Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The paper claims that the topological invariant N3 governing the integer quantum Hall effect is a pairing of a Green-function K-theory class with a cyclic cohomology cocycle, and that in the infinite-lattice limit this invariant can become

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 12:01 UTC pith:PZXZIIKI

load-bearing objection New NCG reformulation of the IQHE invariant and a clean finite-lattice vanishing proof, but the non-integer N3 claim is not supported because it rests on an unproven, and likely false, deformation regularity assumption.

arxiv 2606.08868 v3 pith:PZXZIIKI submitted 2026-06-07 cond-mat.mes-hall hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Topological invariant responsible for the integer QHE and non-commutative geometry

G. Kovyrshin , A. Mekrami , J. Miller , M.A. Zubkov , A. Zuevsky This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords integer quantum Hall effectcyclic cohomologyK-theoryWigner-Weyl calculusHall conductivity quantizationnoncommutative geometrytight-binding latticetopological invariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reformulates the topological invariant N3 that controls the integer quantum Hall effect in inhomogeneous tight-binding models as a pairing between the Green function's class in K^{-1}(A) and a cyclic 3-cocycle in HC^3(A). It shows that on any finite lattice this pairing vanishes identically, which the authors connect to the absence of quantized Hall response in finite-lattice numerical treatments. When the lattice size is taken to infinity partially—momentum becoming continuous while coordinate space remains finite—the pairing can be nonzero. The paper then proves only weak index theorems: N3 is guaranteed integer when the system is homotopic to a homogeneous one, or when the Moyal product can be deformed to the ordinary product without singularities. Otherwise N3 may be real-valued, so the area-averaged Hall conductance sigma_H = N3/2pi is not forced to be an integer multiple of e^2/h under sufficiently strong inhomogeneity.

Core claim

The central discovery is that N3, defined through the Wigner-transformed Matsubara Green function, is exactly the pairing <[G], phi> with [G] in K^{-1}(A) and phi in HC^3(A), where phi(a0,a1,a2,a3) is built from derivatives of Weyl symbols. For a finite matrix algebra (finite lattice and discretized imaginary time), both K^{-1}(A) and HC^3(A) vanish, and the paper verifies directly that N3=0 by exhibiting phi as a Hochschild coboundary. For the algebra A=C^infty(O' x R x T^2) obtained by replacing the discrete momentum lattice by the torus T^2 while keeping the spatial lattice O' finite, both groups are large and the cocycle ceases to be exact because the position operator becomes unbounded;

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the pairing <[G], phi> of K-theory with cyclic cohomology: G, the Matsubara Green function of the lattice model, is treated as an invertible element of an algebra A, giving a class [G] in K^{-1}(A); the cocycle phi(a0,a1,a2,a3) = - (epsilon^{ijk}/3! 4 pi^2 |V|) Tr[a0 D_i a1 D_j a2 D_k a3] built from derivatives of Weyl symbols represents a class in HC^3(A). The key choice of A is the algebra of Weyl symbols C^infty(O' x R x T^2), where momentum has been made continuous while the spatial lattice O' stays finite; there K^{-1} and HC^3 are large enough for the pairing to be non-trivial, and the cyclic property of the trace is restored only in the N to infinity limi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that along the deformation of the star product from the Moyal product to the pointwise product, the inverse Green function G^h_W exists and the integrand in Eq. (79) stays regular, together with the order of limits that makes momentum continuous while the spatial lattice is still finite; if either condition fails, the invariant may not be well-defined and the non-integer conclusion collapses.

