REVIEW 2 cited by
Hawking radiation as tunneling from the Kerr and Kerr-Newman black holes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent work, which treats the Hawking radiation as a semi-classical tunneling process at the horizon of the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom spacetimes, indicates that the exact radiant spectrum is no longer pure thermal after considering the black hole background as dynamical and the conservation of energy. In this paper, we extend the method to investigate Hawking radiation as massless particles tunneling across the event horizon of the Kerr black hole and that of charged particles from the Kerr-Newman black hole by taking into account the energy conservation, the angular momentum conservation, and the electric charge conservation. Our results show that when self-gravitation is considered, the tunneling rate is related to the change of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and the derived emission spectrum deviates from the pure thermal spectrum, but is consistent with an underlying unitary theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantum Scattering in Schwarzschild Spacetime: Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Atmospheres
The paper derives a Bose-Einstein emission rate at the Hawking temperature and an atmosphere radius rAtm = 4 ln2 r_s from antibound poles of the Schwarzschild S-matrix, but the derivation is not self-consistent.
-
The Hawking temperature in the context of dark energy for Kerr-Newman and Kerr-Newman-AdS backgrounds
Hawking temperatures for emergent gravity metrics of KN and KNAdS are calculated along θ=0, modified by dark energy from DBI k-essence fields, with metrics satisfying Einstein equations at large r.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.