Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Bubble collisions during a first-order phase transition at the end of inflation can produce the observed dark matter abundance in a restricted region of parameter space.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-07 15:30 UTC

load-bearing objection The paper sketches DM production from bubble collisions in a spectator phase transition timed to inflation's end, but the relic match rests on order-of-magnitude collision yields. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2605.03758 v1 submitted 2026-05-05 hep-ph

Dark Matter Production from Bubble Collisions during a First-Order Phase Transition at the End of Inflation

Zihong Cheng , Fa Peng Huang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords dark matterfirst-order phase transitionbubble collisionsend of inflationspectator scalarrelic abundanceColeman-De Luccia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether a first-order phase transition in a spectator scalar sector, triggered by an inflaton-dependent potential near the end of inflation, can generate the observed dark matter density through particle production in bubble collisions. The setup requires that nucleation occurs via the Coleman-De Luccia channel, the transition completes successfully, and Hawking-Moss effects stay subdominant. In this regime, elastic self-scatterings redistribute momenta among the produced spectator particles while their decays into dark matter dominate over competing processes, allowing both direct collision products and decay contributions to build the relic abundance. The calculation shows that the observed dark matter density fits within the order-of-magnitude accuracy of the production treatment for a limited set of parameters.

Core claim

In a spectator scalar sector with an inflaton-dependent effective potential, a first-order phase transition at the end of inflation produces particles via bubble collisions. When elastic self-scatterings efficiently redistribute momenta and decays into dark matter provide the dominant transfer channel, with other number-changing processes remaining inefficient compared to Hubble expansion, the combined direct production and subsequent decays accommodate the observed relic abundance within the order-of-magnitude precision of the collision treatment, provided the transition completes successfully and Coleman-De Luccia nucleation dominates.

What carries the argument

Particle production from bubble collisions in the first-order phase transition of the inflaton-dependent spectator sector, followed by elastic momentum redistribution and decay into the dark matter sector.

Load-bearing premise

Elastic self-scatterings efficiently redistribute momenta among spectator particles while their decay into dark matter dominates over other number-changing or sink processes, and the order-of-magnitude treatment of production in bubble collisions suffices to match the relic density.

What would settle it

A more precise computation of particle yields from bubble collisions that shows the total dark matter density deviates from the observed value by more than an order of magnitude across the claimed viable parameter region.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Both direct production during bubble collisions and decays of spectator particles contribute to the final dark matter abundance.
  • The phase transition must complete successfully with Coleman-De Luccia nucleation dominant and Hawking-Moss effects subdominant.
  • Elastic self-scatterings must remain efficient while competing number-changing processes stay inefficient relative to the Hubble rate.
  • The mechanism works only within a restricted window of the model's parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This production route connects the end of inflation directly to dark matter genesis through the spectator sector without extra fields.
  • The restricted parameter space suggests that cosmological observations of phase transition signatures could further constrain or rule out the dark matter yield.
  • Similar bubble-collision channels might operate in other early-universe phase transitions if spectator dynamics are present.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies dark matter production from spectator particles generated in bubble collisions during a first-order phase transition at the end of inflation. The spectator sector has an inflaton-dependent potential so that nucleation becomes significant only near the end of inflation. The authors identify the parameter region where Coleman-De Luccia vacuum decay dominates, Hawking-Moss remains subdominant, the transition completes, and elastic self-scatterings redistribute momenta while decay into dark matter dominates over competing processes. They conclude that the observed relic abundance can be accommodated within the order-of-magnitude accuracy of the collision-production treatment in a restricted region of the two-parameter space (spectator potential parameters and nucleation rate parameters).

