Nuclear giant resonances from first principles

Andrea Porro; Francesco Marino; Sonia Bacca

Nuclear giant resonances from first principles

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ab initio many-body methods compute nuclear giant resonances from realistic interactions.

desk verdict This is a review chapter that organizes existing ab initio methods for giant resonances on 16O and 40Ca but adds no new calculations or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.07229 v1 submitted 2026-04-08 nucl-th

Sonia Bacca , Francesco Marino , Andrea Porro This is my paper

classification nucl-th

keywords giantresonancesabinitionucleartheoryresponsefunctionsoxygen-16calcium-40collectiveexcitationsmany-bodymethods

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to demonstrate that several many-body techniques built directly on realistic nuclear Hamiltonians can calculate the response functions for giant resonances. It surveys the random phase approximation, Lorentz integral transform coupled-cluster, projected generator-coordinate, and self-consistent Green's function approaches, then applies them to the benchmark nuclei oxygen-16 and calcium-40. A sympathetic reader would care because these collective excitations involve many nucleons moving together and have long been measured experimentally, offering a direct test of whether fundamental forces produce observed nuclear behavior. The work emphasizes points of agreement and divergence among the methods while tying results to measured cross sections and energies.

What carries the argument

The nuclear response function computed through ab initio many-body solvers applied to realistic Hamiltonians.

What would settle it

A large mismatch between the calculated giant resonance positions, widths, or strengths and the corresponding experimental data for oxygen-16 or calcium-40 would show that the methods do not yet capture the relevant physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that first-principles calculations of nuclear giant resonances are now feasible with multiple many-body techniques grounded in realistic interactions, and that their application to oxygen-16 and calcium-40 reveals both consistency among methods and connections to measured observables.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the selected methods and the nuclei oxygen-16 and calcium-40 provide a fair test of the approaches' ability to describe giant resonances across a wider range of nuclei and observables.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Agreement across independent methods on the same benchmark nuclei increases in the calculated response functions.
Divergences between methods identify specific aspects of the many-body treatment that require further development.
Direct comparison with experimental observables validates or constrains the underlying realistic nuclear interactions.
The same frameworks can be used to predict other electromagnetic or weak response properties in these nuclei.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the methods prove reliable here, they could be applied next to neighboring light nuclei to map how resonance properties change with neutron number.
Persistent differences with data might point to the need for improved treatment of three-body forces in the response calculation.
Consistent predictions across methods would allow theorists to use the cheapest reliable approach for systematic studies of additional observables.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper is a survey of ab initio approaches to nuclear giant resonances. It walks through the random phase approximation, Lorentz integral transform coupled-cluster theory, projected generator-coordinate method, and self-consistent Green's functions, then lines up their predictions for the two closed-shell benchmarks against experiment. The central point is that these methods, built on realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions, can now compute response functions and that the results show both agreement and clear differences on observables like energies and transition strengths. That is useful to see in one place. The overview of the physics and the historical framing are clear and direct. The comparisons stay tied to measurable quantities rather than floating in abstract theory space. The soft spots are limited and mostly come with the territory of a review. Only two nuclei are used, both closed-shell, so the picture does not yet speak to open-shell or heavier systems where the methods may behave differently. No new data or derivations appear, which is expected but means the value is entirely in the synthesis and the critical notes on where the approaches diverge. The abstract gives no sign of hidden fitting or circular arguments. This is for nuclear theorists who need a compact map of the current ab initio options for collective excitations. Someone already expert in one method will probably skim it, but a reader looking for orientation or a reference point for citing the state of the field will get something concrete. It deserves a serious referee. The organization and the explicit link to experiment make it worth the time even though it is not original research. I would send it out for review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter that surveys ab initio many-body methods for computing nuclear giant resonances from realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions. It covers conceptual foundations, outlines the random phase approximation (RPA), Lorentz integral transform coupled-cluster (LIT-CC), projected generator-coordinate method (PGCM), and self-consistent Green's functions (SCGF) approaches, and concludes with a comparison of their predictions for the benchmark nuclei 16O and 40Ca against experimental observables.

