The paper defines three desiderata (responsiveness, smoothness, symmetry) and empirically compares FAD, intensity vectors, and acoustic maps on controlled FOA scenes of increasing complexity.
Sensitivity Analysis of Generative Spatial Audio Metrics: A Study on Responsiveness, Smoothness, and Symmetry
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Evaluating generative spatial audio for First-Order Ambisonics (FOA) remains challenging due to a limited understanding of how metrics respond to changes in spatial parameters such as azimuth and elevation. We propose a framework to analyze metric sensitivity along continuous spatial trajectories, drawing on principles of sensitivity analysis in parametric sound synthesis. Using controlled FOA scenes with increasing scene complexity, we define three desiderata for metric behavior: Responsiveness, Smoothness, and Symmetry. We assess standard distribution-based and sample-based metrics, including Fr\'echet Audio Distance (FAD), intensity vectors, and acoustic maps. Our findings show that FAD using localization-specific embeddings and acoustic maps yield high Responsiveness and robust Smoothness and Symmetry across conditions, while intensity vectors degrade with increasing scene complexity. This is the first step towards investigating the sensitivity of metrics for generative spatial audio.
fields
eess.AS 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Sensitivity Analysis of Generative Spatial Audio Metrics: A Study on Responsiveness, Smoothness, and Symmetry
The paper defines three desiderata (responsiveness, smoothness, symmetry) and empirically compares FAD, intensity vectors, and acoustic maps on controlled FOA scenes of increasing complexity.