Significance. If the order-of-magnitude estimates of the collision yield and the dominance of the decay channel hold under more precise computation, the work would provide a novel mechanism connecting the end of inflation to dark matter genesis via bubble collisions. It extends existing ideas on non-thermal production during phase transitions and could be relevant for models with late-time first-order transitions. The explicit identification of viable parameter space and the separation of direct collision production from subsequent decay are positive features, though the approximate nature of the central calculation limits the strength of the result.

major comments (3)
  1. [relic density and particle production analysis] The central claim that the observed dark matter abundance is accommodated within order-of-magnitude accuracy rests on an unquantified estimate of the particle production spectrum from bubble collisions (abstract and the relic-density analysis). No explicit derivation of the differential yield, no error estimates, and no sensitivity scan to variations in production efficiency by factors of a few are provided; a shift in this efficiency would move or remove the viable region.
  2. [analysis of competing processes] The assertion that elastic self-scatterings efficiently redistribute momenta while decay into dark matter dominates over other number-changing or sink processes is stated without quantitative rate comparisons to the Hubble expansion (abstract). This assumption is load-bearing for transferring the spectator population to the dark sector and for the final abundance calculation.
  3. [parameter space scan and viable region identification] The parameter space is scanned after assuming dominance of the collision-to-decay channel; without independent benchmarks or fixed external inputs for the collision yield, the match to the observed abundance is partly by construction within the stated accuracy (abstract).
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction and setup] Notation for the spectator potential parameters and nucleation rate parameters could be clarified with an explicit table of symbols and ranges.
  2. [conclusions] The manuscript would benefit from a brief discussion of how the order-of-magnitude treatment could be improved in future work, e.g., via lattice simulations of bubble collisions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the observed dark matter abundance is accommodated within order-of-magnitude accuracy rests on an unquantified estimate of the particle production spectrum from bubble collisions (abstract and the relic-density analysis). No explicit derivation of the differential yield, no error estimates, and no sensitivity scan to variations in production efficiency by factors of a few are provided; a shift in this efficiency would move or remove the viable region.

    Authors: We agree that the particle production from bubble collisions is treated at the order-of-magnitude level, consistent with the abstract statement. The manuscript derives the yield from the energy released in collisions and the fraction converted into particles, following standard estimates in the literature on bubble wall dynamics. We will revise the relevant section to include an explicit expression for the differential yield, rough error estimates based on the underlying approximations, and a sensitivity scan demonstrating how the viable parameter region shifts under variations in production efficiency by factors of a few. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assertion that elastic self-scatterings efficiently redistribute momenta while decay into dark matter dominates over other number-changing or sink processes is stated without quantitative rate comparisons to the Hubble expansion (abstract). This assumption is load-bearing for transferring the spectator population to the dark sector and for the final abundance calculation.

    Authors: Section 4 of the manuscript compares the elastic scattering rate, decay rate, and Hubble expansion rate, showing that elastic scatterings redistribute momenta efficiently while decay dominates over competing channels in the viable regime. To strengthen this, we will add explicit rate formulas, their ratios to the Hubble rate, and numerical evaluations at benchmark points within the identified parameter space. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The parameter space is scanned after assuming dominance of the collision-to-decay channel; without independent benchmarks or fixed external inputs for the collision yield, the match to the observed abundance is partly by construction within the stated accuracy (abstract).

    Authors: The collision yield is calculated independently from the model parameters (energy release, wall velocity, and production efficiency) without reference to the observed abundance. The scan varies the spectator potential and nucleation parameters under the physical constraints of CDL dominance and transition completion, then identifies where the resulting abundance lies within the observed value at order-of-magnitude level. We will revise the text and add a figure to clarify this independent computation and the resulting abundance as a function of parameters prior to applying the observational constraint. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A fully precise, non-order-of-magnitude derivation of the particle production spectrum from bubble collisions would require dedicated numerical simulations that lie beyond the analytical scope of this work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relic-density accommodation follows from independent production calculation.

full rationale

The paper derives bubble nucleation via Coleman-De Luccia, analyzes collisions, computes spectator production and subsequent decay into dark matter, then identifies the parameter region where the resulting relic density matches the observed value within the stated O(1) accuracy. This is a standard forward calculation of yield versus fixed external benchmark (observed Omega_DM), not a reduction of the output to the input by definition or fit. No self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is load-bearing in the provided derivation chain. The explicit caveat on order-of-magnitude treatment is a limitation on precision, not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an inflaton-dependent effective potential for the spectator, dominance of Coleman-De Luccia nucleation, efficient momentum redistribution by elastic scatterings, and an order-of-magnitude collision production treatment; these are introduced without external calibration in the provided text.

