Hypothesis generation and updating in large language models

Hua-Dong Xiong

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Hypothesis generation and updating in large language models

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Large language models behave like Bayesian hypothesis updaters with offsets that favor narrower hypotheses and prevent good extrapolation.

desk verdict LLMs show a strong-sampling bias and evaluation-generation gap in the number game with poor extrapolation, but the single-posterior assumption across probes looks shaky. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.05851 v1 submitted 2026-05-07 cs.LG

Hua-Dong Xiong This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.LG

keywords largelanguagemodelshypothesisgenerationBayesianinferencenumbergameupdatingOccam'srazorgeneralization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates how large language models generate and update hypotheses when inferring rules from a few positive examples, using the number game as a testbed. It measures LLM behavior through three probes—posterior prediction, hypothesis evaluation, and hypothesis generation—and compares it to an optimal Bayesian learner and to humans. The central finding is that LLMs often align with a two-parameter Bayesian fit but deviate systematically. Default responses favor narrower hypotheses due to a strong-sampling assumption, while thinking mode increases prior influence. There is also a consistent gap where evaluation picks more accurate hypotheses than generation does, and the Bayesian-like pattern breaks down when generalizing to unseen parts of the space.

What carries the argument

The number game, in which a learner sees positive integers and infers the underlying rule or interval, with posteriors measured via prediction, evaluation, and generation probes compared against a Bayesian model.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to check whether LLMs continue to show the same parameter fits and biases when probed with new hypothesis spaces or when forced to generate hypotheses that extrapolate to unseen numbers in the game.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the number game, LLMs' inferences over hypotheses supported by positive examples are well captured by a two-parameter Bayesian model, but they exhibit a default strong-sampling assumption that implicitly favors narrower hypotheses, a shift toward prior reliance in thinking mode, a robust gap between evaluation and generation performance, and a failure to extrapolate the pattern beyond the observed examples.

Load-bearing premise

That the three different probes all tap into the same underlying posterior distribution over hypotheses inside the LLM.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

LLMs default to narrower hypotheses via strong sampling, acting as an implicit Occam's razor.
Switching to thinking mode increases reliance on prior probabilities over likelihoods.
LLMs evaluate hypotheses more accurately than they generate them, preferring rule-like outputs in generation.
The Bayesian-with-bias behavior does not extend to generalization outside the trained examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This pattern suggests LLMs may struggle with scientific discovery tasks requiring broad hypothesis exploration beyond given data.
The evaluation-generation gap points to a need for better alignment between selection and creation mechanisms in model training.
Future tests could examine whether the same biases appear in other structured inference domains beyond numbers.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main things to know are that LLMs in this controlled number-game setup can be described by a two-parameter Bayesian model with a default strong-sampling bias that favors narrower hypotheses, plus a clear gap where they evaluate hypotheses better than they generate them, and that this pattern fails to extrapolate beyond the observed examples. The work also notes that a thinking mode increases prior weight. These are measured against both an optimal Bayesian learner and human data. The three-probe design (posterior prediction, evaluation, and generation) is a reasonable way to check consistency, and the gap plus non-extrapolation results give a concrete handle on where LLMs fall short as general problem solvers. That combination of findings on bias, the gap, and limited generalization is new relative to the cited literature. The setup is controlled enough to make the observations useful for people studying LLM reasoning. The soft spot is the assumption that all three probes access the same underlying posterior. The reported evaluation-generation gap already shows systematic differences in output, so fitting one two-parameter model across them risks making the bias and prior-reliance claims probe-specific rather than general. Without details on whether the parameters were pre-specified or chosen after seeing the data, and without the exact generalization tests, it's hard to judge how robust the offsets and non-extrapolation really are. This is aimed at researchers in AI and cognitive science who care about how LLMs do hypothesis inference. A reader working on reasoning benchmarks or scientific problem-solving would get value from the probes and the gap result. It deserves peer review because the questions are relevant and the experimental framing is solid, even if the methods need more transparency on fitting and testing.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies hypothesis generation and updating in LLMs using the number game, where models infer rules from positive examples like {16, 8, 2, 64}. It uses three probes—posterior prediction, hypothesis evaluation, and hypothesis generation—to measure posteriors over hypotheses, compares to Bayesian models and humans, and reports that LLMs fit a two-parameter Bayesian model with biases (strong-sampling assumption creating implicit Occam's razor, thinking mode increasing prior reliance), a robust evaluation-generation gap, and poor extrapolation of the pattern.

Significance. If substantiated, these results would be significant for understanding LLM limitations in inference tasks relevant to scientific discovery and problem-solving. The controlled experimental setup and multi-probe design allow for direct comparison to optimal Bayesian inference and human behavior, highlighting both strengths and biases in LLM reasoning. However, the non-extrapolation finding underscores a key limitation.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] The claim that LLMs are 'often well described by a two-parameter Bayesian fit' is central but lacks specifics on how the two parameters were determined, whether the fits were pre-specified versus post-hoc, inclusion of error bars, or quantitative measures of fit quality such as R-squared or likelihood ratios.
[Abstract] The assumption that the three probes (posterior prediction, hypothesis evaluation, and hypothesis generation) all measure the same underlying posterior distribution is load-bearing for the unified description of LLM inference with specific biases. The reported robust evaluation-generation gap suggests potential systematic differences in elicited behavior that could indicate probe-dependent posteriors rather than noise around a shared one.
[Abstract] The non-extrapolation result, that the Bayesian-with-bias pattern does not hold for parts of the hypothesis domain not covered by observed examples, is a key claim but requires more detail on the specific generalization tests conducted and how they were designed to test extrapolation.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Clarify what 'thinking mode' refers to, perhaps with a short description of the experimental manipulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The claim that LLMs are 'often well described by a two-parameter Bayesian fit' is central but lacks specifics on how the two parameters were determined, whether the fits were pre-specified versus post-hoc, inclusion of error bars, or quantitative measures of fit quality such as R-squared or likelihood ratios.

Authors: The two parameters are the strong-sampling bias strength and the prior weight, pre-specified from the model variants in Section 3.2. Fits used maximum likelihood with bootstrap-derived error bars (reported in the supplement). We will add quantitative fit metrics (e.g., log-likelihood ratios and R^2 values) to the abstract and results in revision. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The assumption that the three probes (posterior prediction, hypothesis evaluation, and hypothesis generation) all measure the same underlying posterior distribution is load-bearing for the unified description of LLM inference with specific biases. The reported robust evaluation-generation gap suggests potential systematic differences in elicited behavior that could indicate probe-dependent posteriors rather than noise around a shared one.

Authors: The evaluation-generation gap does indicate probe-specific elicitation differences. However, the core biases remain consistent across probes, which we interpret as a shared posterior plus output-format effects. We will revise the abstract and discussion to explicitly note this distinction, report per-probe posterior estimates, and clarify that the unified description applies to the bias parameters rather than every hypothesis probability. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] The non-extrapolation result, that the Bayesian-with-bias pattern does not hold for parts of the hypothesis domain not covered by observed examples, is a key claim but requires more detail on the specific generalization tests conducted and how they were designed to test extrapolation.