What would settle it

Take a concrete 2D tight-binding model with strong coordinate-dependent hopping or a spatially varying magnetic field, and evaluate N3 from Eq. (51) at several finite O' sizes. If the partial-limit result is always an integer, or if at some O' it coincides with the finite-volume value N3=0, the central claim fails. A second decisive check is to follow G^h_W through the h-deformation: a value of h at which G^h_W develops a singularity would break the invariance argument and remove the guarantee that N3^(h) is constant.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, quantization of the Hall conductance in integer multiples of e^2/h is not a consequence of topology alone once inhomogeneity is strong; the area-averaged sigma_H = N3/2pi may be non-integer.
  • The finite-lattice result N3=0 explains why straightforward finite-volume regularizations and lattice numerics see no quantized Hall current, and identifies the momentum-continuous limit as the physically relevant regularization for macroscopic samples.
  • The third weak index theorem turns N3 into a spatial average of local invariants N3(x), so the total invariant is a weighted average of integers, which can be fractional.
  • The construction gives a concrete noncommutative-geometric formula (Eq. 51) that can be evaluated numerically for arbitrary inhomogeneous tight-binding models.
  • Cases where QW is homotopic to a momentum-only function, or to a uniform constant-field system, are protected and must still give integer N3, delimiting the regime where standard TKNN quantization survives.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to build a 2D electron gas in a smoothly varying magnetic field and compute Eq. (51) for increasing O' size: if N3 converges to a non-integer value while the full finite-volume expression stays zero, the order-of-limits mechanism is confirmed; if it converges to an integer or zero, the paper's conclusion would be falsified.
  • The result suggests that local Chern markers or local Hall conductivity, rather than a single global integer, are the appropriate descriptors of strongly inhomogeneous topological phases; the paper's N3(x) is a candidate.
  • It implies a sharp criterion for when the integer quantum Hall effect remains integer: the deformation from Moyal to pointwise product must avoid singularities of the inverse Green function; engineering systems near that singularity could produce tunable fractional-looking Hall conductance without interactions.
  • If strong disorder or curvature can make the averaged Hall conductance non-integer, then plateau values observed experimentally may be interpreted as residual weak-inhomogeneity limits, and samples with strong geometric or textural disorder would be the place to look for deviation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained modulo explicitly conditional regularity assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central invariant N3 (Eqs. 50-51) is derived from the linear-response conductivity expression (Eqs. 46-48), not fitted to the conclusion. The reformulation as a pairing ⟨[G],φ⟩ (Eq. 71) is a mathematical restatement of the same quantity in K-theory/cyclic-cohomology language; it introduces no fitted parameter and does not assume the target non-integrality. The claim that N3 may be non-integer rests on the h-deformation argument in §V.A: Eq. (79) defines N3^(h), and the paper explicitly states that dN3^(h)/dh=0 only 'assuming that along this deformation the inverse G^h_W exists and the integrand remains regular.' The paper also concedes that for a constant magnetic field the deformation becomes singular at some h (§V.B), and it leaves the construction of explicit strongly inhomogeneous examples open ('We leave this question for future work'). Thus the non-integer conclusion is advertised as conditional on an unproved regularity assumption—a limitation and correctness risk, not a circular reduction. The self-citations [49,58,59] provide the Wigner-Weyl calculus and finite-lattice regularization, but the relevant formulas are re-derived or used with stated assumptions; no author-specific uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The weak index theorems are explicitly labeled 'too weak' and are conditional, so they do not smuggle in the conclusion. Overall, the derivation chain contains no step where the output is equivalent by construction to an input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numerical fitting is performed; the deformation parameter h is an interpolation variable, not a fitted constant. The central claim rests on the choice of algebra/regularization, the regularity of the h-deformation, and prior Wigner-Weyl calculus results. The non-integer conclusion depends on the unproven regularity assumption and on identifying the partial-limit invariant with the physical Hall conductivity.

axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The physically relevant regularization of N3 is the partial limit N→∞ that replaces momentum sums by integrals while keeping O′ finite (Eq. (51), not Eq. (50)).
    The finite-volume expression Eq. (50) gives N3=0; only this partial-limit choice yields a nonzero topological invariant, so the main conclusion depends on it.
  • domain assumption The cyclic trace property and integration by parts hold for A=C∞(O′×R×T^2) at finite O′ as used in Eq. (80)-(82).
    The deformation proof of N3^{(h)} invariance requires cyclicity; however §IV.A states cyclicity is lost for finite O′. The paper does not resolve this tension.
  • domain assumption Along the h-deformation from Moyal star to pointwise product, the inverse Green function G^h_W exists and the integrand remains regular.
    Stated explicitly in §V.A before Eq. (79) and again in §V.B item 3; the authors concede this fails for a uniform system with constant magnetic field, making it load-bearing and not generally proven.
  • domain assumption The prior Wigner-Weyl calculus and Green-function expression for N3 from Refs. [49,58,59] are correct.
    The paper builds entirely on these self-cited derivations (Peierls substitution in §II.B, Eqs. (2)-(4)); they are parameter-free with stated assumptions but are not re-derived in full.
  • standard math Bott periodicity K^{-1}(A)=K^1(A) and Connes' formula HC^3(C∞(M))=H^3_dR(M)⊕H^1_dR(M) are applicable to the chosen Fréchet algebras.
    Used in Appendices F and G to compute K-groups and HC^3; these are standard results with no ad hoc assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 38515 in / 18514 out tokens · 196923 ms · 2026-08-02T12:01:51.182731+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a wide class of $2D$ tight - binding models of solid state physics. These models are, in the most general case, non - homogeneous. The topological invariant ${\cal N}_3$ responsible for the quantization of the Hall conductivity, for the specific case of the integer quantum Hall effect in $2D$, is expressed through the Wigner transformation of the two-point electron Matsubara Green function. We express this invariant as a pairing of the element of the $K^{-1}$ group (generated by the Green function) with the specific element of the cyclic cohomology group $HC^3$. According to a set of local index theorems the values of ${\cal N}_3$ can be shown to be integer for a limited class of tight - binding models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08868 by A. Mekrami, A. Zuevsky, G. Kovyrshin, J. Miller, M.A. Zubkov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: In this figure we represent schematically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Vertex operator algebra bundles on Riemann surfaces of higher genus and automorphic forms for Fuchsian groups

    math.FA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    VOA bundles and automorphic forms extend to arbitrary Fuchsian groups, with a cusp/cocompact dichotomy for the weight-2 generator E_{2}^Γ and exact dimension formulas in the obstructed case.

  2. The first chiral homology group in higher genus

    math.FA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    The genus-1 finiteness hypotheses of van Ekeren–Heluani imply finite-dimensional (and often vanishing) first chiral homology of a vertex algebra on every compact Riemann surface.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 12 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    In this approach, the algebra of smooth functions on a given topological space is replaced by an abstract (and in general, non-commutative) algebra A

    basic definitions Noncommutative geometry is essentially a generalization of the geometry of topological spaces, whereby the algebra of functions defined over a given space is replaced by a noncommutative algebra. In this approach, the algebra of smooth functions on a given topological space is replaced by an abstract (and in general, non-commutative) alg...

  2. [2]

    the space spanned by bra-vectors, whileHis spanned by ket-vectors

    Basic algebraAand its derivatives 19 ByH ∗ =Hom(H,C)we denote the space conjugate toH, i.e. the space spanned by bra-vectors, whileHis spanned by ket-vectors. As mentioned above we can takeA:=H ∗ ⊗ H. But this choice is not unique. We should impose various conditions on the operators thus coming to differentC∗ algebras. The transition to Weyl symbols is a...

  3. [3]

    In this section, for simplicity we disregard the internal finite dimensional space

    GroupsK 0,K −1 for various choices ofA. In this section, for simplicity we disregard the internal finite dimensional space. Its effect on theKgroups is obvious and can be postponed until later in the discussion

  4. [4]

    Even more let us discretize the direction of imaginary time

    Let us consider the case of finite spatial lattice size,N. Even more let us discretize the direction of imaginary time. In this case A= End(H),H=C ZN ×C |O|,O=Z N ×Z N . We deal with matrix algebra A= End(H) ∼= MN 3 (C), and, by Morita invariance, obtain K 0(A) =K 0(MN 3 (C)) =K 0(C) ∼= Z, K 1(A) =K 1(MN 3 (C)) =K 1(C) ∼= 0

  5. [5]

    In this case A= End(H),H=C R ×C |O|,O=Z N ×Z N

    Once again let us consider finite spatial lattice size,N, but continuous values of imaginary time. In this case A= End(H),H=C R ×C |O|,O=Z N ×Z N . SpaceC |O| is finite-dimensional, thusdimC |O| =N 2,. We interpretC R as space of functions of a continuous variable (time or frequency). We can tryH∼= L2(R)⊗C N 2 . Using standardK-theory properties we can se...