free parameters (2)
  • spectator potential parameters
    Inflaton-dependent effective potential parameters are adjusted to control nucleation timing and bubble properties.
  • nucleation rate parameters
    Parameters governing when the transition becomes significant near the end of inflation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Vacuum decay is dominated by the Coleman-De Luccia channel with Hawking-Moss subdominant.
    Stated as a requirement for viable regime in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Phase transition completes successfully in the inflating background.
    Required for consistent physical interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1376 out tokens · 30804 ms · 2026-05-07T15:30:07.721129+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study whether a first-order phase transition at the end of inflation can generate the observed dark matter abundance through bubble collisions. The transition occurs in a spectator scalar sector with an inflaton-dependent effective potential, so that the nucleation rate grows during inflation and becomes significant only near its end. We identify the region of parameter space in which vacuum decay is dominated by the Coleman--De~Luccia channel, the Hawking--Moss transition remains subdominant, and the nucleated bubbles admit a consistent physical interpretation in an inflating background. Requiring also that the phase transition completes successfully, we then analyze particle production from bubble collisions. In the viable regime, elastic self-scatterings of the spectator particles can efficiently redistribute their momenta, while their decay into dark matter provides the dominant channel for transferring the spectator population to the dark sector. Other competing number-changing or sink processes remain inefficient compared with the Hubble expansion. The final relic abundance receives contributions from both direct production in bubble collisions and the subsequent decay of spectator field particles. We find that the observed dark matter abundance can be accommodated, within the order-of-magnitude accuracy of the collision-production treatment, in a restricted region of parameter space.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can the universe be matter-dominated after a supercooled first-order phase transition?

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    After a supercooled first-order phase transition, the scalar field's equation of state is set by the bubble-wall Lorentz factor γ*, and matter domination is delayed until a/a* ≃ γ* in the free-streaming limit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    Bozorgnia, J

    N. Bozorgnia, J. Bramante, J.M. Cline, D. Curtin, D. McKeen, D.E. Morrissey et al.,Dark matter candidates and searches,Can. J. Phys.103(2025) 671 [2410.23454]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    TASI lectures on dark matter models and direct detection

    T. Lin,Dark matter models and direct detection,PoS333(2019) 009 [1904.07915]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Boveia et al.,Snowmass 2021 cross frontier report: Dark matter complementarity, 2211.07027

    A. Boveia et al.,Snowmass 2021 cross frontier report: Dark matter complementarity, 2211.07027

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches - current status and future prospects

    L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski,WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 066201 [1707.06277]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Thermally Generated Gauge Singlet Scalars as Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    J. McDonald,Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Goudelis, K.A

    A. Goudelis, K.A. Mohan and D. Sengupta,Clockworking FIMPs,JHEP10(2018) 014 [1807.06642]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Baldes, M

    I. Baldes, M. Dichtl, Y. Gouttenoire and F. Sala,Ultrahigh-Energy Particle Collisions and Heavy Dark Matter at Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 061001 [2306.15555]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Azatov, M

    A. Azatov, M. Vanvlasselaer and W. Yin,Dark Matter production from relativistic bubble walls,JHEP03(2021) 288 [2101.05721]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Azatov, X

    A. Azatov, X. Nagels, M. Vanvlasselaer and W. Yin,Populating secluded dark sector with ultra-relativistic bubbles,JHEP11(2024) 129 [2406.12554]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Krylov, A

    E. Krylov, A. Levin and V. Rubakov,Cosmological phase transition, baryon asymmetry and dark matter Q-balls,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 083528 [1301.0354]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    Huang and C.S

    F.P. Huang and C.S. Li,Probing the baryogenesis and dark matter relaxed in phase transition by gravitational waves and colliders,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 095028 [1709.09691]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    E. Hall, T. Konstandin, R. McGehee and H. Murayama,Asymmetric matter from a dark first-order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 055011 [1911.12342]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    J.-P. Hong, S. Jung and K.-P. Xie,Fermi-ball dark matter from a first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 075028 [2008.04430]. – 42 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Jiang, F.P

    S. Jiang, F.P. Huang and P. Ko,Gauged Q-ball dark matter through a cosmological first-order phase transition,JHEP07(2024) 053 [2404.16509]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Jiang, A

    S. Jiang, A. Yang and F.P. Huang,Macroscopic Dark Matter under siege: from White Dwarf Data to Gravitational Wave Detection,2511.23263

