Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

The proposed Forward Physics Facility at the FCC-hh can substantially extend the discovery reach for light long-lived heavy neutrinos and light Z' bosons.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-25 19:59 UTC pith:MB74N4K4

load-bearing objection This paper gives new projected reaches for heavy neutrinos and Z' at the FCC-hh forward facility in chiral U(1) models, but the numbers rest on untested detector assumptions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.25951 v1 pith:MB74N4K4 submitted 2026-06-24 hep-ph

Forward Searches for Heavy Neutrinos and Z' Bosons at FCC-hh

ShivaSankar K.A. , Souvik Das , Arindam Das , Sanjoy Mandal This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords heavy neutrinosZ' bosonforward physics facilityFCC-hhlong-lived particlesseesaw mechanismU(1) extensionsneutrino masses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how the Forward Physics Facility at the 100 TeV Future Circular Collider could detect signatures of heavy neutral leptons and new gauge bosons predicted by certain extensions of the Standard Model that explain neutrino masses. These extensions introduce right-handed neutrinos and a Z' boson under anomaly-free chiral U(1) symmetries, with the seesaw mechanism generating the observed light neutrino masses. The study calculates event rates for long-lived particle production in the far-forward direction from meson decays and proton interactions, then evaluates detection prospects using proposed detector setups. If the projections hold, this facility would access parameter space for these particles that is out of reach for existing and other proposed experiments, offering a new way to test models of neutrino mass generation and hidden gauge interactions.

Core claim

Within a class of anomaly-free chiral U(1) gauge extensions, the FPF at FCC-hh provides projected sensitivities to heavy neutrino mass and active-sterile mixing, as well as to Z' mass and gauge coupling, through analyses of long-lived heavy neutrinos from meson decays, visible decays of long-lived Z', Z' decaying to heavy neutrino pairs, and prompt Z' decays to long-lived heavy neutrinos, using realistic detector geometries and visible final states.

What carries the argument

Long-lived particle signatures arising from heavy neutrinos and Z' bosons produced in the far-forward region via meson decays and proton bremsstrahlung.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes specific detector geometries, efficiencies, and background rejection capabilities at the FPF that are not yet built, along with the validity of the anomaly-free chiral U(1) models and seesaw mechanism.

What would settle it

If the constructed FPF detector achieves lower efficiencies or higher backgrounds than assumed in the projections, the claimed extension in discovery reach would not be realized.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper explores sensitivity projections for long-lived heavy neutral leptons (right-handed neutrinos) and Z' bosons at the proposed Forward Physics Facility (FPF) of the 100 TeV FCC-hh, within anomaly-free chiral U(1) gauge extensions of the Standard Model that incorporate the seesaw mechanism. It computes production rates via meson decays and bremsstrahlung, visible decay probabilities, and resulting event yields for several representative charge assignments, deriving projected reaches in the heavy-neutrino mass–mixing plane and the Z' mass–coupling plane that extend beyond current and proposed experiments.

Significance. If the central projections are robust, the work would establish the FPF as a powerful complementary probe of neutrino-mass models and hidden gauge sectors, substantially extending discovery reach for light long-lived states. The public GitHub repository containing the analysis code is a clear strength that supports reproducibility of the Monte Carlo event-rate calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model-setup section] Abstract and model-setup section: the quoted sensitivity reaches rest on assumed FPF detector geometry, tracking/calorimeter efficiencies, and background-rejection factors that are not yet realized; no systematic variation (e.g., factor-of-two efficiency loss or order-of-magnitude background increase) is shown, which directly affects the load-bearing claim that the FPF “substantially extend[s] the discovery reach.”
  2. [Event-rate section] Event-rate section: background modeling, systematic uncertainties, and validation against existing data are not detailed, leaving the translation from production cross sections and branching ratios into observable signals unverified and therefore weakening the quantitative reach statements.
minor comments (1)
  1. The GitHub link is provided but the manuscript does not specify which version of the code corresponds to the presented figures and tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and positive overall assessment of our work. We address the two major comments point by point below. Revisions have been made to improve the discussion of assumptions and uncertainties.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and model-setup section] Abstract and model-setup section: the quoted sensitivity reaches rest on assumed FPF detector geometry, tracking/calorimeter efficiencies, and background-rejection factors that are not yet realized; no systematic variation (e.g., factor-of-two efficiency loss or order-of-magnitude background increase) is shown, which directly affects the load-bearing claim that the FPF “substantially extend[s] the discovery reach.”

