REVIEW 4 cited by
Unitarity Corrections in High Energy QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The high energy limit of QCD is investigated in the generalized leading logarithmic approximation. We study unitarity corrections to the BFKL Pomeron containing t-channel states with up to six gluons. Special attention is given to the field theory structure of the corresponding multi-gluon amplitudes. We discuss the transition from two to six gluons in the t-channel.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Dipole-dipole scattering at high energy in the Pomeron field theory with Braun Hamiltonian and beyond
Deep in saturation, Braun-Hamiltonian pomeron calculus predicts S_dd = (S_BK)^4 for dipole-dipole scattering, four powers of the standard estimate, but the paper's own unitary toy model contradicts this prediction.
-
Summing large Pomeron loops in the saturation region: dipole-nucleus collision beyond nonlinear equations
After summing large Pomeron loops, the dipole-nucleus amplitude has the same energy dependence as dipole-dipole scattering, limiting the BK equation to z' below roughly 2 sqrt(kappa c) A^{1/6}.
-
Dipole-dipole scattering: summing large Pomeron loops in non-linear evolution with leading twist kernel
In a leading-twist kernel, matching the BK solution to fan-diagram series yields KNO multiplicity distributions and gluon entropy S_E = ln(xG) for dipole-nucleus and dipole-dipole scattering.
-
Summing large Pomeron loops in the saturation region: nucleus-nucleus collision
The nucleus-nucleus scattering amplitude deep in the saturation region reduces to the single nucleon-nucleon term and therefore has the same energy dependence as dipole-dipole scattering.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.