Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Late-time growth of holographic time-like entanglement is fixed by one critical surface inside the black hole, whose existence is guaranteed by the null energy condition.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 17:39 UTC pith:PHPS7VUD

load-bearing objection Solid analytic result: NEC+Kasner guarantees an interior critical surface that sets the late-time TEE growth rate under the CWES prescription; dictionary caveat is already owned by the authors. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.21079 v3 pith:PHPS7VUD submitted 2026-06-19 hep-th gr-qc

Linear Growth of Holographic Time-like Entanglement Entropy and Kasner exponents

Zi-Hao Li , Run-Qiu Yang This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc PACS 04.70.Dy11.25.Tq04.60.Cf
keywords holographic time-like entanglement entropyKasner exponentscritical extremal surfacenull energy conditionblack hole interiorCWES prescriptionhairy black holeslate-time growth rate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks what controls the late-time growth of holographic time-like entanglement entropy (TEE) in AdS black holes that end in a space-like singularity. Using a concrete bulk construction made of piece-wise extremal surfaces, the authors prove that as the boundary time-like strip becomes arbitrarily wide the growth rate of TEE approaches a constant set entirely by the local geometry of a single critical surface that sits between the event horizon and the singularity. The null energy condition, together with the assumption that the deep interior looks like a Kasner geometry, is enough to guarantee that this critical surface always exists. The same geometry also implies that the pure vacuum black hole maximises the real part of the growth rate (under the dominant energy condition) and, the authors conjecture and then check numerically, minimises the imaginary part. The result ties a boundary information-theoretic quantity directly to the geometry of black-hole interiors and supplies concrete bounds that can be tested in other holographic models.

Core claim

In asymptotically AdS black holes with a space-like singularity and no inner horizon, the late-time linear growth rate of the complex-valued area of the piece-wise extremal surface dual to TEE is completely determined by a critical extremal surface Ac located at a finite radius zc inside the horizon: lim τ0 o∞ dA/dτ0 = √g(zc). The null energy condition plus Kasner asymptotics near the singularity force g(z) o0 as z o∞, guaranteeing that such a maximum of g(z) always exists.

What carries the argument

The geometric function g(z) = −z^{2−2d}f(z)e^{-χ(z)} whose global maximum inside the horizon locates the critical surface Ac and whose square root equals the late-time growth rate; its existence follows from the Kasner-exponent inequality pt+(d−2)ps≥0 enforced by the null energy condition.

Load-bearing premise

The entire geometric identification of the growth rate with an interior critical surface rests on taking the Complex-valued Weak Extremal Surface construction as the holographic dual of time-like entanglement entropy.

What would settle it

Construct an asymptotically AdS black hole with a space-like singularity that obeys the null energy condition yet whose function g(z) has no maximum between the horizon and the singularity, or show that a different holographic dictionary for TEE yields a late-time growth rate independent of any interior critical surface.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Late-time TEE growth becomes a direct probe of black-hole interior geometry rather than of near-boundary physics.
  • The null energy condition acquires a new holographic role: it protects the existence of a well-defined linear growth rate for time-like entanglement.
  • Vacuum Schwarzschild-AdS maximises the real growth rate and minimises the imaginary part under fixed horizon radius or temperature, and under a scheme-independent energy density.
  • Mild quantum-gravity corrections that preserve the Kasner form of the singularity still leave the critical surface intact because of a finite buffer zone in Kasner-exponent space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same critical-surface mechanism survives for inhomogeneous boundary strips, TEE growth rates could become a practical diagnostic of interior Kasner exponents without needing full geodesic reconstruction.
  • The conjectured lower bound on the imaginary part may be the time-like counterpart of known spatial-entanglement bounds and could constrain allowed matter content in holographic models.
  • A phantom scalar that flips the sign of the kinetic term would push the Kasner exponents across the critical line and could destroy Ac, offering a sharp test of how far the construction can be stretched.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper adopts the Complex-valued Weak Extremal Surface (CWES) prescription as an exploratory holographic dual for time-like entanglement entropy (TEE) of a boundary time-like strip of width τ₀. For static planar asymptotically AdS black holes with a space-like singularity and no inner horizon, it shows analytically that the late-time growth rate of the real part of the CWES area is linear and is completely fixed by a critical interior surface A_c located at the global maximum of g(z) = −z^{2−2d}f(z)e^{-χ(z)}. Two independent derivations (asymptotic expansion of the area integrals and Hamilton–Jacobi) both yield lim_{τ₀ o∞} dA/dτ₀ = √g(z_c). Existence of A_c is guaranteed by the null energy condition together with Kasner asymptotics near the singularity (central inequality p_t + (d−2)p_s ≥ 0 and a finite buffer zone against mild NEC violations). The real-part upper bound is imported from the algebraically identical Hartman–Maldacena critical surface under the dominant energy condition; a corresponding vacuum lower bound for the imaginary part is conjectured and supported by numerical Einstein-scalar hairy black holes in fixed-horizon, fixed-temperature and (scheme-independent) fixed-energy ensembles.

