2311.01112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [44]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Eto and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase of QCD in magnetic field: gauge field dynamics,JHEP05(2025) 037 [2409.08841]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Spin statistics and surgeries of topological solitons in QCD matter in magnetic field,JHEP02(2025) 171 [2406.14419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    Copinger, M

    P. Copinger, M. Eto, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field,JHEP (to appear)(2025) [2512.22023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Baryonic torii: Toroidal baryons in a generalized Skyrme model,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 045027 [1410.8407]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [48]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Skyrmions confined as beads on a vortex ring,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 025008 [1606.00336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [49]

    Nitta,Fractional instantons and bions in the principal chiral model onR 2 ×S 1 with twisted boundary conditions,JHEP08(2015) 063 [1503.06336]

    M. Nitta,Fractional instantons and bions in the principal chiral model onR 2 ×S 1 with twisted boundary conditions,JHEP08(2015) 063 [1503.06336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [50]

    Nitta,Relations among topological solitons,Phys

    M. Nitta,Relations among topological solitons,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 105006 [2202.03929]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [51]

    Manohar and H

    A. Manohar and H. Georgi,Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model,Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 189

    1984

  51. [52]

    Son and M.A

    D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark matter, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 014021 [0710.1084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [53]

    Goldstone and F

    J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek,Fractional Quantum Numbers on Solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.47 (1981) 986

    1981

  53. [54]

    Adkins, C.R

    G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten,Static Properties of Nucleons in the Skyrme Model, Nucl. Phys. B228(1983) 552

    1983

  54. [55]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Linking number of vortices as baryon number,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 065011 [2002.01762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [56]

    Gudnason and M

    S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Linked vortices as baryons in the miscible BEC-Skyrme model, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 045022 [2006.04067]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020