REVIEW 3 cited by
Black hole entropy from non-perturbative gauge theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present the details of a mean-field approximation scheme for the quantum mechanics of N D0-branes at finite temperature. The approximation can be applied at strong 't Hooft coupling. We find that the resulting entropy is in good agreement with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of a ten-dimensional non-extremal black hole with 0-brane charge. This result is in accord with the duality conjectured by Itzhaki, Maldacena, Sonnenschein and Yankielowicz. We study the spectrum of single-string excitations within the quantum mechanics, and find evidence for a clear separation between light and heavy degrees of freedom. We also present a way of identifying the black hole horizon.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Double--Scaling Large--\(d\) Saddle of BFSS/BMN Matrix Quantum Mechanics
A double-scaling large-d saddle for mass-deformed BFSS/BMN matrix QM interpolates between commutator-dominated and mass-dominated regimes, yielding BFSS_{2}-like low-T uniform-holonomy dynamics and IKKT-like high-T al...
-
Gram--Wishart--Stiefel formulation of the $N=2$, large--$d$ gauge theory in 1D
Gram/Wishart/Stiefel reformulation of N=2 large-d BFSS/BMN endpoints absorbs -A into a shifted mass and recovers the universal continuum -2d DΛ-channel after non-polynomial transverse completion.
-
Endpoint formulation and Molien--Weyl structure for the \(N=2\), large--\(d\) BFSS/BMN models
Establishes equivalence between endpoint and Molien-Weyl formulations for large-d BFSS models on the lattice and derives finite continuum D-channel via a toy holonomy potential model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.