Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

RelFlexformer: Efficient Attention 3D-Transformers for Integrable Relative Positional Encodings

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-12 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read RelFlexformers integrate arbitrary integrable relative positional encodings via non-uniform Fourier transforms to deliver O(L log L) attention for 3D points at irregular locations.

desk verdict RelFlexformers extend efficient RPE attention to arbitrary 3D positions via NU-FFT, but the approximation error bounds for maintaining O(L log L) and quality gains need direct verification in the derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.10706 v1 submitted 2026-05-11 cs.LG

Byeongchan Kim , Arijit Sehanobish , Avinava Dubey , Min-hwan Oh , Krzysztof Choromanski This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords RelFlexformer3DTransformerrelativepositionalencodingnon-uniformFouriertransformpointcloudsefficientattentiondatamodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces RelFlexformers as a new family of 3D transformers that apply relative positional encodings defined by any integrable modulation function. These encodings are realized through the non-uniform fast Fourier transform, which keeps attention computation at O(L log L) cost even when input tokens sit at completely arbitrary positions in 3D space. The approach matters because many 3D datasets, especially point clouds, lack the regular grid structure that earlier efficient RPE methods required. By removing that structural constraint, the models generalize prior techniques while preserving or improving accuracy on downstream 3D tasks.

What carries the argument

The Non-Uniform Fourier Transform (NU-FFT) applied to integrable modulation functions, which modulates attention scores for tokens at arbitrarily distributed 3D coordinates.

What would settle it

Measure wall-clock attention time and downstream accuracy on a large irregular point-cloud dataset while scaling sequence length L; the claim holds if runtime stays linearithmic and accuracy does not drop below standard quadratic-attention baselines.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

RelFlexformers are 3D-Transformer models that flexibly integrate universal 3D Relative Positional Encoding methods given by arbitrary integrable modulation functions f, achieve O(L log L) attention complexity by leveraging the Non-Uniform Fourier Transform, and generalize existing RPE-attention techniques from homogeneous grid settings to arbitrary heterogeneous 3D position distributions such as point clouds.

Load-bearing premise

Integrable modulation functions exist that can be evaluated via NU-FFT on arbitrary 3D positions without extra structure or approximation errors large enough to erase the claimed speed or quality gains.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Point-cloud modeling becomes directly feasible without forcing tokens onto uniform grids.
  • Attention for long 3D sequences remains practical because cost grows as O(L log L) rather than O(L squared).
  • Existing RPE methods for grid data extend automatically to heterogeneous 3D layouts.
  • Empirical tests on multiple 3D datasets show measurable quality gains from the flexible encodings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same NU-FFT construction could be tested in 2D or 4D settings to check whether the efficiency pattern generalizes beyond three dimensions.
  • Hybrid models that combine RelFlexformer blocks with other fast attention primitives might further reduce constants in practice.
  • Applications such as 3D scene reconstruction or molecular modeling could benefit from the removal of grid assumptions.
  • Error bounds on the NU-FFT approximation for specific families of modulation functions remain open for tighter analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces RelFlexformers, a new class of 3D-Transformer models that integrate arbitrary integrable relative positional encodings (RPEs) defined by modulation functions f via the Non-Uniform Fast Fourier Transform (NU-FFT). This yields O(L log L) attention complexity for L-length sequences with arbitrarily distributed 3D token positions, generalizing prior efficient RPE methods from homogeneous grid settings to heterogeneous unstructured point clouds, with empirical quality gains demonstrated on a portfolio of 3D datasets.