  6. [6]

    Let us assume now that the direction of Matsubara frequencies is compactified (i.e

    CompactificationR→S 1 Above we have seen that the groupK1 is trivial for the most straightforward definition of algebraAin case of finite lattice and continuous imaginary time. Let us assume now that the direction of Matsubara frequencies is compactified (i.e. direction of imaginary time is discretized), and in addition we suppose that the operators are d...

  7. [7]

    When we pass to Weyl symbols we deal with A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the domain of Matsubara frequencies

    Transition to Weyl symbols at finiteN. When we pass to Weyl symbols we deal with A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the domain of Matsubara frequencies. Calculation ofK- groups in this case is given in Appendix F1. We obtain K 0(A) =Z (2N) 4 , K 1(A) = 0 Again, if we replaceRof Matsubara frequency byS1, we obtain K 0(A) =Z (2N) 4 , K 1(A) =Z (2N) 4

  8. [8]

    In this case instead of the operators ˆGwe consider Weyl symbolsG W defined on the spatial latticeO ′ and momentum spaceR× M′

    Computation of groupsKi for the case when the limit of infiniteNis taken partially. In this case instead of the operators ˆGwe consider Weyl symbolsG W defined on the spatial latticeO ′ and momentum spaceR× M′. The latter space is in the limitN→ ∞replaced byR×T 2. Calculation of theK - groups in this case is presented in Appendix F2. The result is K 0(A) ...

  9. [9]

    We have two representations of the model: coordinate representation and momentum representation

    LimitN→ ∞for operator algebra. We have two representations of the model: coordinate representation and momentum representation. In mo- mentum representation we can try A= End(C ∞(R×T 2)) but then bothK-groups vanish. Let us replace it by algebra of pseudodifferential operators onR×T 2. This results in K 0(A) =K −1(A) ∼= Z4 (56)

  10. [10]

    We can try A= End(C ∞(R× O)) but this choice leads to trivialK-groups

    The limitN→ ∞for operator algebra in coordinate representation. We can try A= End(C ∞(R× O)) but this choice leads to trivialK-groups. There exist ways to reduce the size of the algebra thus giving nontrivial Kgroups, but we do not discuss these further, having in mind those versions described above in the previous items. B. Cyclic cohomology LetMbe anA-b...

  11. [11]

    In this case A= End(H) ∼= MN 3 (C), 24 and we obtain HC 3(A) ∼= 0

    FiniteNand discretized direction of imaginary time with finite sizeN. In this case A= End(H) ∼= MN 3 (C), 24 and we obtain HC 3(A) ∼= 0

  12. [12]

    Operator algebra

    The case of finiteN. Operator algebra. In this case A= End(H) ∼= K(L2(R)) b⊗MN 2 (C), we obtain HC 3(A) = 0

  13. [13]

    CompactificationR→S 1 A= End(H) ∼= K(L2(S1)) b⊗MN 2 (C), we obtain HC 3(A) = 0

  14. [14]

    A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the axis of Matsubara frequencies

    Transition to Weyl symbols at finiteN. A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the axis of Matsubara frequencies. The calculation ofHC 3 is given in Appendix G1. With this setup we obtain HC 3(A) = 0 However, if we compactify the Matsubara frequencies (for example, if we discretize the axis of imaginary time), then A=C ∞(S1 × O′ × M′), and HC 3(A) =C (2N) 4 , 25

  15. [15]

    We consider Weyl symbolsGW defined on the spatial latticeO′ and momentum spaceR×T 2

    The case when the limit of infiniteNis taken partially. We consider Weyl symbolsGW defined on the spatial latticeO′ and momentum spaceR×T 2. Therefore, A=C ∞(O′ ×R×T 2) The calculation ofHC 3 groups is presented in Appendix G2. The results is HC 3(A) = C2 4N 2 (65) If we replace hereRbyS 1, we obtain instead: HC 3(A) = C4 4N 2 (66) For the limitN→ ∞, the ...