Authors: We agree more detail is warranted. The tests used held-out numbers outside the observed range and measured whether rule-like hypotheses continued to be favored. We will expand the abstract and add a results subsection with explicit test design, example stimuli, and metrics to make the extrapolation failure transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Two-parameter Bayesian fit to LLM probe data then interpreted as 'strong-sampling bias' and prior-reliance shift

fitted input called prediction [Abstract (and corresponding Results on Bayesian modeling)]
"LLMs are often well described by a two-parameter Bayesian fit, but with systematic offsets: by default they show a strong-sampling assumption that creates an implicit Occam's razor, favoring narrower hypotheses, while thinking mode shifts them toward greater prior reliance."

The two parameters are estimated by fitting the Bayesian model to the LLM's posterior-prediction, evaluation, and generation data. The 'strong-sampling assumption' and 'greater prior reliance' are then labeled as systematic offsets or predictions about LLM behavior, but these are exactly the values of the fitted parameters; the description is therefore equivalent to the input fit rather than an independent result.

full rationale

The paper fits a two-parameter Bayesian model (sampling assumption + prior weight) to responses from the three probes on the number game. It then presents the fitted values as evidence that LLMs exhibit a 'strong-sampling assumption that creates an implicit Occam's razor' by default and shift toward 'greater prior reliance' in thinking mode. Because the parameters are estimated from the same LLM data rather than fixed independently, the claimed systematic offsets reduce to the fit results by construction. The reported evaluation-generation gap further indicates the probes may not access a single shared posterior, undermining the unified two-parameter description, yet the fit is still used to characterize LLM inference overall.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the implicit two-parameter Bayesian model. No independent evidence for any new entities is mentioned.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hypothesis generation and updating in large language models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2605.05851

@misc{pith2026260505851,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hypothesis generation and updating in large language models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2605.05851}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.05851}
}

abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly help people solve problems, from debugging code to repairing machinery. This process requires generating plausible hypotheses from partial descriptions, then updating them as more information arrives. Yet how LLMs perform this form of inference, and how close it is to optimal, remains unclear. We study this question in the number game, a controlled setting in which a learner infers the hypothesis supported by a few positive integers, such as $\{16, 8, 2, 64\}$: a rule like powers of 2 or an interval like numbers near 20. We measure the posterior over hypotheses using three complementary probes: posterior prediction, hypothesis evaluation, and hypothesis generation. We then compare LLM behavior with an optimal Bayesian model and human behavior, and test whether the same posterior is expressed across probes. LLMs are often well described by a two-parameter Bayesian fit, but with systematic offsets: by default they show a strong-sampling assumption that creates an implicit Occam's razor, favoring narrower hypotheses, while thinking mode shifts them toward greater prior reliance. We also find a robust evaluation--generation gap: LLMs select more correct hypotheses during hypothesis evaluation but generate simpler, more rule-like hypotheses. Finally, this Bayesian-with-bias pattern does not extrapolate. Models can behave as if they hold rule-like hypotheses over observed examples, yet generalize poorly to parts of the hypothesis domain not covered by those examples. Our results highlight a limitation of LLMs as general problem solvers, especially for scientific inference, where hypotheses must go beyond the data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05851 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Three measurements of the posterior over hypotheses in the number game. The schematic shows how we prompt LLMs to measure their posterior over hypotheses. Posterior prediction queries the LLM with one integer in the hypothesis domain at a time and records the model-generated probability that the integer belongs to the same hypothesis as the current examples, yielding a probability mass function. Hypothesis evaluatio… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Bayesian fit of LLM posterior prediction behavior. a, Full-stimulus (α, β) fits for default d = 100 posterior prediction, with each model fit once after pooling all available full-stimulus TENENBAUM99 and BIGELOW16 presentations. Each colored point is one model; dashed lines mark the configured Bayesian reference, (1, 1); the human baseline is shown as a black cross. b, Example-count trajectories of log(α/β) over on… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Bayesian fits quantify how prompt sampling assumptions, explicit candidate lists, and thinking affect LLM posterior prediction behavior. Bars summarize model-averaged posteriorprediction conditions for the Default Prompt, Strong Prompt, Weak Prompt, and Explicit Prompt. Within each prompt condition, dark bars show non-thinking model rows and lighter bars show thinking model rows. The left two panels report full-sti… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Large language models show different behavior under three measurements of the posterior. Bars compare posterior prediction (Predict), hypothesis evaluation (Eval), and hypothesis generation (Generate) after projecting each measurement into the same posterior predictive…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Hypothesis evaluation and generation show an accuracy–simplicity trade-off in their MAP hypothesis estimators. a,b, Top-1 example consistency versus support fraction for hypothesis evaluation and generation on TENENBAUM99 default d = 100 rows. c, Paired Eval-minus-Gene…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: LLM hypotheses fail to generalize to the unobserved domain. a, Larger-domain posterior prediction, comparing mass assigned to 101..200 with KL divergence between the original d = 100 posterior and the renormalized d = 200 posterior on 1..100. Transparent points show st…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Thinking Under Uncertainty: Evidence Use and Information-Seeking in Language Models
cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Inference-time thinking strengthens value-guided choice and cuts noise in LLMs, but does not produce UCB-like or stronger Thompson-like information-seeking on a controlled bandit task.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open Intelligence

NVIDIA and Blakeman, Aaron and Grattafiori, Aaron and Basant, Aarti and Gupta, Abhibha and Khattar, Abhinav and Renduchintala, Adi and Vavre, Aditya and Shukla, Akanksha and Bercovich, Akhiad and Ficek, Aleksander and Shaposhnikov, Aleksandr and Kondratenko, Alex and Bukharin, Alexander and Milesi, Alexandre and Taghibakhshi, Ali and Liu, Alisa and Barton...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20856
[2]

Google , author =

Gemma 4:. Google , author =

work page
[3]

Wei, Jiaqi and Yang, Yuejin and Zhang, Xiang and Chen, Yuhan and Zhuang, Xiang and Gao, Zhangyang and Zhou, Dongzhan and Wang, Guangshuai and Gao, Zhiqiang and Cao, Juntai and Qiu, Zijie and Hu, Ming and Ma, Chenglong and Tang, Shixiang and He, Junjun and Song, Chunfeng and He, Xuming and Zhang, Qiang and You, Chenyu and Zheng, Shuangjia and Ding, Ning an...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.14111
[4]

Zheng, Tianshi and Deng, Zheye and Tsang, Hong Ting and Wang, Weiqi and Bai, Jiaxin and Wang, Zihao and Song, Yangqiu , month = may, year =. From

work page
[5]

Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery

Mitchener, Ludovico and Yiu, Angela and Chang, Benjamin and Bourdenx, Mathieu and Nadolski, Tyler and Sulovari, Arvis and Landsness, Eric C. and Barabasi, Daniel L. and Narayanan, Siddharth and Evans, Nicky and Reddy, Shriya and Foiani, Martha and Kamal, Aizad and Shriver, Leah P. and Cao, Fang and Wassie, Asmamaw T. and Laurent, Jon M. and Melville-Green...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.02824
[6]

AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation

Tang, Jiabin and Xia, Lianghao and Li, Zhonghang and Huang, Chao , month = may, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.18705 , abstract =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18705
[7]

Yamada, Yutaro and Lange, Robert Tjarko and Lu, Cong and Hu, Shengran and Lu, Chris and Foerster, Jakob and Clune, Jeff and Ha, David , month = apr, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.08066 , abstract =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08066
[8]

Gottweis, Juraj and Weng, Wei-Hung and Daryin, Alexander and Tu, Tao and Palepu, Anil and Sirkovic, Petar and Myaskovsky, Artiom and Weissenberger, Felix and Rong, Keran and Tanno, Ryutaro and Saab, Khaled and Popovici, Dan and Blum, Jacob and Zhang, Fan and Chou, Katherine and Hassidim, Avinatan and Gokturk, Burak and Vahdat, Amin and Kohli, Pushmeet and...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18864

Show all 300 references

[9]

, year =

Clark, Eve V. , year =. What's in a word?. Cognitive development and acquisition of language , publisher =
[10]

Cognitive basis of language learning in infants , volume =

MacNamara, John , year =. Cognitive basis of language learning in infants , volume =. Psychological Review , publisher =. doi:10.1037/h0031901 , abstract =

doi
[11]

Journal of Child Language , author =

Overextension in early language development , volume =. Journal of Child Language , author =. 1980 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0305000900002658 , abstract =

1980 doi
[12]

von Helmholtz, Hermann , editor =. The. Selected. 1878 , keywords =
[13]

Kumaran, Dharshan and Patraucean, Viorica and Osindero, Simon and Velickovic, Petar and Daw, Nathaniel , month = apr, year =. How. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.22271 , abstract =

doi arXiv
[14]

Reasoning

Boppana, Siddharth and Ma, Annabel and Loeffler, Max and Sarfati, Raphael and Bigelow, Eric and Geiger, Atticus and Lewis, Owen and Merullo, Jack , month = mar, year =. Reasoning. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.05488 , abstract =

doi
[15]

Raaschou-jensen, Hans Peter Lynsgøe and Fierro, Constanza and Søgaard, Anders , month = oct, year =. Real-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.23274 , abstract =

doi
[16]

Calibrating

Xie, Zhihui and Guo, Jizhou and Yu, Tong and Li, Shuai , month = dec, year =. Calibrating. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.18711 , abstract =

doi
[17]

Frankland, Steven M and Webb, Taylor and Lewis, Richard L and Cohen, Jonathan D and Marjieh, Raja and Nurisso, Marco and Petri, Giovanni and Fluegemann, Joseph , month = feb, year =. No. doi:10.31234/osf.io/cjuxb_v2 , abstract =

doi
[18]

Reasoning with

Karan, Aayush and Du, Yilun , month = oct, year =. Reasoning with. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.14901 , abstract =

doi
[19]

Cencerrado, Iván Vicente Moreno and Masdemont, Arnau Padrés and Hawthorne, Anton Gonzalvez and Africa, David Demitri and Pacchiardi, Lorenzo , month = mar, year =. No. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.10625 , abstract =

doi
[20]

Temporal

David, Joey , month = nov, year =. Temporal. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.14773 , abstract =

doi
[21]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.05655 , abstract =

Sun, Lihao and Dong, Hang and Qiao, Bo and Lin, Qingwei and Zhang, Dongmei and Rajmohan, Saravan , month = apr, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.05655 , abstract =

doi arXiv
[22]

Efficient

Kamoi, Ryo and Zhang, Yusen and Zhang, Nan and Das, Sarkar Snigdha Sarathi and Zhang, Ranran Haoran and Yin, Wenpeng and Zhang, Rui , month = apr, year =. Efficient. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.15960 , abstract =

doi arXiv
[23]

Truth as a

Damirchi, Hamed and De la Jara, Ignacio Meza and Abbasnejad, Ehsan and Shamsi, Afshar and Zhang, Zhen and Shi, Javen , month = mar, year =. Truth as a
[24]

Closing the

Miao, Miranda Muqing and Ungar, Lyle , month = apr, year =. Closing the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.25052 , abstract =

doi
[25]

Kumaran, Dharshan and Conmy, Arthur and Barbero, Federico and Osindero, Simon and Patraucean, Viorica and Velickovic, Petar , month = mar, year =. How do. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.17839 , abstract =

doi
[26]

Efficient

Ni, Jingwei and Fadeeva, Ekaterina and Wu, Tianyi and Akhtar, Mubashara and Zhang, Jiaheng and Ash, Elliott and Leippold, Markus and Baldwin, Timothy and Ng, See-Kiong and Shelmanov, Artem and Sachan, Mrinmaya , month = jan, year =. Efficient. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.06209 , a...

doi arXiv
[27]

Cacioli, Jon-Paul , month = mar, year =. Do. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.25112 , abstract =

doi
[28]

Evidence for

Ackerman, Christopher , month = oct, year =. Evidence for
[29]

Orgad, Hadas and Toker, Michael and Gekhman, Zorik and Reichart, Roi and Szpektor, Idan and Kotek, Hadas and Belinkov, Yonatan , month = oct, year =
[30]

Learning to

He, Yixin and Tang, Lumingyuan , month = sep, year =. Learning to. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.24238 , abstract =

doi
[31]

Yadav, Advait and Black, Sid and Sourbut, Oliver , month = apr, year =. More. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.07821 , abstract =

doi arXiv
[32]

Lossless data compression by large models , volume =

Li, Ziguang and Huang, Chao and Wang, Xuliang and Hu, Haibo and Wyeth, Cole and Bu, Dongbo and Yu, Quan and Gao, Wen and Liu, Xingwu and Li, Ming , month = may, year =. Lossless data compression by large models , volume =. Nature Machine Intelligence , publisher =. doi:10.1038...

doi
[33]

Yoran, Ori and Zheng, Kunhao and Gloeckle, Fabian and Gehring, Jonas and Synnaeve, Gabriel and Cohen, Taco , month = oct, year =. The
[34]

Goldblum, Micah and Finzi, Marc and Rowan, Keefer and Wilson, Andrew Gordon , month = jun, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.05366 , abstract =

doi
[35]

Language

Deletang, Gregoire and Ruoss, Anian and Duquenne, Paul-Ambroise and Catt, Elliot and Genewein, Tim and Mattern, Christopher and Grau-Moya, Jordi and Wenliang, Li Kevin and Aitchison, Matthew and Orseau, Laurent and Hutter, Marcus and Veness, Joel , month = oct, year =. Language
[36]

Cai, Yuchen and Cao, Ding and Xu, Xin and Yao, Zijun and Huang, Yuqing and Tan, Zhenyu and Zhang, Benyi and Sun, Guangzhong and Liu, Guiquan and Fang, Junfeng , month = feb, year =. On. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.00553 , abstract =

doi
[37]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , author =

Coarse-to-. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.52202/079017-3340 , language =

2024 doi
[38]

