REVIEW 1 cited by
Star Formation Rates in Faint Radio Galaxies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The decimetric radio continuum luminosity of a star-forming galaxy appears to be directly proportional to the rate of formation of supernovae in the galaxy. Since decimetric radiation does not suffer significant extinction and is not directive, radio luminosities may thus provide a particularly straightforward way to determine the current rate of star formation. Using a sample of over 700 local galaxies we confirm the utility of the radio luminosity as a measure of star formation rate by showing concordance with the rates predicted by U-band, H-alpha, and far-infrared luminosites. We also show that there are systematic discrepancies between these various indicators, suggesting that the H-alpha luminosity may underestimate the star formation rate by approximately an order of magnitude when the star formation rate is more than 20 solar mass per year. We use this calibration and the measured radio luminosities of sub-mJy radio sources to infer the star formation rate in approximately 60 star-forming galaxies at moderate (z = 0.1) redshifts, both as the actual rate and as the fraction of the existing mass of stars in the galaxy. For some of these objects the inferred current rate of star formation could increase the stellar mass in the galaxy by approximately 10% over an interval of about 30 Myr.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A MIGHTEE robust measurement of the star formation rate-radio correlation
The SFR–1.4 GHz radio correlation is log10(SFR) = 0.790(L′)+1.244(1+z)^0.122−0.033M′ with 0.178 dex scatter, showing significant redshift but weak mass dependence when AGN are treated probabilistically.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.