Significance. If the NU-FFT approximation errors can be rigorously bounded to preserve both the stated complexity and performance, the work would meaningfully advance efficient attention for unstructured 3D data by unifying and extending grid-based RPE techniques into a flexible framework applicable to point clouds. The manuscript earns credit for grounding the approach in established NU-FFT theory and for conducting extensive empirical evaluation across multiple 3D datasets.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (NU-FFT-based RPE integration): The central claim of exact O(L log L) complexity for arbitrary 3D position distributions rests on representing integrable modulation functions f via NU-FFT, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error bounds or analysis for the approximation parameters (oversampling factor, kernel support, grid size) specific to these f; this is load-bearing for the generalization from structured grids to heterogeneous scenarios and for the claimed complexity-quality tradeoff.
  2. [§5] §5 (Empirical evaluation): The reported quality improvements lack ablation or sensitivity analysis on the NU-FFT approximation parameters, leaving open whether the gains hold under varying point densities or when error is controlled to machine precision, which directly affects the practical validity of the heterogeneous 3D claims.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] The definition and integrability conditions on the modulation function f are introduced late; an explicit early statement with an example would improve readability.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (attention visualization): The caption does not specify the exact NU-FFT parameters used, making it difficult to reproduce the depicted modulation effects.
  3. [§1] Several citations to prior grid-based RPE methods (e.g., in §1) could be expanded with direct complexity comparisons to highlight the precise generalization achieved.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. The two major comments highlight important aspects of rigor in the theoretical claims and empirical validation. We address each point below and outline revisions that will strengthen the manuscript while preserving its core contributions on flexible 3D RPE via NU-FFT.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (NU-FFT-based RPE integration): The central claim of exact O(L log L) complexity for arbitrary 3D position distributions rests on representing integrable modulation functions f via NU-FFT, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error bounds or analysis for the approximation parameters (oversampling factor, kernel support, grid size) specific to these f; this is load-bearing for the generalization from structured grids to heterogeneous scenarios and for the claimed complexity-quality tradeoff.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated error analysis is necessary to fully support the generalization to heterogeneous 3D positions. The NU-FFT framework (as established in the literature, e.g., Greengard et al.) provides general error bounds controlled by the oversampling factor, kernel support width, and grid resolution, which can be made arbitrarily small for integrable f without changing the asymptotic O(L log L) complexity. However, the manuscript does not tailor these bounds explicitly to the modulation functions f used in RelFlexformers. In the revision, we will add a new subsection in §3 that (i) recalls the relevant NU-FFT error theorems, (ii) derives parameter-dependent bounds specific to the integrable f considered (including examples for common RPE kernels), and (iii) discusses how the approximation error trades off against the claimed complexity for unstructured point clouds. This will make the load-bearing assumptions explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Empirical evaluation): The reported quality improvements lack ablation or sensitivity analysis on the NU-FFT approximation parameters, leaving open whether the gains hold under varying point densities or when error is controlled to machine precision, which directly affects the practical validity of the heterogeneous 3D claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current empirical section does not include sensitivity analysis on the NU-FFT hyperparameters. To close this gap, the revised §5 will incorporate additional ablation studies that (i) vary the oversampling factor, kernel support, and grid size across the portfolio of 3D datasets (including point clouds with heterogeneous densities), (ii) report performance when the NU-FFT approximation error is driven to near machine precision, and (iii) compare against the default parameters used in the main results. These experiments will demonstrate that the observed quality gains are robust and not artifacts of particular approximation settings, thereby reinforcing the practical validity of the heterogeneous 3D claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivation relies on external NU-FFT theory for O(L log L) complexity

full rationale

The paper defines RelFlexformers via application of integrable modulation functions f through NU-FFT to achieve O(L log L) attention for arbitrary 3D point distributions. This builds directly on established non-uniform FFT properties (external to the paper) rather than re-deriving or fitting them from the model's own outputs. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation forms the load-bearing uniqueness argument, and the generalization from grid RPEs is presented as an extension using prior NU-FFT results. The abstract and description contain no self-referential definitions or renamings that collapse the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the integrability of the modulation functions and the applicability of NU-FFT to arbitrary 3D position distributions; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Modulation functions f are integrable
    Explicitly required for the universal 3D RPE method described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption NU-FFT can be applied to arbitrarily distributed token positions in 3D without loss of the stated complexity
    Central to generalizing from grid-based to heterogeneous scenarios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RelFlexformer: Efficient Attention 3D-Transformers for Integrable Relative Positional Encodings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2605.10706

@misc{pith2026260510706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RelFlexformer: Efficient Attention 3D-Transformers for Integrable Relative Positional Encodings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2605.10706}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.10706}
}
abstract

We present a new class of efficient attention mechanisms applying universal 3D Relative Positional Encoding (RPE) methods given by arbitrary integrable modulation functions $f$. They lead to the new class of 3D-Transformer models, called \textit{RelFlexformers}, flexibly integrating those RPEs, and characterized by the $O(L \log L)$ time complexity of the attention computation for the $L$-length input sequences. RelFlexformers builds on the theory of the Non-Uniform Fourier Transform (NU-FFT), naturally generalizing several existing efficient RPE-attention methods from structured settings with tokens homogeneously embedded in unweighted grids into general non-structured heterogeneous scenarios, where tokens' positions are arbitrarily distributed in the corresponding 3D spaces. As such, RelFlexformers can be applied in particular to model point clouds. Our extensive empirical evaluation on a large portfolio of 3D datasets confirms quality improvements provided by the NU-FFT-driven attention modulation techniques in the RelFlexformers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10706 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Execution time (ms) as a function of sequence length ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. RelFlexformer Mask Behavior Analysis. Comparison of our proposed kernels against standard RBF and Laplace kernels. As the Euclidean distance between points increases, the kernel value decays smoothly, mimicking the behavior of Heat and Laplace kernels (dashed lines). The tight variance in the scatter highlights the stability of our projection method across varying spatial scales. Substituting this into the convoluti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of the quadrature size S per head across different datasets. The plots illustrate the performance trade-offs on NYU Depth v2 (left, mIoU%), ScanObjectNN v2 (middle, Overall Accuracy%), and SUN RGB-D (right, mIoU%) for λ = 2. the RPE mask M is blended from identity to full strength over the first N epochs via Mˆ = 1 + α (M − 1), α = 1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ClockRoPE: Random Fourier Rotations for Temporal Routine Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Random Fourier Rotations let transformer position encodings approximate any positive-definite attention kernel; ClockRoPE applies this to model daily/weekly routines in sequential recommendation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    3d semantic parsing of large-scale indoor spaces