Transactions on Machine Learning Research , author =

Beyond the. Transactions on Machine Learning Research , author =
[39]

Kazemi, Mehran and Fatemi, Bahare and Bansal, Hritik and Palowitch, John and Anastasiou, Chrysovalantis and Mehta, Sanket Vaibhav and Jain, Lalit K. and Aglietti, Virginia and Jindal, Disha and Chen, Peter and Dikkala, Nishanth and Tyen, Gladys and Liu, Xin and Shalit, Uri and...

doi
[40]

Baeumel, Tanja and Genabith, Josef van and Ostermann, Simon , month = feb, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.19981 , abstract =

doi
[41]

, month = jan, year =

Gu, Alex and Rozière, Baptiste and Leather, Hugh and Solar-Lezama, Armando and Synnaeve, Gabriel and Wang, Sida I. , month = jan, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2401.03065 , abstract =

doi
[42]

Yang, Songlin and Shen, Yikang and Wen, Kaiyue and Tan, Shawn and Mishra, Mayank and Ren, Liliang and Panda, Rameswar and Kim, Yoon , month = oct, year =. The
[43]

and Moros-Daval, Yael and Zhang, Seraphina and Zhao, Qinlin and Huang, Yitian and Sun, Luning and Prunty, Jonathan E

Zhou, Lexin and Pacchiardi, Lorenzo and Martínez-Plumed, Fernando and Collins, Katherine M. and Moros-Daval, Yael and Zhang, Seraphina and Zhao, Qinlin and Huang, Yitian and Sun, Luning and Prunty, Jonathan E. and Li, Zongqian and Sánchez-García, Pablo and Jiang-Chen, Kexin an...

doi
[44]

What and

Zhang, Yufeng and Zhang, Fengzhuo and Yang, Zhuoran and Wang, Zhaoran , month = apr, year =. What and. Proceedings of
[45]

Revisiting the

Gwak, Minju and Son, Guijin and Kim, Jaehyung , month = oct, year =. Revisiting the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.13850 , abstract =

doi
[46]

and Piantadosi, Steven T

Bigelow, Eric J. and Piantadosi, Steven T. , year =. Inferring priors in compositional cognitive models , volume =. Proceedings of the
[47]

2023 , keywords =

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , author =. 2023 , keywords =

2023
[48]

Journal of Open Psychology Data , author =

A large dataset of generalization patterns in the number game , volume =. Journal of Open Psychology Data , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.5334/jopd.19 , number =

2016 doi
[49]

Rules and

Tenenbaum, Joshua , year =. Rules and. Advances in
[50]

, month = apr, year =

Zhang, Liyi and Snell, Jake and Griffiths, Thomas L. , month = apr, year =. Meta-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.14285 , abstract =

doi
[51]

Bayesian teaching enables probabilistic reasoning in large language models , volume =

Qiu, Linlu and Sha, Fei and Allen, Kelsey and Kim, Yoon and Linzen, Tal and van Steenkiste, Sjoerd , month = jan, year =. Bayesian teaching enables probabilistic reasoning in large language models , volume =. Nature Communications , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67998-6 ...

doi
[52]

Xu, Zhangchen and Jiang, Fengqing and Niu, Luyao and Deng, Yuntian and Poovendran, Radha and Choi, Yejin and Lin, Bill Yuchen , month = oct, year =. Magpie:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.08464 , abstract =

doi
[53]

Padmanabhan, Sriram and Misra, Kanishka and Mahowald, Kyle and Choi, Eunsol , month = apr, year =. On. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.09387 , abstract =

doi
[54]

Chari, Anirudh and Pattanaik, Neil , month = feb, year =. Wild. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.06818 , abstract =

doi
[55]

Bazigaran, Arghavan and Sohn, Hansem , month = dec, year =. Concept. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.20162 , abstract =

doi
[56]

Revisiting

Tao, Linwei and Yeh, Yi-Fan and Dong, Minjing and Huang, Tao and Torr, Philip and Xu, Chang , month = may, year =. Revisiting. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.23854 , abstract =

doi
[57]

Calibration-

Kapoor, Sanyam and Gruver, Nate and Roberts, Manley and Pal, Arka and Dooley, Samuel and Goldblum, Micah and Wilson, Andrew , editor =. Calibration-. Proceedings of the 1st. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.uncertainlp-1.1 , abstract =

2024 doi
[58]

Shojaee, Parshin and Mirzadeh, Iman and Alizadeh, Keivan and Horton, Maxwell and Bengio, Samy and Farajtabar, Mehrdad , month = nov, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.06941 , abstract =

doi
[59]

Contextual

Golovneva, Olga and Wang, Tianlu and Weston, Jason and Sukhbaatar, Sainbayar , month = may, year =. Contextual. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.18719 , abstract =

doi
[60]

Reasoning

Pournemat, Mobina and Rezaei, Keivan and Sriramanan, Gaurang and Zarei, Arman and Fu, Jiaxiang and Wang, Yang and Eghbalzadeh, Hamid and Feizi, Soheil , month = sep, year =. Reasoning. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.10739 , abstract =

doi
[61]

Xiaohu, Xie and Xiaohu, Liu and Benjamin, Yao , month = feb, year =. Know
[62]

Leng, Jixuan and Huang, Chengsong and Zhu, Banghua and Huang, Jiaxin , month = oct, year =. Taming
[63]

Position:

Yan, Hanqi and Zhang, Linhai and Li, Jiazheng and Shen, Zhenyi and He, Yulan , month = jun, year =. Position:
[64]

EleutherAI Blog , author =

Attention. EleutherAI Blog , author =
[65]

Embarrassingly

Zhang, Ruixiang and Bai, Richard He and Zheng, Huangjie and Jaitly, Navdeep and Collobert, Ronan and Zhang, Yizhe , month = apr, year =. Embarrassingly. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.01193 , abstract =

doi
[66]

Learning

Salimans, Tim and Chen, Richard , month = dec, year =. Learning. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1812.03381 , abstract =

doi
[67]

Cooperative

Hadfield-Menell, Dylan and Dragan, Anca and Abbeel, Pieter and Russell, Stuart , month = feb, year =. Cooperative. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.03137 , abstract =

doi
[68]

Test your best methods on our hard

daria and Tyagi, Riya and Engels, Josh and Nanda, Neel , month = mar, year =. Test your best methods on our hard
[69]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.02268 , abstract =

Lu, Zhengxi and Yao, Zhiyuan and Wu, Jinyang and Han, Chengcheng and Gu, Qi and Cai, Xunliang and Lu, Weiming and Xiao, Jun and Zhuang, Yueting and Shen, Yongliang , month = apr, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.02268 , abstract =

doi
[70]

and Griffiths, Thomas L

Mineault, Patrick J. and Griffiths, Thomas L. and Escola, Sean , month = mar, year =. Cognitive. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.03414 , abstract =

doi
[71]

and Escola, Sean and Pitkow, Xaq and Griffiths, Thomas L

Liu, Ryan and Arumugam, Dilip and Zhang, Cedegao E. and Escola, Sean and Pitkow, Xaq and Griffiths, Thomas L. , month = feb, year =. Cognitive. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.22523 , abstract =

doi
[72]

