REVIEW 4 cited by
Breakdown of the Narrow Width Approximation for New Physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The narrow width approximation is used in high energy physics to reduce the complexity of scattering calculations. It is a fortunate accident that it works so well for the Standard Model, but in general it will fail in the context of new physics. We find numerous examples of significant corrections when the calculation is performed fully off-shell including a finite width, notably from effects from the decay matrix elements. If not taken into account, attempts to reconstruct the Lagrangian of a new physics discovery from data would result in considerable inaccuracies and likely inconsistencies.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Four Polarizations of the $W$ at High Energies
Polarization interference in intermediate W bosons is generically nonzero even on-shell, can exceed width-over-mass corrections at low energies, and is suppressed at LHC energies; a 2P scheme is proposed to reduce gau...
-
Heavy Vector Triplets at a Muon Collider
Muon colliders can probe heavy vector triplets up to 12 TeV, competitive with HE-LHC but below FCC-hh projections, including indirect electroweak precision limits.
-
The Radial Mode of Composite Higgs Theories at the LHC
LHC Run-2 data exclude the composite-Higgs radial mode below 0.93–1.13 TeV (2σ); HL-LHC can reach 1.8–2.2 TeV, while the twin-Higgs radial mode is projected to 1.2 TeV.
-
Interference effects in new physics searches
Interference between new-physics resonances and Standard Model backgrounds must be included in collider searches; the review shows it can distort, enhance, or even cancel expected signals.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.