    Iro Armeni, Ozan Sener, Amir R Zamir, Helen Jiang, Ioannis Brilakis, Martin Fischer, and Silvio Savarese. 3d semantic parsing of large-scale indoor spaces. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1534–1543, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Point Convolutional Neural Networks by Extension Operators

    Matan Atzmon, Haggai Maron, and Yaron Lipman. Point convolutional neural networks by extension operators.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10091, 2018

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Multimae: Multi-modal multi-task masked autoencoders

    Roman Bachmann, David Mizrahi, Andrei Atanov, and Amir Zamir. Multimae: Multi-modal multi-task masked autoencoders. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 348–367. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer

    Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters, and Arman Cohan. Longformer: The long-document trans- former.arXiv:2004.05150, 2020

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Giancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11621–11631, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Shapeconv: Shape-aware convolutional layer for indoor rgb-d semantic segmentation

    Jinming Cao, Hanchao Leng, Dani Lischinski, Daniel Cohen-Or, Changhe Tu, and Yangyan Li. Shapeconv: Shape-aware convolutional layer for indoor rgb-d semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7088–7097, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Spatial information guided convolution for real-time rgbd semantic segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30:2313–2324, 2021

    Lin-Zhuo Chen, Zheng Lin, Ziqin Wang, Yong-Liang Yang, and Ming-Ming Cheng. Spatial information guided convolution for real-time rgbd semantic segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30:2313–2324, 2021. 10

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Bi-directional cross-modality feature propagation with separation-and-aggregation gate for rgb-d semantic segmentation

    Xiaokang Chen, Kwan-Yee Lin, Jingbo Wang, Wayne Wu, Chen Qian, Hongsheng Li, and Gang Zeng. Bi-directional cross-modality feature propagation with separation-and-aggregation gate for rgb-d semantic segmentation. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 561–577. Springer, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    Scaling up kernels in 3d cnns.arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10555, 1(2):5, 2022

    Yukang Chen, Jianhui Liu, Xiaojuan Qi, Xiangyu Zhang, Jian Sun, and Jiaya Jia. Scaling up kernels in 3d cnns.arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10555, 1(2):5, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    A unified point- based framework for 3d segmentation

    Hung-Yueh Chiang, Yen-Liang Lin, Yueh-Cheng Liu, and Winston H Hsu. A unified point- based framework for 3d segmentation. In2019 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 155–163. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    From block-toeplitz matrices to differential equations on graphs: towards a general theory for scalable masked transformers

    Krzysztof Choromanski, Han Lin, Haoxian Chen, Tianyi Zhang, Arijit Sehanobish, Valerii Likhosherstov, Jack Parker-Holder, Tamás Sarlós, Adrian Weller, and Thomas Weingarten. From block-toeplitz matrices to differential equations on graphs: towards a general theory for scalable...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Rethinking attention with performers

    Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski, Valerii Likhosherstov, David Dohan, Xingyou Song, An- dreea Gane, Tamas Sarlos, Peter Hawkins, Jared Quincy Davis, Afroz Mohiuddin, Lukasz Kaiser, et al. Rethinking attention with performers. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Fast tree-field integra- tors: From low displacement rank to topological transformers

    Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski, Arijit Sehanobish, Somnath Basu Roy Chowdhury, Han Lin, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Tamas Sarlos, and Snigdha Chaturvedi. Fast tree-field integra- tors: From low displacement rank to topological transformers. InThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neur...

    2024

  6. [14]

    4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks

    Christopher Choy, JunYoung Gwak, and Silvio Savarese. 4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3075–3084, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes

    Angela Dai, Angel X Chang, Manolis Savva, Maciej Halber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5828–5839, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:...

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Fast kernel methods: Sobolev, physics-informed, and additive models, 2025

    Nathan Doumèche, Francis Bach, Gérard Biau, and Claire Boyer. Fast kernel methods: Sobolev, physics-informed, and additive models, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Asymformer: Asymmetrical cross-modal representation learning for mobile platform real-time rgb-d se- mantic segmentation

    Siqi Du, Weixi Wang, Renzhong Guo, Ruisheng Wang, and Shengjun Tang. Asymformer: Asymmetrical cross-modal representation learning for mobile platform real-time rgb-d se- mantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p...