Significance. If the comparisons are accurate and balanced, the review would be useful for the field by synthesizing how recent ab initio frameworks grounded in realistic Hamiltonians can access response functions for collective excitations, contrasting with traditional EDF methods. It explicitly credits existing literature for methods and predictions without asserting new derivations or fits, providing a descriptive synthesis rather than novel claims.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that the comparison emphasizes 'points of agreement and divergence' for 16O and 40Ca; adding a summary table of key observables (e.g., centroid energies, widths) across methods would improve readability without altering the descriptive scope.
Section on historical overview: the transition from EDF to ab initio methods is well-motivated, but a brief sentence on why closed-shell nuclei were chosen as benchmarks (computational tractability) would clarify the scope limitation noted in the reader's assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the review is viewed as a useful synthesis for the field.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; review of established external methods

full rationale

This is a review chapter surveying established ab initio frameworks (RPA, LIT-CC, PGCM, SCGF) drawn from prior literature for computing nuclear response functions in giant resonances. The manuscript outlines conceptual foundations, historical context, and computational implementations by reference to external works, then summarizes previously published predictions for the benchmark nuclei 16O and 40Ca without performing new derivations, fits, or self-referential calculations. No equations or claims in the paper reduce by construction to its own inputs; all load-bearing content is externally sourced and independently verifiable. This satisfies the criteria for zero circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions from nuclear many-body theory as stated in the abstract; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced by this review itself.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption Realistic nuclear interactions reproduce nucleon-nucleon phase shifts and accurately describe the binding energies of light nuclei.
Explicitly stated in the abstract as the foundation for the modern ab initio framework.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nuclear giant resonances from first principles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.07229

@misc{pith2026260407229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nuclear giant resonances from first principles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.07229}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.07229}
}

abstract

This chapter presents an ab initio perspective on giant resonances in atomic nuclei and surveys the principal theoretical frameworks that aim to describe these collective excitations from first principles. While the study of nuclear giant resonances has traditionally been dominated by the energy density functional approach, recent years have witnessed the development of advanced many-body approaches grounded directly in realistic nuclear interactions, namely, Hamiltonians that reproduce nucleon-nucleon phase shifts and accurately describe the binding energies of light nuclei. Within this modern framework, we review the main many-body methods currently used to compute nuclear response functions. These include the random phase approximation, the Lorentz integral transform coupled-cluster theory, the projected generator-coordinate method, and the self-consistent Green's functions approach. After giving a general conceptual and historical overview of giant-resonance phenomena, we outline the theoretical foundations and computational implementations of each method. We conclude with a critical comparison of their predictions for selected benchmark nuclei, $^{16}$O and $^{40}$Ca, emphasizing points of agreement and divergence, while maintaining a close connection to the relevant experimental observables.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J(x) uniqueness) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Response function R(ω) = 1/(2J0+1) Σ |⟨Ψ0|O|Ψν⟩|² δ(Eν−E0−ω); linear-response polarization ΠAB(ω) with Lehmann representation; LIT L(σ,Γ) = Γ/π ∫ R(ω)/((σ−ω)²+Γ²) dω inverted numerically.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Ab initio methods start from Schrödinger equation with χEFT Hamiltonians; no adjustable parameters tuned to finite nuclei.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Revisiting the Equation-of-Motion Method: A Universal Framework for Correlated Quantum Systems
nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

An equation-of-motion method using an IMSRG(2) correlated reference and the full one-body operator space is implemented and applied to the dipole response of 4He and closed-shell oxygen isotopes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

On the monopole and quadrupole isoscalar giant resonances in 4 He, 16 O, 20 Ne and 40 Ca.Phys

Abgrall Y and Caurier E (1975). On the monopole and quadrupole isoscalar giant resonances in 4 He, 16 O, 20 Ne and 40 Ca.Phys. Lett. B56: 229–231. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90381-0. Ahrens J (1985). The total absorption of photons by nuclei.Nuclear Physics A446 (1): 229–239. ISSN 0375-9474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(85)90591-3. Ahrens J, Borch...