Significance. If the geometric statements hold under the CWES framework, the work supplies a clean, NEC-protected link between late-time TEE growth and black-hole interior geometry, together with a concrete Kasner-exponent criterion and a buffer zone that survives mild quantum corrections. The dual analytic derivations (asymptotic integral and Hamilton–Jacobi) and the explicit verification in Einstein-scalar gravity are strengths. The numerical restoration of vacuum extremality under a scheme-independent energy definition is a useful cross-check. The main limitation is that the results are statements about a particular bulk construction rather than a definitive boundary dual; the paper is appropriately cautious on this point.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. 1 / Sec. 2.3] The entire geometric identification of the growth rate with A_c (Secs. 2.3–2.4, Eqs. (2.23), (2.28), (2.32)) rests on the CWES prescription. The paper correctly labels CWES as an exploratory framework (abstract, Sec. 1) and does not claim it is the definitive dictionary. For the central claim to be of interest beyond a bulk construction, a short discussion of how the same late-time linear growth (or its absence) would appear under at least one alternative TEE proposal (e.g., modular-flow or complex-extremal-surface constructions cited in the introduction) would substantially strengthen the paper. Without that, the result remains conditional on CWES.
  2. [Sec. 3 / Sec. 4] The imaginary-part lower bound is stated as a conjecture and is supported only by numerical Einstein-scalar solutions with m^{2} = −2 (Sec. 3). Because this mass locally violates the DEC inside the horizon, the numerical evidence is interesting but does not yet establish a general geometric or energy-condition origin for the bound. A clearer statement of the minimal assumptions under which the vacuum is expected to minimize Im A (or an explicit counter-example search with a phantom scalar) would make the conjecture more falsifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 6] Fig. 6 caption and surrounding text: the phrase “Physical Region: p_t + (d−2)p_s ≤ 0” appears to reverse the inequality relative to the central condition (2.32). Please correct the figure label for consistency.
  2. [Sec. 2.2.2] Eq. (2.16) and the subsequent discussion: it would help the reader to state explicitly that the imaginary part is independent of both τ₀ and H_* already at the level of the induced metric, before the late-time analysis.
  3. [Appendix A / Sec. 2.1] Appendix A: the three alternative boundary configurations are useful; a one-sentence pointer in the main text (near Fig. 2) that the growth rate studied is specifically the symmetric-expansion case would avoid possible confusion with the TFD or rigid-translation setups.
  4. [Abstract / Sec. 1] Typographical: “space-like singularity and no inner horizon” is repeated almost verbatim in the abstract and introduction; a slight rephrasing would improve flow.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: late-time growth rate and Ac existence are derived from NEC + Kasner asymptotics within the adopted CWES framework; self-citations supply the exploratory dictionary and an algebraically identical prior bound, not a forced reduction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.3 (after Eq. 2.28) and Ref. [12]]
    "Because their late-time growth rates are controlled by the exact same local interior geometric quantity √g(zc), the known HM growth-rate bound can be imported for the real part of the CWES-defined TEE under the same assumptions. Consequently, the dominant energy condition based upper bound established in Ref. [12] … also holds for the real part of the TEE."

