REVIEW 5 cited by
The infrared behaviour of the static potential in perturbative QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The definition of the quark-antiquark static potential is given within an effective field theory framework. The leading infrared divergences of the static singlet potential in perturbation theory are explicitly calculated.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Wilson loops with neural networks
Neural networks parametrize gauge-invariant interpolators that extract ground-state Wilson loops with improved signal-to-noise ratio compared to traditional methods while preserving gauge invariance.
-
A tale of Bethe logarithms: leptonic widths of $\chi_{cJ}$ and Lamb shift
The infrared divergence in chi_cJ to e+e- decays is canceled by adding the next-to-leading Fock component, yielding finite, scale-independent leptonic width predictions expressed through Bethe logarithms.
-
Renormalon subtracted nonrelativistic QCD for heavy hadron systems
MRS-pNRQCD plus GFMC stabilizes heavy-hadron spectroscopy; NNLO baryon masses undershoot lattice QCD by 125–175 MeV with 1/m_Q scaling, and a critical mass ratio for tetraquark binding is extracted.
-
Strong coupling in (2+1+1)-flavor QCD
A first, preliminary extraction of the QCD strong coupling from static quark-antiquark energy in (2+1+1)-flavor lattice QCD, consistent with previous determinations but not yet final.
-
Factorial growth in perturbation theory, power corrections: precise extraction of quark masses and $\alpha_\text{s}$
A QCD method that subtracts and Borel-sums factorially growing high-order terms improves the stability of perturbative series for the static energy, pole mass, and Bjorken sum rule.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.