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90381-0 1975
[2]

Bally B, Scalesi A, Som` a V, Zurek L and Duguet T (2025)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01271-0.2401.00941. Bally B, Scalesi A, Som` a V, Zurek L and Duguet T (2025). Mean-field approximation on steroids: exact description of the deuteron.Eur. Phys. J. A61 (6):

work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01271-0.2401.00941 2025
[3]

Barbieri C and Carbone A (2017)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01596-4.2410.03356. Barbieri C and Carbone A (2017). Self-Consistent Green’s Function Approaches, Springer International Publishing, Cham. ISBN 978-3-319-53336-0, 571–644. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53336-0

work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01596-4.2410.03356 2017
[4]

Extension of the random phase approximation including the selfconsistent coupling to two phonon contributions

Barbieri C and Dickhoff WH (2003). Extension of the random phase approximation including the selfconsistent coupling to two phonon contributions. Phys. Rev. C68: 014311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.014311.nucl-th/0212025. Barbieri C, Raimondi F and Mcilroy C (2018). Recent Applications of Self-Consistent Green’s Function Theory to Nuclei.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.96...

work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevc.68.014311.nucl-th/0212025 2003
[5]

Gorkov algebraic diagrammatic construction formalism at third order.Phys. Rev. C105: 044330. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044330.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044330. Barnea N, Efros VD, Leidemann W and Orlandini G (2010). The Lorentz Integral Transform and its Inversion.Few Body Syst.47: 201–206. doi: 10.1007/s00601-009-0081-0.0906.5421. Bar...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.044330.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physrevc.105.044330 2010
[6]

Electric dipole polarizability of 48Caand implications for the neutron skin.Phys

Birkhan J, Miorelli M, Bacca S, Bassauer S, Bertulani CA, Hagen G, Matsubara H, von Neumann-Cosel P, Papenbrock T, Pietralla N, Ponomarev VY, Richter A, Schwenk A and Tamii A (2017), Jun. Electric dipole polarizability of 48Caand implications for the neutron skin.Phys. Rev. Lett.118: 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.252501.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.252501.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physrevlett.118.252501 2017
[7]

Sum rules for nuclear collective excitations

doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90079-6. Bonaiti F, Bacca S, Hagen G and Jansen GR (2024), Oct. Electromagnetic observables of open-shell nuclei from coupled-cluster theory.Phys. Rev. C 110: 044306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044306.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044306. Bonaiti F, Hagen G and Papenbrock T (2025),

work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90079-6 2024
[8]

Bonaiti F, Porro A, Bacca S, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2026), Feb

Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations2508.14217. Bonaiti F, Porro A, Bacca S, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2026), Feb. Ab initio calculations of monopole sum rules: From finite nuclei to infinite nuclear matter.Phys. Rev. C113: 024333. doi:10.1103/kfdd-79g7.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kfdd-79g7. Bracco A, Lanza E...

work page doi:10.1103/kfdd-79g7.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kfdd-79g7 2026

Show all 42 references

[9]

Caurier E, Bourotte-Bilwes B and Abgrall Y (1973)

doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1067.1412.3081. Caurier E, Bourotte-Bilwes B and Abgrall Y (1973). Microscopic treatment of the coupled monopole and quadrupole vibrations in light nuclei.Phys. Lett. B44: 411–415. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90321-3. Chadwick M and et al. (2011). Endf/b...

1973 doi
[10]

Coello-P´ erez EA (2026), Low-energy collective excitations in atomic nuclei, Encyclopedia of Nuclear Physics, Elsevier

Symmetry restoration in the axially deformed proton-neutron quasiparticle random phase approximation for nuclear beta decay: The effect of angular-momentum projection2510.16313. Coello-P´ erez EA (2026), Low-energy collective excitations in atomic nuclei, Encyclopedia of Nucle...

2026 doi
[11]

Edmonds AR (1996)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00914-y.2209.03424. Edmonds AR (1996). Angular momentum in quantum mechanics, 4, Princeton university press. Efros VD, Leidemann W and Orlandini G (1994). Response functions from integral transforms with a lorentz ker- nel.Physics Letters B338 (2): ...

1996 doi
[12]

Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction.Phys. Rev. C91: 051301(R). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.051301. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.051301. Ekstr¨ om A, Forss´ en C, Hagen G, Jansen GR, Jiang W and Papenbrock T (2023). What is ab initi...

2023 doi
[13]

doi:10.1007/s00601-024-01918-0

Chiral symmetry and nuclear interactions.Few-Body Systems65. doi:10.1007/s00601-024-01918-0. Erler J, Kl¨ upfel P and Reinhard PG (2011). Self-consistent nuclear mean-field models: example skyrme-hartree-fock.J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.38: 033101. doi:doi:10.1088/0954-3899/3...