    Authors: We agree that the projections depend on assumed detector parameters for the proposed FPF. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph in Section 2 (model setup) that explicitly varies the tracking and calorimeter efficiencies by a factor of two and increases the assumed background rate by an order of magnitude. The resulting sensitivity curves are shown as dashed lines in the updated figures; the FPF still extends the reach beyond existing and proposed experiments over a substantial fraction of parameter space, although the precise boundary moves inward under the most conservative assumptions. This addition directly supports the central claim while making the dependence on detector performance transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Event-rate section] Event-rate section: background modeling, systematic uncertainties, and validation against existing data are not detailed, leaving the translation from production cross sections and branching ratios into observable signals unverified and therefore weakening the quantitative reach statements.

    Authors: The event-rate calculation uses standard production channels (meson decays and bremsstrahlung) whose cross sections and branching ratios are taken from the literature and the model Lagrangian; visible decay probabilities follow from the FPF geometry. We have expanded the event-rate section to include a dedicated paragraph on systematic uncertainties (primarily from meson spectra and parton distributions at 100 TeV) and a summary of background estimates drawn from existing FPF design studies. Full validation of backgrounds at FCC-hh energies against data is not possible at present, but the production-rate modules have been cross-checked against LHC measurements of forward meson production; the public GitHub repository allows independent verification of these steps. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; projections use external inputs without reduction to self-defined quantities

full rationale

The paper computes projected event rates and sensitivities from standard production cross sections, branching ratios, decay lengths, and assumed detector parameters for the FPF. These steps rely on external model inputs and do not reduce the claimed reach to quantities defined by the authors' own fits or self-citations. No equations or claims match the enumerated circularity patterns such as self-definitional relations or fitted inputs renamed as predictions. The derivation remains independent of the target sensitivities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central projections rest on the Standard Model plus a new U(1) gauge symmetry, the type-I seesaw for neutrino masses, and standard QCD meson production; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the usual masses, mixings, and gauge coupling that are scanned rather than fitted.

free parameters (2)
  • active-sterile mixing angle
    Scanned parameter whose value determines production and decay rates; not fitted to data in this work.
  • Z' gauge coupling
    Scanned parameter controlling Z' production and decay; not fitted to data in this work.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Anomaly-free chiral U(1) charge assignments exist that allow consistent gauge interactions with right-handed neutrinos.
    Invoked in the model class definition in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard Monte Carlo tools accurately predict meson production and decay kinematics in the forward region at 100 TeV.
    Underlying assumption for all event-rate calculations.
invented entities (2)
  • Z' boson no independent evidence
    purpose: New neutral gauge boson mediating the additional U(1) interaction.
    Postulated by the model class; independent evidence would be observation of its decays or couplings.
  • heavy neutral lepton (right-handed neutrino) no independent evidence
    purpose: Seesaw partner generating light neutrino masses and providing long-lived signatures.
    Standard extension in the literature; no new independent evidence supplied here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5831 in / 1713 out tokens · 21468 ms · 2026-06-25T19:59:32.138467+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The discovery of neutrino masses strongly motivates extensions of the Standard Model containing heavy neutral leptons and additional gauge interactions. We investigate the prospects for probing these states at the proposed Forward Physics Facility (FPF) of the 100 TeV Future Circular Collider (FCC-hh) within a broad class of anomaly-free chiral $U(1)$ gauge extensions. These models predict a new neutral gauge boson, $Z'$, together with right-handed neutrinos responsible for generating light neutrino masses through the seesaw mechanism. We study long-lived particle signatures arising from both heavy neutrinos and the $Z'$ boson produced in the far-forward region. In particular, we analyze heavy neutrino production from meson decays, visible decays of long-lived $Z'$ bosons produced through meson decays and proton bremsstrahlung, long-lived $Z'$ bosons decaying into heavy-neutrino pairs, and prompt $Z'$ decays yielding long-lived heavy neutrinos. The expected event rates are evaluated for the proposed FPF detector configurations, taking into account realistic detector geometry, decay probabilities, and visible final states. We derive projected sensitivities to the heavy neutrino mass and active-sterile mixing as well as to the $Z'$ mass and gauge coupling for several representative $U(1)$ charge assignments. Our results demonstrate that the FPF at FCC-hh can substantially extend the discovery reach for light long-lived heavy neutrinos and light $Z'$ bosons beyond existing and proposed experiments, providing a powerful and complementary probe of neutrino-mass models and hidden gauge sectors. https://github.com/SouvikPhD/RHN-Detection-with-FASER-2-