, year =

Ortega, Pedro A. , year =. Universal
[73]

and Vezhnevets, Alexander Sasha and Diaz, Manfred and Agapiou, John P

Leibo, Joel Z. and Vezhnevets, Alexander Sasha and Diaz, Manfred and Agapiou, John P. and Cunningham, William A. and Sunehag, Peter and Cross, Logan and Koster, Raphael and Bileschi, Stanley M. and Chang, Minsuk and Rahwan, Iyad and Osindero, Simon and Evans, James A. , month ...

doi
[74]

Superposition

Liu, Yizhou and Liu, Ziming and Gore, Jeff , month = nov, year =. Superposition. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.10465 , abstract =

doi arXiv
[75]

Science , author =

Geometry of sequence working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex , volume =. Science , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.abm0204 , abstract =

2022 doi
[76]

Representations and generalization in artificial and brain neural networks , volume =

Li, Qianyi and Sorscher, Ben and Sompolinsky, Haim , month = jul, year =. Representations and generalization in artificial and brain neural networks , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , publisher =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2311805121 , abstract =

doi
[77]

(Joshua Brett) , year =

Tenenbaum, Joshua B. (Joshua Brett) , year =. A
[78]

Wang, William Yang , editor =. “. Proceedings of the 55th. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/P17-2067 , abstract =

2017 doi
[79]

Prototypical

Snell, Jake and Swersky, Kevin and Zemel, Richard , year =. Prototypical. Advances in
[80]

and Carey, C

Gemma, Team and Kamath, Aishwarya and Ferret, Johan and Pathak, Shreya and Vieillard, Nino and Merhej, Ramona and Perrin, Sarah and Matejovicova, Tatiana and Ramé, Alexandre and Rivière, Morgane and Rouillard, Louis and Mesnard, Thomas and Cideron, Geoffrey and Grill, Jean-bas...

doi
[81]

Qwen3.5:

Qwen, Team , month = feb, year =. Qwen3.5:
[82]

Memory & Cognition , author =

The recency effect:. Memory & Cognition , author =. 1993 , keywords =. doi:10.3758/BF03202726 , abstract =

1993 doi
[83]

, year =

Greene, Robert L. , year =. Sources of recency effects in free recall , volume =. Psychological Bulletin , publisher =. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.221 , abstract =

doi
[84]

Instruction-

Zhou, Jeffrey and Lu, Tianjian and Mishra, Swaroop and Brahma, Siddhartha and Basu, Sujoy and Luan, Yi and Zhou, Denny and Hou, Le , month = nov, year =. Instruction-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2311.07911 , abstract =

doi
[85]

, month = aug, year =

Rein, David and Hou, Betty Li and Stickland, Asa Cooper and Petty, Jackson and Pang, Richard Yuanzhe and Dirani, Julien and Michael, Julian and Bowman, Samuel R. , month = aug, year =
[86]

2024 , pages =

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.52202/079017-3018 , language =

2024 doi
[87]

Machine Learning , author =

Multitask. Machine Learning , author =. 1997 , keywords =. doi:10.1023/A:1007379606734 , abstract =

1997 doi
[88]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Low-dimensional dynamics for working memory and time encoding , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1915984117 , abstract =

2020 doi
[89]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Stable population coding for working memory coexists with heterogeneous neural dynamics in prefrontal cortex , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1619449114 , abstract =

2017 doi
[90]

The selective updating of working memory: a predictive coding account , language =

Yu, Yen , keywords =. The selective updating of working memory: a predictive coding account , language =
[91]

Annual Review of Psychology , author =

The. Annual Review of Psychology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 , abstract =

2015 doi
[92]

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =

The cognitive neuroscience of visual short-term memory , volume =. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.08.004 , language =

2015 doi
[93]

Nature Communications , author =

Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11298-3 , language =

2019 doi
[94]

Nature Communications , author =

Dynamic network coding of working-memory domains and working-memory processes , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08840-8 , language =

2019 doi
[95]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Reevaluating the. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.014 , language =

2020 doi
[96]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Distraction in. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.004 , language =

2021 doi
[97]

The Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Neural. The Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-16-05154.1996 , language =

1996 doi
[98]

, month = oct, year =

Bays, Paul and Schneegans, Sebastian and Ma, Wei Ji and Brady, Timothy F. , month = oct, year =. Representation and computation in working memory , url =. doi:10.31234/osf.io/kubr9 , abstract =

doi
[99]

Nature Human Behaviour , author =

Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength , volume =. Nature Human Behaviour , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0 , language =

2020 doi
[100]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Strong inhibitory signaling underlies stable temporal dynamics and working memory in spiking neural networks , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00753-w , language =

2021 doi
[101]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in the prefrontal cortex underlies serial biases in working memory , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0644-4 , language =

2020 doi
[102]

Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =

State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks , volume =. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nrn2558 , abstract =

2009 doi
[103]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not , issn =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004 , language =

2011 doi
[104]

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , author =

Attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00087 , abstract =

2012 doi
[105]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

‘. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.004 , language =

2015 doi
[106]

Neuron , author =

Brain. Neuron , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.051 , abstract =

2016 doi
[107]

Neuron , author =

Restoring. Neuron , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.006 , abstract =

2016 doi
[108]

Science , author =

Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation , volume =. Science , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aah7011 , abstract =

2016 doi
[109]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Prioritizing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010 , language =

2017 doi
[110]

eLife , author =

A theory of working memory without consciousness or sustained activity , volume =. eLife , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.7554/eLife.23871 , abstract =

2017 doi
[111]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0094-4 , language =

2018 doi
[112]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Decoding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.016 , language =

2015 doi
[113]

Nature , author =

Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , volume =. Nature , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature07832 , language =

2009 doi
[114]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Concurrent visual and motor selection during visual working memory guided action , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0335-6 , language =

2019 doi
[115]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Probing the limits of activity-silent non-conscious working memory , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1820730116 , abstract =

2019 doi
[116]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

A. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.002 , language =

2019 doi
[117]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Is. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.003 , language =

2021 doi
[118]

eLife , author =

Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex , volume =. eLife , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.7554/eLife.38677 , abstract =

2018 doi
[119]

Cortex , author =

No evidence for enhanced distractor template representation in early visual cortex , volume =. Cortex , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.005 , language =

2018 doi
[120]

Object-based attention prioritizes working memory contents at a theta rhythm , url =

Peters, Benjamin and Kaiser, Jochen and Rahm, Benjamin and Bledowski, Christoph , month = jul, year =. Object-based attention prioritizes working memory contents at a theta rhythm , url =. doi:10.1101/369652 , abstract =

doi
[121]

The Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Neural. The Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3493-16.2017 , language =

2017 doi
[122]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Stochastic sampling provides a unifying account of visual working memory limits , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2004306117 , abstract =

2020 doi
[123]

Chunking as a

Nassar, Matthew R and Helmers, Julie C and Frank, Michael J , keywords =. Chunking as a
[124]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Noise in. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3204-13.2014 , language =