2011 doi
[14]

Frosini M, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Bally B, Mongelli T, Rodr ´ ıguez TR, Roth R and Som` a V (2022b)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00694-x.2111.01461. Frosini M, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Bally B, Mongelli T, Rodr ´ ıguez TR, Roth R and Som` a V (2022b). Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: II. Ab initio study of neon isotopes via PGCM and IM-NCSM calculations.Eu...

doi
[15]

2111.00797

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00693-y. 2111.00797. Frosini M, Duguet T, Ebran JP and Som` a V (2022c). Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: I. Novel PGCM-PT formalism.Eur. Phys. J. A58 (4):

doi
[16]

Gambacurta D and Grasso M (2016)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00692-z.2110.15737. Gambacurta D and Grasso M (2016). Second RPA calculations with the Skyrme and Gogny interactions.Eur. Phys. J. A52 (7):

2016 doi
[17]

Gambacurta D, Grasso M and Catara F (2010)

doi:10.1140/epja/ i2016-16198-6. Gambacurta D, Grasso M and Catara F (2010). Collective nuclear excitations with Skyrme-Second RPA.Phys. Rev. C81: 054312. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.81.054312.1002.3563. Garg U (2023). Isoscalar Giant Resonances: Experimental Studies, Springer Natur...

2010 doi
[18]

The compression-mode giant resonances and nuclear incompressibility.Prog

Garg U and Col` o G (2018). The compression-mode giant resonances and nuclear incompressibility.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.101: 55–95. doi:10.1016/j. ppnp.2018.03.001.1801.03672. Gazit D, Barnea N, Bacca S, Leidemann W and Orlandini G (2006), Dec. Photonuclear sum rules and the te...

2018 doi
[19]

https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00931-x

ISSN 1434-601X. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00931-x. Gour JR, Piecuch P, Hjorth-Jensen M, W loch M and Dean DJ (2006), Aug. Coupled-cluster calculations for valence systems around 16O.Phys. Rev. C 74: 024310. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.024310.https://link.aps.org/doi/...

2006 doi
[20]

doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379

ISSN 2296-424X. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2020.00379. Hergert H (2026), What is ab initio in nuclear theory?, Encyclopedia of Nuclear Physics, Elsevier. Hergert H, Bogner SK, Morris TD, Schwenk A and Tsukiyama K (2016a). The ...

2020 doi
[21]

doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00251

ISSN 2296-424X. doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00251. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2019.00251. Lazauskas R, Hiyama E and Carbonell J (2019). Ab initio calculations of 5h resonant states.Physics Letters B791: 335–341. ISSN 0370-2693. doi: https://do...

2019 doi
[22]

Marino F, Bonaiti F, Bacca S, Hagen G and Jansen GR (2025b), Jul

Electromagnetic sum rules for 22O from coupled-cluster theory.arxiv:2509.160012509.16001. Marino F, Bonaiti F, Bacca S, Hagen G and Jansen GR (2025b), Jul. Structure and dynamics of open-shell nuclei from spherical coupled-cluster theory. Phys. Rev. C112: 014315. doi:10.1103/v...

2022 doi
[23]

Papenbrock T (2024)

doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.48.537. Papenbrock T (2024). Ab initio computations of atomic nuclei. doi:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00843.2410.00843. Parnes E, Barnea N, Carleo G, Lovato A, Rocco N and Zhang X (2026), Jan. Nuclear responses with neural-network quantum states.Phys. Rev....

2024 doi
[24]

Collective effects in inelastic scattering from nuclei.Nuclear Physics27 (2): 270–283

Pinkston WT and Satchler G (1961). Collective effects in inelastic scattering from nuclei.Nuclear Physics27 (2): 270–283. Porro A, Col` o G, Duguet T, Gambacurta D and Som` a V (2024a). Symmetry-restored Skyrme-random-phase-approximation calculations of the monopole strength i...

