Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Integers representable as a difference of two rational fourth powers

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Positive integers n up to 10000 that equal x^4 minus y^4 for nonzero rational x and y are fully listed.

desk verdict The paper delivers a concrete list of n ≤ 10000 that are differences of nonzero rational fourth powers, extending Cohen's sum work, but its completeness claim depends on an unstated or unproven bound on denominator size. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.15832 v2 submitted 2026-04-17 math.GM

classification math.GM
keywords differenceoffourthpowersrationalsolutionsDiophantineequationsenumerationpositiveintegersupto10000
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends earlier work on sums of two rational fourth powers by instead examining differences. It determines exactly which positive integers n no larger than 10000 admit a representation n = x^4 - y^4 with x and y nonzero rationals. The resulting list supplies concrete data on the solubility of this equation over the rationals for small n. A sympathetic reader would use the list to test conjectures about which n are possible and to guide searches for parametric families that generate all such representations.

What carries the argument

Exhaustive algebraic or computational search over all pairs of nonzero rationals x and y that could produce each fixed n, after clearing denominators to reduce to integer equations.

What would settle it

A positive integer n ≤ 10000 together with explicit nonzero rationals x and y such that n = x^4 - y^4 but n is absent from the published list, or a listed n for which no such x and y exist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The complete list of positive integers n ≤ 10000 that can be written as n = x^4 - y^4 for some nonzero rational numbers x and y is obtained by exhaustive enumeration.

Load-bearing premise

The method used to check every possible pair of nonzero rationals x and y for each n up to 10000 never misses a representation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Certain n ≤ 10000 admit rational solutions to the difference equation while others do not.
  • The pattern of representable n can be compared directly with the pattern for sums x^4 + y^4.
  • Any infinite family of solutions must be consistent with the finite list already found.
  • Scaling arguments that turn rational solutions into integer solutions are confirmed or refuted by the enumerated cases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the list reveals that many n are missed, it suggests that the difference equation may have only finitely many solutions for each fixed n beyond a certain size.
  • The enumeration supplies test cases for conjectures linking fourth-power differences to elliptic curves of bounded rank.
  • Extending the same exhaustive search past 10000 would immediately show whether new n become representable or whether the pattern stabilizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the equation n = x^4 - y^4 over nonzero rational x and y. Motivated by Cohen's classification of sums of two rational fourth powers for n ≤ 10000, the authors claim to obtain the complete list of positive integers n ≤ 10000 that admit such a representation.

Significance. If the enumeration is exhaustive, the resulting list would supply concrete data complementary to existing work on fourth-power Diophantine equations, potentially guiding further study of the surface x^4 - y^4 = n. The explicit computational classification for small n is a modest but useful contribution provided the completeness claim can be substantiated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'complete list' of representable n ≤ 10000 rests on an enumeration of solutions to the cleared equation A^4 - B^4 = n D^4 (D ≠ 0). No search bounds, height limits on D, or verification procedure are described, so it is impossible to confirm that all solutions have been captured.
  2. [Main enumeration section] Main text (enumeration section): without either an explicit algorithm together with its termination criterion or a separate theorem proving that every rational solution satisfies a concrete bound on the denominator, the completeness claim for the reported list cannot be verified and remains open to the possibility of missed representations with larger |D|.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] The paper would benefit from including the explicit list (or a summary table) in an appendix or dedicated section rather than only asserting its existence.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for rational x, y and the cleared integers A, B, D should be introduced once and used consistently throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying the need for greater detail on our enumeration procedure. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'complete list' of representable n ≤ 10000 rests on an enumeration of solutions to the cleared equation A^4 - B^4 = n D^4 (D ≠ 0). No search bounds, height limits on D, or verification procedure are described, so it is impossible to confirm that all solutions have been captured.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not describe the search bounds or verification steps. In the revised version we will amend the abstract to note that the list results from an exhaustive enumeration of integer solutions to A^4 - B^4 = n D^4 subject to explicit bounds on D, with the full algorithm and termination criterion supplied in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main enumeration section] Main text (enumeration section): without either an explicit algorithm together with its termination criterion or a separate theorem proving that every rational solution satisfies a concrete bound on the denominator, the completeness claim for the reported list cannot be verified and remains open to the possibility of missed representations with larger |D|.