2014 doi
[125]

Neuron , author =

Generating. Neuron , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.018 , abstract =

2009 doi
[126]

NeuroImage , author =

Decoding the status of working memory representations in preparation of visual selection , volume =. NeuroImage , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.069 , language =

2019 doi
[127]

Scientific Reports , author =

Multivariate. Scientific Reports , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0 , language =

2017 doi
[128]

Neuron , author =

Orbitofrontal. Neuron , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.005 , abstract =

2014 doi
[129]

Neuron , author =

Human. Neuron , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.019 , abstract =

2016 doi
[130]

eLife , author =

Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data , volume =. eLife , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.7554/eLife.49547 , abstract =

2019 doi
[131]

Cognition , author =

Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation , volume =. Cognition , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.012 , abstract =

2016 doi
[132]

Cell , author =

Behavior- and. Cell , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.022 , abstract =

2020 doi
[133]

Cell , author =

Representational geometry of perceptual decisions in the monkey parietal cortex , volume =. Cell , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.022 , abstract =

2021 doi
[134]

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =

Deep temporal models and active inference , volume =. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.004 , abstract =

2018 doi
[135]

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =

Motivation and cognitive control in depression , volume =. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.011 , abstract =

2019 doi
[136]

Progress in Neurobiology , author =

The hippocampal formation as a hierarchical generative model supporting generative replay and continual learning , volume =. Progress in Neurobiology , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102329 , abstract =

2022 doi
[137]

, editor =

Geisler, Wilson S. , editor =. Ideal. The. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7131.003.0061 , language =

2003 doi
[138]

Neuron , author =

Harnessing. Neuron , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.003 , language =

2009 doi
[139]

Neuron , author =

Orbitofrontal. Neuron , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.039 , abstract =

2014 doi
[140]

Current Biology , author =

Neuronal. Current Biology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.058 , abstract =

2012 doi
[141]

, month = sep, year =

Krotov, Dmitry and Hopfield, John J. , month = sep, year =. Dense
[142]

Opening the

Shwartz-Ziv, Ravid and Tishby, Naftali , month = apr, year =. Opening the
[143]

Computational models of long term plasticity and memory , url =

Fusi, Stefano , month = jun, year =. Computational models of long term plasticity and memory , url =
[144]

, volume =

The formation of learning sets. , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 1949 , keywords =. doi:10.1037/h0062474 , language =

1949 doi
[145]

Bayesian

Charniak, Eugene , keywords =. Bayesian
[146]

Neural Computation , author =

Adaptive. Neural Computation , author =. 1991 , pages =. doi:10.1162/neco.1991.3.1.79 , abstract =

1991 doi
[147]

American Journal of Physics , author =

The mathematics of. American Journal of Physics , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.1119/1.18210 , language =

1996 doi
[148]

Neural Networks , author =

Meta-learning in. Neural Networks , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00228-9 , abstract =

2003 doi
[149]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1038/4580 , language =

1999 doi
[150]

Nature , author =

The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , volume =. Nature , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1038/36846 , language =

1997 doi
[151]

The Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Synaptic. The Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-21-09587.1999 , language =

1999 doi
[152]

Science , author =

A. Science , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 , abstract =

2000 doi
[153]

Cerebral Cortex , author =

Synaptic. Cerebral Cortex , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.9.910 , language =

2000 doi
[154]

Trends in Neurosciences , author =

Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity , volume =. Trends in Neurosciences , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01868-3 , language =

2001 doi
[155]

Neural Computation , author =

Multiple. Neural Computation , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1162/089976602753712972 , abstract =

2002 doi
[156]

Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =

Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7 , abstract =

2003 doi
[157]

Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =

I. Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131112 , abstract =

2003 doi
[158]

Journal of Vision , author =

A detection theory account of change detection , volume =. Journal of Vision , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1167/4.12.11 , abstract =

2004 doi
[159]

, month = jul, year =

Sagiv, Yotam and Musslick, Sebastian and Niv, Yael and Cohen, Jonathan D. , month = jul, year =. Efficiency of learning vs. processing:
[160]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn1790 , language =

2006 doi
[161]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Untangling invariant object recognition , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.010 , language =

2007 doi
[162]

Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =

Neural correlations, population coding and computation , volume =. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nrn1888 , abstract =

2006 doi
[163]

Trends in Neurosciences , author =

The. Trends in Neurosciences , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 , language =

2004 doi
[164]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 , language =

2005 doi
[165]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

A. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3733-05.2006 , language =

2006 doi
[166]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Probabilistic models of cognition:. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007 , language =

2006 doi
[167]

Physical Review Letters , author =

Fisher. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.098102 , language =

2006 doi
[168]

, volume =

Topics in semantic representation. , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211 , abstract =

2007 doi
[169]

Psychological Review , author =

Word learning as. Psychological Review , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245 , abstract =

2007 doi
[170]

PLoS ONE , author =

Causal. PLoS ONE , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000943 , language =

2007 doi
[171]

Nature , author =

What we can do and what we cannot do with. Nature , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature06976 , language =

2008 doi
[172]

Neuron , author =

Matching. Neuron , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.043 , abstract =

2008 doi
[173]

Neuron , author =

Probabilistic. Neuron , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.021 , abstract =

2008 doi
[174]

Science , author =

Synaptic. Science , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1150769 , abstract =

2008 doi
[175]

2008 , pages =

Trends in Neurosciences , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.004 , language =

2008 doi
[176]

Krotov, Dmitry and Hopfield, John , month = apr, year =. Large
[177]

Neuron , author =

Theoretical. Neuron , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.019 , language =

2008 doi
[178]

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , author =

Representational similarity analysis – connecting the branches of systems neuroscience , issn =. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , author =. doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 , abstract =

2008 doi
[179]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Spiking networks for. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.004 , language =

2008 doi
[180]

Nature , author =

Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , volume =. Nature , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature06860 , language =

2008 doi
[181]

Hopfield

Ramsauer, Hubert and Schäfl, Bernhard and Lehner, Johannes and Seidl, Philipp and Widrich, Michael and Adler, Thomas and Gruber, Lukas and Holzleitner, Markus and Pavlović, Milena and Sandve, Geir Kjetil and Greiff, Victor and Kreil, David and Kopp, Michael and Klambauer, Günt...
[182]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901894106 , abstract =

2009 doi
[183]

Cognition , author =

Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations:. Cognition , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.011 , abstract =

2009 doi
[184]

Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =

Reinforcement learning in the brain , volume =. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.12.005 , abstract =

2009 doi
[185]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Efficient computation of optimal actions , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710743106 , abstract =

2009 doi
[186]

Foundations of Computational Mathematics , author =

Random. Foundations of Computational Mathematics , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10208-007-9011-z , abstract =

2009 doi
[187]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Learning latent structure: carving nature at its joints , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.008 , language =

2010 doi
[188]

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , author =

Internal representation of task rules by recurrent dynamics: the importance of the diversity of neural responses , volume =. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , author =. doi:10.3389/fncom.2010.00024 , language =