1961 doi
[25]

2402.02228

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01340-4. 2402.02228. Porro A, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Frosini M, Roth R and Som` a V (2024c). Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei: II. Ab initio PGCM calculations in 46Ti, 28Si and 24Mg.Eur. Phys. J. A60 (6):

doi
[26]

Porro A, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Frosini M, Roth R and Som` a V (2024d)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01341-3.2402.15901. Porro A, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Frosini M, Roth R and Som` a V (2024d). Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei: III. Moments evaluation in ab initio PGCM calculations.Eur. Phys. J. A60 (7):

doi
[27]

Porro A, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Frosini M, Roth R and Som` a V (2024e)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01377-5.2404.14154. Porro A, Duguet T, Ebran JP, Frosini M, Roth R and Som` a V (2024e). Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei: IV. Angular momentum projection and rotation-vibration coupling.Eur. Phys. J. A60 (11):

doi
[28]

Porro A, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2025)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01448-7.2407.01325. Porro A, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2025). Impact of ground-state correlations on the multipole response of nuclei: Ab initio calculations of moment operators.Phys. Rev. C112 (5): 054303. doi:10.1103/1ktc-lknn.2507.20665. Quaglioni ...

2025 doi
[29]

Nuclear electromagnetic dipole response with the self-consistent green’s function formalism.Phys. Rev. C99: 054327. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054327.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054327. Ring P and Schuck P (1980). The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, first ed., Theoret...

1980 doi
[30]

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.04.001

ISSN 0146-6410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.04.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641018300334. Roth R and Navr´ atil P (2007). Importance-truncated no-core shell model.Physical Review Letters99 (9): 092501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.092501...

2018 doi
[31]

ISBN 978-3-319-93601-7

Many-Body Methods for Atoms, Molecules and Clusters, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-93601-7. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93602-4. Schunck N (2019). Energy density functional methods for atomic nuclei, IoP Publishing. Shavitt I and Bartlet...

2019 doi
[32]

Sobczyk JE, Acharya B, Bacca S and Hagen G (2021), Aug

doi:10.1140/ epja/i2019-12825-0.1905.02055. Sobczyk JE, Acharya B, Bacca S and Hagen G (2021), Aug. Ab initio computation of the longitudinal response function in 40Ca.Phys. Rev. Lett.127: 072501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.072501.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett....

1905 doi
[33]

Ab initio self-consistent gorkov-green’s function calculations of semimagic nu- clei: Formalism at second order with a two-nucleon interaction.Phys. Rev. C84: 064317. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064317. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064317. Som` a V, Cipollone A, Ba...

2014 doi
[34]

Novel chiral hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei.Phys. Rev. C101: 014318.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.014318. Som` a V (2020). Self-consistent green’s function theory for atomic nuclei.Frontiers in Physics8:

2020 doi
[35]

doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00340

ISSN 2296-424X. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00340. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2020.00340. Speth J and van der Woude A (1981). Giant resonances in nuclei.Reports on Progress in Physics44 (7):

2020 doi
[36]

Steinwedel H and Jensen JHD (1950).Z

http://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/44/i=7/a=002. Steinwedel H and Jensen JHD (1950).Z. Naturforsch.5A:

1950
[37]

Electric dipole polarizabilities of hydrogen and helium isotopes.Phys

Stetcu I, Quaglioni S, Friar JL, Hayes AC and Navr´ atil P (2009), Jun. Electric dipole polarizabilities of hydrogen and helium isotopes.Phys. Rev. C79: 064001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064001.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064001. Stoitsov MV, Ring P and Sharma M...

2009 doi
[38]

doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12781-7.http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epja/i2019-12781-7

ISSN 1434-6001. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12781-7.http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epja/i2019-12781-7. von Neumann-Cosel P and Tamii A (2025). Electric dipole polarizability constraints on neutron skin and sym- metry energy.Frontiers in PhysicsVolume 13 -

2025 doi
[39]

doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1629987

ISSN 2296-424X. doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1629987. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2025.1629987. Walecka JD (1995). Theoretical nuclear and subnuclear physics,

2025 doi
[40]

Production review of accelerator-based medical isotopes.Molecules27 (16):

Wang Y, Chen D, dos Santos Augusto R, Liang J, Qin Z, Liu J and Liu Z (2022). Production review of accelerator-based medical isotopes.Molecules27 (16):

2022
[41]

Whitehead RR (1980)