    Authors: We accept this observation. Our enumeration proceeded by iterating over coprime positive integers A > B and D, computing n = (A^4 - B^4)/D^4 whenever it is a positive integer, and retaining those n ≤ 10000. The search was terminated after verifying that further increases in the bound on D produced no additional such n. We will insert a dedicated subsection that states the precise algorithm, the concrete bound chosen for D, the termination criterion, and the verification steps performed, thereby allowing the completeness claim to be checked directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; enumeration rests on direct search of the Diophantine equation.

full rationale

The paper states it obtains the complete list of n ≤ 10000 representable as x^4 - y^4 with nonzero rationals x, y, motivated by Cohen's earlier enumeration for the sum case. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed completeness to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or prior results by the same authors. The method is described as investigation of the cleared equation A^4 - B^4 = n D^4; any bound on D is an external computational choice whose justification is not shown to be internal to the paper's own logic. This is a standard direct-enumeration claim with no load-bearing circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard number-theoretic facts about factoring and rational points; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Basic algebraic identities and properties of the rational numbers under addition and multiplication
    Invoked implicitly to factor the difference of fourth powers and to scale rational solutions to integers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integers representable as a difference of two rational fourth powers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.15832

@misc{pith2026260415832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integers representable as a difference of two rational fourth powers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.15832}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.15832}
}
abstract

In Section 6.6 of the book {\it Number Theory, Volume I: Tools and Diophantine Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 239, Springer (2007)}, Cohen investigated the solubility of the equation $n=x^4+y^4$ in the rational numbers $x,y$ for all positive integers $n \leq 10000$. Motivated by this, we investigate the equation $n=x^4-y^4$ and obtain the complete list of positive integers $n\leq 10000$ that can be represented in this form for some nonzero rational numbers $x$ and $y$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integer Sequences which Are Closed with Respect to Multiplication and whose Sumset does not Intersect the Sequence

    math.NT 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    T_k (kth powers) is never maximal for k≥3; V_k is maximal only for k=2,3; W_k is never maximal for k≥3, each proved by explicit supersequences whose sum-free property follows from known Diophantine results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bosma, J

    W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust. The Magma algebra system. I. The user language.J. Symbolic Comput., 24(3-4):235–265, 1997. Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993)

  2. [2]

    A. Bremner. Some quartic curves with no points in any cubic field.Proc. Math. Soc., 52(3):193–214, 1986

  3. [3]

    Bremner and N

    A. Bremner and N. X Tho. On the Diophantine equationx 4 +y 4 =c.Acta Arith., 204(2):141–150, 2022

  4. [4]

    Cohen.Number theory

    H. Cohen.Number theory. Vol. I. Tools and Diophantine equations, volume 239 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2007

  5. [5]

    V. A. Demjanenko. Rational points of a class of algebraic curves.Izv. Vysˇ s. Uˇ cebn. Zaved. Matem- atika, 30(6):1373–1396, 1966

  6. [6]

    V Flynn and J

    E. V Flynn and J. L Wetherell. Covering collections and a challenge problem of serre.Acta Arith., 98(2):197–205, 2001

  7. [7]

    Grechuk.Polynomial Diophantine equations: A Systematic Approach

    B. Grechuk.Polynomial Diophantine equations: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Cham, 2024. With contributions by Ashleigh Wilcox

  8. [8]

    J Mordell.Diophantine equations, volume 30 ofPure and Applied Mathematics

    L. J Mordell.Diophantine equations, volume 30 ofPure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press, New York, 1969

Show all 14 references
  1. [9]

    A Newton and Rouse. J. Integers that are sums of two rational sixth powers.Canad. Math. Bull., 66(1):166–177, 2023

  2. [10]

    The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, 2026

    OEIS Foundation Inc. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, 2026. Published electroni- cally athttp://oeis.org

  3. [11]

    P Serre.Lectures on the Mordell-Weil Theorem, Transl

    J. P Serre.Lectures on the Mordell-Weil Theorem, Transl. and ed. by Martin Brown. From notes by Michel Waldschmidt., volume 30 ofAspects of Mathematics. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, 1997

  4. [12]

    H Silverman

    J. H Silverman. Rational points on certain families of curves of genus at least 2.Proc. Math. Soc., 55(3):465–481, 1987

  5. [13]

    H Silverman and J

    J. H Silverman and J. T Tate.Rational points on elliptic curves, volume 9. Springer, 1992

  6. [14]

    N. X Tho. On two unsolved Fermat equations of signature (4,4,4).Expo. Math., 44(3), 2026. School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, UK Email address:amw64@leicester.ac.uk F aculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Hanoi University of Science and Tec...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.