REVIEW 2 cited by
Two-Loop Large-$m_t$ Electroweak Corrections to $K\to\pi\nu\bar\nu$ for Arbitrary Higgs Boson Mass
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider for the first time the leading large top mass corrections, arising at higher order in electroweak interactions, to the rare decays $K\to\pi\nu\bar\nu$ and the related modes $B\to X_s\nu\bar\nu$ and $B\to l^+l^-$. Higher order effects of similar type have previously been calculated in the large-$m_t$ limit for key observables of precision electroweak physics at Z-factories. Here we obtain the corresponding corrections of order ${\cal O}(G^2_F m^4_t)$ at the amplitude level for short-distance dominated rare meson decays. This allows us to quantify the importance of higher order electroweak effects for these processes, which can be reliably computed and have very small uncertainties from strong interactions. Simultaneously it becomes possible to remove, to some extent, ambiguities in the definition of electroweak parameters describing the strength of FCNC interactions. The corrections we discuss are at the level of a few percent.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Feasibility Study of Lepton Number Violation in Rare $B$ and $K$ Meson Decays
Dimension-7 lepton-number-violating operators can make B→Kνν and K→πνν observable only in flavor-hierarchical scenarios (first lepton generation decoupled) or with a cutoff near 100-200 GeV; otherwise baryon washout a...
-
Investigating non-local contributions in $B_{s} \to \phi \bar{\ell} \ell$ including higher-twist effects
Including twist-5 and twist-6 B_s-meson distribution amplitudes enhances the charm-loop non-local form factors in B_s to phi l+l- by about an order of magnitude, producing a larger but still Standard-Model-consistent ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.