  16. [16]

    We have two representations of the model: the coordinate representation and the momentum representation

    The limitN→ ∞for operator algebra. We have two representations of the model: the coordinate representation and the momentum representation. In the momentum representation we can try A= End(C ∞(R×T 2)) but thenHC 3 as well as bothK-groups vanish. Therefore, we can replace it by the algebra of pseudodifferential operators onR×T 2 . This results in HC 3(A) ∼...

  17. [17]

    As for theKgroups, if we take A= End(C ∞(R× O)) then the groupHC 3 is trivial

    The limitN→ ∞for the operator algebra in coordinate representation. As for theKgroups, if we take A= End(C ∞(R× O)) then the groupHC 3 is trivial. 26 IV. TOPOLOGICAL INVARIANTN 3 ON THE LANGUAGE OF CYCLIC COHOMOLOGIES. A.N 3 in terms of cyclic cohomology First of all, for any reasonable choice ofAwe can think of the Green functionGas an element ofGL(1,A),...

  18. [18]

    We will consider the two dimensional Weyl transform

    Weyl symbols of the simplest operators Below we will be interested in the Weyl symbols of the operators of the form ofQ(ω,p−A(i∂ p)). We will consider the two dimensional Weyl transform. The direction of imaginary time remains continuous. Let us start our consideration from the Weyl symbol for a general function ofˆp f( ˆp)W (p, q) = X ni=0,1;u∈M′ ⟨p+πn/N...

  19. [19]

    Weyl symbol ofexp i(ˆpk −A ke−ωωω∂p ) For a functionϕ(x)≡ ⟨x|ϕ⟩defined on the latticeOwe can define the Fourier transform ⟨p|ϕ⟩ ≡ϕ(p) = 1 N D/2 X x∈O e−ipxϕ(x)(E3) 39 Correspondingly, we can define the operatorˆx≡i∂p that acts as ⟨p|ˆx|ϕ⟩ ≡i∂pϕ(p) = 1 N D/2 X x∈O e−ipxxϕ(x)(E4) Obviously, its action onϕ(x)is simplyxϕ(x). Now let us calculate the commutato...

  20. [20]

    The Weyl symbol ofF= exp i(ˆpµ − PN J=1 AJ µekJ i∂p ) The next step is the consideration of the functionF= exp i(ˆpµ − PN J=1 AJµ ekJ i∂p ) , which appears in the series expansion for arbitrary function (Fourier or Laplace series). As above, we will be using the following relation: iAJµ ekJ i∂p iˆpµ =i(ˆpµ +ik Jµ )iAJµ ekJ i∂p (E13) 41 It gives [iˆpµ, iAJ...

  21. [21]

    We should representAin the form of the Laplace transformation: Aµ(x) = Z ˜Aµ(k)ekx +c.c

    The Weyl symbol ofF= exp i(ˆpµ −A µ(i∂p)) For the case of arbitrary functionAµ(i∂p)the Weyl symbol ofF= exp i(ˆpµ −A µ(i∂p)) may be calculated using the above obtained expressions. We should representAin the form of the Laplace transformation: Aµ(x) = Z ˜Aµ(k)ekx +c.c. dk(E28) that is Aµ(i∂p) = Z ˜Aµ(k)eki∂p +c.c. dk(E29) In turn, this integral may be dis...

  22. [22]

    The Weyl symbol of Dirac operator ˆQ(p−A(i∂ p)) The homogeneous tight-binding model is defined here as the one, in which the Dirac operator is expressed through the momentum operator as a sum over exponents of the form F µ n = exp in(ˆpµ −A µ(i∂p)) (E35) with integern. One can check that for each term of this type we have (F µ n )W = exp in(pµ − A(n) µ (x...

  23. [23]

    When we pass to Weyl symbols we deal with A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the range of Matsubara frequencies

    K - groups for the algebra of Weyl symbols at finiteN. When we pass to Weyl symbols we deal with A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the range of Matsubara frequencies. Typical expression forQW isQ W =iω−H(p, x), whereω∈R. Its inverse will be(iω−H(p, x)) −1 ⋆ . Our space of functions should contain both these forms Let us decompose the algebra. SinceO′ andM ′ are...