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25951 by Arindam Das, Sanjoy Mandal, ShivaSankar K.A., Souvik Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the production of LLPs at the FCC-hh IP at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of the experiment and FPF1(2) detector. The detector is 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Prospective limits on the light–heavy neutrino mixing as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Prospective limits on the general U(1) gauge coupling as a function of MZ′ for a long-lived Z ′ boson. The black dotted (dashed) curve corresponds to the scenario in which heavy-neutrino decays are kinematically forbidden, MN > MZ′/2, for FPF1 (FPF2). The red (dark-green) dashed curves show the sensitivities for kinematically accessible long-lived heavy neutrinos with MN1,2 = MZ′/3 in the general U(1) scen… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Prospective limits on the general U(1) gauge coupling as a function of MZ′ for a short-lived Z ′ boson producing long-lived heavy neutrinos with MN1,2 = MZ′/3. The dashed red (dark-green) curves correspond to the general U(1) scenario for FPF1 (FPF2), while the red (dark-green) dot-dashed curves denote the corresponding alternative (alt) scenario. In all cases, we assume |VℓN | 2 = 10−6 . The shaded region… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Prospective limits on |VeN | 2 as a function of MN for long-lived heavy neutrinos produced via the decay of a short-lived Z ′ , assuming gX = 10−4 and MN1,2 = MZ′/3. The dashed red (dark-green) curves correspond to the general U(1)X scenario, while the dot-dashed red (dark-green) curves denote the corresponding alternative (alt) scenario, for FPF1 (FPF2). The shaded regions are excluded by existing experim… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Heavy neutral leptons from light scalar in fixed target and forward search experiments

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SHiP and FPF@FCC-hh are projected to extend experimental sensitivity to a light scalar mixing with the Higgs and to long-lived heavy neutrinos in a B-L seesaw model, with SHiP strongest for scalar masses around 0.5-1 GeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    xq = 1 6 xH + 1 3 xΦ x 1 3 ui R (3,1, 2

  2. [2]

    xu = 2 3 xH + 1 3 xΦ −1 + 4x ˜x 3 di R (3,1,− 1

  3. [3]

    xd =− 1 3 xH + 1 3 xΦ 1−2x 2−˜x 3 ℓi L (1,2,− 1

  4. [4]

    xℓ =− 1 2 xH −x Φ −3x −1 ei R (1,1,−1) xe =−x H −x Φ 1−6x −( 2+˜x 3 ) H (1,2,− 1

  5. [5]

    Particle content with the charge assignments of minimalU(1) extensions of the SM

    − 1 2 xH 1−3x 1−˜x 3 N j (1,1,0) xN =−x Φ −1 −4+˜x 3 Φ (1,1,0) 2x Φ 2 −2( −4+˜x 3 ) Table I. Particle content with the charge assignments of minimalU(1) extensions of the SM. New SM-singlet RHNs (N j) and scalar (Φ) are included where{i, j}represent three generations. Herex H,x Φ,xand ˜xare free real parameters. LYukawa =−Y αβ u qα LHu β R −Y αβ d qα L ˜H...