    The upper bound on the real growth rate is not re-derived from first principles inside this paper; it is taken over from the authors’ own prior HM analysis (Ref. [12]) solely because the critical-surface equation g'(zc)=0 is algebraically identical. This is a mild self-citation load for one secondary claim, not for the primary existence or growth-rate derivation.

full rationale

The core derivation (Secs. 2.3–2.4) defines g(z) ≡ −z^{2−2d}f(z)e^{−χ(z)}, identifies H_{*,min}^4 = max g(z) at the critical surface where g'(zc)=0, then shows via asymptotic expansion of the area integrals (Eqs. 2.21–2.23) and independently via Hamilton–Jacobi (Eqs. 2.26–2.28) that lim τ0→∞ dA/dτ0 = √g(zc). Existence of Ac follows from lim z→∞ g(z)=0, obtained by mapping to Kasner exponents (Eq. 2.30), imposing the NEC on the z–xi and z–t planes (Eqs. 2.33–2.38), and verifying the inequality pt+(d−2)ps≥0 (Eq. 2.32) with a buffer zone (Fig. 6). These steps are self-contained once Kasner asymptotics and NEC are granted; they do not redefine the growth rate as √g(zc) by fiat, nor fit parameters to the target. The CWES prescription is explicitly adopted only as an “exploratory framework” (abstract, Sec. 1) with citations to prior work (including authors’ own), and the real-part DEC upper bound is imported from the algebraically identical HM critical-surface equation of Ref. [12] rather than re-derived circularly. The imaginary lower bound is stated as a conjecture and checked numerically. No fitted-input-as-prediction, self-definitional loop, or uniqueness theorem smuggled from the authors appears. Minor self-citation for the dictionary and the imported bound raises the score only to 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The load-bearing inputs are the CWES geometric prescription (adopted as exploratory), the assumption that the near-singularity metric is Kasner, and the null/dominant energy conditions. No free parameters are fitted; the critical surface Ac is derived rather than postulated. The scheme-independent energy definition of Ref. [60] is used to restore bounds but is not invented here.

axioms (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Complex-valued Weak Extremal Surface (CWES) prescription correctly computes holographic TEE via piece-wise space-like + time-like bulk segments.
    Explicitly adopted as an exploratory framework (abstract, Sec. 1); the paper states the definitive dictionary remains debated and does not claim CWES is preferred.
  • domain assumption Near a space-like singularity without inner horizon the metric asymptotes to Kasner form with exponents pt, ps related to metric scalings a, b.
    Stated in Sec. 2.4.1; the paper notes that some Einstein-Maxwell-scalar models with transcendental potentials do not yield Kasner and leaves those cases for future work.
  • domain assumption Null energy condition holds in the bulk (or is only mildly violated near the singularity).
    Used to prove lim g(z)=0 and hence existence of Ac (Sec. 2.4.1, Eqs. 2.33–2.38); a finite buffer zone is invoked to tolerate mild quantum violations.
  • domain assumption Dominant energy condition implies the vacuum upper bound on the real growth rate (imported from Hartman-Maldacena analysis).
    Invoked in Sec. 2.3 and Sec. 3; the governing equation g'(zc)=0 is algebraically identical to the HM critical surface.
invented entities (1)
  • Critical extremal surface Ac located at the global maximum of g(z)=−z^{2−2d}f(z)e^{−χ(z)} no independent evidence
    purpose: Governs the late-time linear growth rate of TEE; its existence is the central geometric claim.
    Derived from the requirement that the area functional remain real and that H* attain its minimum; not an independent postulate.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30680 in / 2947 out tokens · 26174 ms · 2026-07-14T17:39:28.247979+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The holographic time-like entanglement entropy (TEE) extends entanglement to time-like boundary subregions. While its definitive holographic dictionary remains debated, one concrete proposal utilizes piece-wise extremal surfaces. In this work, we adopt this geometric prescription as an exploratory framework to holographically investigate the late-time ($\tau_0\to \infty$) growth of TEE in asymptotically AdS black holes with a space-like singularity and no inner horizon. By assuming a Kasner geometry near the space-like singularity and using the null energy condition, we analytically show that a critical extremal surface $\mathcal{A}_c$ inside the event horizon completely governs the late-time linear growth of the TEE. This result suggests that the late-time behavior of TEE is tightly constrained by the geometry of black hole interiors. While the dominant energy condition (DEC) guarantees an upper bound for the real part's growth rate, we conjecture a corresponding universal lower bound for the imaginary part. Numerical results from Einstein-scalar theory demonstrate the robustness of this bounding behavior: the vacuum Schwarzschild-AdS geometry consistently maximizes the real growth rate and minimizes the imaginary part, suggesting these bounds hold in broader holographic setups.