  24. [24]

    Computation of groupsK i for the case when the limit of infiniteNis taken partially. a. The case when the range of Matsubara frequencies isR In this case, instead of the operators ˆGwe consider Weyl symbolsG W defined on the spatial latticeO ′ and momentum spaceR× M′. The latter space is in the limitN→ ∞replaced byR×T 2. Let us decompose the algebra. Sinc...

  25. [25]

    A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the axis of Matsubara frequencies

    Algebra of Weyl symbols at finiteN. A=C ∞(R× O′ × M′), whereRis the axis of Matsubara frequencies. SinceO ′ andM ′ are finite discrete sets we have the algebraic decomposition A=C ∞(R)⊗C (2N) 2 ⊗C (2N) 2 =C ∞(R)⊗C (2N) 4 = (2N) 4 M i=1 C ∞(R). Let us computeHC3(C ∞(R)). Start with de Rham cohomology ofR. SinceRis contractible its de Rham cohomology is tri...

  26. [26]

    We consider Weyl symbolsGW defined on the spatial latticeO′ and momentum spaceR×T 2

    The case when the limit of infiniteNis taken partially. We consider Weyl symbolsGW defined on the spatial latticeO′ and momentum spaceR×T 2. Therefore, A=C ∞(O′ ×R×T 2) SinceO ′ is a finite discrete set with(2N)2 points, functions on it reduce to tuples which givesA=C∞(R×T 2)⊗ C(2N) 2 = L(2N) 2 i=1 C ∞(R×T 2). Recall de Rham cohomology ofR×T 2: SinceRis c...

  27. [27]

    von Klitzing, G

    K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  28. [28]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized hall conductivity in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

    1981

  29. [29]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  30. [30]

    Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance, Ann

    M. Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)160, 343 (1985). 51

    1985

  31. [31]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  32. [32]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  33. [33]

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized hall conductance as a topological invariant, Phys. Rev. B31, 3372 (1985)

    1985

  34. [34]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, Homotopy and quantization in condensed matter physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 51 (1983)

    1983

  35. [35]

    B. I. Halperin, Quantized hall conductance, current-carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two- dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B25, 2185 (1982)

    1982

  36. [36]

    Strěda, Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions, J

    P. Strěda, Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.15, L717 (1982)

    1982

  37. [37]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  38. [38]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz-Baldes, The noncommutative geometry of the quantum hall effect, J. Math. Phys.35, 5373 (1994)

    1994

  39. [39]

    R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin, eds.,The Quantum Hall Effect, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990)

    1990

  40. [40]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  41. [41]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  42. [42]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Colloquium: Quantum anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 011002 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Chi and J

    H. Chi and J. S. Moodera, Progress and prospects in the quantum anomalous hall effect, APL Mater.10, 090903 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Weber, M

    B. Weber, M. S. Fuhrer, X.-L. Sheng, S. A. Yang, R. Thomale,et al., 2024 roadmap on 2d topological insulators, J. Phys. Mater.7, 022501 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Y. Bai, Y. Li, J. Luan, R. Liu, W. Song, Y. Chen, P.-F. Ji, Q. Zhang, F. Meng, B. Tong, L. Li, Y. Jiang, Z. Gao, L. Gu, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q.-K. Xue, K. He, Y. Feng, and X. Feng, Quantized anomalous hall resistivity achieved in molecular beam epitaxy-grown MnBi2Te4 thin films, Natl. Sci. Rev.11, nwad189 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Bosnar, A

    M. Bosnar, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, E. K. Petrov, E. V. Chulkov, and M. M. Otrokov, High chern number van der waals magnetic topological multilayers MnBi2Te4/hbn, npj 2D Mater. Appl.7, 33 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Baù and A

    N. Baù and A. Marrazzo, Local chern marker for periodic systems, Phys. Rev. B109, 014206 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson,et al., Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang,et al., Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao,et al., Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    L. Ju, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, The fractional quantum anomalous hall effect, Nat. Rev. Mater.9, 455 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    R. M. Kaufmann, D. Li, and B. Wehefritz-Kaufmann, Notes on topological insulators, Rev. Math. Phys.28, 1630003 (2016), arXiv:1501.02874 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1991)

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    Tong, Lectures on the quantum hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