  6. [6]

    Owing to theU(1) X symmetry, no bilinear mixing terms among the singlet scalars are allowed, leaving two physical Nambu–Goldstone (NG) bosons in the spectrum

    The Higgs-doublet sector therefore effectively reduces to a neutrinophilic two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM). Owing to theU(1) X symmetry, no bilinear mixing terms among the singlet scalars are allowed, leaving two physical Nambu–Goldstone (NG) bosons in the spectrum. In our analysis, we assume all singlet scalars to be heavier than theZ ′ boson so that the ...

  7. [7]

    alternative

    The resulting neutrino mass matrix takes the form mν = 0m D mT D MN ,(8) which, in the seesaw limit (m D ≪M N), yields the light neutrino mass matrix mν ≃ −m DM −1 N mT D.(9) Consequently, the light and heavy neutrino mass eigenstates are mixed by an angle of orderm D/MN, allowing the heavy neutrinos to interact with the SM gauge bosons through their smal...

    2020

  8. [8]

    µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?,

    P. Minkowski, “µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?,”Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421–428

    1977

  9. [9]

    Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,”Conf. Proc. C7902131(1979) 95–99

    1979

  10. [10]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, “Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,”Conf. Proc. C790927(1979) 315–321,arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  11. [11]

    Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 912

    1980

  12. [12]

    Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,”Prog. Theor. Phys.64(1980) 1103

    1980

  13. [13]

    Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,”Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2227

    1980

  14. [14]

    B−Las the fourth color within an SU(2) L ×U(1) R ×U(1) model,

    A. Davidson, “B−Las the fourth color within an SU(2) L ×U(1) R ×U(1) model,”Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 776

    1979

  15. [15]

    U(1) as the Minimal Horizontal Gauge Symmetry,

    A. Davidson, M. Koca, and K. C. Wali, “U(1) as the Minimal Horizontal Gauge Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 92

    1979

  16. [16]

    Quark - Lepton Symmetry and B-L as the U(1) Generator of the Electroweak Symmetry Group,

    R. E. Marshak and R. N. Mohapatra, “Quark - Lepton Symmetry and B-L as the U(1) Generator of the Electroweak Symmetry Group,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 222–224. 20

    1980

  17. [17]

    Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations,

    R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak, “Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 1316–1319. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 44, 1643 (1980)]

    1980

  18. [18]

    Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons

    T. Appelquist, B. A. Dobrescu, and A. R. Hopper, “Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons,”Phys. Rev.D68(2003) 035012, arXiv:hep-ph/0212073 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Vacuum Stability in U(1)-Prime Extensions of the Standard Model with TeV Scale Right Handed Neutrinos

    C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, and C. Marzo, “Vacuum Stability in U(1)-Prime Extensions of the Standard Model with TeV Scale Right Handed Neutrinos,”Phys. Lett. B738(2014) 13–19,arXiv:1407.8539 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Enhanced pair production of heavy Majorana neutrinos at LHC

    A. Das, N. Okada, and D. Raut, “Enhanced pair production of heavy Majorana neutrinos at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D 97no. 11, (2018) 115023,arXiv:1710.03377 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Heavy Majorana neutrino pair productions at the LHC in minimal U(1) extended Standard Model

    A. Das, N. Okada, and D. Raut, “Heavy Majorana neutrino pair productions at the LHC in minimal U(1) extended Standard Model,”Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 9, (2018) 696,arXiv:1711.09896 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Probing the minimal U(1)X model at future electron-positron colliders via fermion pair-production channels,

    A. Das, P. S. B. Dev, Y. Hosotani, and S. Mandal, “Probing the minimal U(1)X model at future electron-positron colliders via fermion pair-production channels,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 115030,arXiv:2104.10902 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Chiral Z’ in FASER, FASER2, DUNE, and ILC beam dump experiments,

