REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraints on Cardassian Scenario from the Expansion Turnaround Redshift and the Sunyaev-Zeldovich/X-ray Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Cosmic acceleration is one of the most remarkable cosmological findings of recent years. Although a dark energy component has usually been invoked as the mechanism for the acceleration, A modification of Friedmann equation from various higher dimensional models provides a feasible alternative. Cardassian expansion is one of these scenarios. In this work, we first consider the constraints on the parameter space from the turnaround redshift, z_{q=0}, at which the universe switches from deceleration to acceleration. We show that, for every Omega_m, there exist a unique n_{peak} (Omega_m), which makes z_{q=0} reach its maximum value, [z_{q=0}]_{max} = exp[1/ (2-3n_{peak})] -1, which is unlinearly inverse to Omega_m. If the acceleration happans earlier than z_{q=0} = 0.6, suggested by Type Ia supernovae measurements, we have Omega_m < 0.328 no matter what the power index is, and moreover, for reasonable matter density, Omega_m ~ 0.3, it is found n ~ (-0.45,0.25). We next test this scenario using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich/X-ray data of a sample of 18 galaxy clusters with 0.14 < z < 0.83 compiled by Reese et al. (2002). The constraints from the current SZ/X-ray data is weak, though a model with lower matter density is prefered. A certain range of the model parameters is also consistent with the data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cosmological Constraints on the DGP Model in light of DESI DR2 2025 Data
DESI DR2 combined with CC, SNIa and CMB priors give H0≈63–64 km s−1 Mpc−1 for flat/non-flat DGP and ΔAIC>100 against ΛCDM, strongly disfavoring the model.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.