    2024

  11. [19]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2009

    Gerald B Folland.Fourier analysis and its applications, volume 4. American Mathematical Soc., 2009

    2009

  12. [20]

    Omnivore: A single model for many visual modalities

    Rohit Girdhar, Mannat Singh, Nikhila Ravi, Laurens Van Der Maaten, Armand Joulin, and Ishan Misra. Omnivore: A single model for many visual modalities. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16102–16112, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    3d semantic segmentation with submanifold sparse convolutional networks

    Benjamin Graham, Martin Engelcke, and Laurens Van Der Maaten. 3d semantic segmentation with submanifold sparse convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9224–9232, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Accelerating the nonuniform fast fourier transform.SIAM Review, 46(3):443–454, 2004

    Leslie Greengard and June-Yub Lee. Accelerating the nonuniform fast fourier transform.SIAM Review, 46(3):443–454, 2004. 11

    2004

  15. [23]

    Martin, and Shi-Min Hu

    Meng-Hao Guo, Jun-Xiong Cai, Zheng-Ning Liu, Tai-Jiang Mu, Ralph R. Martin, and Shi-Min Hu. Pct: Point cloud transformer.Computational Visual Media, 7(2):187–199, Apr 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Learning rich features from rgb-d images for object detection and segmentation

    Saurabh Gupta, Ross Girshick, Pablo Arbeláez, and Jitendra Malik. Learning rich features from rgb-d images for object detection and segmentation. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 345–360. Springer, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention

    Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Point-to-voxel knowledge distillation for lidar semantic segmentation

    Yuenan Hou, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Chen Change Loy, and Yikang Li. Point-to-voxel knowledge distillation for lidar semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Acnet: Attention based network to exploit complementary features for rgbd semantic segmentation

    Xinxin Hu, Kailun Yang, Lei Fei, and Kaiwei Wang. Acnet: Attention based network to exploit complementary features for rgbd semantic segmentation. In2019 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pages 1440–1444. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Fourier position embedding: enhancing atten- tion’s periodic extension for length generalization

    Ermo Hua, Che Jiang, Xingtai Lv, Kaiyan Zhang, Youbang Sun, Yuchen Fan, Xuekai Zhu, Biqing Qi, Ning Ding, and Bowen Zhou. Fourier position embedding: enhancing atten- tion’s periodic extension for length generalization. InProceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Mac...

    2025

  21. [29]

    Hierarchical point-edge interaction network for point cloud semantic segmentation

    Li Jiang, Hengshuang Zhao, Shu Liu, Xiaoyong Shen, Chi-Wing Fu, and Jiaya Jia. Hierarchical point-edge interaction network for point cloud semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Transformers are rnns: fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention

    Angelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, and François Fleuret. Transformers are rnns: fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’20. JMLR.org, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Reformer: The efficient transformer

    Nikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, and Anselm Levskaya. Reformer: The efficient transformer. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Rethinking range view representation for lidar segmentation

    Lingdong Kong, Youquan Liu, Runnan Chen, Yuexin Ma, Xinge Zhu, Yikang Li, Yuenan Hou, Yu Qiao, and Ziwei Liu. Rethinking range view representation for lidar segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Spherical transformer for lidar-based 3d recognition

    Xin Lai, Yukang Chen, Fanbin Lu, Jianhui Liu, and Jiaya Jia. Spherical transformer for lidar-based 3d recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Stratified transformer for 3d point cloud segmentation

    Xin Lai, Jianhui Liu, Li Jiang, Liwei Wang, Hengshuang Zhao, Shu Liu, Xiaojuan Qi, and Jiaya Jia. Stratified transformer for 3d point cloud segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8500–8509, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs

    Loic Landrieu and Martin Simonovsky. Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Pointgrid: A deep network for 3d shape understanding

    Truc Le and Ye Duan. Pointgrid: A deep network for 3d shape understanding. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9204–9214, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Seggcn: Efficient 3d point cloud segmentation with fuzzy spherical kernel

    Huan Lei, Naveed Akhtar, and Ajmal Mian. Seggcn: Efficient 3d point cloud segmentation with fuzzy spherical kernel. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Pointcnn: Convolution on x-transformed points.Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    Yangyan Li, Rui Bu, Mingchao Sun, Wei Wu, Xinhan Di, and Baoquan Chen. Pointcnn: Convolution on x-transformed points.Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018. 12

    2018

  31. [39]

    Pamba: enhancing global interaction in point clouds via state space model

    Zhuoyuan Li, Yubo Ai, Jiahao Lu, ChuXin Wang, Jiacheng Deng, Hanzhi Chang, Yanzhe Liang, Wenfei Yang, Shifeng Zhang, and Tianzhu Zhang. Pamba: enhancing global interaction in point clouds via state space model. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p...