ISSN 1420-3049.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/16/5294. Whitehead RR (1980). Moment Methods and Lanczos Methods, Springer US, Boston, MA. ISBN 978-1-4613-3120-9, 235–255. doi:10.1007/ 978-1-4613-3120-9

1980
[42]

Chiral NNLO sat descriptions of nuclear multipole resonances within the random phase approximation.Phys

Wu Q, Hu BS, Xu FR, Ma YZ, Dai SJ, Sun ZH and Jansen GR (2018). Chiral NNLO sat descriptions of nuclear multipole resonances within the random phase approximation.Phys. Rev. C97 (5): 054306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054306. Youngblood DH, Rozsa CM, Moss JM, Brown DR and Bronson...

2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

On the monopole and quadrupole isoscalar giant resonances in 4 He, 16 O, 20 Ne and 40 Ca.Phys

Abgrall Y and Caurier E (1975). On the monopole and quadrupole isoscalar giant resonances in 4 He, 16 O, 20 Ne and 40 Ca.Phys. Lett. B56: 229–231. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90381-0. Ahrens J (1985). The total absorption of photons by nuclei.Nuclear Physics A446 (1): 229–239. ISSN 0375-9474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(85)90591-3. Ahrens J, Borch...

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90381-0 1975

[2] [2]

Bally B, Scalesi A, Som` a V, Zurek L and Duguet T (2025)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01271-0.2401.00941. Bally B, Scalesi A, Som` a V, Zurek L and Duguet T (2025). Mean-field approximation on steroids: exact description of the deuteron.Eur. Phys. J. A61 (6):

work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01271-0.2401.00941 2025

[3] [3]

Barbieri C and Carbone A (2017)

doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01596-4.2410.03356. Barbieri C and Carbone A (2017). Self-Consistent Green’s Function Approaches, Springer International Publishing, Cham. ISBN 978-3-319-53336-0, 571–644. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53336-0

work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01596-4.2410.03356 2017

[4] [4]

Extension of the random phase approximation including the selfconsistent coupling to two phonon contributions

Barbieri C and Dickhoff WH (2003). Extension of the random phase approximation including the selfconsistent coupling to two phonon contributions. Phys. Rev. C68: 014311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.014311.nucl-th/0212025. Barbieri C, Raimondi F and Mcilroy C (2018). Recent Applications of Self-Consistent Green’s Function Theory to Nuclei.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.96...

work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevc.68.014311.nucl-th/0212025 2003

[5] [5]

Gorkov algebraic diagrammatic construction formalism at third order.Phys. Rev. C105: 044330. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044330.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044330. Barnea N, Efros VD, Leidemann W and Orlandini G (2010). The Lorentz Integral Transform and its Inversion.Few Body Syst.47: 201–206. doi: 10.1007/s00601-009-0081-0.0906.5421. Bar...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.044330.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physrevc.105.044330 2010

[6] [6]

Electric dipole polarizability of 48Caand implications for the neutron skin.Phys

Birkhan J, Miorelli M, Bacca S, Bassauer S, Bertulani CA, Hagen G, Matsubara H, von Neumann-Cosel P, Papenbrock T, Pietralla N, Ponomarev VY, Richter A, Schwenk A and Tamii A (2017), Jun. Electric dipole polarizability of 48Caand implications for the neutron skin.Phys. Rev. Lett.118: 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.252501.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.252501.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physrevlett.118.252501 2017

[7] [7]

Sum rules for nuclear collective excitations

doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90079-6. Bonaiti F, Bacca S, Hagen G and Jansen GR (2024), Oct. Electromagnetic observables of open-shell nuclei from coupled-cluster theory.Phys. Rev. C 110: 044306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044306.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044306. Bonaiti F, Hagen G and Papenbrock T (2025),

work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90079-6 2024

[8] [8]

Bonaiti F, Porro A, Bacca S, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2026), Feb

Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations2508.14217. Bonaiti F, Porro A, Bacca S, Schwenk A and Tichai A (2026), Feb. Ab initio calculations of monopole sum rules: From finite nuclei to infinite nuclear matter.Phys. Rev. C113: 024333. doi:10.1103/kfdd-79g7.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kfdd-79g7. Bracco A, Lanza E...

work page doi:10.1103/kfdd-79g7.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kfdd-79g7 2026