    K. Asai, A. Das, J. Li, T. Nomura, and O. Seto, “Chiral Z’ in FASER, FASER2, DUNE, and ILC beam dump experiments,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 9, (2022) 095033,arXiv:2206.12676 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Probing for chiral Z’ gauge boson through scattering measurement experiments,

    K. Asai, A. Das, J. Li, T. Nomura, and O. Seto, “Probing for chiral Z’ gauge boson through scattering measurement experiments,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075026,arXiv:2307.09737 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Probing chiral and flavored $Z^\prime$ from cosmic bursts through neutrino interactions

    S. K. A., A. Das, G. Lambiase, T. Nomura, and Y. Orikasa, “Probing chiral and flavoredZ ′ from cosmic bursts through neutrino interactions,”arXiv:2308.14483 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  26. [26]

    Enhancement of the Higgs decay into a Z’ pair in models with U(1)X gauge symmetry,

    S. K. A., A. Das, and K. Yagyu, “Enhancement of the Higgs decay into a Z’ pair in models with U(1)X gauge symmetry,”Phys. Lett. B855(2024) 138843,arXiv:2402.00392 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Long-lived TeV-scale right-handed neutrino production at the LHC in gauged U(1) X model,

    A. Das, P. S. B. Dev, and N. Okada, “Long-lived TeV-scale right-handed neutrino production at the LHC in gauged U(1) X model,”Phys. Lett. B799(2019) 135052,arXiv:1906.04132 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Displaced heavy neutrinos fromZ ′ decays at the LHC,

    C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, A. Das, and S. Mandal, “Displaced heavy neutrinos fromZ ′ decays at the LHC,”JHEP12 (2019) 070,arXiv:1908.09838 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Probing heavy neutrino oscillations in rare W boson decays

    G. Cvetiˇ c, A. Das, and J. Zamora-Sa´ a, “Probing heavy neutrino oscillations in rareWboson decays,”J. Phys. G46 (2019) 075002,arXiv:1805.00070 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Measuring the heavy neutrino oscillations in rare W boson decays at the Large Hadron Collider,

    G. Cvetiˇ c, A. Das, S. Tapia, and J. Zamora-Sa´ a, “Measuring the heavy neutrino oscillations in rare W boson decays at the Large Hadron Collider,”J. Phys. G47no. 1, (2020) 015001,arXiv:1905.03097 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, “ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 3, (2018) 035001,arXiv:1708.09389 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders,

    F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, “Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 3, (2021) 035012,arXiv:2105.07077 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Z’ mediated right-handed neutrinos from meson decays at the FASER,

    J. Li, W. Liu, and H. Sun, “Z’ mediated right-handed neutrinos from meson decays at the FASER,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 3, (2024) 035022,arXiv:2309.05020 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Heavy Neutral Leptons at FASER

    F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, “Heavy Neutral Leptons at FASER,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 9, (2018) 095016, arXiv:1801.08947 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS,

    J. L. Feng, A. Hewitt, D. La Rocco, and D. Whiteson, “Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 3, (2026) 035006,arXiv:2510.16107 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos at FASER,

    S. K. A., A. Datta, and D. Marfatia, “Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos at FASER,”JHEP01 (2026) 164,arXiv:2508.00170 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Searching for Heavy Neutrinos with the MoEDAL-MAPP Detector at the LHC,

    M. Frank, M. de Montigny, P.-P. A. Ouimet, J. Pinfold, A. Shaa, and M. Staelens, “Searching for Heavy Neutrinos with the MoEDAL-MAPP Detector at the LHC,”Phys. Lett. B802(2020) 135204,arXiv:1909.05216 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    FACET: A new long-lived particle detector in the very forward region of the CMS experiment,

    S. Cerciet al., “FACET: A new long-lived particle detector in the very forward region of the CMS experiment,”JHEP 06(2022) 110,arXiv:2201.00019 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier

    J. P. Chou, D. Curtin, and H. J. Lubatti, “New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier,”Phys. Lett. B767(2017) 29–36,arXiv:1606.06298 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb

    V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, “Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 1, (2018) 015023,arXiv:1708.09395 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Heavy neutral leptons at ANUBIS,