    2025

  32. [40]

    Pointmamba: A simple state space model for point cloud analysis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:32653–32677, 2024

    Dingkang Liang, Xin Zhou, Wei Xu, Xingkui Zhu, Zhikang Zou, Xiaoqing Ye, Xiao Tan, and Xiang Bai. Pointmamba: A simple state space model for point cloud analysis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:32653–32677, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Meta architecture for point cloud analysis

    Haojia Lin, Xiawu Zheng, Lijiang Li, Fei Chao, Shanshan Wang, Yan Wang, Yonghong Tian, and Rongrong Ji. Meta architecture for point cloud analysis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17682–17691, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Masked discrimination for self-supervised learning on point clouds

    Haotian Liu, Mu Cai, and Yong Jae Lee. Masked discrimination for self-supervised learning on point clouds. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 657–675. Springer, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Point mamba: A novel point cloud backbone based on state space model with octree-based ordering strategy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06467, 2024

    Jiuming Liu, Ruiji Yu, Yian Wang, Yu Zheng, Tianchen Deng, Weicai Ye, and Hesheng Wang. Point mamba: A novel point cloud backbone based on state space model with octree-based ordering strategy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06467, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Point2sequence: Learning the shape representation of 3d point clouds with an attention-based sequence to sequence network

    Xinhai Liu, Zhizhong Han, Yu-Shen Liu, and Matthias Zwicker. Point2sequence: Learning the shape representation of 3d point clouds with an attention-based sequence to sequence network. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 8778–8785, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Relation-shape convolutional neural network for point cloud analysis

    Yongcheng Liu, Bin Fan, Shiming Xiang, and Chunhong Pan. Relation-shape convolutional neural network for point cloud analysis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8895–8904, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Multi-space alignments towards universal lidar segmentation

    Youquan Liu, Lingdong Kong, Xiaoyang Wu, Runnan Chen, Xin Li, Liang Pan, Ziwei Liu, and Yuexin Ma. Multi-space alignments towards universal lidar segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Transformers in 3d point clouds: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07417, 2022

    Dening Lu, Qian Xie, Mingqiang Wei, Kyle Gao, Linlin Xu, and Jonathan Li. Transformers in 3d point clouds: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07417, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Stable, fast and accurate: Kernelized attention with relative positional encoding

    Shengjie Luo, Shanda Li, Tianle Cai, Di He, Dinglan Peng, Shuxin Zheng, Guolin Ke, Liwei Wang, and Tie-Yan Liu. Stable, fast and accurate: Kernelized attention with relative positional encoding. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y . Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, ed...

    2021

  42. [50]

    Rethinking network design and local geometry in point cloud: A simple residual mlp framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07123, 2022

    Xu Ma, Can Qin, Haoxuan You, Haoxi Ran, and Yun Fu. Rethinking network design and local geometry in point cloud: A simple residual mlp framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07123, 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images

    Pushmeet Kohli Nathan Silberman, Derek Hoiem and Rob Fergus. Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images. InECCV, 2012

    2012

  44. [52]

    Masked autoencoders for 3d point cloud self-supervised learning.World Scientific Annual Review of Artificial Intelligence, 1:2440001, 2023

    Yatian Pang, Eng Hock Francis Tay, Li Yuan, and Zhenghua Chen. Masked autoencoders for 3d point cloud self-supervised learning.World Scientific Annual Review of Artificial Intelligence, 1:2440001, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Oa-cnns: Omni-adaptive sparse cnns for 3d semantic segmentation

    Bohao Peng, Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Yukang Chen, Hengshuang Zhao, Zhuotao Tian, and Jiaya Jia. Oa-cnns: Omni-adaptive sparse cnns for 3d semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Pointcept: A codebase for point cloud perception research

    Pointcept Contributors. Pointcept: A codebase for point cloud perception research. https: //github.com/Pointcept/Pointcept, 2023. 13

    2023

  47. [55]

    Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation

    Ofir Press, Noah Smith, and Mike Lewis. Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J

    Charles R. Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. InIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 652–660, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Pointnext: Revisiting pointnet++ with improved training and scaling strategies.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23192–23204, 2022

    Guocheng Qian, Yuchen Li, Houwen Peng, Jinjie Mai, Hasan Hammoud, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Bernard Ghanem. Pointnext: Revisiting pointnet++ with improved training and scaling strategies.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23192–23204, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer.J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21(1), January 2020

    2020

  52. [60]

    Turner, René Wagner, Adrian Weller, and Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski

    Isaac Reid, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Deepali Jain, William F Whitney, Amr Ahmed, Joshua Ainslie, Alex Bewley, Mithun George Jacob, Aranyak Mehta, David Rendleman, Connor Schenck, Richard E. Turner, René Wagner, Adrian Weller, and Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski. Linear transformer to...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Efficient 3d semantic segmentation with su- perpoint transformer