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Holographic Timelike Entanglement and Subregion Complexity in Localized AdS3*S3*T4 Black Holes

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Timelike entanglement and subregion complexity detect the cap–horizon transition of localized AdS3×S3×T4 black poles via fixed-boundary-interval Lorentzian branch selection, effects absent in BTZ and large-r limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 66 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    J.M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind,Cool horizons for entangled black holes,Fortsch. Phys.61 (2013) 781 [1306.0533]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 2323 [1005.3035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062 [0705.0016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech.0504(2005) P04010 [cond-mat/0503393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Ho and D.A

    W.W. Ho and D.A. Abanin,Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems,Phys. Rev. B95(2017) 094302 [1508.03784]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Hartman and J

    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena,Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,JHEP05(2013) 014 [1303.1080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Li and R.-Q

    Z. Li and R.-Q. Yang,Upper bounds of holographic entanglement entropy growth rate for thermofield double states,JHEP10(2022) 072 [2205.15154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Olson and T.C

    S.J. Olson and T.C. Ralph,Extraction of timelike entanglement from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. A85(2012) 012306 [1101.2565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang,Fix the dual geometries ofT¯Tdeformed CFT 2 and highly excited states of CFT2,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1117 [1811.07758]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031601 [2210.09457]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Jiang and H

    X. Jiang and H. Yang,Timelike entanglement entropy revisited,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106021 [2503.19342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Milekhin, Z

    A. Milekhin, Z. Adamska and J. Preskill,Observable and computable entanglement in time, 2502.12240

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Gong, W.-z

    X. Gong, W.-z. Guo and J. Xu,Entanglement measures for causally connected subregions and holography,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106009 [2508.05158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and T. Liu,Entanglement of General Subregions in Time-Dependent States,2512.19955

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and Y.-X. Zhang,Relation between time- and spacelike entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 086020 [2402.00268]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Xu and W.-z

    J. Xu and W.-z. Guo,Imaginary part of timelike entanglement entropy,JHEP02(2025) 094 [2410.22684]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Harper, T

    J. Harper, T. Kawamoto, R. Maeda, N. Nakamura and T. Takayanagi,Non-Hermitian density matrices from timelike entanglement and wormholes,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 126017 [2512.13800]

    arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar,Time-like entanglement entropy in AdS/BCFT,JHEP06(2023) 173 [2304.10907]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar,Timelike entanglement entropy with gravitational anomalies, JHEP08(2025) 038 [2504.19694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Timelike entanglement entropy: A top-down approach, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 026030 [2505.20388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic timelike entanglement across dimensions, JHEP11(2025) 100 [2508.13266]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    He and H.-Q

    P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang,Holographic timelike entanglement entropy from Rindler method*, Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 115113 [2307.09803]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong,Timelike and gravitational anomalous entanglement from the inner horizon,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 204 [2412.21058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Afrasiar, J.K

    M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak and D. Giataganas,Timelike entanglement entropy and phase transitions in non-conformal theories,JHEP07(2024) 243 [2404.01393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Afrasiar, J.K

    M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak and D. Giataganas,Holographic timelike entanglement entropy in non-relativistic theories,JHEP05(2025) 205 [2411.18514]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Afrasiar, J.K

    M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak and K.-Y. Kim,Aspects of holographic timelike entanglement entropy in black hole backgrounds,2512.21327