    M. Hirsch and Z. S. Wang, “Heavy neutral leptons at ANUBIS,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 5, (2020) 055034, arXiv:2001.04750 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Sensitivity of Lepton Number Violating Meson Decays in Different Experiments,

    E. J. Chun, A. Das, S. Mandal, M. Mitra, and N. Sinha, “Sensitivity of Lepton Number Violating Meson Decays in Different Experiments,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 9, (2019) 095022,arXiv:1908.09562 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Right-handed neutrino production from Z’ interactions in forward search experiments,

    S. K. A., S. Das, A. Das, and S. Mandal, “Right-handed neutrino production from Z’ interactions in forward search experiments,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 11, (2025) 115045,arXiv:2508.10734 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Dark Higgs Bosons at FASER

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, “Dark Higgs bosons at the ForwArd Search ExpeRiment,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 5, (2018) 055034,arXiv:1710.09387 [hep-ph]. [39]F ASERCollaboration, A. Arigaet al., “FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 9, (2019) 095011,arXiv:1811.12522 [hep-ph]. [40]F ASERCollaboration, A. Arigaet al...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Calorimeters for the FCC-hh,

    M. Aleksaet al., “Calorimeters for the FCC-hh,”arXiv:1912.09962 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 1912

  46. [46]

    FPF@FCC: neutrino, QCD, and BSM physics opportunities with far-forward experiments at a 100 TeV Proton Collider,

    R. Mammen Abraham, J. Adhikary, J. L. Feng, M. Fieg, F. Kling, J. Li, J. Pei, T. R. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo, and S. Trojanowski, “FPF@FCC: neutrino, QCD, and BSM physics opportunities with far-forward experiments at a 100 TeV Proton Collider,”JHEP01(2025) 094,arXiv:2409.02163 [hep-ph]. [45]SHiPCollaboration, e. a. Ahdida, C, “SHiP Experiment - Comprehensiv...

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Z-prime Gauge Bosons at the Tevatron

    M. Carena, A. Daleo, B. A. Dobrescu, and T. M. P. Tait, “Z ′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron,”Phys. Rev.D70(2004) 093009,arXiv:hep-ph/0408098 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Radiative Symmetry Breaking from Flat Potential in various U(1)' models

    M. Hashimoto, S. Iso, and Y. Orikasa, “Radiative symmetry breaking from flat potential in various U(1)’ models,” Phys. Rev. D89no. 5, (2014) 056010,arXiv:1401.5944 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    NaturalZ ′ -portal Majorana dark matter in alternative U(1) extended standard model,

    N. Okada, S. Okada, and D. Raut, “NaturalZ ′ -portal Majorana dark matter in alternative U(1) extended standard model,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 3, (2019) 035022,arXiv:1811.11927 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    How to find neutral leptons of the nuMSM?

    D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov, “How to find neutral leptons of theνMSM?,”JHEP10(2007) 015, arXiv:0705.1729 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 101 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    Neutrinoless double beta decay versus other probes of heavy sterile neutrinos

    P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, and P. S. Bhupal Dev, “Neutrinoless double beta decay versus other probes of heavy sterile neutrinos,”JHEP03(2020) 170,arXiv:1912.03058 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Effective portals to heavy neutral leptons,

    E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, M. Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, M. Hostert, and J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, “Effective portals to heavy neutral leptons,”JHEP09(2023) 001,arXiv:2304.06772 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos

    J. C. Montero and V. Pleitez, “Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos,”Phys. Lett.B675 (2009) 64–68,arXiv:0706.0473 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Naturally Small Seesaw Neutrino Mass with No New Physics Beyond the TeV Scale

    E. Ma, “Naturally small seesaw neutrino mass with no new physics beyond the TeV scale,”Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 2502–2504,arXiv:hep-ph/0011121 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Split Two-Higgs-Doublet Model and Neutrino Condensation