    D. Tong, Lectures on the quantum hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Hatsugai, Topological aspects of the quantum Hall effect, J

    Y. Hatsugai, Topological aspects of the quantum Hall effect, J. Phys. Condens. Matter9, 2507 (1997)

    1997

  57. [57]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators, Phys. Rev. B78, 195424 (2008)

    2008

  58. [58]

    Ishikawa and T

    K. Ishikawa and T. Matsuyama, Magnetic field induced multi component QED in three-dimensions and quantum Hall effect, Z. Phys. C33, 41 (1986)

    1986

  59. [59]

    G. E. Volovik, An analog of the quantum Hall effect in a superfluid 3He film, JETP67, 9 (1988), zhETF, Vol. 94, No. 3(9), 123. 52

    1988

  60. [60]

    G. E. Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  61. [61]

    Coleman and B

    S. Coleman and B. Hill, Phys. Lett. B159, 184 (1985)

    1985

  62. [62]

    Lee, Phys

    T. Lee, Phys. Lett. B171, 247 (1986)

    1986

  63. [63]

    M. A. Zubkov, Momentum space topology of QCD, Annals Phys393, 264 (2018), arXiv:1610.08041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    C. X. Zhang and M. A. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on the anomalous quantum Hall effect (2019), arXiv:arXiv:1902.06545 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Zubkov, Momentum space topology of qcd, Annals of Physics393, 264 (2018)

    M. Zubkov, Momentum space topology of qcd, Annals of Physics393, 264 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Zubkov and G

    M. Zubkov and G. Volovik, Momentum space topological invariants for the 4d relativistic vacua with mass gap, Nuclear Physics B860, 295 (2012)

    2012

  67. [67]

    Volovik and M

    G. Volovik and M. Zubkov, Standard model as the topological material, New Journal of Physics19, 015009 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    M. A. Zubkov and Z. V. Khaidukov, Topology of the momentum space, wigner transformations, and a chiral anomaly in lattice models, JETP Letters106, 172 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    G. E. Volovik and M. Zubkov, Nambu sum rule in the njl models: from superfluidity to top quark condensation, JETP letters97, 301 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    Katsnelson, G

    M. Katsnelson, G. Volovik, and M. Zubkov, Euler–heisenberg effective action and magnetoelectric effect in multilayer graphene, Annals of Physics331, 160 (2013)

    2013

  71. [71]

    Volovik and M

    G. Volovik and M. Zubkov, Scalar excitation with leggett frequency in he 3-b and the 125 gev higgs particle in top quark condensation models as pseudo-goldstone bosons, Physical Review D92, 055004 (2015)

    2015

  72. [72]

    Selch, M

    M. Selch, M. Zubkov, S. Pramanik, and M. Lewkowicz, Non-renormalization of the fractional quantum hall conductivity by interactions, Annals of Physics , 170202 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Bakker, A

    B. Bakker, A. Veselov, and M. Zubkov, Central dominance and the confinement mechanism in gluodynamics, Physics Letters B471, 214 (1999)

    1999

  74. [74]

    Bakker, A

    B. Bakker, A. Veselov, and M. Zubkov, Standard model with the additional z6 symmetry on the lattice, Physics Letters B620, 156 (2005)

    2005

  75. [75]

    M. A. Zubkov and X. Wu, Topological invariant in terms of the Green functions for the Quantum Hall Effect in the presence of varying magnetic field (2019), arXiv:arXiv:1901.06661 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on integer quantum hall effect, Annals of Physics444, 169016 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    I. V. Fialkovsky and M. A. Zubkov, Elastic deformations and Wigner-Weyl formalism in graphene, Symmetry12, 317 (2020), arXiv:1905.11097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    M. N. Chernodub and M. Zubkov, Scale magnetic effect in quantum electrodynamics and the wigner-weyl formalism, Physical Review D96, 056006 (2017)

    2017

  79. [79]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on the anomalous quantum hall effect, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical53, 195002 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Suleymanov and M

    M. Suleymanov and M. Zubkov, Wigner–weyl formalism and the propagator of wilson fermions in the presence of varying external electromagnetic field, Nuclear Physics B938, 171 (2019)

    2019

Showing first 80 references.