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Jiang, A

    S. Jiang, A. Yang, J. Ma and F.P. Huang,Implication of nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave on dynamical dark matter through a dark first-order phase transition,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 065009 [2306.17827]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Baker, J

    M.J. Baker, J. Kopp and A.J. Long,Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 151102 [1912.02830]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Chway, T

    D. Chway, T.H. Jung and C.S. Shin,Dark matter filtering-out effect during a first-order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 095019 [1912.04238]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Jiang, F.P

    S. Jiang, F.P. Huang and C.S. Li,Hydrodynamic effects on the filtered dark matter produced by a first-order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063508 [2305.02218]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Watkins and L.M

    R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow,Aspects of Reheating in First Order Inflation,Nucl. Phys. B 374(1992) 446

    work page 1992

  27. [27]

    Non-thermal Dark Matter Production from the Electroweak Phase Transition: Multi-TeV WIMPs and "Baby-Zillas"

    A. Falkowski and J.M. No,Non-thermal Dark Matter Production from the Electroweak Phase Transition: Multi-TeV WIMPs and ’Baby-Zillas’,JHEP02(2013) 034 [1211.5615]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Particle production from phase transition bubbles,

    H. Mansour and B. Shakya,Particle production from phase transition bubbles,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 023520 [2308.13070]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Giudice, H.M

    G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee, A. Pomarol and B. Shakya,Nonthermal heavy dark matter from a first-order phase transition,JHEP12(2024) 190 [2403.03252]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Cataldi, K

    M. Cataldi, K. M¨ u¨ ursepp and M. Vanvlasselaer,CP-violation in production of heavy neutrinos from bubble collisions,JHEP01(2026) 058 [2506.12123]

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Freese and M

    K. Freese and M.W. Winkler,Dark matter and gravitational waves from a dark big bang, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083522 [2302.11579]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    H. An, X. Tong and S. Zhou,Superheavy dark matter production from a symmetry-restoring first-order phase transition during inflation,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 023522 [2208.14857]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions,JCAP06(2010) 028 [1004.4187]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Hydrodynamic obstruction to bubble expansion

    T. Konstandin and J.M. No,Hydrodynamic obstruction to bubble expansion,JCAP02 (2011) 008 [1011.3735]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Can electroweak bubble walls run away?

    D. Bodeker and G.D. Moore,Can electroweak bubble walls run away?,JCAP05(2009) 009 [0903.4099]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum

    S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2929

    work page 1977

  37. [37]

    Callan, Jr

    C.G. Callan, Jr. and S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762

    work page 1977

  38. [38]

    General Solutions for Tunneling of Scalar Fields with Quartic Potentials

    F.C. Adams,General solutions for tunneling of scalar fields with quartic potentials,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 2800 [hep-ph/9302321]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  39. [39]

    Coleman and F

    S.R. Coleman and F. De Luccia,Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3305. – 43 –

    work page 1980

  40. [40]

    Sasaki, E.D

    M. Sasaki, E.D. Stewart and T. Tanaka,General solutions for tunneling of scalar fields with quartic potentials in de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 941 [hep-ph/9402247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994

  41. [41]

    Hawking-Moss bounces and vacuum decay rates

    E.J. Weinberg,Hawking-Moss bounces and vacuum decay rates,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 251303 [hep-th/0612146]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    Hawking and I.G

    S.W. Hawking and I.G. Moss,Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 35

    work page 1982

  43. [43]

    A criterion for bubble formation in de Sitter universe

    V. Balek and M. Demetrian,A Criterion for bubble formation in de Sitter universe,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 063518 [gr-qc/0311040]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    A. Joti, A. Katsis, D. Loupas, A. Salvio, A. Strumia, N. Tetradis et al.,(Higgs) vacuum decay during inflation,JHEP07(2017) 058 [1706.00792]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Vicentini,New bounds on vacuum decay in de Sitter space,2205.11036

    S. Vicentini,New bounds on vacuum decay in de Sitter space,2205.11036

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Lee and E.J

    H. Lee and E.J. Weinberg,Negative modes of Coleman-De Luccia bounces,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 124002 [1408.6547]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    Jinno and R

    R. Jinno and R. Sato,Negative mode problem of false vacuum decay revisited,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 096009 [2010.04462]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Battarra, G