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    Prihadi, M.A.R

    H.L. Prihadi, M.A.R. Al-Faritsi, R.R. Firdaus, F. Khairunnisa, Y.P. Sarwono and F.P. Zen, Holographic timelike entanglement and subregion complexity with scalar hair,JHEP04 (2026) 174 [2601.18310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Heller, F

    M.P. Heller, F. Ori and A. Serantes,Geometric Interpretation of Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 131601 [2408.15752]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Guo and J

    W.-z. Guo and J. Xu,Duality of Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces inside and outside the horizon, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L101901 [2502.16774]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Heller, F

    M.P. Heller, F. Ori and A. Serantes,Temporal Entanglement from Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. X15(2025) 041022 [2507.17847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Narayan,de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement,Phys

    K. Narayan,de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 126004 [2210.12963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Narayan,Further remarks on de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys

    K. Narayan,Further remarks on de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 086009 [2310.00320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Narayan and H.K

    K. Narayan and H.K. Saini,Notes on time entanglement and pseudo-entropy,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 499 [2303.01307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Takayanagi,Essay: Emergent Holographic Spacetime from Quantum Information,Phys

    T. Takayanagi,Essay: Emergent Holographic Spacetime from Quantum Information,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 240001 [2506.06595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Li, Z.-Q

    Z. Li, Z.-Q. Xiao and R.-Q. Yang,On holographic time-like entanglement entropy,JHEP04 (2023) 004 [2211.14883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Timelike entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2023) 052 [2302.11695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Bohra and A

    H. Bohra and A. Sivaramakrishnan,Composite AdS geodesics for CFT correlators and timelike entanglement entropy,2511.22168

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Li and R.-Q

    Z.-H. Li and R.-Q. Yang,Black Hole Interior and Time-like Entanglement Entropy, 2601.18319

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    B. Liu, H. Chen and B. Lian,Entanglement entropy of free fermions in timelike slices,Phys. Rev. B110(2024) 144306 [2210.03134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and Y.-X. Zhang,On the real-time evolution of pseudo-entropy in 2d CFTs,JHEP09(2022) 094 [2206.11818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Omidi,Pseudo Rényi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,2309.04112

    F. Omidi,Pseudo Rényi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,2309.04112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    He, Y.-X

    S. He, Y.-X. Zhang, L. Zhao and Z.-X. Zhao,Entanglement and pseudo entanglement dynamics versus fusion in CFT,JHEP06(2024) 177 [2312.02679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Mukherjee,Pseudo Entropy in U(1) gauge theory,JHEP10(2022) 016 [2205.08179]

    J. Mukherjee,Pseudo Entropy in U(1) gauge theory,JHEP10(2022) 016 [2205.08179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Katoch, D

    G. Katoch, D. Sarkar and B. Sen,Holographic timelike entanglement in AdS3 Vaidya,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 046026 [2504.14313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Katoch, D

    G. Katoch, D. Sarkar and B. Sen,Entanglement inequalities for timelike intervals within dynamical holography,2604.11158. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Carmi, S

    D. Carmi, S. Chapman, H. Marrochio, R.C. Myers and S. Sugishita,On the Time Dependence of Holographic Complexity,JHEP11(2017) 188 [1709.10184]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Yang,Upper bound on cross sections inside black holes and complexity growth rate, Phys

    R.-Q. Yang,Upper bound on cross sections inside black holes and complexity growth rate, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 106001 [1911.12561]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Y.-S. An, L. Li, F.-G. Yang and R.-Q. Yang,Interior structure and complexity growth rate of holographic superconductor from M-theory,JHEP08(2022) 133 [2205.02442]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Auzzi, S

    R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, E. Rabinovici, F.I. Schaposnik Massolo and G. Tallarita,On the time dependence of holographic complexity for charged AdS black holes with scalar hair,JHEP08 (2022) 235 [2205.03365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    S. Paul, G. Guin and S. Gangopadhyay,Holographic entanglement entropy and complexity for the cosmological braneworld model,JHEP08(2025) 164 [2505.11553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Freedman, S.S