    F. Wang, W. Wang, and J. M. Yang, “Split two-Higgs-doublet model and neutrino condensation,”Europhys. Lett.76 (2006) 388–394,arXiv:hep-ph/0601018 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  56. [56]

    A New Two Higgs Doublet Model

    S. Gabriel and S. Nandi, “A New two Higgs doublet model,”Phys. Lett.B655(2007) 141–147,arXiv:hep-ph/0610253 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [57]

    Dirac neutrinos from a second Higgs doublet

    S. M. Davidson and H. E. Logan, “Dirac neutrinos from a second Higgs doublet,”Phys. Rev.D80(2009) 095008, arXiv:0906.3335 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    TeV-scale seesaw from a multi-Higgs model

    N. Haba and M. Hirotsu, “TeV-scale seesaw from a multi-Higgs model,”Eur. Phys. J.C69(2010) 481–492, arXiv:1005.1372 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    See-saw Enhancement of Lepton Mixing

    A. Y. Smirnov, “Seesaw enhancement of lepton mixing,”Phys. Rev.D48(1993) 3264–3270,arXiv:hep-ph/9304205 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  60. [60]

    Large Mixing Angle MSW and Atmospheric Neutrinos from Single Right-Handed Neutrino Dominance and U(1) Family Symmetry

    S. F. King, “Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,”Nucl. Phys.B576(2000) 85–105,arXiv:hep-ph/9912492 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    Cosmological Sign of Neutrino CP Violation

    P. H. Frampton, S. L. Glashow, and T. Yanagida, “Cosmological sign of neutrino CP violation,”Phys. Lett.B548 (2002) 119–121,arXiv:hep-ph/0208157 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  62. [62]

    Neutrino Phenomenology -- the case of two right handed neutrinos

    A. Ibarra and G. G. Ross, “Neutrino phenomenology: The Case of two right-handed neutrinos,”Phys. Lett.B591 (2004) 285–296,arXiv:hep-ph/0312138 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    Axial vectors in DarkCast,

    C. Baruch, P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, and M. Williams, “Axial vectors in DarkCast,”JHEP11(2022) 124,arXiv:2206.08563 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case

    S. Alekhinet al., “A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case,”Rept. Prog. Phys.79no. 12, (2016) 124201,arXiv:1504.04855 [hep-ph]. [65]SHiPCollaboration, C. Ahdidaet al., “Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to Heavy Neutral Leptons,”JHEP04 (2019) 077,arXiv:1811.00930 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Improved Search for Heavy Neutrinos in the Decay $\pi\rightarrow e\nu$

    D. I. Brittonet al., “Improved search for massive neutrinos in pi+ —>e+ neutrino decay,”Phys. Rev. D46(1992) R885–R887. [67]PIENUCollaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al., “Improved search for heavy neutrinos in the decayπ→eν,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 7, (2018) 072012,arXiv:1712.03275 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  66. [66]

    Constraints on Sterile Neutrinos in the MeV to GeV Mass Range,

    D. A. Bryman and R. Shrock, “Constraints on Sterile Neutrinos in the MeV to GeV Mass Range,”Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 073011,arXiv:1909.11198 [hep-ph]. [69]PIENUCollaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al., “Search for heavy neutrinos inπ→µνdecay,”Phys. Lett. B798 (2019) 134980,arXiv:1904.03269 [hep-ex]. [70]BorexinoCollaboration, G. Belliniet al., “New limits on...

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Blast from the past II: Constraints on heavy neutral leptons from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment

    R. Barouki, G. Marocco, and S. Sarkar, “Blast from the past II: Constraints on heavy neutral leptons from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment,”SciPost Phys.13(2022) 118,arXiv:2208.00416 [hep-ph]. [76]CHARMCollaboration, F. Bergsmaet al., “A Search for Decays of Heavy Neutrinos in the Mass Range 0.5-GeV to 2.8-GeV,”Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 473–478

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Long-lived sterile neutrinos at Belle II in effective field theory,