    Damien Robert, Hugo Raguet, and Loic Landrieu. Efficient 3d semantic segmentation with su- perpoint transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  54. [62]

    Language-grounded indoor 3d semantic segmentation in the wild

    David Rozenberszki, Or Litany, and Angela Dai. Language-grounded indoor 3d semantic segmentation in the wild. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 125–141. Springer, 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    Gritsenko, Matthias Minderer, Dmitry Kalashnikov, Jonathan Tompson, Vikas Sindhwani, and Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski

    Connor Schenck, Isaac Reid, Mithun George Jacob, Alex Bewley, Joshua Ainslie, David Rendleman, Deepali Jain, Mohit Sharma, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Ayzaan Wahid, Sumeet Singh, René Wagner, Tianli Ding, Chuyuan Fu, Arunkumar Byravan, Jake Varley, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Matthias Minde...

    2025

  56. [64]

    Efficient multi-task rgb-d scene analysis for indoor environments

    Daniel Seichter, Söhnke Benedikt Fischedick, Mona Köhler, and Horst-Michael Groß. Efficient multi-task rgb-d scene analysis for indoor environments. In2022 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pages 1–10. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    Efficient rgb-d semantic segmentation for indoor scene analysis

    Daniel Seichter, Mona Köhler, Benjamin Lewandowski, Tim Wengefeld, and Horst-Michael Gross. Efficient rgb-d semantic segmentation for indoor scene analysis. In2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 13525–13531. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  58. [66]

    Self-attention with relative position representations

    Peter Shaw, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Ashish Vaswani. Self-attention with relative position representations. In Marilyn Walker, Heng Ji, and Amanda Stent, editors,Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Huma...

    2018

  59. [67]

    Sun rgb-d: A rgb-d scene under- standing benchmark suite

    Shuran Song, Samuel P Lichtenberg, and Jianxiong Xiao. Sun rgb-d: A rgb-d scene under- standing benchmark suite. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 567–576, 2015

    2015

  60. [68]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomput., 568(C), February 2024

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomput., 568(C), February 2024. 14

    2024

  61. [69]

    Searching efficient 3d architectures with sparse point-voxel convolution

    Haotian Tang, Zhijian Liu, Shengyu Zhao, Yujun Lin, Ji Lin, Hanrui Wang, and Song Han. Searching efficient 3d architectures with sparse point-voxel convolution. InEuropean confer- ence on computer vision, 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Tangent convolutions for dense prediction in 3d

    Maxim Tatarchenko, Jaesik Park, Vladlen Koltun, and Qian-Yi Zhou. Tangent convolutions for dense prediction in 3d. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  63. [71]

    Segcloud: Semantic segmentation of 3d point clouds

    Lyne Tchapmi, Christopher Choy, Iro Armeni, Jun Young Gwak, and Silvio Savarese. Segcloud: Semantic segmentation of 3d point clouds. InProceedings of the International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), 2017

    2017

  64. [72]

    Kpconv: Flexible and deformable convolution for point clouds

    Hugues Thomas, Charles R Qi, Jean-Emmanuel Deschaud, Beatriz Marcotegui, François Goulette, and Leonidas J Guibas. Kpconv: Flexible and deformable convolution for point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 6411–6420, 2019

    2019

  65. [73]

    Revisiting point cloud classification: A new benchmark dataset and classification model on real-world data

    Mikaela Angelina Uy, Quang-Hieu Pham, Binh-Son Hua, Thanh Nguyen, and Sai-Kit Yeung. Revisiting point cloud classification: A new benchmark dataset and classification model on real-world data. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 158...

    2019

  66. [74]

    Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. InProceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17, page 6000–6010, Red Ho...

    2017

  67. [75]

    Graph attention convo- lution for point cloud semantic segmentation

    Lei Wang, Yuchun Huang, Yaolin Hou, Shenman Zhang, and Jie Shan. Graph attention convo- lution for point cloud semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019

    2019

  68. [76]

    Octformer: Octree-based transformers for 3d point clouds.ACM Transac- tions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–11, 2023

    Peng-Shuai Wang. Octformer: Octree-based transformers for 3d point clouds.ACM Transac- tions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–11, 2023

    2023

  69. [77]

    Deep parametric continuous convolutional neural networks

    Shenlong Wang, Simon Suo, Wei-Chiu Ma, Andrei Pokrovsky, and Raquel Urtasun. Deep parametric continuous convolutional neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  70. [78]

    Multimodal token fusion for vision transformers

    Yikai Wang, Xinghao Chen, Lele Cao, Wenbing Huang, Fuchun Sun, and Yunhe Wang. Multimodal token fusion for vision transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12186–12195, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    Deep multimodal fusion by channel exchanging.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:4835–4845, 2020