    L. Battarra, G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Negative Modes of Oscillating Instantons, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 124001 [1208.2182]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Bramberger, M

    S.F. Bramberger, M. Chitishvili and G. Lavrelashvili,Aspects of the negative mode problem in quantum tunneling with gravity,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 125006 [1906.07033]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Turner, E.J

    M.S. Turner, E.J. Weinberg and L.M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 2384

    work page 1992

  51. [51]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal,JCAP04(2019) 003 [1809.08242]

    work page arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    An, K.-F

    H. An, K.-F. Lyu, L.-T. Wang and S. Zhou,A unique gravitational wave signal from phase transition during inflation*,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 101001 [2009.12381]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints on $r$ and $n_s$ Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data

    L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,2512.10613

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 5 U.K., 1985.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511565045

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565045 1985

  55. [55]

    Coleman,Quantum Tunneling and Negative Eigenvalues,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Quantum Tunneling and Negative Eigenvalues,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 178

    work page 1988

  56. [56]

    Tanaka and M

    T. Tanaka and M. Sasaki,False vacuum decay with gravity: Negative mode problem,Prog. Theor. Phys.88(1992) 503

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    work page 1977

  58. [58]

    Gibbons, S.W

    G.W. Gibbons, S.W. Hawking and M.J. Perry,Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 141

    work page 1978

  59. [59]

    De Alwis, F

    S.P. De Alwis, F. Muia, V. Pasquarella and F. Quevedo,Quantum Transitions Between Minkowski and de Sitter Spacetimes,Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000069 [1909.01975]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Gregory, I.G

    R. Gregory, I.G. Moss, N. Oshita and S. Patrick,Hawking-Moss transition with a black hole seed,JHEP09(2020) 135 [2007.11428]. – 44 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    J. Zou, L. Bian and S.-J. Wang,Simulating first-order phase transition during inflation, 2602.05501

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  62. [62]

    Bao and K

    Y. Bao and K. Harigaya,Spectator Composes a Gravitational Canon: Spectator-field-triggered Phase Transition During Inflation and its Anisotropic Gravitational Wave Signals,2601.04307

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Jinno, T

    R. Jinno, T. Konstandin and M. Takimoto,Relativistic bubble collisions—a closer look, JCAP09(2019) 035 [1906.02588]

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Aspects of particle production from bubble dynamics at a first order phase transition,

    B. Shakya,Aspects of particle production from bubble dynamics at a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023521 [2308.16224]. [65]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]. [66]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing,Astro...

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    work page 1979

  66. [66]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin and A.V. Veryaskin,Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 189

    work page 1982

  67. [67]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise,Constraints on Generalized Inflationary Cosmologies,Nucl. Phys. B244(1984) 541

    work page 1984

  68. [68]

    Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon

    C.J. Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218(1986) 629

    work page 1986

  69. [69]

    Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys

    E. Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 272

    work page 1984

  70. [70]

    Gravitational Radiation from Colliding Vacuum Bubbles: Envelope Approximation to Many-Bubble Collisions

    A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  71. [71]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles

    S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin,Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles, JCAP09(2008) 022 [0806.1828]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    Hu and Y.-L

    X.-H. Hu and Y.-L. Zhou,Gravitational waves of GUT phase transition during inflation, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 115003 [2501.01491]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Cosmological phase transitions: from perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135(2024) 104094 [2305.02357]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background

    D.J. Fixsen,The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,Astrophys. J.707 (2009) 916 [0911.1955]. [78]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    An, K.-F

    H. An, K.-F. Lyu, L.-T. Wang and S. Zhou,Gravitational waves from an inflation triggered first-order phase transition,JHEP06(2022) 050 [2201.05171]. – 45 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    H. An, B. Su, H. Tai, L.-T. Wang and C. Yang,Phase transition during inflation and the gravitational wave signal at pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L121304 [2308.00070]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin

    J. Luo et al.,Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,2502.20138

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  79. [79]

    Ringwald, K

    A. Ringwald, K. Saikawa and C. Tamarit,Primordial gravitational waves in a minimal model of particle physics and cosmology,JCAP02(2021) 046 [2009.02050]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions,JHEP01(2021) 097 [2002.04615]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.