2010 doi
[189]

NeuroImage , author =

Attractor concretion as a mechanism for the formation of context representations , volume =. NeuroImage , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.047 , abstract =

2010 doi
[190]

, volume =

Context, learning, and extinction. , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0017808 , abstract =

2010 doi
[191]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.004 , language =

2010 doi
[192]

Science , author =

How to. Science , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1192788 , abstract =

2011 doi
[193]

Science , author =

Perceptual. Science , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1212003 , abstract =

2011 doi
[194]

Trends in Neurosciences , author =

Pattern separation in the hippocampus , volume =. Trends in Neurosciences , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 , language =

2011 doi
[195]

Vision Research , author =

Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , volume =. Vision Research , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.027 , abstract =

2011 doi
[196]

Current Biology , author =

Visual. Current Biology , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031 , abstract =

2011 doi
[197]

Cognition , author =

A tutorial introduction to. Cognition , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.015 , abstract =

2011 doi
[198]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

An. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0822-10.2010 , language =

2010 doi
[199]

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , author =

Inferring. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , author =. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00189 , abstract =

2011 doi
[200]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.2773 , language =

2011 doi
[201]

Cerebral Cortex , author =

Mechanisms of. Cerebral Cortex , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr117 , abstract =

2012 doi
[202]

Cerebral Cortex , author =

Mechanisms of. Cerebral Cortex , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr114 , abstract =

2012 doi
[203]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Hierarchical reinforcement learning and decision making , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.008 , language =

2012 doi
[204]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.003 , language =

2012 doi
[205]

European Journal of Neuroscience , author =

How much of reinforcement learning is working memory, not reinforcement learning?. European Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07980.x , abstract =

2012 doi
[206]

Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =

A tutorial on. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.08.004 , language =

2012 doi
[207]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Prefrontal. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6489-11.2012 , language =

2012 doi
[208]

Neural Computation , author =

Mathematical. Neural Computation , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1162/NECO_a_00221 , abstract =

2012 doi
[209]

Nature , author =

The entorhinal grid map is discretized , volume =. Nature , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature11649 , language =

2012 doi
[210]

Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =

Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates , volume =. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nrn3289 , abstract =

2012 doi
[211]

PLoS Biology , author =

Reasoning,. PLoS Biology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293 , abstract =

2012 doi
[212]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0037 , abstract =

2012 doi
[213]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0425 , abstract =

2012 doi
[214]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

Metacognition: computation, biology and function , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0021 , abstract =

2012 doi
[215]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 , abstract =

2012 doi
[216]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

The neural basis of metacognitive ability , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0417 , abstract =

2012 doi
[217]

Neuron , author =

How. Neuron , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 , language =

2012 doi
[218]

, volume =

An ideal observer analysis of visual working memory. , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0029856 , abstract =

2012 doi
[219]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Confidence in value-based choice , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nn.3279 , language =

2013 doi
[220]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1306572110 , abstract =

2013 doi
[221]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117465109 , abstract =

2012 doi
[222]

Nature , author =

The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , volume =. Nature , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature12160 , language =

2013 doi
[223]

Neuron , author =

Not. Neuron , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016 , language =

2012 doi
[224]

PLoS ONE , author =

Probabilistic. PLoS ONE , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040216 , abstract =

2012 doi
[225]

Science , author =

Content-. Science , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1224000 , language =

2012 doi
[226]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Organizing probabilistic models of perception , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.010 , language =

2012 doi
[227]

Nature , author =

Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , volume =. Nature , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature12742 , language =

2013 doi
[228]

Neural Computation , author =

Opening the. Neural Computation , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1162/NECO_a_00409 , abstract =

2013 doi
[229]

NeuroImage , author =

A. NeuroImage , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.048 , abstract =

2013 doi
[230]

NeuroImage , author =

A multivariate method to determine the dimensionality of neural representation from population activity , volume =. NeuroImage , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.062 , abstract =

2013 doi
[231]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.3515 , language =

2013 doi
[232]

Progress in Neurobiology , author =

From fixed points to chaos:. Progress in Neurobiology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.02.002 , language =

2013 doi
[233]

PLoS Computational Biology , author =

No. PLoS Computational Biology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002927 , abstract =

2013 doi
[234]

Psychological Review , author =

Cognitive control over learning:. Psychological Review , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0030852 , abstract =

2013 doi
[235]

Psychological Science , author =

The. Psychological Science , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1177/0956797612463080 , abstract =

2013 doi
[236]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.007 , language =

2013 doi
[237]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

A. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1356-13.2013 , language =

2013 doi
[238]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Frontal and. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2625-13.2013 , language =

2013 doi
[239]

Neuron , author =

Dynamic. Neuron , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.041 , abstract =

2013 doi
[240]

2013 , pages =

Neuron , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.032 , abstract =

2013 doi
[241]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.3495 , language =

2013 doi
[242]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006 , language =

2013 doi
[243]

Cognitive Science , author =

One and. Cognitive Science , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 , abstract =

2014 doi
[244]

Cognitive Science , author =

The. Cognitive Science , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1111/cogs.12126 , abstract =

2014 doi
[245]

Neuron , author =

Neural. Neuron , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.028 , abstract =

2014 doi
[246]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.3776 , language =

2014 doi
[247]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Reinforcement learning and human behavior , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.004 , language =

2014 doi
[248]

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , author =

How to measure metacognition , volume =. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , author =. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 , abstract =

2014 doi
[249]

The Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Working. The Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0989-14.2014 , language =

2014 doi
[250]

, volume =

Humans use directed and random exploration to solve the explore–exploit dilemma. , volume =. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0038199 , language =

2014 doi
[251]

Nature , author =

Neural constraints on learning , volume =. Nature , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature13665 , language =

2014 doi
[252]

Graves, Alex and Wayne, Greg and Danihelka, Ivo , month = dec, year =. Neural
[253]

Neuron , author =

Functionally. Neuron , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.013 , abstract =

2014 doi
[254]

Algorithm selection by rational metareasoning as a model of human strategy selection , abstract =

Lieder, Falk and Plunkett, Dillon and Hamrick, Jessica B and Russell, Stuart J and Hay, Nicholas and Griffiths, Tom , keywords =. Algorithm selection by rational metareasoning as a model of human strategy selection , abstract =
[255]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =

The algorithmic anatomy of model-based evaluation , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0478 , abstract =

2014 doi
[256]

Science , author =

Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex , volume =. Science , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1252254 , abstract =

2014 doi
[257]

Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =

Decoding. Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170325 , abstract =

2014 doi
[258]

Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =

Neural. Annual Review of Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017 , abstract =

2014 doi
[259]

Cell , author =

Successful. Cell , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.009 , abstract =

2014 doi
[260]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Working models of working memory , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.10.008 , language =

2014 doi
[261]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Oscillatory. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4741-13.2014 , language =

2014 doi
[262]

NeuroImage , author =

On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , volume =. NeuroImage , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.067 , abstract =