    Yikai Wang, Wenbing Huang, Fuchun Sun, Tingyang Xu, Yu Rong, and Junzhou Huang. Deep multimodal fusion by channel exchanging.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:4835–4845, 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    Sarma, Michael M

    Yue Wang, Yongbin Sun, Ziwei Liu, Sanjay E. Sarma, Michael M. Bronstein, and Justin M. Solomon. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. InACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia) 38(5), pages 146:1–146:12, 2019

    2019

  73. [81]

    Pointconvformer: Revenge of the point-based convolu- tion

    Wenxuan Wu, Li Fuxin, and Qi Shan. Pointconvformer: Revenge of the point-based convolu- tion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 21802–21813, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Pointconv: Deep convolutional networks on 3d point clouds

    Wenxuan Wu, Zhongang Qi, and Li Fuxin. Pointconv: Deep convolutional networks on 3d point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9621–9630, 2019

    2019

  75. [83]

    Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger

    Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Peng-Shuai Wang, Zhijian Liu, Xihui Liu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, Tong He, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4840–4851, 2024. 15

    2024

  76. [84]

    Point transformer v2: Grouped vector attention and partition-based pooling.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:33330–33342, 2022

    Xiaoyang Wu, Yixing Lao, Li Jiang, Xihui Liu, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v2: Grouped vector attention and partition-based pooling.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:33330–33342, 2022

    2022

  77. [85]

    Towards large-scale 3d representation learning with multi-dataset point prompt training

    Xiaoyang Wu, Zhuotao Tian, Xin Wen, Bohao Peng, Xihui Liu, Kaicheng Yu, and Hengshuang Zhao. Towards large-scale 3d representation learning with multi-dataset point prompt training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes

    Zhirong Wu, Shuran Song, Aditya Khosla, Fisher Yu, Linguang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and Jianxiong Xiao. 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1912–1920, 2015

    1912

  79. [87]

    Attentional shapecontextnet for point cloud recognition

    Saining Xie, Sainan Liu, Zeyu Chen, and Zhuowen Tu. Attentional shapecontextnet for point cloud recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4606–4615, 2018

    2018

  80. [88]

    Paconv: Position adaptive convolution with dynamic kernel assembling on point clouds

    Mutian Xu, Runyu Ding, Hengshuang Zhao, and Xiaojuan Qi. Paconv: Position adaptive convolution with dynamic kernel assembling on point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021

    2021

  81. [89]

    Spidercnn: Deep learning on point sets with parameterized convolutional filters

    Yifan Xu, Tianqi Fan, Mingye Xu, Long Zeng, and Yu Qiao. Spidercnn: Deep learning on point sets with parameterized convolutional filters. InProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 87–102, 2018

    2018

  82. [90]

    2dpass: 2d priors assisted semantic segmentation on lidar point clouds

    Xu Yan, Jiantao Gao, Chaoda Zheng, Chao Zheng, Ruimao Zhang, Shuguang Cui, and Zhen Li. 2dpass: 2d priors assisted semantic segmentation on lidar point clouds. InEuropean conference on computer vision, 2022

    2022

  83. [91]

    Pointasnl: Robust point clouds processing using nonlocal neural networks with adaptive sampling

    Xu Yan, Chaoda Zheng, Zhen Li, Sheng Wang, and Shuguang Cui. Pointasnl: Robust point clouds processing using nonlocal neural networks with adaptive sampling. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5589–5598, 2020

    2020

  84. [92]

    One inlier is first: Towards efficient position encoding for point cloud registration

    Fan Yang, Lin Guo, Zhi Chen, and Wenbing Tao. One inlier is first: Towards efficient position encoding for point cloud registration. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho, editors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  85. [93]

    Modeling point clouds with self-attention and gumbel subset sampling

    Jiancheng Yang, Qiang Zhang, Bingbing Ni, Linguo Li, Jinxian Liu, Mengdie Zhou, and Qi Tian. Modeling point clouds with self-attention and gumbel subset sampling. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019

    2019

  86. [94]

    Swin3d: A pretrained transformer backbone for 3d indoor scene understanding.Computational Visual Media, 11(1):83–101, 2025

    Yu-Qi Yang, Yu-Xiao Guo, Jian-Yu Xiong, Yang Liu, Hao Pan, Peng-Shuai Wang, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo. Swin3d: A pretrained transformer backbone for 3d indoor scene understanding.Computational Visual Media, 11(1):83–101, 2025

    2025

  87. [95]

    Scannet++: A high-fidelity dataset of 3d indoor scenes

    Chandan Yeshwanth, Yueh-Cheng Liu, Matthias Nießner, and Angela Dai. Scannet++: A high-fidelity dataset of 3d indoor scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12–22, 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Dformerv2: Geometry self-attention for rgbd semantic segmentation