    G. Zhou, J. Y. G¨ unther, Z. S. Wang, J. de Vries, and H. K. Dreiner, “Long-lived sterile neutrinos at Belle II in effective field theory,”JHEP04(2022) 057,arXiv:2111.04403 [hep-ph]. [78]DELPHICollaboration, P. Abreuet al., “Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays,”Z. Phys. C74 (1997) 57–71. [Erratum: Z.Phys.C 75, 580 (1997)]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Reinterpreting the ATLAS bounds on heavy neutral leptons in a realistic neutrino oscillation model,

    J.-L. Tastet, O. Ruchayskiy, and I. Timiryasov, “Reinterpreting the ATLAS bounds on heavy neutral leptons in a realistic neutrino oscillation model,”JHEP12(2021) 182,arXiv:2107.12980 [hep-ph]. [80]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in s=13 TeV pp Collisions with the ...

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Search for Admixtures of Massive Neutrinos in the Decayπ + →µ + Neutrino,

    M. Daum, B. Jost, R. M. Marshall, R. C. Minehart, W. A. Stephens, and K. O. H. Ziock, “Search for Admixtures of Massive Neutrinos in the Decayπ + →µ + Neutrino,”Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 2624

    1987

  71. [71]

    Heavy neutral leptons below the kaon mass at hodoscopic neutrino detectors,

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, N. Foppiani, and M. Hostert, “Heavy neutral leptons below the kaon mass at hodoscopic neutrino detectors,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 9, (2022) 095006,arXiv:2109.03831 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    MicroBooNE experiment, NuMI absorber, and heavy neutral leptons,

    K. J. Kelly and P. A. N. Machado, “MicroBooNE experiment, NuMI absorber, and heavy neutral leptons,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 5, (2021) 055015,arXiv:2106.06548 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Study of the decay K+ => pi+,nu,nubar in the momentum region 140<Ppi<199 MeV/c

    R. S. Hayanoet al., “HEAVY NEUTRINO SEARCH USING K(mu2) DECAY,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1305. [90]BNL-E949Collaboration, A. V. Artamonovet al., “Study of the decayK + →π +ν¯νin the momentum region 140< P π <199 MeV/c,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 092004,arXiv:0903.0030 [hep-ex]. [91]NuT eV, E815Collaboration, A. Vaitaitiset al., “Search for neutral heavy leptons ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1982

  74. [74]

    Revisiting cosmological bounds on sterile neutrinos

    A. C. Vincent, E. F. Martinez, P. Hern´ andez, M. Lattanzi, and O. Mena, “Revisiting cosmological bounds on sterile neutrinos,”JCAP04(2015) 006,arXiv:1408.1956 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Cosmological and astrophysical bounds on a heavy sterile neutrino and the KARMEN anomaly

    A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, G. Raffelt, and D. V. Semikoz, “Cosmological and astrophysical bounds on a heavy sterile neutrino and the KARMEN anomaly,”Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 331–351,arXiv:hep-ph/0002223

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  76. [76]

    Restrictions on the lifetime of sterile neutrinos from primordial nucleosynthesis

    O. Ruchayskiy and A. Ivashko, “Restrictions on the lifetime of sterile neutrinos from primordial nucleosynthesis,”JCAP 10(2012) 014,arXiv:1202.2841 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  77. [77]

    Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on sterile neutrino and lepton asymmetry of the Universe,

    G. B. Gelmini, M. Kawasaki, A. Kusenko, K. Murai, and V. Takhistov, “Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on sterile neutrino and lepton asymmetry of the Universe,”JCAP09(2020) 051,arXiv:2005.06721 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Irreducible Axion Background,

    K. Langhoff, N. J. Outmezguine, and N. L. Rodd, “Irreducible Axion Background,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 24, (2022) 241101,arXiv:2209.06216 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    An Extended Analysis of Heavy Neutral Leptons during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,

    N. Sabti, A. Magalich, and A. Filimonova, “An Extended Analysis of Heavy Neutral Leptons during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,”JCAP11(2020) 056,arXiv:2006.07387 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons,

    A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, and V. Syvolap, “Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 023517,arXiv:2008.00749 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.