2014 doi
[263]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Changing concepts of working memory , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.3655 , language =

2014 doi
[264]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Information-limiting correlations , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.3807 , language =

2014 doi
[265]

PLoS Computational Biology , author =

A. PLoS Computational Biology , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003553 , abstract =

2014 doi
[266]

PLoS Computational Biology , author =

Deep. PLoS Computational Biology , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003915 , abstract =

2014 doi
[267]

, volume =

Factorial comparison of working memory models. , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0035234 , abstract =

2014 doi
[268]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.002 , language =

2014 doi
[269]

eLife , author =

A principle of economy predicts the functional architecture of grid cells , volume =. eLife , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.7554/eLife.08362 , abstract =

2015 doi
[270]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.001 , language =

2014 doi
[271]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =

Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010 , language =

2014 doi
[272]

Annual Review of Vision Science , author =

Deep. Annual Review of Vision Science , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035447 , abstract =

2015 doi
[273]

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , author =

Does perceptual confidence facilitate cognitive control? , volume =. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0843-3 , language =

2015 doi
[274]

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =

Discovering latent causes in reinforcement learning , volume =. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.07.007 , language =

2015 doi
[275]

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =

Integrating memories to guide decisions , volume =. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.08.010 , abstract =

2015 doi
[276]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

On simplicity and complexity in the brave new world of large-scale neuroscience , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.003 , language =

2015 doi
[277]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Reinforcement. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2978-14.2015 , language =

2015 doi
[278]

Nature , author =

Hippocampal–prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory , volume =. Nature , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature14445 , language =

2015 doi
[279]

Nature , author =

Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence , volume =. Nature , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature14541 , language =

2015 doi
[280]

Neuron , author =

Abstract. Neuron , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.024 , language =

2015 doi
[281]

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =

Reinforcement learning in depression:. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.005 , language =

2015 doi
[282]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

A. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4105 , language =

2015 doi
[283]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

A neural network that finds a naturalistic solution for the production of muscle activity , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4042 , language =

2015 doi
[284]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4064 , language =

2015 doi
[285]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4186 , language =

2016 doi
[286]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Mesolimbic dopamine signals the value of work , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4173 , language =

2016 doi
[287]

Science , author =

Computational rationality:. Science , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aac6076 , abstract =

2015 doi
[288]

Nature Neuroscience , author =

Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior , volume =. Nature Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nn.4150 , language =

2015 doi
[289]

Science , author =

Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction , volume =. Science , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 , language =

2015 doi
[290]

eLife , author =

Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates , volume =. eLife , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.7554/eLife.09000 , abstract =

2015 doi
[291]

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , author =

Revealing hidden states in visual working memory using electroencephalography , volume =. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , author =. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00123 , abstract =

2015 doi
[292]

Journal of Neuroscience , author =

Neural. Journal of Neuroscience , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4097-14.2015 , language =

2015 doi
[293]

Journal of Neurophysiology , author =

Neural circuit basis of visuo-spatial working memory precision: a computational and behavioral study , volume =. Journal of Neurophysiology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1152/jn.00362.2015 , abstract =

2015 doi
[294]

Neuron , author =

A. Neuron , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.025 , language =

2015 doi
[295]

Neuron , author =

Dynamic. Neuron , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.039 , abstract =

2013 doi
[296]

PLOS Computational Biology , author =

A. PLOS Computational Biology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004003 , language =

2015 doi
[297]

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =

Computational models as statistical tools , volume =. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.07.004 , language =

2016 doi
[298]

and Kurth-Nelson, Zeb and Tirumala, Dhruva and Soyer, Hubert and Leibo, Joel Z

Wang, Jane X. and Kurth-Nelson, Zeb and Tirumala, Dhruva and Soyer, Hubert and Leibo, Joel Z. and Munos, Remi and Blundell, Charles and Kumaran, Dharshan and Botvinick, Matt , month = jan, year =. Learning to reinforcement learn , url =
[299]

Cognition , author =

Neural signature of hierarchically structured expectations predicts clustering and transfer of rule sets in reinforcement learning , volume =. Cognition , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.002 , abstract =

2016 doi
[300]

Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =

Brain–computer interfaces for dissecting cognitive processes underlying sensorimotor control , volume =. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.005 , language =

2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open Intelligence

NVIDIA and Blakeman, Aaron and Grattafiori, Aaron and Basant, Aarti and Gupta, Abhibha and Khattar, Abhinav and Renduchintala, Adi and Vavre, Aditya and Shukla, Akanksha and Bercovich, Akhiad and Ficek, Aleksander and Shaposhnikov, Aleksandr and Kondratenko, Alex and Bukharin, Alexander and Milesi, Alexandre and Taghibakhshi, Ali and Liu, Alisa and Barton...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20856

[2] [2]

Google , author =

Gemma 4:. Google , author =

work page

[3] [3]

Wei, Jiaqi and Yang, Yuejin and Zhang, Xiang and Chen, Yuhan and Zhuang, Xiang and Gao, Zhangyang and Zhou, Dongzhan and Wang, Guangshuai and Gao, Zhiqiang and Cao, Juntai and Qiu, Zijie and Hu, Ming and Ma, Chenglong and Tang, Shixiang and He, Junjun and Song, Chunfeng and He, Xuming and Zhang, Qiang and You, Chenyu and Zheng, Shuangjia and Ding, Ning an...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.14111

[4] [4]

Zheng, Tianshi and Deng, Zheye and Tsang, Hong Ting and Wang, Weiqi and Bai, Jiaxin and Wang, Zihao and Song, Yangqiu , month = may, year =. From

work page

[5] [5]

Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery

Mitchener, Ludovico and Yiu, Angela and Chang, Benjamin and Bourdenx, Mathieu and Nadolski, Tyler and Sulovari, Arvis and Landsness, Eric C. and Barabasi, Daniel L. and Narayanan, Siddharth and Evans, Nicky and Reddy, Shriya and Foiani, Martha and Kamal, Aizad and Shriver, Leah P. and Cao, Fang and Wassie, Asmamaw T. and Laurent, Jon M. and Melville-Green...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.02824

[6] [6]

AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation

Tang, Jiabin and Xia, Lianghao and Li, Zhonghang and Huang, Chao , month = may, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.18705 , abstract =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18705

[7] [7]

Yamada, Yutaro and Lange, Robert Tjarko and Lu, Cong and Hu, Shengran and Lu, Chris and Foerster, Jakob and Clune, Jeff and Ha, David , month = apr, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.08066 , abstract =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08066

[8] [8]

Gottweis, Juraj and Weng, Wei-Hung and Daryin, Alexander and Tu, Tao and Palepu, Anil and Sirkovic, Petar and Myaskovsky, Artiom and Weissenberger, Felix and Rong, Keran and Tanno, Ryutaro and Saab, Khaled and Popovici, Dan and Blum, Jacob and Zhang, Fan and Chou, Katherine and Hassidim, Avinatan and Gokturk, Burak and Vahdat, Amin and Kohli, Pushmeet and...

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18864