    Bo-Wen Yin, Jiao-Long Cao, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Qibin Hou. Dformerv2: Geometry self-attention for rgbd semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19345–19355, 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    Omnisegmentor: A flexible multi-modal learning framework for semantic segmentation

    Bo-Wen Yin, Jiao-Long Cao, Xuying Zhang, Yuming Chen, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Qibin Hou. Omnisegmentor: A flexible multi-modal learning framework for semantic segmentation. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    DFormer: Rethinking RGBD representation learning for semantic segmentation

    Bowen Yin, Xuying Zhang, Zhong-Yu Li, Li Liu, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Qibin Hou. DFormer: Rethinking RGBD representation learning for semantic segmentation. InThe Twelfth Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  91. [99]

    Point-bert: Pre-training 3d point cloud transformers with masked point modeling

    Xumin Yu, Lulu Tang, Yongming Rao, Tiejun Huang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Point-bert: Pre-training 3d point cloud transformers with masked point modeling. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 19313–19322, 2022. 16

    2022

  92. [100]

    Litept: Lighter yet stronger point transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13689, 2025

    Yuanwen Yue, Damien Robert, Jianyuan Wang, Sunghwan Hong, Jan Dirk Wegner, Christian Rupprecht, and Konrad Schindler. Litept: Lighter yet stronger point transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13689, 2025

    2025

  93. [101]

    Big bird: transformers for longer sequences

    Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie, Chris Alberti, Santiago Ontanon, Philip Pham, Anirudh Ravula, Qifan Wang, Li Yang, and Amr Ahmed. Big bird: transformers for longer sequences. InProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Informatio...

    2020

  94. [102]

    Cmx: Cross-modal fusion for rgb-x semantic segmentation with transformers.IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 24(12):14679–14694, 2023

    Jiaming Zhang, Huayao Liu, Kailun Yang, Xinxin Hu, Ruiping Liu, and Rainer Stiefelha- gen. Cmx: Cross-modal fusion for rgb-x semantic segmentation with transformers.IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 24(12):14679–14694, 2023

    2023

  95. [103]

    Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27061–27074, 2022

    Renrui Zhang, Ziyu Guo, Peng Gao, Rongyao Fang, Bin Zhao, Dong Wang, Yu Qiao, and Hongsheng Li. Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27061–27074, 2022

    2022

  96. [104]

    Point cloud mamba: Point cloud learning via state space model

    Tao Zhang, Haobo Yuan, Lu Qi, Jiangning Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Shunping Ji, Shuicheng Yan, and Xiangtai Li. Point cloud mamba: Point cloud learning via state space model. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 10121–10130, 2025

    2025

  97. [105]

    Pointweb: Enhancing local neigh- borhood features for point cloud processing

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Chi-Wing Fu, and Jiaya Jia. Pointweb: Enhancing local neigh- borhood features for point cloud processing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019

    2019

  98. [106]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 16259– 16268, 2021

    2021

  99. [107]

    Pgdenet: Progressive guided fusion and depth enhancement network for rgb-d indoor scene parsing.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25:3483–3494, 2022

    Wujie Zhou, Enquan Yang, Jingsheng Lei, Jian Wan, and Lu Yu. Pgdenet: Progressive guided fusion and depth enhancement network for rgb-d indoor scene parsing.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25:3483–3494, 2022

    2022

  100. [108]

    Frnet: Feature reconstruction network for rgb-d indoor scene parsing.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 16(4):677– 687, 2022

    Wujie Zhou, Enquan Yang, Jingsheng Lei, and Lu Yu. Frnet: Feature reconstruction network for rgb-d indoor scene parsing.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 16(4):677– 687, 2022

    2022

  101. [109]

    modality gap

    Xinge Zhu, Hui Zhou, Tai Wang, Fangzhou Hong, Yuexin Ma, Wei Li, Hongsheng Li, and Dahua Lin. Cylindrical and asymmetrical 3d convolution networks for lidar segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021. 17 A Related W...

    2021

  102. [110]

    By leveraging camera intrinsics (fx, fy, cx, cy), lifting-based methods enable the model to reason about physical scale and spatial proximity

    represent milestones in this direction, rethinking RGB-D representation by treating depth maps as geometry priors rather than simple texture maps. By leveraging camera intrinsics (fx, fy, cx, cy), lifting-based methods enable the model to reason about physical scale and spatia...

  103. [111]

    Bold denotes the best result in the Performer group. Method Area 5 MLP/CNN PointNet [56] 41.1 SegCloud [71] 48.9 TanConv [70] 52.6 PointCNN [38] 57.3 ParamConv [77] 58.3 PointWeb [105] 60.3 HPEIN [29] 61.9 KPConv [72] 67.1 GACNet [75] 62.9 SPGraph [35] 58.0 SegGCN [37] 63.6 PA...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.