    D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 363 [hep-th/9904017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    Myers and A

    R.C. Myers and A. Sinha,Seeing a c-theorem with holography,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 046006 [1006.1263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Headrick and T

    M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi,A Holographic proof of the strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 106013 [0704.3719]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    Wall,Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Class

    A.C. Wall,Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 225007 [1211.3494]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Li, H.-S

    Z. Li, H.-S. Liu, Z.-Q. Xiao and R.-Q. Yang,Quantization-scheme-Independent Energy and Its Implications for Holographic Bounds,2601.07607

    arXiv

  61. [61]

    Belinski and I.M

    V.A. Belinski and I.M. Khalatnikov,Effect of Scalar and Vector Fields on the Nature of the Cosmological Singularity,Sov. Phys. JETP36(1973) 591

    1973

  62. [62]

    Kasner,Geometrical theorems on Einstein’s cosmological equations,Am

    E. Kasner,Geometrical theorems on Einstein’s cosmological equations,Am. J. Math.43 (1921) 217

    1921

  63. [63]

    R.-G. Cai, L. Li and R.-Q. Yang,No Inner-Horizon Theorem for Black Holes with Charged Scalar Hairs,JHEP03(2021) 263 [2009.05520]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Hartnoll, G.T

    S.A. Hartnoll, G.T. Horowitz, J. Kruthoff and J.E. Santos,Diving into a holographic superconductor,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 009 [2008.12786]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Zhang, X

    X.-K. Zhang, X. Zhao, Z.-Y. Nie, Y.-P. Hu and Y.-S. An,Interior structure of the holographic s+p superconductor and chaotic-stable transition near the black hole singularity, Phys. Lett. B872(2026) 140110 [2506.19419]

    arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Zhao, Z.-Y

    Z.-Q. Zhao, Z.-Y. Nie, X.-K. Zhang, Y.-S. An, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Interior structure of black holes with nonlinear terms,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 447 [2512.24893]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Zhao, Z.-Y

    Z.-Q. Zhao, Z.-Y. Nie, S.-W. Wei, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Interior geometry of black holes as a probe of first-order phase transition,2604.01818

    arXiv

  68. [68]

    Z.-X. Zhao, L. Zhao and S. He,Timelike entanglement entropy in higher curvature gravity, JHEP12(2025) 156 [2509.04181]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Grandi and I

    N. Grandi and I. Salazar Landea,Diving inside a hairy black hole,JHEP05(2021) 152 [2102.02707]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    S. Paul, A. Roy Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Information theoretic measures for Lifshitz system,JHEP10(2024) 033 [2408.03670]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Li,On Thermodynamics of AdS Black Holes with Scalar Hair,Phys

    L. Li,On Thermodynamics of AdS Black Holes with Scalar Hair,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136123 [2008.05597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  73. [73]

    Narayan, H.K

    K. Narayan, H.K. Saini and G. Yadav,Cosmological singularities, holographic complexity and entanglement,JHEP07(2024) 125 [2404.00761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Lloyd,Ultimate physical limits to computation,Nature406(2000) 1047 [quant-ph/9908043]

    S. Lloyd,Ultimate physical limits to computation,Nature406(2000) 1047 [quant-ph/9908043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  75. [75]

    Brown, D.A

    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao,Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 191301 [1509.07876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Brown, D.A

    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao,Complexity, action, and black holes,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 086006 [1512.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Lehner, R.C

    L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin,Gravitational action with null boundaries,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084046 [1609.00207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Cai, S.-M

    R.-G. Cai, S.-M. Ruan, S.-J. Wang, R.-Q. Yang and R.-H. Peng,Action growth for AdS black holes,JHEP09(2016) 161 [1606.08307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Yang,Strong energy condition and complexity growth bound in holography,Phys

    R.-Q. Yang,Strong energy condition and complexity growth bound in holography,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 086017 [1610.05090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Alishahiha,Timelike Holographic Complexity,2510.25700

    M. Alishahiha,Timelike Holographic Complexity,2510.25700

    arXiv

Showing first 80 references.